LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BELL v CAPSTAR COMMUNICATIONS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,251, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: LN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: BELL, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018251, Common Stock, Warrant, Mmr, Sfx Broadcasting, Holder, Merger, Price, Paragraph, Capstar Communications, Allegations, Shares, Purchase, Radio, Hicks Muse, Sfx Entertainment, Warrant Agreement, Complaint, Exercise, Deny, Defendants Admit, Upo, Warrant Entitling, Securities, Up0, Adjustment, Delaware Corporation, Spin-off/merger Transaction, Information Sufficient, Outstanding Shares, Amfm Operating, Unit Purchase Option, Correct Statement, Truth, First Sentence, Noddings Opinion , ContentID: 120240200

Case Documents
1 2000-10-27 ANSWER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100950
7 pages
PDF
2 2000-08-22 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100951
12 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 2 documents , 19 pages
Price: $ 24.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . ANSWER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
ALLEGATIONS
COMPLAINT
DENY
DEFENDANTS ADMIT
PLAINTIFF
INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
CORRECT STATEMENT
COURT
WARRANT
TRUTH
FIRST SENTENCE
RESPECTFULLY REFER
REMAINDER
RESPONSE
WARRANT AGREEMENT
SFX
MERGER
SECOND SENTENCES
HICKS MUSE
EXERCISE PRICE
STOCK
ADJUSTMENT
DELAWARE
CAPSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
PAYMENT
AMOUNT
COMMON
SHARES
               lN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


MARTIN BELL,
                                                 8
                Plaintiff,
                                                 :
                V.                                           C.A. No. 18251 NC
                                                 ii
CAPSTAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
A Delaware Corporation, and AMMO                 B
OPERATING INC., A Delaware                       ;
Corporation

                Defendants.

                                            ANSWER

       Capstar Communications, inc. and AMMO Operating Inc. ("Defendants") answer Plaintiff's

Ccmplaint as follows:

       1. Defendants admit the allegations in paragraph 1 of the Complaint.

       2. At this time, Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a

belief as to the truth of the allegations in paragraph 2 of the Complaint, and therefore deny them.

       3. Defendants admit the allegations in the first sentence of paragraph 3 of the

Complaint. As to the remainder of the allegations in paragraph 3, Defendants admit that, as a result

of the SFX merger, Plaintiff became entitled, upon exercise of the  UP0 and of the Class A and Class

B Warrants, and payment of the total exercise price, to receive a certain amount of SFX common

stock  but>  because Defendants are without knowledge concerning, the "antidilution adjustment"

referenced in paragraph 2., Defendants are without knowledge or infomration sufficient to form a

belief as to the amount of shares Plaintiff was entitled to receive, and therefore deny them

       4. Defendants admit the allegations of paragraph 4 of the Complaint.



        5.     At this time, Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a

SNIPPETS:
  • lN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Capstar Communications, inc. and AMMO Operating Inc. answer Plaintiff's
  • Defendants admit the allegations in paragraph 1 of the Complaint.
  • Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a
  • belief as to the truth of the allegations in paragraph 2 of the Complaint, and therefore deny
  • As to the remainder of the allegations in paragraph 3, Defendants admit that, as a result
  • of the SFX merger, Plaintiff became entitled, upon exercise of the UP0 and of the Class A and
  • B Warrants, and payment of the total exercise price, to receive a certain amount of SFX common
  • stock but> because Defendants are without knowledge concerning, the "antidilution adjustment"
  • belief as to the amount of shares Plaintiff was entitled to receive,
  • As to the allegations in the first sentence of paragraph 7, Defendants are, at this time,
  • Defendants admit the allegations in the first and second sentences of paragraph 13
  • respectfully refer the Court to the Warrant Agreement for a true and correct statement of its
  • The allegations of paragraph 20 state a legal conclusion as to which no response is
  • including that Plaintiff defines "Hicks Muse Merger" as encompassing

  • 2 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    WARRANT
    PLAINTIFF
    MMR
    SFX BROADCASTING
    HOLDER
    MERGER
    PRICE
    CAPSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
    SHARES
    PURCHASE
    RADIO
    SFX ENTERTAINMENT
    HICKS MUSE
    EXERCISE
    WARRANT AGREEMENT
    UPO
    WARRANT ENTITLING
    SECURITIES
    UP0
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    SPIN-OFF/MERGER TRANSACTION
    ADJUSTMENT
    OUTSTANDING SHARES
    AMFM OPERATING
    UNIT PURCHASE OPTION
    NODDINGS OPINION
    CAPITAL REORGANIZATION
    CONSOLIDATION
    MULTI-MARKET RADIO
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    MARTIN BELL,                                        1
                          Plaintiff,
    
                  V.
    
    CAPSTAR  COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
    a Delaware corporation., and AMFM OPERATING )
    INC., a Delaware corporation
                                                        j
                          Defendants.                   )
                                            COMPLAINT
    
                  Plaintiffs hereby alleges for his complaint as follows:
    
                                           INTRODUCTION
    
                  1.      In 1994, plaintiff acquired a Unit Purchase Option (the  "UPO") entitling
    
    plaintiff to purchase up to 16,000 units of securities issued by Multi-Market Radio, Inc. (the
    
    "Units"), at a price of $7.75 per Unit. Each Unit consisted of(i) one share of Class A Common
    
    Stock of MMR, (ii) one Class A Warrant entitling the holder to purchase one share of MMR
    
    Class A Common Stock at a price of $7.75 per share, and (iii) one Class B Warrant entitling the
    
    holder to purchase one share of MMR Class A Common Stock of MMR at a price of $11.50 per
    
    share. Thus, if the Option and the Warrants were executed fully, plaintiff would pay $432,000
    
    (the "Aggregate Exercise Price") (computed as 16,000 options at $7.75, 16,000 Class A
    
    Wan-ants at $7.75 and 16,000 Class B Warrants at $11.50),  and would receive 48,000 shares of
    
    MMR Class A Common Stock (16,000 shares upon exercise of the UPO, 16,000 shares upon
    
    exercise of the Class A Warrants and 16,000 shares upon exercise of the Class B Warrants).
    
    
    
                   2.     As the result of an antidilution adjustment, the  UP0 became exercisable
    
    for 22,710 units of  MMR, thus, upon payment of the Aggregate Exercise Price, plaintiff was
    
    entitled to receive 68,130 shares of MMR Class A Common Stock.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • a Delaware corporation., and AMFM OPERATING) INC., a Delaware corporation
  • plaintiff acquired a Unit Purchase Option entitling
  • plaintiff to purchase up to 16,000 units of securities issued by Multi-Market Radio, Inc. (the
  • at a price of $7.75 per Unit.
  • Stock of MMR, one Class A Warrant entitling the holder to purchase one share of MMR
  • Class A Common Stock at a price of $7.75 per share, and one Class B Warrant entitling the
  • MMR Class A Common Stock (16,000 shares upon exercise of the UPO, 16,000 shares upon
  • and each share of MMR was converted into .2983 shares of SFX Broadcasting.
  • SFX Merger, plaintiff became entitled, upon exercise of the UP0 and of the Class A and Class B
  • and to distribute the stock of SFX Entertainment pro rata to holders of the stock
  • Inc. ("Hicks Muse") in a merger pursuant to which each share of SFX Broadcasting's
  • Inc. v. Capstar Communications,
  • For the:reasons set forth herein and in the Noddings Opinion,
  • corporation and is the corporate successor to Multi-Market Radio,
  • AMFM Operating Inc.
  • Class A Common Stock at a price of $7.75 (subject to adjustment), and one Class B Warrant
  • The Warrant Agreement for the Class A and Class B Warrants sets forth
  • capital reorganization or other change
  • of outstanding shares of Common Stock,
  • corporation (other than a consolidation or merger in which the
  • Accordingly, as a result of the Spin-Off/Merger Transaction, upon exercise of the UP0 and the
  •    |