LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SIEGEL v KARMAZIN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,221, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: SIEGEL, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018221, Infinity, Viacom, Common Stock, Transaction, Times Relevant, Price, York, Times Relevant Hereto, Directors, Broadcasting, Cbs, Plan, Shares, Fiduciary Duties, Public Shareholders, Breach, Stockholders, Relief, Complaint, Pursuant, Merger, Delaware Corporation, Outstanding, President, Chief Executive Officer , ContentID: 120240217

Case Documents
1 2000-08 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100979
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
VIACOM
PLAINTIFF
COMMON STOCK
MEMBERS
TRANSACTION
TIMES RELEVANT
PRICE
BUSINESS
YORK
TIMES RELEVANT HERETO
DIRECTORS
BROADCASTING
CBS
PLAN
SHARES
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
BREACH
LAW
STOCKHOLDERS
RELIEF
COMPLAINT
PURSUANT
MERGER
DELAWARE CORPORATION
OUTSTANDING
PRESIDENT
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                     i
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                      /
I
     F!EBECCA SIEGEL, on behalf of herself            j
     and all others similarly situated,

                                Plaintiff,
                                                           Civil Action No.
                  -against-                                            c-  `
                                                                       z  1
     MEL KARMAZIN, DAVID T. MCLAUGHLIN,                                 i
     JEFFREY SHERMAN, ARTURO R.
     MORENO, ROBERT D. WALTER, BRUCE S.
     GORDON, GEORGE H. CONRADES,
     VVILLIAM  S. LEVINE, F.ARID SULEMAN,
      INFINITY BROADCASTING CORP. and
     VIACOM  INC.,

                                Defendants.


                               CLL4SS ACTION COMPLAINT

                  Plaintiff, by her attorneys, Rosenthal, Monh,ait,  Gross & Goddess,

     P.A., for her complaint against defendants, alleges upon information and belief,

except as to paragraph 2 hereof, which is alleged upon knowledge, as follows:

                  1.    Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Rules of

the Court of Chancery on her own behalf and as a class action on behalf of all

     persons, other than defendants and those in privity with them, who own the

     commorl stock of Infinity Broadcasting Corp. ("Infinity" or the "Company"). Infinity

     operates the radio broadcasting and outdoor advertising business of CBS

     Corpora,tion  ("CBS"). On September 6, 1999, CBS and Viacom Inc. ("Viacom")



entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended, pursuant to which

CBS would merge with and into Viacom (or a wholly-owned subsidiary of

Viacom). That merger has since been consummated.

SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff, by her attorneys, Rosenthal, Monh,ait, Gross & Goddess,
  • P.A., for her complaint against defendants, alleges upon information and belief,
  • Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Rules of
  • commorl stock of Infinity Broadcasting Corp..
  • operates the radio broadcasting and outdoor advertising business of CBS
  • On September 6, 1999, CBS and Viacom Inc.
  • That merger has since been consummated.
  • Plaintiff has been the owner of the common stock of Infinity
  • since prior to the transaction Iherein complained of and continuously to date.
  • Defendant Infinity is a Delaware corporation with its principal
  • offices located at 40 VVest 57%h Street, New York, New York 10019.
  • A common stock and 700,000,000 shares of Class B common stock.
  • Defendant Mel Karrnazin, at all times relevant hereto, has
  • President and Chief Executive Officer of Infinity and President
  • Defendants David T. McLaughlin, at all times relevant hereto,
  • stand in a fiduciary position relative to the Company's public shareholders.
  • The class is so numerous that joinder elf all members is
  • As of April 30, 2000, the Company had ifssued and outstanding
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common to the
  • a breach of the duty of fair clealing with respect to the pl,aintiff and the other
  • thereby making appropriate injunctive relief and/or
  • Directors had formed a special committee composed of Ipurportedly independent
  • Class A Common Stock closing price of $35.25 per share on that date.
  • to the pulblic stockholders of ll?finity; and the $40.04 per share price is not the
  • as part of a plan for defendants to obtain complete
  • violated their fiduciary duties to Infinity and the remaining stockholders of Infinity
  •    |