LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PLATT v PHOENIX INVESTMENT PARTNERS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,174, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: PLATT, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018174, Home Life, Phoenix, Transaction, Common Stock, Shareholders, Price, Investment, Relevant Times, Executive Officer, Shares, Insurance Company, Majority, Fiduciary Duties, Damages, Public Shareholders, Acts, Relief, Market, Control, Effectuate, Consummate, Alleges, Management, Outstanding, Vice President, Directors, Stockholders , ContentID: 120240248

Case Documents
1 2000-07-25 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101015
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PHOENIX
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFF
MEMBERS
TRANSACTION
COMMON STOCK
SHAREHOLDERS
PRICE
INVESTMENT
RELEVANT TIMES
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SHARES
INSURANCE COMPANY
MAJORITY
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
DAMAGES
PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
ACTS
RELIEF
MARKET
CONTROL
EFFECTUATE
CONSUMMATE
ALLEGES
MANAGEMENT
OUTSTANDING
VICE PRESIDENT
DIRECTORS
STOCKHOLDERS
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                 
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                  
________________________________________-----------------      x
LEO PLATT,                             Plaintiff.              I

          -against-

PHOENIX INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LTD.,:
PHOENIX HOME LIFE MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY, PHILIP R.
MCLOUGHLIN, MICHAEL E. HAYLON,                                 :
CLYDE E. BARTTER, ROBERT W.
FIONDELLA, MARILYN E. LAMARCHE,                                :
JAMES M. OATES, FERDINAND L.J.
VERDONCK, JOHN T. ANDERSON,                                    :                                   
GLEN D. CHURCHILL, DONNA F.                                                                        
TUTTLE, DAVID A WILLIAMS,                                                                          

                                       Defendants.             I
-------------------------------------------------~-------   x                             ,i`.i_.
                                                                                                   
                                                   INTRODUCTION

          Plaintiff alleges on information and belief, except for those allegations which pertain to

plaintiff which are alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:

                                                      `THE PARTIES

                    1.       Plaintiff is and has been at all relevant times the owner of common

Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company ("Phoenix" or -the "Company").

                   2.        Phoenix is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the

of Delaware with its principal executive offices located at 56 Prospect Street, Hartford,

Through subsidiaries, Phoenix provides investment management services to individuals,

corporations and institutions. As of March 20,2000,  there were outstanding 44,227,583  shares of

Phoenix common stock of which Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company ("Home Life")

owned 30.7 million shares or 63.30%.

                    3.       Home Life is a mutual insurance company based in Hartford, Connecticut.

                   4.        Defendant Philip R. McLaughlin ("McLaughlin") is and was at all

SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff alleges on information and belief, except for those allegations which pertain to
  • Plaintiff is and has been at all relevant times the owner of common stock of
  • Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company.
  • Through subsidiaries, Phoenix provides investment management services to individuals,
  • Phoenix common stock of which Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company
  • owned 30.7 million shares or 63.30%.
  • director and Executive Vice President of Phoenix and Senior Vice President Securities
  • and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Home Life.
  • David A. Williams are and have been at all relevant times directors of the Company.
  • The individual defendants named above,
  • owe the highest fiduciary duties of good faith, loyalty, fair dealing, due care, and candor
  • individually and on behalf of all other stockholders of the Company (except the defendants
  • The claims of plaintiff are typical of the claims of the other members of the Class in that
  • relief with respect to the Class as a whole.
  • press release that it had offered to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Phoenix's
  • owned by public shareholders at a price of $12.50 per share.
  • Because Home Life controls a majority of the Company's common stock,
  • proceed with the Offer without an auction or other type of market check to maximize value for
  • unless the transaction is to be approved by a majority of the minority shareholders Home
  • Life will be able to effectuate the transaction without an effective shareholder vote.
  • Because of its control over the Company and effective control over the
  • continue to breach their fiduciary duties owed to plaintiff and the Class and will consummate
  • By reason of the foregoing acts, practices, and course of conduct by
  • damages suffered and to be suffered by them as the result of the acts and transactions
  •    |