LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE THE CHERRY CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,007, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: SINCLAIR, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018007, Cherry, Stipulation, Settlement, Parties, Agreement, Cherry Common Stock, Affiliates, Chancery, Price, Delaware, Cash, Shares, Representatives, Judgement, Pursuant, Common Stock, Directors, Compromise, Adequate, Public Shareholders, Llp, Hereby, Expenses, Above-captioned Consolidated Civil, Outstanding Cherry Common, John Shaw, Prejudice, Proceeding, Reargument, Provisions, Scheduling Order, Merger, Duties, Proposed Buyout, Evidence, Determination, Releasing, Damages, Relief, Acting, Breaching , ContentID: 120240339

Case Documents
1 2001-09-21 ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126778
5 pages
PDF
2 2001-03-15 STIPULATION AND RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114863
16 pages
PDF
3 2000-04 COMLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101156
6 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 27 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
PARTIES
REPRESENTATIVES
HEREBY
JUDGEMENT
MEMBERS
STIPULATION
PURSUANT
SCHEDULING ORDER
DIRECTORS
MERGER
CHANCERY
AGREEMENT
DETERMINATION
ADEQUATE
COUNSEL
DEFENDANTS
RELEASING
LAW
PLAINTIFFS
COMMON STOCK
CHERRY
AFFILIATES
SETTLEMENT HEARING
THEREIN
ATTORNEYS
MANNER
ACCORDANCE
MATTER
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                                                                                          p  c.
In re:
                                            ;
THE CHERRY CORPORATION                                  CONSOLIDATED
SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                     ;1     CIVIL ACTION NO. 18007 NC



                             ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

          The Amended Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement, and Release,

dated July 17, 2001 (the "Stipulation"), of the above-captioned action (the "Action"), having

been presented at the Settlement Hearing on September 21, 2001, pursuant to the Scheduling

Order for Approval of Settlement of Class Action entered herein on July 23, 2001

("Scheduling Order"), which Stipulation was joined and consented to by all parties to the

Action and which (along with the defined terms therein) is incorporated herein by reference;

and the Court having determined that notice of said hearing was given in accordance with the

Scheduling Order to members of the Class as certified by the Court in the Scheduling Order

and that said notice was adequate and sufficient; and the parties having appeared by their

attorneys of record; and the attorneys for the respective parties having been heard in support

of the Stipulation and the settlement of the Action provided therein (the "Settlement"), and an

opportunity to be heard having been given to all other persons desiring to be heard as

provided in the notice; and the entire matter of the Settlement having been considered by the

Court;

          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, this

September, 2001, as follows:



            1.    The Notice of  Pendency  of Class Action, Temporary and Proposed Class

Action Determination, Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Settlement Hearing, and Right to
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • The Amended Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement, and Release,
  • been presented at the Settlement Hearing on September 21, 2001, pursuant to the Scheduling
  • Action and which (along with the defined terms therein) is incorporated herein by reference;
  • and the Court having determined that notice of said hearing was given in accordance with the
  • Scheduling Order to members of the Class as certified by the Court in the Scheduling Order
  • and that said notice was adequate and sufficient; and the parties having appeared by their
  • attorneys of record; and the attorneys for the respective parties having been heard in support
  • Action Determination, Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Settlement Hearing, and Right to
  • Appear has been given to the Class, pursuant
  • the Class was filed with the Court by counsel for Defendants and full opportunity to be heard
  • The form and manner of the
  • Notice to the Class is hereby determined to have been the best notice practicable under the
  • Class are bound by the Order and Final Judgment herein.
  • common to the Class, the claims of the Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the Class,
  • The Court finds that Plaintiffs and their counsel have adequately
  • Plaintiffs are hereby certified as Class representatives and their counsel
  • The Settlement is found to be fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best
  • (including, but not limited to, any claims arising under federal or state law relating to
  • Cherry common stock pursuant to the increase in the price per share of Cherry shares from
  • future officers, directors, stockholders, representatives, employees, attorneys, financial or
  • assigns, and any of their respective members, employees, agents, affiliates or controlling
  • statements, representations, misrepresentations, omissions or any other matter, thing or cause
  • to the Merger Agreement, the Merger Consideration, or the merger, to the negotiation and
  • Settled Claims shall not include the right of any members of the Class, the Releasing Parties

  • 2 . STIPULATION AND RELEASE

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    STIPULATION
    COURT
    SETTLEMENT
    PARTIES
    DEFENDANTS
    AGREEMENT
    CHERRY COMMON STOCK
    ATTORNEYS
    CHANCERY
    PRICE
    DELAWARE
    AFFILIATES
    CASH
    SHARES
    COMPROMISE
    REPRESENTATIVES
    LLP
    EXPENSES
    ABOVE-CAPTIONED CONSOLIDATED CIVIL
    OUTSTANDING CHERRY COMMON
    JOHN SHAW
    PREJUDICE
    PURSUANT
    JUDGEMENT
    PROCEEDING
    REARGUMENT
    PROVISIONS
    EVIDENCE
    
                                            ORIGINAL                                                   
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                r-    
    In re:                                                                                             
                                                   ;                                                   
    THE CHERRY CORPORATION                                 Cons. CA.                       .-          
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                                                            
                                                   ;                                      v:           
                                                           No. 18007NC                    (,I.         
                                                    1                                     z-c:
                                                                                          _._-'  :->
                                                   1                                             -... c
    
                                     STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF
                                COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT, AND RELEASE;
    
              The parties to the above-captioned consolidated civil action, by and through their
    
    attorneys, have entered into the following Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise,
    
    Settlement, and Release (the "Stipulation"), subject to the approval of the Court:
    
              WHEREAS, prior to July 17, 2000, defendant Peter B. Cherry, Chairman and President
    
    of The Cherry Corporation (`Cherry"), and his affiliates (collectively referred to as the "Cherry
    
    Family") beneficially owned approximately 52% of all outstanding Cherry common stock;
    
              WHEREAS, on April 182000, the Cherry Family offered to purchase any and all shares
    
    of Cherry common stock not owned by the Cherry Family at a price of $18.75 per share net to
    
    the seller in cash (the "Initial Offer");
    
              WHEREAS, on April 24,2000, plaintiffs, Donald Sinclair, John Shaw, and Garrett Long,
    
    filed Case Nos. 18007, 18008 and 18009, respectively, against Cherry, Peter B. Cherry, Alfred S.
    
    Budnick, Thomas L. Martin, Jr., Robert B. McDermott, Peter A. Guglielmi, Charles W. Denny,
    
    W. Ed Tyler, and Henry J. West in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for
    
    New Castle County; on April 26,2000, John McKenzie filed (Case No. 18012 in the same court
    
    against the same defendants; on May 9,2000, Edward Lynd filed Case No. 18044 in the same
    
    
    
    Cl1199 3513259-12.032241 0024
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • The parties to the above-captioned consolidated civil action,
  • attorneys, have entered into the following Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise,
  • Settlement, and Release, subject to the approval of the Court:
  • WHEREAS, prior to July 17, 2000, defendant Peter B. Cherry, Chairman and President
  • Family") beneficially owned approximately 52% of all outstanding Cherry common stock;
  • WHEREAS, on April 182000, the Cherry Family offered to purchase any and all shares
  • of Cherry common stock not owned by the Cherry Family at a price of $18.75 per share net to
  • the seller in cash;
  • WHEREAS, on April 24,2000, plaintiffs, Donald Sinclair, John Shaw, and Garrett Long,
  • court against the same defendants; on June 6,2000, the above-referenced actions were
  • WHEREAS, during the course of the litigation, the parties and their counsel began to
  • the Court, and pursuant to the Court of Chancery Rule 23, the Action and any and all claims,
  • families, parent entities, associates, affiliates or subsidiaries and each of their
  • present or future officers, directors, stockholders, representatives, employees, attorneys,
  • and released with prejudice pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein;
  • class certification and plaintiffs' application for attorneys' fees and expenses.
  • Judgment in the ibrm attached hereto as Exhibit C.
  • reargument, either because the time for an appeal or reargument has expired with no appeal or
  • Cherry will pay to plaintiffs' counsel, SchifSrin & Barroway, LLP, any amounts awarded by the
  • Stipulation nor its contents shall be admissible in evidence or shall be referred to for any
  • in the Action or in any other litigation or proceeding.
  • any of the provisions of this Stipulation shall not be deemed a waiver of any of the

  • 3 . COMLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFF
    DEFENDANTS
    MEMBERS
    COMMON STOCK
    PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
    AFFILIATES
    COURT
    LAW
    DUTIES
    DIRECTORS
    PROPOSED BUYOUT
    ADEQUATE
    DAMAGES
    RELIEF
    PRICE
    ACTING
    BREACHING
    PETER
    SHARES
    CONSUMER
    OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK
    FAITH
    OWES
    DEALING
    LOYALTY
    CARE
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    PUBLIC STOCKHOLDERS
    PROPER
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    --------------------------------x
    DONALD SINCLAIR,                            ::         Civil Action No. / $.p.c'-+dC
                  Plaintiff,                    ::
          V.                                    ::
    PETER B. CHERRY, ALFRED S.                  :
    BUDNICK, DR. THOMAS L. MARTIN, :
    JR, ROBERT B. MCDERMOTT, PETER :
    A. GUGLIELMI, CHARLES W. DENNY, :
    W. ED TYLER, HENRY J. WEST, and :
    THE CHERRY CORPORATION                      ::
                  Defendants.                   :
    ---------------m----------------x
    
                                           COMPLAINT
    
          Plaintiff alleges upon information and belief, except as to
    
    paragraph 1 which is alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:
    
                                           THE PARTIES
    
          1.      Plaintiff is the owner of shares of the common stock of
    
    The Cherry Corporation ("Cherry" or the "Company") and has been the
    
    owner of such shares continuously since prior to the wrongs
    
    complained of herein.
    
          2.      Cherry is a corporation duly existing and organized under
    
    the laws of the State of Delaware. Cherry manufactures proprietary
    
    and customer electrical switches, sensors, electronic keyboards and
    
    controls, and semiconductors.              The Company sells its products to
    
    the worldwide automotive, computer, and consumer and commercial
    
    markets.
    
          3.      Defendant Peter B. Cherry  ("P. Cherry") is and at all
    times relevant hereto has been President and Chairman of the Board
    
    of    Directors of          Cherry.       P.      Cherry    owns    and/or    controls
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Plaintiff alleges upon information and belief,
  • The Cherry Corporation and has been the
  • owner of such shares continuously since prior to the wrongs
  • the worldwide automotive, computer, and consumer and commercial
  • Defendant Peter B. Cherry is and at all times relevant hereto has been President and Chairman
  • approximately 54% of the outstanding common stock of the Company.
  • As the majority shareholder of Cherry, P. Cherry owes fiduciary
  • duties of good faith, fair dealing, loyalty, and due care to
  • Cherry's public shareholders.
  • Tyler and Henry J. West are directors of Cherry.
  • All the Individual Defendants are in a fiduciary
  • Cherry and owe them the highest obligations of good faith,
  • dealing, due care and loyalty.
  • The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common to the Class and which predominate over
  • adequate representative of the Class and will fairly and adequately
  • his affiliates for $18.75 per share in cash.
  • potential without paying an adequate or fair price to the Company's
  • to the detriment of Cherry's public stockholders.
  • is engaging in self-dealing and not acting in good faith
  • breached and are breaching their fiduciary duties to the members of
  • Unless the proposed buyout is enjoined by the Court,
  • plaintiff prays for judgment and relief as follows:
  • rescinding it and setting it aside or awarding rescissory damages
  • deem just and proper.
  •    |