LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PYENSON v UNITED TELEVISION Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,222, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: PYENSON, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018222, Utvi, Shareholders, Bhc, Shares, Common, Common Stock, Control, Directors, Times Relevant Hereto, Transaction, Siegel, Majority, News, Preferred Adrs, Agreement, Television, Cash, President, Voting Stock, Fiduciary Duties, Breach, Representing, Premium, Consummating, Acquisition, Merger , ContentID: 120240216

Case Documents
1 2000-08-15 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100978
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFF
SHAREHOLDERS
BHC
MEMBERS
SHARES
COMMON
COMMON STOCK
CONTROL
DIRECTORS
TIMES RELEVANT HERETO
TRANSACTION
SIEGEL
MAJORITY
NEWS
PREFERRED ADRS
AGREEMENT
TELEVISION
CASH
COURT
PRESIDENT
VOTING STOCK
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
BREACH
REPRESENTING
PREMIUM
CONSUMMATING
ACQUISITION
MERGER
                                                                                      ORIGINAL
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                     


---~-------------------------~------------"------------------x
KAREN PYENSON, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

                  Plaintiff,

                                                                                          _
         V.

                                                                                               _-
UNITED TELEVISION, INC., JOHN J. SIEGEL,                                                       i  1
HERBERT J. SIEGEL, JOHN L. EASTMAN,
NORMAN PERLMUTTER, JAMES D.                                                                    _  -
                                                                                                .  r
HODGSO.N,  HOWARD F. ROYCROFT, EVAN                                                             c
C.  THOM:PSON,  BHC COMMUNICATIONS                                                              c3
and CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES INC.

                  Defendants.
--~.-----------------------------~--------".------------------x

                                      a&ASS ACTION COMPLAINT

         Plaintiff, by and through her attorneys, alleges upon information and belief, except as to

paragraph 2 which is alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:

         1.       This is a shareholder class action on behalf of the public, minority stockholders

UTVI against UTVI, its  Bo,ard of Directors, and its majority/controlling shareholder, BHC

Communications  ("BHC"), a  :subsidiary  of Chris-Craft Industries Inc.(L`CC"), arising out of their

agreement to sell all of the publically held shares of UTVI common stock not owned by CC, BHC

or its subsidiaries at an inadequate price of approximately $150.00 per share.

                                                 THE PARTIES

         2.       Plaintiff has owned shares of the common stock of United Television, Inc. ("UTVI"

or the "Company") since prior to the wrongs complained of herein.

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Plaintiff, by and through her attorneys, alleges upon information and belief, except as to
  • UTVI against UTVI, its Bo,ard of Directors, and its majority/controlling shareholder, BHC
  • agreement to sell all of the publically held shares of UTVI common stock not owned by CC, BHC
  • UTVI is a television broadcasting group that owns and operates television stations.
  • Defendant John C. Siegel ("J.
  • Siegel") is and at all times relevant hereto has been
  • Chairman Iof the Board of Directors and a director of UTVI.
  • an Executive Vice President of CC.
  • The defendants referred to in paragraphs 6 through 12 are collectively referred to
  • Defendants have, and at all relevant times had, the power to control!
  • Defendant BHC is the majority and controlling shareholder of UTVI.
  • plaintiff and the other members of the Class.
  • approximaLtely 80 percent of the common stock and 97 percent of the voting stock of BHC.
  • U'IVI, CC owes fiduciary duties of good faith, fair dealing, loyalty, candor, and due care to
  • whether defendants have breached and/or are continuing to breach fiduciary
  • Corporation ("News") and Fox Television, a subsidiary of News, at a price of $150.00 per
  • News will also acquire l3HC and CC in connection with the transaction.
  • has agreed to vote its shares in favor of the BHC merger.
  • Under the term,s of the agreement, News will give UTVI shareholders $60.00 in cash
  • receive either $150.00 in cash or 3.3755 preferred ADRs.
  • representing a premium of 16.4 percent.
  • In entering into -the acquisition agreement, each ofthe defendants has directly violated.
  • with them, from proceeding with, consummating or closing the proposed transaction;
  •    |