LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PACK v KAHN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,242, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: PACK, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018242, Iturf, Allegations, Amended Complaint, Committee, Del, Merger, Special Committee, Kahn, Facts, Cash, Directors, Transaction, Motion, Nelson, Common Stock, Stockholders, Vanderslice, Duty, Delaware, Third-party, Averments, Paragraph, Exchange Ratio, Amended Complaint Fails, Piper Jaffray, Care, Guillemin, Breach, Deny, Motivation, Independence, Dismiss, Evans, Business Judgment, Loyalty Allegations Fail, Provision, Conclusory, Inter-company Agreements, Respectfully Refer, Shares, Admit , ContentID: 120240204

Case Documents
1 2001-07-02 OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS EVANS NYE AND PLATT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115442
17 pages
PDF
2 2001-04-03 OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS VANDERSLICE NELSON KAHN GUILLEMIN AND EDGAR IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115443
50 pages
PDF
3 2001-03-05 ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS DELIA*S TO CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115255
8 pages
PDF
4 2000-08-17 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100965
11 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 4 documents , 86 pages
Price: $ 34.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS EVANS NYE AND PLATT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ITURF
MEMBERS
DEL
ALLEGATIONS
MERGER
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
AMENDED COMPLAINT
DUTY
AMENDED COMPLAINT FAILS
COURT
CARE
BREACH
DEFENDANTS
DISMISS
EVANS
LOYALTY ALLEGATIONS FAIL
PROVISION
PIPER JAFFRAY
STOCKHOLDERS
MONEY DAMAGES
DIRECTORS
TRANSACTION
PLAINTIFFS
INVESTMENT
NEGOTIATE
FINANCIAL ADVISOR
NATURE
DIVIDED LOYALTIES
CONTROLLING STOCKHOLDER
               IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                         IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


IN RE  iTURF  INC. SHAREHOLDER          ) Consolidated
LITIGATION                              ) Civil Action No.  18242-NC




                         OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS
                      EVANS, NYE AND PLATT IN SUPPORT O F
               THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS  THE AMENDED COMPLAINT




                                     SQUADRON ELLENOFF, PLESENT
                                      & SHEINFELD LLP
                                     Neal M. Goldman
                                     55 1 Fifth Avenue
                                     New York, NY 101'76
                                     (212) 661-6500


                                     MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT  & TUNNELL
                                     Jon E. Abramczyk
                                     1201 N. Market Street
                                     P.O. Box 1347
                                     Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
                                     (302) 658-9200
                                        Attorneys for Defendants
                                        Thomas R. IEvans,  Timothy LJ. Nye
                                        and Douglas R. Platt



July 2,200l



                                                                                 1.



                                 TABLE  OF CONTENTS



SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS
  • EVANS, NYE AND PLATT IN SUPPORT O F
  • THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
  • The Merger
  • TH-E DUTY OF LOYALTY ALLEGATIONS FAIL TO STATE CLAIMS FOR RELIEF AGAINST THE MEMBERS OF THE
  • Divided Loyalties.
  • THE AMENDED COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE A CLAIM AGAINST THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE
  • FOlR BREACH OF THE DUTY OF CARE.
  • $102And iTurf s Charter
  • The Committee's Choice of Piper Jaffray Does Not
  • The Special Committee Had No Duty To Negotiate
  • Andreae v. Andreas, Del.
  • NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEtEDING
  • On January 29, 2001, plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint, which challenges
  • approved by the stockholders of the two companies and consummated on November 20,
  • charter provision adopted pursuant to Q 102of the Delaware General Corporation Law
  • The Independent Committee adopts and joins in the applicable arguments set forth in Arguments
  • of the transaction consideration to iTurf s Class A Stockholders, other than dELiA*s,
  • THE DUTY OF LOYALTY ALLEGATIONS FAIL TOI STATE CLAIMS FOR RELIEF AGAINST `THE MEMBERS OF THE
  • Mr. Kahn's Nominal Investment in Platt's Company Does
  • stockholder and re.ndered accounting services to the controlling stockholder and his
  • The Due Care Claims For Money Damages Against the Members
  • could not function as an independent financial advisor to the Special Committee because Piper

  • 2 . OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS VANDERSLICE NELSON KAHN GUILLEMIN AND EDGAR IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ALLEGATIONS
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    DEFENDANTS
    FACTS
    KAHN
    CASH
    DEL
    COURT
    MERGER
    MOTION
    NELSON
    DIRECTORS
    VANDERSLICE
    DELAWARE
    THIRD-PARTY
    PLAINTIFFS
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE
    GUILLEMIN
    COMMON STOCK
    STOCKHOLDERS
    TRANSACTION
    EXCHANGE RATIO
    MOTIVATION
    INDEPENDENCE
    PIPER JAFFRAY
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    CONCLUSORY
    INTER-COMPANY AGREEMENTS
    INSUFFICIENT
    
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    IN RE iTURF  INC.                                      Consolidated
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                Civil Action No. 18242 N C
    
    
    
    
    
                      OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS VANDERSLICE,
                NELSON, KAHN, GUILLEMIN AND EDGAR IN SUPPORT OF
                THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
                 AGAINST THEM AND TO STRIKE CERTAIN ALLEGATIONS
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                                         .
    
                                                                              I
    OF COUNSEL:                           Jesse A. Finkelstein                .-         :_ ,.
    Dale A. Schreiber                     Sr.inivas M. Raju
    Peter J.W. Sherwin                    Richards, L.ayton & Finger
    John R. Eraatz                        One Rodney Square
    Proskauer Rose LLP                    P. 0. Box 551
    1585 Broadway                         Wilmington, DE 19899
    New York, NY 10036                    (302) 6584541
    (212-969-3000                          Attorneys for Defendants Beth Vanderslice,
                                           Bruce Nelson, Stephen I. Kahn, Evan
                                           Guillemin and Christopher C. Edgar
    
    Dated: April 3, 2001
    
    
    
    
    
    RLFI-228907X-I
    
    
    
                                             TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    TABLE OF                    AUTHORlTIES  . . . . . . . iii
    
    PRELIMlNARY  STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . 1
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS VANDERSLICE, NELSON, KAHN, GUILLEMIN AND EDGAR IN SUPPORT OF
  • AGAINST THEM AND TO STRIKE CERTAIN ALLEGATIONS
  • OF FACTS
  • BOARD'S ALLEGED MOTIVATION AND THE SALEABILITY
  • OF iTURF TO A THIRD-PARTY SHOULD BE STRICKEN.
  • Sold For More Than The Value `Of Its Cash,
  • AS AGAINST THE DlRECTOR DEFENDANTS
  • There Are No Allegations That Vanderslice Or Nelson
  • No Basis Is Alleged For Challenging The Independence Of
  • The Members Of The Special Committee
  • The Remaining Allegations Are Insufficient To Challenge
  • Andreae v. Andreae, Del.
  • the three plaintiffs - purporting to be stockholders of defendant dELiA*s
  • shares of iTurf Class A common stock for each share of common stock of defendant
  • "Merger").1 This exchange ratio was applicable to all stockholdem of dELiA*s,
  • `Th.e Merger was announced on August 16,2000, the stockholders of each company approved the
  • Plaintiffs have not yet sought class, certification of the Putative Class or demonstrated
  • of Directors of iTurf acting through a special committee of indep,endent directors (the
  • "Special Committee") advised by independent counsel and U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray
  • dELiA*s could terminate these agreements without cause if any third-party held more than 20%
  • companies, exercising their business judgment, decided that the Merger, which provided
  • conclusory allegation is contradicted by the Amended Complaint's implicit claim that the
  • there is no logical basis to challenge the expressed motivations for the transaction set
  • These were, among other things, to simplify the relationship between the two companies; to companies that constrained each company's ability to expand its business; to increase the

  • 3 . ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS DELIA*S TO CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    AVERMENTS
    PARAGRAPH
    DENY
    ITURF
    COURT
    RESPECTFULLY REFER
    ADMIT
    TRANSACTION
    DEFENDANTS
    LACK INFORMATION
    KNOWLEDGE SUFFICIENT
    TRUTH
    LAW
    DIRECTORS
    PRESIDENT
    CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS
    EXCHANGE RATIO
    COMMON STOCK
    CHIEF
    MEMBER
    ITURFINC
    OFFICER
    VICE PRESIDENT
    PROXY
    PLAINTIFFS
    REASONS
    BUSINESS
    CHAIRMAN
    OFFERING
    
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                        
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    IN RE iTURF  INC.
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
    
    
                                                                                         v, <-.
             ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS dELiA*s CORP. AND dELiA*s GROUl%k.  s
               TO THE CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAIh
    
             Defendant dELiA*s Corp., formerly known as iTurfInc.  ("iTurf'), and defendant dELiA*s
    
    Group Inc., formerly known as dELiA*s Inc. ("dELiA*s"  and, together with iTurf, the "Corporate
    
    Defendants"), through their attorneys, Richards, Layton& Finger, P.A. and Proskauer Rose LLP, for
    
    their answer to the consolidated amended class action complaint (the "Amended Complaint"):
    
             1.       Deny the averments in paragraph 1 of the Amended Complaint, except admit that
    
    dELiA*s merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of iTurf (the "Transaction") and that the
    
    Transaction included an exchange of 1.715 shares of iTurf Class A common stock for each share of
    
    dELiA*s common stock
    
             2.       Lack information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
    
    averments in paragraph 2 of the Amended Complaint
    
             3.       Deny the averments in paragraph 3 of the Amended Complaint, except admit that
    
    iTurfis a Delaware corporation that had a principal place of business at One Battery Park Plaza, New
    
    York, New York 10004.
    
             4.       Deny the averments in paragraph 4 of the Amended Complaint, except admit that
    
    dELiA*s is a Delaware corporation that at the time of the Transaction held 11,425,OOO shares of
    
    iTurf Class B common stock.
    
    
    
    RLFl-2277281-l
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN RE iTURF INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
  • ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS dELiA*s CORP.
  • Defendant dELiA*s Corp., formerly known as iTurfInc.
  • their answer to the consolidated amended class action complaint:
  • Deny the averments in paragraph 1 of the Amended Complaint, except admit that
  • dELiA*s merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of iTurf (the "Transaction") and that
  • Transaction included an exchange of 1.715 shares of iTurf Class A common stock for each share
  • averments in paragraph 2 of the Amended Complaint
  • iTurfis a Delaware corporation that had a principal place of business at One Battery Park
  • Stephen I. Kahn has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Chief
  • Officer of iTurf and has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
  • offering in April 1999 and was a member of the audit and the compensation committees of the
  • Evan Guillemin has served as a Vice President of iTurf since January 1999,
  • a legal conclusion and respectmlly refer all questions of law to the Court.
  • Lack information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the factual
  • a legal conclusion and respectfully refer all questions of law to the Court.
  • 2000 (the "Proxy") for its contents.
  • The exchange ratio for the Transaction fell within
  • Defendants' position that the plaintiffs bear the burden of proving that the Transaction was
  • negotiated, agreed upon, and consummated in good faith and for good business reasons.

  • 4 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    COMMON STOCK
    PLAINTIFF
    TRANSACTION
    MEMBERS
    SHARES
    KAHN
    MERGER
    SHAREHOLDERS
    LAW
    COMPLAINT
    CONSUMERS
    PUBLIC OFFERING
    DIRECTORS
    CHIEF
    OFFICER
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    BREACH
    DAMAGES
    EXCHANGE
    VICE
    HOLDERS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    RELIEF
    PRICE
    MARKET
    EVANS
    PRIOR
    COMMITTEES
    
              IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE          /
                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
      -------------------~--------------------x
      GLENN PACK,on behalf of himself
      and all other similarly situated,
    
                              Plaintiff,
    
                - against -                        : Civil Action No. 1 gcyLhJ([_
    
      STEPHEN I. KAHN, BETH VANDERSLICE,
    . THOMAS R. EVANS, DOUGLASS PLATT,
      TIMOTHY U. NYE, BRUCE NELSON,
      CHRISTOPHER C. EDGAR, EVAN GUILLEMIN,        :
      ITURF INC., and DELIA'S INC.
    
                              Defendants.
      ----------------------------------------x
    
                                CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    
                Plaintiff, by his attorneys, for his complaint against
    
      defendants,     alleges upon information and belief,      except for
     paragraph 2 hereof, which is alleged upon knowledge, as follows:
    
                1.     Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Rule 23 of
    
      the Rules of the Court of Chancery on his behalf and as a class
    
      action on behalf of all persons, other than defendants and those in
     privity with them, who own the common stock of iTurf Inc. ("iTurf"
      or the "Company") _
    
                2.      Plaintiff has been the owner of the common stock of
      the Company since prior to the transaction herein complained of and
    
      continuously to date.
    
                3.      iTurf is a corporation duly organized and existing
    
      under the laws of the State of Delaware, with principal executive
    
    
    
    offices at One I3attery Park Plaza, New York, New York 10004.                   The
    
    Company is a self-described "leading network provider of online
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • STEPHEN I. KAHN, BETH VANDERSLICE,.
  • ITURF INC., and DELIA'S INC.
  • Plaintiff, by his attorneys, for his complaint against
  • defendants, alleges upon information and belief, except for paragraph 2 hereof, which is
  • action on behalf of all persons, other than defendants and those in privity with them, who
  • destinations focused on consumers between the ages of 13 and 24."
  • Defendant Stephen I. Kahn is the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive
  • individually owns approximately 6,296,470 shares, or 41% of dELiA's
  • a director of iTurf since its initial public offering in 1999.
  • compensation committees.
  • Defendant Thomas R. Evans is a Board
  • as well as serving as the Senior Vice
  • Guillemin previously served as Chief Financial Officer of iTurf from 1997 to 1999,
  • a.nd as a class action, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Rules of the Court of Chancery, on behalf
  • The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common
  • respect to the plaintiff and the other members of the Class; and whether the Class is
  • -for-stock transaction.
  • While loeing labeled a merger, both dELiA's and defendant Kahn have
  • fact that iTurf's shares were, and continue to be, trading at a price higher than dELiA's,
  • The exchange ratio 1.715 shares of iTurf Class A
  • currently valued by the market.
  • On the day prior to the announcement of the
  • Thus, while dELiA's shareholders, including defendant Kahn, will be materially enriched by
  • transaction at the expense of iTurf's public stockholders.
  • Defendants have breached and continue to breach their duty as
  • Defendants will violate their fiduciary duties to the minority
  •    |