LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

HELENE GISSEN REVOCABLE TRUST v BHC COMMUNICATIONS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,209, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018209, Plaintiff: HELENE GISSEN REVOCABLE TRUST, Chris-craft, Bhc, Utv, Merger, News Corporation, Special Committee, Amended Complaints, Transaction, Complaint, Shareholders, Special Committees, Business Judgment Rule, Facts, Price, Common Stock, Support, Del, Negotiations, York, Directors, Allegations, Motion, Minority Shareholders, Merger Agreement, Dismiss, Duty, Negotiate, Delaware, Stockholders, Shares, Financial Advisor, Fiduciary Duty, Viacom, Complaints, Wilmington, Compl, Motions, Esquire, Chris-craft Defendants, Unfairness , ContentID: 120240229

Case Documents
1 2001-06-04 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114893
24 pages
PDF
2 2001-03-09 CONSOLIDATED REPLY BRIEF OF THE CHRIS-CRAFT DEFENDANTS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115447
38 pages
PDF
3 2001-03-09 THE UTV AND BHC DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115446
13 pages
PDF
4 2001-03-02 PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115448
38 pages
PDF
5 2001-02-23 OPENING BRIEF OF CHRIS-CRAFT DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115450
30 pages
PDF
6 2001-02-23 OPENING BRIEF OF BHC AND UTV DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115449
12 pages
PDF
7 2001-02-06 CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100991
25 pages
PDF
8 2000-08-14 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100992
9 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 8 documents , 189 pages
Price: $ 54.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS
COMPLAINTS
BHC
ESQUIRE
NEWS CORPORATION
UTV
SPECIAL COMMITTEES
DELAWARE
TRANSACTIONS
COURT
WELL-PLEADED ALLEGATIONS
YORK
DIRECTORS
MERGER
FIDUCIARY DUTY
NEGOTIATIONS
MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS
MINORITY STOCKHOLDERS
PARAGRAPHS
ATTORNEYS
DISCOVERY
PROPOSED TRANSACTION
MERGER AGREEMENTS
REASONABLE INFERENCES
FINANCIAL ADVISORS
CASTLE COUNTY
WILMINGTON
UNITED TELEVISION
   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


IN RE BHC COMMUNICATIONS, INC. )                           Consolidated
SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION                                )    C.A. No.  18209

IN RE UNITED TELEVISION, INC.,                        )    Consolidated
SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION                                >    CA. No. 18218

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

                             Argued: March 14, 2001
                               Decided: June 4, 2001

Joseph A. Rosenthal, Esquire, MORRIS, ROSENTHAL, GROSS & GODDESS,
P.A., Pamela S. Tikellis, Esquire, CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS, Wilmington,
Delaware; Judith L. Spanier, Esquire, (argued), ABBEY GARDY, New York, New
York; Paul J. Geller, Esquire, Howard K. Coates, Jr., Esquire, (argued), CAULEY
GELLER BOWMAN & COATES, Boca  Raton,  Florida; Aaron L. Brody, Esquire,             -
STULL STULL & BRODY, New York, New York; Lawrence D. Levit, Esquire,
WOLF POPPER LLP, New York, New York; Mark A. Topaz, Esquire, Bala
Cynwyd, Pennsylvania;  Attorneys  for  Plaintiffs.

Stephen J. Rothschild, Esquire, (argued), Robert S . Saunders, Esquire, Paul J.
Lockwood, Esquire, SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM,
Wilmington, Delaware,  Attorneys  for  Defendants  Chris-Crafr Industries, Inc.,
Herbert J. Siegel, John C. Siegel, William D. Seigel, and Joelen  K. Merkel.

Jesse A. Finkelstein, Esquire, (argued), Peter B. Ladig, Esquire, RICHARDS,
LAYTON  & FINGER, Wilmington, Delaware,  Attorneys  for  United Television,
Inc., Norman Perbnutter, James D. Hodgson, Howard F. Roycroft, and Evan C.
Thompson in C.A. No. I821 8.

Donald J. Wolfe, Jr., Esquire, (argued), Matthew E. Fischer, Esquire, POTTER
ANDERSON & CORROON, Jane W. Parver, Esquire, KAY, SCHOLER,
FIERMAN, HAYS  & HANDLER,  New  York,  New  York,  Attorneys  for  BHC
Communications, Inc., John L. Eastman, Barry S. Greene, Laurence M. Kashdin
and Morgan L. Miller, in C.A. No. 18209, and John L. Eastman in C.A. No.
18218.

LAMB, Vice Chancellor



                                         I.

       These consolidated actions arise out of a series of merger agreements

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
  • STULL STULL & BRODY, New York, New York; Lawrence D. Levit, Esquire, WOLF POPPER LLP, New
  • Saunders, Esquire, Paul J. Lockwood, Esquire, SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM, Wilmington,
  • These consolidated actions arise out of a series of merger agreements
  • The plaintiffs sue as
  • representatives of the public minority stockholders of the two subsidiary
  • Their complaints allege claims of breach of fiduciary duty
  • against the ultimate parent corporation and against the directors of the two
  • All defendants have moved to dismiss the complaints for failure to state
  • leave to renew once certain limited discovery is undertaken.
  • I note, however, that those directors are not alleged to have done anything in their capacity
  • interest in BHC Communications, Inc., which corporation, in turn,
  • owns a majority interest in United Television,
  • News Corporation agreed to acquire Chris-Craft.
  • BHC and UTV for a combination of cash and securities.
  • transactions to their respective boards of directors,
  • both complaints base their allegations more or less entirely on the disclosures found in the
  • I note that the Form F-4, at page 50, contains a detailed description of discussions between egotiations taking place between Chris-Craft and Viacom.
  • their respective financial advisors that the proposed transaction was fair from
  • minority shareholders in a sale of the Company."
  • In passing on a motion to dismiss a complaint under Court of Chancery
  • court is to assume the truthfulness of all well-pleaded allegations of fact in the
  • from them in plaintiffs' favor unless they are reasonable inferences.
  • merger are set forth in paragraphs 21 through 53.

  • 2 . CONSOLIDATED REPLY BRIEF OF THE CHRIS-CRAFT DEFENDANTS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CHRIS-CRAFT
    UTV
    MERGER
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
    AMENDED COMPLAINTS
    PRICE
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    DEL
    SUPPORT
    SPECIAL COMMITTEES
    NEGOTIATE
    NEWS CORPORATION
    CHRIS-CRAFT DEFENDANTS
    UNFAIRNESS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    ALLEGATIONS
    TRANSACTION
    SHAREHOLDER
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    NEGOTIATIONS
    AMENDED COMPLAINTS LACK
    ALLEGED PROCEDURAL DEFECT
    INDEPENDENT GROUND
    BHC ANS
    CONTROL PREMIUM
    MINORITY STOCKHOLDERS
    CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINTS
    CONTROLLING STOCKHOLDER
    
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    IN RE BHC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.                             ;
    SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION
    
    ------------------------------------------------------x
    
    ------------------------------------------------------x
    
    IN RE UNITED TELEVISION, INC.
    SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION
    
    
    
     CONSOLIDATED REPLY BRIEF OF THE CHRIS-CRAFT DEFENDANTS
                      IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS
                     THE CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINTS
    
    
    
    
    
                                                               SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE,
                                                                    MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
                                                               One Rodney Square
                                                               P.O. Box 636
                                                               Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                               (302) 651-3000
                                                               Attorneys for Chris-Craft
                                                               Industries, Inc., Herbert J. Siegel,
                                                               John C. Siegel, William D. Siegel and
                                                               Joelen  K. Merkel
    
    DATED: March  9,200l
    
    
    
                                              TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    PRELIMINARY STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
    
    ARGUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    I.        PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS ARE BASED ON UNREASONABLE
              INFERENCES AND UNSUPPORTED CONCLUSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IN RE UNITED TELEVISION, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION
  • CONSOLIDATED REPLY BRIEF OF THE CHRIS-CRAFT DEFENDANTS
  • IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS
  • THE CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINTS
  • That Chris-Craft Negotiated The BHC And UTV
  • tween Any Alleged Procedural Defect And Any Harm.
  • The Merger Prices For BHC Or UTV
  • THE AMENDED COMPLAINTS LACK WELL-PLEADED ALLE-REBUTTING THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
  • Independent Ground For Application Of The Business
  • THE AMENDED COMPLAINTS LACK WELL-PLEADED ALLE-GATIONS OF UNFAIRNESS.
  • Plaintiffs Have Not Alleged Facts Supporting An Inference That They Have Been Harmed By An
  • Price
  • Bershad v. Curtiss-Wright Corp., Del.

  • 3 . THE UTV AND BHC DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BHC
    UTV
    PLAINTIFFS
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE
    CHRIS-CRAFT
    DEFENDANTS
    DIRECTORS
    DUTY
    NEGOTIATION
    INDEPENDENCE
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    MOTIONS
    EASTMAN
    BREACH
    MINORITY
    ALLEGATIONS
    DELAWARE
    INSINUATION
    SUBSIDIARIES
    TRANSACTION
    CARE CLAIM
    INFERENCE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    ATTORNEYS
    UNITED TELEVISION
    PARTICIPATION
    NEWS CORPORATION
    SUBSERVIENT DIRECTORS
    CONSULTANCY
    
                                                                                 ORIGINAL
                     IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    IN RE BHC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.              :     Consolidated
    SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION                            CA. No. 18209 ,d
    
    
    
    
    
    IN RE UNITED TELEVISION, INC. :             Consolidated
    SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION                            CA. No. 18218
    
    
    
                                        THE UTV AND BHC
                            DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF
                      IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS
    
    
    Donald J. Wolfe, Jr.                                 Jesse A. Finkelstein
    Matthew E. Fischer                                   Peter B. Ladig
    Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP                        Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
    13 13 North Market Street                            One Rodney Square
    P.O. Box 95 1                                        P.O. Box 55 1
    Wilmington, Delaware 19899-095 1                     Wilmington, Delaware 19899
    (302) 984-6000                                       (302) 658-6541
    
    Attorneys for BHC Communications, Inc.,              Attorneys for United Television, Inc.,
    John L. Eastman, Barry S. Greene,                    Norman Perlmutter, James D. Hodgson,
    Lawrence M. Kashdin and Morgan L. Miller             Howard F. Roycroft and
    in In re BHC Communications, Inc.                    Evan C. Thompson in
                                                         In re United Television, Inc.
    Attorneys for John L. Eastman in
    In re United Television, Inc.
    
    
    
    
    
    Dated: March 9.2001
    
    
    
                                     PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF
  • IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS
  • Attorneys for John L. Eastman in In re United Television,
  • that these actions attempt to assert an ostensible breach of fiduciary duty owed by
  • both cases posits, albeit on the basis of unsupported insinuation, that Chris-Craft, the
  • boards of both subsidiaries and dictated the prices to be paid to and accepted by their
  • While conceding the creation and participation of independent special committees
  • of directors of both the BHC and UTV boards in connection with the challenged transactions,
  • unquestioned by either complaint, plaintiffs strain to avoid the typically cleansing effects
  • I As if to confirm this conclusion, the briefs of both plaintiffs strain to emphasize that
  • It is to be expected that plaintiffs are motivated to attack the special committee
  • plaintiffs in each of these actions are littered with conclusory allegations that these
  • could not carefully consider the decision to approve the challenged transaction because
  • special committee to fulfill their fiduciary duty to inform themselves about News Corporation
  • disloyalty to the minority shareholders whom they were charged to protect.
  • important and useful distinction between a "reasonable inference" and a hypothetical
  • the negotiation process -- indeed, who are not alleged to have played any role at all --
  • Eastman, Perlmutter or Thompson played any role in negotiating the UTV/News Corp.
  • Count I alleges only a duty of care claim against the Director
  • passing reference in Count II to "subservient directors on the BHC board" was not only
  • current consultancies, without more, are insufficient to rebut the presumption of
  • Moreover, Greene's consultancy is with BHC, not Chris-Craft, and BHC has not
  • plaintiffs in each action complain that their respective special committee members failed to f the transaction it proposed."

  • 4 . PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CHRIS-CRAFT
    DEFENDANTS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    PLAINTIFFS
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE
    NEWS CORPORATION
    COUNSEL
    MOTION
    TRANSACTION
    DISMISS
    FACTS
    FINANCIAL ADVISOR
    VIACOM
    YORK
    NEGOTIATIONS
    MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS
    LLP
    UTVI
    WILMINGTON
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    LITIGATION
    ALLEGATIONS
    BHC BOARD
    BROADCAST CASH FLOW
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
    INSTRUCTIONS
    CBS
    CO-LEAD COUNSEL
    PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    _________________--_------------------------------------------ X
    IN RE BHC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.                                 :                C.A. No. 18209
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
    -------_-----_------------------------------------------------ x
    
      PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS
    
                                                                   CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP
                                                                   Pamela S. Tikellis
                                                                   Robert J. Kriner, Jr.
                                                                  Timothy R. Dudderar
                                                                  One Rodney Square
                                                                   p.0.          Box     1635     &    
                                                                  Wilmington, DE  19899`i.;            
                                                                   (302) 656-2500           ;          
                                                                                                     
                                                                                            .~         
                                                                   Co-Lead and Co-Liaisbn Counse(,for  
                                                                   Plaintiffs                          
                                                                                                       
                                                                   ROSENTHAL  MONHAl$.GRO!$$$
                                                                   GODDESS, P.A.
                                                                   Joseph A. Rosenthal
                                                                   Suite 1401
                                                                   Mellon Bank Center
                                                                  Wilmington, Delaware 19801
                                                                   (302) 656-4433
    
                                                                   Co-Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    ABBEY GARDY  & SQUITIERI, LLP
    212 East 39th Street
    New York, New York 10016
    (212) 889-3700
    
    WOLF POPPER, LLP
    845 Third Avenue
    New York, New York 10022
    (212) 759-4600
    
    Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
    
    
    
                                                                                          TABLE OF
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
  • PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS
  • Wilmington, Delaware 19801
  • Co-Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs OF COUNSEL:
  • ABBEY GARDY & SQUITIERI, LLP 212 East 39th Street New York, New York 10016 889-3700
  • Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
  • PRELIMINARY STATEMENT..
  • STATEMENT OF FACTS
  • Instructions From Chris-Craft.
  • The BHC Special Committee Retains Advisors
  • Chris-Craft and Viacom Negotiations Intensify Without
  • Chris-Craft and News Corporation Finalize Merger
  • The Transaction Unfairly Benefits Chris-Craft
  • Shareholders At The Expense of BHC Shareholders.
  • The Well-Pleaded Allegations of the Complaint State

  • 5 . OPENING BRIEF OF CHRIS-CRAFT DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BHC
    FACTS
    UTV
    AMENDED COMPLAINTS
    SPECIAL COMMITTEES
    DEFENDANTS
    NEWS CORPORATION
    COMPL
    PLAINTIFFS
    TRANSACTION
    MERGER
    COURT
    SUPPORT
    DEL
    MOTION
    STOCKHOLDERS
    FINANCIAL ADVISORS
    ALLEGATIONS
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
    PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    CONTROL PREMIUM
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    MERGER CONSIDERATION
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    PROPOSED TRANSACTION
    NEGOTIATIONS
    SUBSIDIARIES
    MINORITY STOCKHOLDERS
    
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ------------------------------~-----------------------x
    
    IN RB BHC COMMUNICATIONS, INC. :                                     Consolidated
    SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION                                               C.A.No. 18209'
    
    -------------------------------------------------------x
    
    -------------------------------------------------------x
    
    IN RE UNITED TELEVISION, INC.                               :        Consolidated
    SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION                                               C.A. No. 18218
    
    -_---------------------------------------------------  x
    
                OPENING BRIEF OF THE CHRIS-CRAFT DEFENDANTS
                      IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS
                     THE CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINTS
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                SKADDEN,  ARPS, SLATE,
                                                                     MEAGHEIX & FLOM LLP
                                                                One Rodney Square
                                                                P.O. Box 636
                                                                Wilmington Delaware 19899
                                                                (302) 651-3000
                                                                Attorneys for Chris-Craft
                                                                Industries, Inc., Herbert J. Siegel,
                                                                John C. Siegel, William D. Siegel and
                                                                Joelen  K. Merkel
    
    DATED: February  23,200l
    
    
    
                                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    
    TABLE OF CASES AND AUTHORITY  ~ . . . . . . . . . .  i . . . . . . . . .  ~ . . . . i
    
    PRELIMINARY STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . 1
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • OPENING BRIEF OF THE CHRIS-CRAFT DEFENDANTS
  • IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS
  • PRELIMINARY STATEMENT.
  • STATEME,NT OF FACTS.
  • ALLEGATIONS REBUTTING THE BIJSINESS JUDGMENT
  • THE AMENDED COMPLAINTS LACK WELL-PLEADED
  • Inc., Del.
  • Defendants Chris-Craft Industries, Inc., Herbert J.
  • Defendants")* submit this brief in support of their motion to dismiss the consolidated
  • amended complaints filed by purported stockholders of RHC Communications,
  • through its majority-owned subsidiary, BHC, which owns 100% of Chris-Craft
  • Television, Inc., 100% of Pinelands, Inc. and approximately 57% of UTV.
  • Inc. (both before and after the merger of those two companies),
  • and special committees of the BHC and UTV Boards of Directors each negotiated
  • separately with Viacom and then News Corporation at arms-length and concluded
  • Plaintiffs,, however, have not alleged any facts that, if true, would
  • themselves to evaluate a possible transaction involving their respective companies.
  • special committees are themselves sufficient to ensure that business judgment review
  • negotiations between the special committees of the BHC and UTV boards, respectively, and News
  • Because the business judgment rule protects the
  • Corporation for a control premium reflecting BHC's controlling interest in UTVI."
  • (BHC Am. Compl.
  • the merger consideration reflects a 16% premium over
  • minority stockholders of BHC and UTV with a substantial premium for their shares,
  • Plaintiffs allege that Chris-Craft breached a fiduciary duty to UTV's minority
  • Indenendent Lena1 And Financial Advisors
  • News Corporation further indicated that, subject to due diligence and a definitive merger
  • BHC special committee that the consideration to be paid in the proposed transaction

  • 6 . OPENING BRIEF OF BHC AND UTV DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BHC
    UTV
    COMPLAINT
    SHAREHOLDERS
    MOTIONS
    WILMINGTON
    DELAWARE
    DISMISS
    JOHN
    PLAINTIFFS
    BHC COMMUNICATIONS
    UNITED TELEVISION
    EASTMAN
    SPECIAL COMMITTEES
    CORROON LLP
    RODNEY SQUARE
    RICHARDS
    ATTORNEYS
    FINKELSTEIN
    LADIG POTTER ANDERSON
    NORTH MARKET STREET
    NORMAN PERLMUTTER
    LAWRENCE
    ROYCROFT
    THOMPSON
    TRANSACTION
    FINANCIAL ADVISORS
    AMENDED COMPLAINTS
    ALLEGATIONS
    
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                   $?
                                                                                                    --a
                                                                                                    -2
                                                                                                - I . .
     ________________________________________--------------   x                                        
                                                                                             ./p,::,   
     IN RE BHC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.                          : Consolidated C.A. No. 18209  .::,,  2   
                                                                                                       
     SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION                                                                    :  ;    
                                                                                              r,;.
     ________"___________----~-----------------------------  x                                Z.Y _
                                                                                              -,       
                                                                                             CA < -
                                                                                             2; C`j    
     ____________________----~-----------------------------  x                                  -5 .PJ 
     IN RE UNITED TELEVISION, INC.                           : Consolidated C.A. No. 18218  ";  w
     SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION
     ________________________________________--------------   x
    
    
              OPENING IBRIEF  OF THE BHC AND UTV DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS
                         IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE
                               CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINTS
    
    
    
    Donald J. Wolfe, Jr.                                           Jesse A. Finkelstein
    Matthew E. Fischer                                             Peter B. Ladig
    Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP                                  Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
    13 13 North Market Street                                      One Rodney Square
    P.O. Box 95 1                                                  P.O. Box 55 1
    Wilmington, Delaware 19899-095 1                               Wilmington, Delaware 19899
    (302) 984-6000                                                 (302) 658-6541
    
    Attorneys for BHC Communications, Inc.,                        Attorneys for United Television,
    John L. Eastman, Barry S. Greene,                              Norman Perlmutter, James D. Hodgson,
    Lawrence M. Kashdin and Morgan L. Miller                       Howard F. Roycroft and
    in In re BHC Communications, Inc. and                          Evan C. Thompson in
    John L. Eastman in h_re United Television, Inc.                re
                                                                   In
    
    
    
    
    
    Dated: February  23,200l
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • OPENING IBRIEF OF THE BHC AND UTV DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS
  • IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE AINTS
  • Jesse A. Finkelstein Matthew E. Fischer
  • Peter B. Ladig Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
  • Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. 13 13 North Market Street
  • One Rodney Square P.O. Box 95 1
  • P.O. Box 55 1 Wilmington,
  • Attorneys for BHC Communications, Inc.,
  • Norman Perlmutter, James D. Hodgson, Lawrence M. Kashdin and Morgan L. Miller
  • Howard F. Roycroft and in In re BHC Communications,
  • Evan C. Thompson in John L. Eastman in h_re United Television,
  • Plaintiffs' Claims For Monetary Damages Against
  • In re Baxter Int'l Inc. Shareholders Litig.,

  • 7 . CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CHRIS-CRAFT
    DEFENDANTS
    COMMON STOCK
    PLAINTIFFS
    NEWS CORPORATION
    SHARES
    TRANSACTION
    MERGER
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE
    YORK
    MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS
    PRICE
    VIACOM
    TELEVISION
    FINANCIAL ADVISOR
    UTVI
    MERGER CONSIDERATION
    NEGOTIATIONS
    BHC MINORITY STOCKHOLDERS
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    BHC BOARD
    PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    COMMUNICATIONS
    PRINCIPAL OFFICES
    PREFERRED ADRS
    CBS
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    WASSERSTEIN PERELLA
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                
                                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                               
                                                                                                       
    - - - - - -_ ._-_^I-_..--  ..-....__ - ______.- .__~                                               
                                                                        I
     IN RE BHC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.                                            CONSOLIDATED CIVIL;?; 
      SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION                                                   ACTION NO. 18209 NC  -..
                                                                        I                              
    . ..____ _____._______.____._  - .___ ---.^ll.  ---- --_. __..-...  I                              
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    TO:        Steven J. Rothschild, Esquire                                       Donald J. Wolfe,
               Skadden Arps Slate Meagher                                          Potter Anderson &
                     & Flom, LLP                                                   Hercules Plaza
               One Rodney Square                                                   Wilmington, DE 19801
               Wilmington, DE 1980 1
    
                                          NOTICE OF FILING CONSOLIDATED
                                                     AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
                         Pursuant to paragraph 6  ofthe Order of Consolidation entered on September 
    
    plaintiffs herewith file the within Consolidated Amended Complaint.
                                                                     ;p;:c ~-
                                                                     Wilmington, DE 19801
    
                                                                     Plaintiffs' Co-Lead and Co-Liaison
    
    
                                                                     ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS
                                                                       -ODDESS,  P.A.
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                     Plaintiffs' Co-Liaison Counsel
    
    
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    -           -- - . - - _ - - _ _ - _ - .------._ -__-___
         IN RE BHC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.                         /    CONSOLIDATED
         SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION                                 I    AMENDED CLASS ACTION
                                                                !    COMPLAINT
                                                                     CONSOLIDATED CIVIL ACTION
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs allege upon information and belief, except for paragraph 1 which is
  • of shares of Class A common stock of BHC Communications,
  • Fifth Avenue, New York, New York.
  • The Company's principal business is television
  • BHC is 80% owned by defendant Chris-Craft Industries,
  • United Television, Inc., a publicly traded Delaware corporation.
  • Defendant Eastman also serves as a director of UTVI.
  • Defendant Chris-Craft is a Delaware corporation with principal offices
  • The individual defendants are in a fiduciary relationship with plaintiffs
  • fiduciary duties to the minority shareholders of BHC.
  • The Proposed Transactions: News Corporation's Acauisitions of Chris-Craft,
  • On August 14,2000, News Corporation announced that it had agreed
  • assets, for $5.35 billion (based on the then trading price of News Corporation Securities),
  • has agreed to vote its shares in favor of the BHC merger.
  • 1591 News Corporation preferred ADRs (each representing four preferred limited voting
  • If this transaction closes after August 13,2001, the Chris-Craft
  • Viacom Inc..
  • CBS and Viacom announced that they had signed
  • a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which Viacom would acquire CBS.
  • and negotiations with an unidentified third party regarding a possible transaction.
  • the BHC special committee retained the firm of Swidler
  • committee retained Wasserstein Perella & Co., Inc. as its financial advisor.
  • the BHC board voted to expand the role of the BHC
  • committee from maximizing value for BHC's minority shareholders through a sale of BHC
  • Wasserstein Perella purportedly conducted its due diligence of News
  • nor any of its advisors engaged in any direct communications with any third party until July
  • protection for BHC minority stockholders in the event of a delay in closing the transaction,
  • That the merger consideration has been unfairly allocated favoring the

  • 8 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CHRIS-CRAFT
    PLAINTIFF
    DEFENDANTS
    COMMON
    SHARES
    SIEGEL
    COMMON STOCK
    YORK
    VICE PRESIDENT
    UTV
    STOCKHOLDER
    SHAREHOLDERS
    TRANSACTION
    MERGER CONSIDERATION
    VOTE
    MEMBERS
    CASH
    NEWS CORPORATION
    PREFERRED ADRS
    DAMAGES
    VOTING
    LIMITATIONS
    COURT
    JOHN
    LAW
    CHRIS-CRAFT OFFICERS
    TELEVISION
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    DEALING
    
     !@  BY\"
    ,'                                                                        F-
    
                     IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                                                              /I
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                              I
    
           HELENE GISSEN REVOCABLE TRUST,                          Civil Action No.
           A/K/A  HELENE ROSENTHAL, dated
           January 5, 1994,                                        CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    
                                          Plaintiff,
                                                          I
                             -against-
    
           BHC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., HERBERT
           J. SIEGEL, WILLIAM D. SIEGEL, JOHN
           C. SIEGEL, LAURENCE M. KASHDIN,
           JOELEN K. MERKEL, BARRY S. GREENE,
           MORGAN L. MILLER, JOHN L. EASTMAN,
           and CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.,
    
                                          Defendants.
    
                       Plaintiff: alleges upon information and belief, except for
    
          paragraph  1 which is alleged upon knowledge, as follows:
                                                THE PARTIES
    
                       1.       Plaintiff is the owner of shares of common stock oE
    
           BHC Communications, Inc.  ("BHC" or the "Company").
    
                       2.       BHC is a corporation duly organized under the laws
    
           of the state of Delaware with principal offices located at 767
    
           Fifth Avenue, New York, New York. The Company's principal business
           is television broadcasting.            BHC is 80% owned by defendant  Chris-
    
           Craft    Industries,      Inc.      ("Chris-Craft").       Chris-Craft owns 18
    
           million shares of  BHC's Class B common stock.                 BHC owns 100% of
    
           Chris-Clraft Television, Inc., 100% of Pinelands, Inc. and 58.5% of
    
           United Television, Inc.  ("UTV").             The Company has outstanding 4.5
    
          million shares of Class A common stock, and 18 million shares of
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • and CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.,
  • Plaintiff is the owner of shares of common stock oE
  • BHC Communications,
  • Fifth Avenue, New York, New York.
  • Vice President and Treasurer of Chris-Craft.
  • Pursuant to the Management Agreement between Chris-Craft and BHC, Chris-Craft officers,
  • The individual defendants are in a fiduciary
  • same fiduciary duties to the minority shareholders of BHC.
  • if not thousands, of Class members.
  • constituting unfair dealing to the detriment of plaintiff and the
  • owns television stations in cities including New York,
  • it had agreed to acquire Chris-Craft, BHC and UTV, which together
  • News Corporation will
  • voting Istock of BHC, has agreed to vote its shares in favor of the
  • combination of $34 in cash and 1.1591 News Corporation preferred
  • EIach Chris-Craft stockholder will be entitled to elect to
  • If this transaction closes after August
  • limitations, either $165 in cash or 3.7131 preferred ADRs.
  • The allocation of the aggregate merger consideration
  • Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
  • the class all damages caused to them and account for all profits
  •    |