LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE AVIS GROUP HOLDINGS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,212, Plaintiff: MOSES, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018212, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Settlement, Fee, Avis, Del, Cendant, Expenses, Reasonableness, Shareholders, York, Proposed Transaction, Supr, Consolidated Action, Stipulation, Special Committee, Representatives, Llp, Financial Advisor, Judgement, Negotiations, Stockholders, Class Members, Lifshitz, Stock, Parties, Master License Agreement, Common Stock, Fiduciary Duties, Hereby, Directors, Common, Merger, Shareholder Liti, Contributing, Approves, Thereof, Transaction, Provisions, Delaware, Fees, Disbursements, Objections , ContentID: 120240226

Case Documents
1 2001-12-13 PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127113
30 pages
PDF
2 2001-10-29 ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126772
7 pages
PDF
3   ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126771
6 pages
PDF
4 2000-08 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100988
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 4 documents , 51 pages
Price: $ 34.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COUNSEL
COURT
FEE
SETTLEMENT
LITIGATION
AVIS
DEL
EXPENSES
ATTORNEYS
CENDANT
REASONABLENESS
SHAREHOLDERS
PROPOSED TRANSACTION
SUPR
YORK
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
LLP
DEFENDANTS
FINANCIAL ADVISOR
NEGOTIATIONS
CLASS MEMBERS
LIFSHITZ
MASTER LICENSE AGREEMENT
COMMON STOCK
REPRESENTATIVES
STOCKHOLDERS
SHAREHOLDER LITI
CONTRIBUTING
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                        7

IN RE AVIS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.                 >        Consol. C.A. No. 18212
SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                         1


                               PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN SUPPORT
                                  OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
                AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES



                                               ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS
                                                     & GODDESS, P.A.
                                               Joseph A. Rosenthal
                                               Suite 140 1, Mellon Bank Center
                                               P.O. Box 1070
                                               Wilmington, DE 19899
                                               (302) 656-4433

                                               Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel



OF COUNSEL:

BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD & LIFSHITZ, LLP
10  East 40th Street
New York, New York 10016

BULL  & LIFSHITZ, LLP
18 East 4 1  St Street
New York, New York 10017

WECHSLER HARWOOD HALEBIAN
  & FEFFER LLP
488 Madison Avenue, f?"  Floor
New York, NY 10022

Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel

Dated: December 13,200l



                                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                   
SNIPPETS:
  • AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES
  • BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD & LIFSHITZ, LLP
  • New York, New York 10016
  • Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel
  • THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT IS FAIR AND REASONABLE AND SHOULD BE APPROVED BY THE COURT.
  • E. The Contingent Nature Of The Fee.
  • In Re AST Research Inc. Shareholder Lit&, Del.
  • Supr., 567 A.2d 1279.
  • In Re The Cherry Corporation Shareholders Litig.,
  • In Re First Interstate Bancoru Shareholder Liti&,
  • North American Philivs Stockholders' Lit&.,
  • This consolidated litigation was brought in response to the announcement by Cendant
  • Corporation of its proposal to acquire by merger the shares of Avis Group Holdings,
  • At the time the Proposed Transaction was announced on August 1.5, 2000, Cendant
  • The preferred stock was convertible into a number of shares of Avis common stock and Avis
  • The Action was brought as a class action on behalf of all Avis stockholders (except defendants
  • counsel and financial advisor, was also negotiating with Cendant, bolstered by the leverage
  • Action were factors contributing to Cendant's decision to increase its
  • No Class members have filed objections to the proposed Settlement
  • eliminate or ameliorate the effects of the master license agreement with Cendant which
  • Directors appointed the Special Committee.
  • Q. Do you recall if the special committee or any of its advisors used the lawsuits as further
  • Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, and representatives of Cendant's financial advisor, Lehman

  • 2 . ORDER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SETTLEMENT
    STIPULATION
    CONSOLIDATED ACTION
    COUNSEL
    JUDGEMENT
    MEMBER
    APPROVES
    THEREOF
    DELAWARE
    PARTIES
    FEES
    DISBURSEMENTS
    OBJECTIONS
    PURPOSES
    PLAINTIFFS
    CHANCERY
    MERGER
    REPRESENTATIVES
    WILMINGTON
    REASONS
    PARAGRAPH
    CENDANT
    ASSERTING
    THERETO
    AMENDMENTS
    PREJUDICE
    STOCK
    AVIS
    DEFENDANTS
    
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
                                                                                                  :
    -----------------------------------------------------~                                             
    IN RE AVIS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. :                            CONSOLIDATED                          ;
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                      C.A. NO. 18212                       
                                                                                                 :,
    -----------------------------------------------------~
    
                                                      ORDER                                      '  >
    
                      The parties having made application, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Rules of
    
    the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County (the
    
    "Court"), for an Order approving the settlement (the "Settlement") of the Consolidated
    
    Action (the "Consolidated Action") in accordance with a Stipulation of Settlement dated
    
    October 23, 2001 (the "Stipulation"), which is incorporated herein by reference and
    
    which, together with the accompanying documents, sets forth the terms and conditions
    
    for the proposed Settlement of the Consolidated Action and for a judgment dismissing the
    
    Consolidated Action with prejudice upon the terms and conditions set forth therein; and
    
    the Court having read and considered the Stipulation and the accompanying documents;
    
    and all parties having consented to the entry of this Order;
    
                      IT IS HEREBY ORDERED thisdq4.i'
                                                              _ day of %h &&l that:
    
                      1.       For purposes of the Settlement only, and preliminarily, for
    
    purposes of this Order, the Consolidated Action shall be maintained and proceed as a
    
    class action, pursuant to Rules 23(a), 23(b)(  1) and 23(b)(2) of the Rules of the Court,
    
    without the right of members to opt out, by the plaintiffs on behalf of all persons or
    
    
    
      entities who held stock of Avis Group Holdings, Inc. ("Avis") (other than the defendants
    
      and their affiliates), of record or beneficially, at any time from the opening of business on
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • for an Order approving the settlement of the Consolidated
  • Action (the "Consolidated Action") in accordance with a Stipulation of Settlement dated
  • for the proposed Settlement of the Consolidated Action and for a judgment dismissing the
  • and all parties having consented to the entry of this Order;
  • For purposes of the Settlement only, and preliminarily, for
  • August l&2000 through March 1,2001, the date of the closing of the Merger that is the
  • and by the plaintiffs' counsel as Class Counsel.
  • King Streets, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, for the purposes of determining whether
  • Counsel for an award of attorneys' fees and disbursements to be paid by Cendant
  • the Hearing or any adjournment thereof.
  • The Court approves, in form and content, the Notice of Pendency
  • Notice substantially in the manner and form set forth in paragraph 4 of this Order meet
  • the Class as shown on the stock records maintained by or on behalf of Avis.
  • any member of the Class who desires to do so may
  • defendants on the merits and with prejudice against the plaintiffs and the Class as
  • objections and any reasons for such person's desiring to appear and to be heard,
  • should be approved, no member of the Class may institute, commence or continue, directly,
  • Agreement, the Merger, the discussions and negotiations pertaining thereto, the Proxy
  • events, the Stipulation, the Settlement proposed in the Stipulation (including any amendments

  • 3 . ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    CONSOLIDATED ACTION
    COURT
    STIPULATION
    MEMBERS
    HEREBY
    REPRESENTATIVES
    JUDGEMENT
    ATTORNEYS
    DEFENDANTS
    LAW
    PLAINTIFFS
    PARTIES
    PROVISIONS
    ACCORDANCE
    PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
    EXECUTORS
    SCHEDULING ORDER
    STOCK
    ADMINISTRATORS
    FOREGOING
    ADEQUATE
    FACTS
    COMMON
    MERGER
    DIRECTORS
    AFFILIATES
    HEIRS
    SUCCESSORS
    FOREGOING HOLDERS
    
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------*
    IN RE AVIS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. :                              CONSOLIDATED        .1              
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                   :    C.A. NO. 18212     c:.
    -----------------------------------------------------~
                                                                                                  .
                                  ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT                                      5 .a
                      A hearing having been held before the Court of Chancery of the State
    
    of Delaware in and for New Castle County (the "Court") on December 18,200 1,
    
    pursuant to the Court's Order dated October 29,200l  (the "Scheduling Order"), upon
    
    a Stipulation of Settlement (the "Stipulation") filed in the above-captioned consoli-
    
    dated action (the "Consolidated Action"), which (along with the defined terms
    
    therein) is incorporated herein by reference; it appearing that due notice of said hear-
    
    ing has been given in accordance with the Scheduling Order; the respective parties
    
    having appeared by their attorneys of record; the Court having heard and considered
    
    evidence in support of the proposed settlement (the "Settlement") set forth in the
    
    Stipulation; the attorneys for the respective parties having been heard; an opportunity
    
    to be heard having been given to all other persons requesting to be heard in accor-
    
    dance with the Scheduling Order; the Court having determined that notice to all
    
    persons or entities who held stock of Avis Group Holdings, Inc. ("Avis") (other than
    
    the defendants and their affiliates), of record or beneficially, at any time from the
    
    
    
    opening of business on August  15,200O  through March  1,200l  (including the legal
    
    representatives, heirs, executors, administrators, transferees, successors and assigns
    
    of all such foregoing holders) (the "Class"),  was  adequate and sufficient; and the
    
    entire matter of the proposed Settlement having been heard and considered by the
    
    court:
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • A hearing having been held before the Court of Chancery of the State
  • a Stipulation of Settlement filed in the above-captioned consolidated action, which (along
  • therein) is incorporated herein by reference; it appearing that due notice of said hearing
  • evidence in support of the proposed settlement set forth in the
  • Stipulation; the attorneys for the respective parties having been heard; an opportunity
  • representatives, heirs, executors, administrators, transferees, successors and assigns
  • of all such foregoing holders), was adequate and sufficient;
  • Each of the provisions of Rule 23of the Rules of the Court
  • has been satisfied and the Consolidated Action has been properly maintained according to the
  • joinder of all members was impracticable, there were questions of law or fact
  • common to the Class, the claims or defenses of the representative parties were
  • typical of the claims or defenses of the Class, and the representative plaintiffs
  • of stock of Avis (other than the defendants and their affiliates), of record or beneficially,
  • closing of the Merger that is the subject of the Consolidated Action,
  • assigns of all such foregoing holders.
  • Due and adequate notice of the proceedings having been
  • them to participate in this hearing, it is hereby determined that they are bound by this
  • Order and Final Judgment entered herein.
  • their present or former affiliates, associates, officers, directors, agents, employees,
  • have arisen, from any of the acts, facts, transactions, occurrences, representations or

  • 4 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    CENDANT
    MEMBERS
    PLAINTIFF
    TRANSACTION
    STOCK
    DIRECTORS
    MICHAEL
    COMMON
    DUTIES
    BREACH
    RELIEF
    PRICE
    STOCKHOLDERS
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    ADJUDICATIONS
    INADEQUATE
    POWER
    BID
    MONACO
    AVIS GROUP HOLDINGS
    LAW
    OFFICER
    YORK
    CONTROL
    CHIEF
    CAR
    CHAIRMAN
    HOLMES
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    ____.____._______  --- ._____. ---_..-.--- ---- x
    MIRIAM MOSES,
    
                   Plaint.iffi,
    
           -  ,against - :  CiviIL  Acti.on No.
                                                                                   .
    W. . ALUN CATHCART, LEONARD S.
    COLEMAN, JR., ALFONSE  M .
    D'AMATO, MARTIN  L .   EDELMAN,                      CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    DEBORAH  L. HARMON,  S T E P H E N
    P. HOLM ES, MICHAEL J. KENNEDY, :
    MICHAEL I?. MONACO, A. B A R R Y
    RAND, F. ROBERT SALERNO,. KEVIN :
    M. SHEEHAN, AVIS GROUP HOLDINGS, :
    INC. and CENDANT CORPORATION, :
    
                   Defendants.
                                                   X
    
                   Plaintiff, by her attorneys, Rosenthal, Monhait, Gross &
    
    Goddess, P.A., for her  r:omplaint against defendants, alleges upon
    
    information and belief, except for paragraph 1 hereof, which is
    
    alleged upon knowledge, as follows:
    
                   1. .    Plaintif? has been the owner oE the common stock of
    
    Avis Group Holdings,  Inc.. ("Avi.s"  or the \\Company")  since prior to
    
    the transaction herein  1:omplained  of and continuously to date.
    
                   2. Avis is a corporation duly organized and existing
    
    under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company is one of the
    
    wc#rld's leading service and information providers of comprehensive
    
    aLtomotive  transportation  and vehicle management solutions.                  Avis
    
    operates the second largest car rental company in the world. The
    
    
    
    Company maintains  it83 principal. offices at 900 Old Country Road,
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • DEBORAH L. HARMON, S T E P H E N P. HOLM ES, MICHAEL J. KENNEDY,: MICHAEL I?. MONACO, A. B A
  • INC. and CENDANT CORPORATION,:
  • Plaintiff, by her attorneys, Rosenthal, Monhait, Gross &
  • Goddess, P.A., for her r:omplaint against defendants, alleges upon
  • Avis Group Holdings, Inc..
  • the transaction herein 1:omplained of and continuously to date.
  • operates the second largest car rental company in the world.
  • Garden Cj.ty, New York.
  • control:; approximately 33% of the equity and 20% of the voting
  • Barry Rand is Chairman and Chief
  • Company and Chairman of Avis Europe plc.
  • Financia.1 Officer of t-he: Company.
  • Michael P. Monaco is a Director of the
  • directorships and executive positions and/or significant stock
  • public shareholders, whcse fiduciary duties, clt all times relevant
  • is so numerous that joinder of all members
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common
  • the extent to which class members are entitled to injunctive relief
  • adjudications with respect to individual members of the Class,
  • The price of $29.00 per sharf?
  • Avis in light of its business, earnings and earnings power, present
  • the $29.00 per share price is inadequate and offers
  • Tlzrou(Jh Edelman, Holmes, Monaco, and Coleman's
  • detriment of Cendant's public stockholders.
  • competing bid for Avi,s, as the success of any such bid would
  • Directors have the power and are exercising their power to enable
  • Cenda.nt has breached and will breach its duty as
  •    |