LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

RAND v NABISCO GROUP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,129, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: RAND, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018129, Holdings, Transaction, Shareholders, Stock, Adequate, Sale, Common Stock, Nabisco, John, Sole Asset, Shares, Public Shareholders, Fiduciary Duties, Reasons, Reynolds, Cash, Breaching, Price, Proposed Transaction, Damages, Phillip Morris, York, Allege, Directors, Affecting, Proper , ContentID: 120240268

Case Documents
1 2000-06-28 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101041
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
MEMBERS
HOLDINGS
TRANSACTION
SHAREHOLDERS
STOCK
ADEQUATE
SALE
COMMON STOCK
NABISCO
JOHN
SOLE ASSET
SHARES
PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
REASONS
REYNOLDS
CASH
BREACHING
PRICE
PROPOSED TRANSACTION
DAMAGES
PHILLIP MORRIS
YORK
ALLEGE
DIRECTORS
AFFECTING
PROPER
LAW
              IN `THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                                                                 \I
HARRIET RAND and MIRIAM SARNOFF,

                        Plaintiffs,                                      Civil Action No. /ti/,av dc

                                                                  ;CLASS  ACTION COMPLAINT
      V.

NABISCO GROUP HOLDINGS CORPORATION,
JAMES M. KILTS, JOHN T. CHAIN, JR., JULIUS L.
CHAMBERS,, JOHN L. CLENDENIN, STEPHEN F.
GOLDSTONE, RAY J. GROVES, DAVID B. JENKINS,
NANCY KARCH, FRED H. LANGHAMMER, H. EUGENE
LRCX&$ii;T, THEODORE E. MARTIN and ROZANNE L.

                                Defendants.
                                                                 ,.

                 Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, allege upon information and belief except with

respect to  `his  ownership of Nabisco Group Holdings Corporation ( "Group" or the

"Company") common stock, which is alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:

                                           PARTIES

           1. Plaintiffs own stock of defendant Group.

      2. Defendant Group is a Delaware corporation with offices at 7 Campus Drive,

Parsippany, New Jersey 07054. Group is a holding company whose sole asset is

Nabisco Holdings Corp. ("Holdings").           As of March 15, 2000, Group had over

326,400,OOO  outstanding shares of common stock held by 45,000 shareholders of

record.

           3.  Dlefendant James M. Kilts is Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director

of the Company.



                                               -l-

SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, allege upon information and belief except with
  • respect to `his ownership of Nabisco Group Holdings Corporation ("Group" or the
  • "Company") common stock, which is alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:
  • Plaintiffs own stock of defendant Group.
  • Theodore E. Martin and Rozanne L. Ridgway are Directors of the Company.
  • The foregoing individuals (collectively the "Individual Defendants") as
  • officers and/lor directors of Nabisco owe Nabisco public shareholders fiduciary duties.
  • so numerous that joinder of all class members is impracticable.
  • there were over 326 million shares of defendant Group common stock outstanding
  • of the Class and which predominate over any questions affecting any individual
  • the Company to potential buyers and to obtain the best transaction available on the
  • Accordingly, plaintiffs are adequate
  • For the reasons stated herein, a class action is superior to other available
  • Reynolds") which, ironically, was a former subsidiary of Group.
  • acquire Holdings for $55 per share, or $14.91 billion in cash.
  • Reportedly, after striking a deal with Phillip Morris Companies on June 25,
  • percent premium over the market price on a sale of Group.
  • cash value of the sale of Group's sole asset to Phillip Morris.
  • The proposed transaction is wrongful, unfair and harmful to Group's public
  • plaintiffs and the Class, and have breached, and are breaching, their fiduciary duties to
  • Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law.
  • Class for all losses and damages suffered and to be suffered by them as a result of the
  • be just and proper.
  • East 45th Street New York,
  •    |