LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

GILBERT v MANOOGIAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,189, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: GILBERT, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018189, Mascotech, Common Stock, Transaction, Executive Officer, Stockholders, Merger, Manoogian, Masco Corporation, Alleges, Industry, Times Relevant, Times Relevant Hereto, Breach, Acts, Shareholders, Fiduciary Obligations, Pursuant, Post-merger Entity, Unfair, Adequate, Ofthe, Relief, Cash Payment, Engine, Applications, Chairman , ContentID: 120240237

Case Documents
1 2000-08-02 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101003
7 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 7 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFF
MEMBERS
COMMON STOCK
TRANSACTION
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
STOCKHOLDERS
MERGER
COURT
MANOOGIAN
MASCO CORPORATION
ALLEGES
INDUSTRY
TIMES RELEVANT
TIMES RELEVANT HERETO
BREACH
ACTS
SHAREHOLDERS
FIDUCIARY OBLIGATIONS
PURSUANT
POST-MERGER ENTITY
UNFAIR
ADEQUATE
OFTHE
RELIEF
CASH PAYMENT
ENGINE
APPLICATIONS
CHAIRMAN
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                     __I; 1
                                                                                " , ;i
____________--__-________________ ------------------------------x               ;:: :-,
MICHAEL GILBERT,                                                     CA. No.    ;  ;,-;

                  Plaintiff,

         V.

RICHARD A. MANOOGIAN; HELMUT F.
STERN; FRANK M. HENNESSEY; PETER A.
DOW; ROGER T. FRIDHOLM; WILLIAM K.
HOWENSTEIN; JOHN A. MORGAN; MASCO
CORPORATION and MASCOTECH, INC.,

                  Defendants.



                                                  COMPLAINT

         Plaintiff, by his attorneys, alleges upon information and belief, except as to paragraph 1

which is alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:

                                                 THE PARTIES

         1.       Plaintiff Michael Gilbert ("plaintiff") is the owner of common stock of Mascotech,

Inc. ("Mascotech" or the "Company") and has been the owner of such shares continuously since

prior to the wrongs complained of herein.

        2.        Defendant Mascotech is a corporation duly existing and organized under the laws of

the State of Delaware, with its principal executive offices located at 2 100  1 Van Born Road,

Michigan. Mascotech is a diversified industrial manufacturing company utilizing advanced

metalworking capabilities to supply metal formed components used in vehicle engine and drivetrain

applications, specialty fasteners, towing systems, packaging and sealing products and other



products. The Company manufactures a broad range of semi-finished components, subassemblies

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Plaintiff, by his attorneys, alleges upon information and belief, except as to paragraph 1
  • Plaintiff Michael Gilbert is the owner of common stock of Mascotech,
  • metalworking capabilities to supply metal formed components used in vehicle engine and
  • applications, specialty fasteners, towing systems, packaging and sealing products and other
  • transportation industry.
  • Defendant Richard A. Manoogian is and at all times relevant hereto
  • Manoogian also serves as Chairman and Chief
  • Executive Officer of Masco Corporation, which owns approximately 17.5% of Mascotech.
  • Defendants Helmut F. Stern, Peter A. Dow, Roger T. Fridholm, William K
  • stockholders of Mascotech, and owe plaintiff and the other members of the class the highest
  • Plaintiff brings this action individually and as a class action, pursuant to Rule 23 of
  • The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.
  • Heartland will acquire Mascotech in a transaction valued at over $2 billion.
  • Pursuant to the terms ofthe merger agreement,
  • will receive a cash payment of $16.90 per Mascotech share, plus an additional cash payment per
  • Unlike the other public shareholders of Mascotech, Masco Corporation, defendant
  • an approximate 20% ownership stake in the post-merger entity.
  • The merger consideration to be paid to Class members is unfair and grossly
  • interests and their fiduciary obligations or, if such conflicts exist, to ensure that all the
  • By reason of the foregoing acts, practices and course of conduct, defendants have
  • Unless enjoined by this Court, the defendants will continue to breach their fiduciary
  • Plaintiff and the Class have no adequate remedy at law.
  • WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment and preliminary and permanent relief, including
  •    |