IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AN> FOR NE:W CASTLE COUNT'Y
B?lJCE D. KIMBALL,
)
Plaintiff,
i
V . 1 C.A. No. 18252-NC
CR.4IG S. LINTHICUM, ,JOHI\. F. ;
MILLER, JR., GREGORY W.
MORGAN, MICHAEL C. POMEF.OY, ;
KEYNETH C. PRICE, JEElRY I,.
WILCOXON, BLACK OAK COME'UTER ;
SERVICES, INC., a Delaw;.re
corporation, and BLACK OAK i
HOSTING SERVICES, LLC, a )
Maryland limited liability )
company I )
Defendant.:;. )
.I _I
ANSWER
--.__ : _
: >
Defendants, Craig S. Linthicum, John F. Miller, Jr., Gregory
W. Morgan, Michael C. Pomeroy, Kenneth C. Price, Jerry L.
Wilcoxon, and Black Oak Computer Services, Inc., by and through
their undersigned co:lnseIl, respond to the plaintiff's complaint
as follows:
SUMMARY-,OF ACTION
1. Any such expeliditures of corporate funds by Black Oak
were properly authorized and were deemed appropriate by Black
Oak. No decision has b':en made to issue additional shares of
Black Oak common stock, however, if such a decision is made,
Black Cak intends to do .so in accordance witlr. the company's
certifj-cate of incorporicion, bli-laws, stock restriction
agreement, and applicable Delaware Law. Upon information and
belief,. the plaintiff was provided with his original certificat's
SNIPPETS:
MILLER, JR., GREGORY W.
KEYNETH C. PRICE, JEElRY I,.
Wilcoxon, and Black Oak Computer Services, Inc., by and through their undersigned co:lnseIl,
Any such expeliditures of corporate funds by Black Oak
No decision has b':en made to issue additional shares of Black Oak common stock, however, if
the company's certifj-cate of incorporicion, bli-laws, stock restriction
the plaintiff was provided with his original certificat's
Oak's counsel, Gordon, I'ournaris 0;
Black O.ak will issue a replacement certificate to the plaintiff
upon written request from the plaintiff,
executes3 .Lost certif.icat.e affidavit in the form required by Black
Oak, Jo:ln C. Nason, org;lnized Black Oak Hosting by filing
20% of CT1 stock for prrlviding technical services.
Admitted as t1 the amounts of cash, labor, equipment
HloweTWrer, it is admitted that the portion of the CT1 agreement which required a cash
there are no members or assets of Black Oak Hosting.
the defendants do not have
Oak board of directors that he would resign,
allegations are admittec:.
sufficient to form a bell-i-ef as to the truth of the averment.
Oak is without possession or control of the criginal stock certificate and cannlst provide it
Paragraphs 1 -through Z;5 are hereby incorporated as those set forth in tnei.?
Paragraphs 1:hrough 44 above are hereby incorporated as those set forth in tl;eir entirety.
the stock restriction agreement f2r Black Oak allows tte stockholders to
Denying the p: aintiff's request for each of the
FIR,S'T AFFIRJIATIVE DEFENSE;
|