LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FRIEDLAND v RUDOLPH Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,261, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: FRIEDLAND, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018261, Nbty, Delaware, Individual Defendants, Del, Facts, Shareholders, Demand, Sales, Nbty Stock, Shareholder, Directors, Eastern District, York, Fiduciary Duty, Consolidation, Motion, Rudolph, Allegations, Insider Trading, Amended Complaint, Growth, Trading, Price, Corporate Information, Shares, Nbty Board, Federal Securities, Reaping Proceeds, Aronson Prong, Store Sales, Prior Pending, Stock, Standard, Forum, Allege, Non-public Information, Disinterest, Misleading Statements, Class Action , ContentID: 120240193

Case Documents
1 2001-07-30 INC. OPENING BRIEF OF NBTY
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127111
52 pages
PDF
2 2001-05-30 INC. SHAREHOLDERS COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115254
15 pages
PDF
3 2001-03-30 REPLY BRIEF OF NBTY AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115439
30 pages
PDF
4 2001-03-09 DERIVATIVE PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115440
37 pages
PDF
5 2000-08-25 VERIFIED DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100939
23 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 5 documents , 157 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . INC. OPENING BRIEF OF NBTY

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DELAWARE
COURT
PLAINTIFFS
SHAREHOLDER
CONSOLIDATION
DEL
AMENDED COMPLAINT
EASTERN DISTRICT
DEFENDANTS
DEMAND
FACTS
ALLEGATIONS
ALLEGE
DIRECTORS
SALES
NBTY BOARD
DERIVATIVEIY
AMENDED COMPL
DELAWARE LAW
DISINTEREST
INDEPENDENCE
PARTICULARITY
FEDERAL SECURITIES
FIDUCIARY DUTY
STORE SALES
STAYED PENDING
CONCLUSORY ALLEGATIONS
DISCLOSURES
PRE-SUIT DEMAND
           IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY




IN  RE NBTY, INC. SHAREHOLDERS       )       Consolidated
LITIGATION                           >       Civil Action No. 18261 NC

                                                                                 ZrJ
                                                                           02  -
                                                                                        8
                                                                          lb ;::*             .,'
                                                                          T-.  +
                                                                          .x!T.   r"
                                                                          i-e :,I             1
                                                                          .px           2       
        OPENING BRIEF OF NBTY, INC. AND THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENl@#TQ                             ,,
          IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AME@@D  _                              2 
     COMPLAINT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, STAY THE CONSOLIDA'TED~IQN                                  `-9
                                                                          -22           ;       -..'
                                                                            <


                               PRICKETT, JONES  & ELLIOT?
                               13 10 King Street, Box 1328
                               Wilmington, DE 19899
                               (302) 888-6500

                               ED WARDS & ANGELL, LLP
                               5 1 John F. Kennedy Parkway
                               Short Hills, NJ 07078
                               (973) 376-7700
                               Admitted Pro Hat Vice

                               Attorneys for Defendants and NBTY, Inc.

Dated: July  30,200l





17556 l\lill3Zlvl



                                                                                                 

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IN RE NBTY, INC. SHAREHOLDERS) Consolidated
  • Plaintiffs' Amended Allegations of Public Disclosures and Insider Trading..........6
  • Plaintiffs' Failure to Make a Pre-Suit Demand on NBTY's Board of Directors.
  • Majority of Disinterested and Independent NBTY Board
  • The Amended Complaint Fails to Plead Specific Facts
  • THIS ACTION SHOULD BE STAYED PENDING THE
  • OUTCOME OF THE FIRST FILED EASTERN DISTRICT ACTION ARISING

  • 2 . INC. SHAREHOLDERS COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    NBTY STOCK
    BUSINESS
    GROWTH
    PRICE
    DEFENDANTS
    SALES
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    PLAINTIFFS
    DIRECTORS
    MARKET
    RUDOLPH
    SHARES
    REPRESENTATIONS
    STORES
    INVESTMENT COMMUNITY
    REAPING PROCEEDS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    INSIDER TRADING
    NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION
    BUSINESS PROSPECTS
    AMENDED DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
    MISAPPROPRIATION
    CORPORATE INFORMATION
    COMMON STOCK
    VERTICAL INTEGRATION
    FUTURE BUSINESS PROSPECTS
    SAME-STORE SALES
    NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS
    CHANCERY RULES
    
                                                      ORIGINAL
                    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                  
                                         IN AN FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    -----------------------------------------------~-----------~---~                                - 
                                                                                                    ;; 
                                                                                               :  .j 
                                                                                               .  -.   
                                                                                                  .  .,
    IN RE NBTY, INC. SHAREHOLDERS                                                  CONSOLIDATED        
    LITIGATION                                                               : CIVIL ACTION  N@ 18261' 
                                                                                                :  :
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                     :-
    ---------------------------------------------------------------~                                 ! 
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                 :,.~ 
                                                                                                  (ii. 
                                                                                                  :  :;
                                FIRST AMENDED DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT  "                                  
    
             Plaintiffs, as and for their first amended derivative complaint (the "Complaint"), by
    
    their attorneys, allege upon personal knowledge as to themselves and their own acts and upon
    
    information and belief as to all other matters, as follows:
    
                                             SUMMARY OF THE CLAIMS
    
              1.       This is a shareholders' derivative action brought pursuant to Rule 23.1 of the
    
    Court of Chancery Rules in the right of and for the benefit of NBTY, Inc.  ("NBTY"  or the
    
    "Company") and its public shareholders against a majority of the members of  NBTY's Board
    
    of Directors, for misappropriation of corporate information and insider trading, and other
    
    breaches of fiduciary duty.
    
             2.        During the first half of 2000, NBTY disseminated information which led the
    
    investment community to believe that it was enjoying, and would continue to enjoy,
    
    significant growth of its business. These glowing representations contributed to a rise in the
    
    market price of NBTY stock; from under $1 l/share at the beginning of 2000 to a high of
    
    almost  $19/share in May of that year. During this same time period, the Director Defendants
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs, as and for their first amended derivative complaint, by
  • Court of Chancery Rules in the right of and for the benefit of NBTY,
  • "Company") and its public shareholders against a majority of the members of NBTY's Board
  • of Directors, for misappropriation of corporate information and insider trading, and other
  • investment community to believe that it was enjoying, and would continue to enjoy,
  • significant growth of its business.
  • These glowing representations contributed to a rise in the
  • the Director Defendants
  • In May, 2000 alone, the Director Defendants sold over 1.2 million shares,
  • On or about June 14, 2000, NBTY publicly announced that sales at the
  • nutritional supplement companies in different segments of the supplement business).
  • Following the disclosure, the price of NBTY stock crumbled, falling from a high closing price
  • market price of NBTY stock.
  • the Director Defendants breached their fiduciary duty of loyalty to NBTY.
  • Director Defendants impermissibly profit from their insider trading (which profits must be
  • line of nutritional supplements in the United States and the United Kingdom.
  • Defendants,") are, and at all relevant times have been, directors of NBTY:
  • (a> Defendant Arthur Rudolph ("A.
  • Company, he had access to and use of adverse, material, non-public information about
  • NBTY's business, finances, products, markets and present and future business prospects.
  • the strength of NBTY's same store sales growth and success of its vertical integration
  • Rudolph sold approximately 500,000 shares of Company common stock, reaping proceeds
  • 2000 announcement touting the 15.6% growth of same-store sales at its Vitamin
  • World stores, which announcement lifted NBTY's stock price by nearly 23% in one day, A.
  • AGAINST THE DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY FOR INSIDER SELLING AND

  • 3 . REPLY BRIEF OF NBTY AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    NBTY
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    DEL
    YORK
    FACTS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    PRIOR PENDING
    EASTERN DISTRICT
    LITIGATION
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    COMPLAINT
    MOTION
    ALLEGATIONS
    DISCLOSURES
    JURISDICTION
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    NBTY BOARD
    PLAINTIFFS ALLEGE
    THIRD-QUARTER
    FEDERAL SECURITIES
    OPERATIVE FACTS
    PLAINTIFFS FAIL
    PRO HAT VICE
    DISINTEREST
    RESOLUTION
    MISREPRESENTATIONS
    NBTY SHARES
    
                        IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN `THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
                                                                                  `.
    
    
    IN  RI! NBTY, INC. SHAREHOLDERS           )      Consolidated                            :
    LITIGATION                                >      Civil Action No. 18261 NC           ^  it    :
                                                                                         : ..J
    
    
    
    
    
                                    REPLY BRIEF OF NBTY, INC.
                                 AND THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
                             IN SUPPORT OF THEIR  MOTION TO DISMISS
                        OR, ALTERNATIVELY, STAY THE CONSOLIDATED ACTION
    
    
    
                                              PRICKETT, JONES  & ELLIOTT
                                              13 10 King Street, Box  13;!8
                                              Wilmington, DE 19899
                                              (302) 888-6500
    
                                              EDWARDS  & ANGELL, LLP
                                              5 1 John F . Kennedy Parkway
                                              Short Hills, NJ 07078
                                              (973) 376-7700
                                              Admitted Pro Hat Vice
                                              Attorneys for Defendants and NBTY, Inc.
    
    Dated: March 30,200:l
    
    
    
    
    
    17556.1\133961v1
    
    
    
                                                                                               TABLE OF
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN `THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • NBTY, INC. SHAREHOLDERS) Consolidated
  • : LITIGATION
  • AND THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
  • IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS
  • Admitted Pro Hat Vice
  • Attorneys for Defendants and NBTY,
  • Six Prior Pending Eastern District Actions as Delaware
  • Claims in Both Prior Pending Eastern District and Delaware
  • Actions Arise from Identical Operative Facts.
  • Both New York and Delaware Actions Involve Identical Individual
  • Plaintiffs Proffer No Additional Allegations of Fact to Cure the Pleading
  • SHOULD .BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION.
  • THE COMPLAINT SHOULD BE DISMISSED BECAUSE PLAINTIFFS CANNOT
  • Plaintiffs Fail to Plead Facts To Show That a M%jority of the NBTY
  • Disinterested and Independent NBTY Board Members.
  • Comity and Efficiency Weigh in Favor of a Stay Pending Resolution of

  • 4 . DERIVATIVE PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    LAW
    DEMAND
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DEL
    FACTS
    MOTION
    DELAWARE
    COURT
    YORK
    ARONSON PRONG
    STANDARD
    FORUM
    CLASS ACTION
    CONVENIENS
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    NBTY
    FEDERAL SECURITIES
    OPPOSITION
    FIRST-FILED ACTION
    PERSONAL FINANCIAL BENEFIT
    ALLEGATIONS
    CORPORATE INFORMATION
    INSIDER TRADING
    STORE SALES
    BRUALDI LAW FIRM
    NON-PENDENCY
    PARTICULARITY
    ACCESS SHAREHOLDERS
    
                                                         ORIGINAL
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                   
                                       IN AN FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------x
    IN RE NBTY, INC. SHAREHOLDERS                                             CONSOLIDATED
    LITIGATION                                                           CIVIL ACTION NO. 18261 NC
    --------------------------------------------------------------x
    
    
    
                        DERIVATIVE PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO
               DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS OR ALTERNATIVELY STAY
    
    
    
                                                            ROSENTHAL MONHAIT GROSS
                                                               & GODDESS, P.A.
                                                            Norman M. Monhait
                                                            Suite 1401, Mellon Bank Center
                                                            P.O. Box 1070
                                                            Wilmington, Delaware 19899-l 070,  ff
                                                            (302) 656-4433                             
                                                                                              ,r7  -
                                                                                              ".P`j ?
                                                                                              :`: ._A -z
                                                                                              .  _., _'
                                                            Attorneys for Plaintiffs          i.iL.,'
                                                                                              ---      
                                                                                                       
                                                                                              .-` :.:
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    GARWIN BRONZAFT GERSTEIN
     & FISHER, LLP
    1501 Broadway, Suite 1416
    New York, NY 10036
    (212) 398-0055
    
    THE BRUALDI LAW FIRM
    Suite 15 15, 29 Broadway
    New York, NY 10006
    (212) 952-0602
    
    
    March 9, 2001
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • DERIVATIVE PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS OR ALTERNATIVELY
  • New York, NY 10036
  • THE BRUALDI LAW FIRM
  • STATEMENT OF FACTS
  • PLAINTIFFS HAVE ADEQUATELY ALLEGED THAT DEMAND ON
  • There Is No First-Filed Action Involving The Same Parties And The
  • Pendency Or Non-pendency Of A Similar Action In Another
  • Abaiian v. Kennedy, Del.
  • In Re Cooper Co. Shareholders Deriv.
  • favor of a federal securities class action lawsuit pending in New York against the corporation
  • the Court of Chancery in the name of and for the benefit of NBTY,
  • corporate information and insider trading, waste of corporate assets, breach of fiduciary
  • `The Individual Defendants include Arthur Rudolph, a director and former Chairman and Chief
  • Defendants directly profit from their insider trading, they have exposed the Company to
  • strategy and the strength of its same store sales growth.
  • plaintiffs fail to adequately plead demand futility as required by Chancery Court Rule
  • because litigating in Delaware is inconvenient for this Delaware corporation pending
  • Delaware law renders each of these arguments without merit.
  • received, or is entitled to receive, a personal financial benefit from the challenged
  • the "reasonable doubt" standard for pleading a director's personal interest is
  • providing a just balance between the pleading with particularity
  • Plaintiffs Have Adequately Pled The First Aronson Prong --Lack Of Disinterestedness By A
  • reasonable inferences drawn from these factual allegations support plaintiffs' claim.
  • THE BASIS OF COMITY OR FORUM NON CONVENIENS
  • the New York federal securities law class action is not only far from identical to
  • as a result of which the former Access shareholders received McKesson stock.

  • 5 . VERIFIED DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    NBTY
    TRADING
    RUDOLPH
    INSIDER TRADING
    SALES
    DIRECTORS
    STOCK
    BUSINESS
    MISLEADING STATEMENTS
    CORPORATE INFORMATION
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    MATERIALLY FALSE
    ADVERSE
    PLAINTIFF
    SHARES
    STOCK PRICE
    REAPING PROCEEDS
    STORE SALES
    NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION
    STORE SALES GROWTH
    MICHAEL ASHNER
    NATHAN ROSENBLATT
    EXECUTIVES
    MISAPPROPRIATION
    CORPORATE ASSETS
    FINANCIAL CONDITION
    SCOTT RUDOLPH
    FUTURE BUSINESS PROSPECTS
    NOMINAL DEFENDANT
    
                                                                                            p" $..", r
                                                                                            I'; i  `;
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                         IN AN FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    -------~------"-----------------------------------------------x
    
    SAUL J. FRIEDLAND, derivatively on behalf of :
    NBTY, INC.
    
                                 Plaintiff,
    
                                                                       Civil Action No.    lExJ
    
    SCOTT RUDOLPH, ARTHUR RIJDOLPH,
    MICHAEL  ASHNER, BERNARD G. OWEN
    GLENN COHEN, NATHAN ROSENBLATT,
    HARVEY  KAMlL,  WILLIAM SHANAHAN,
    
                                 Defendants,
             -and-
    
    NBTY, INC., a Delaware corporation,
    
                                 Nominal Defendant.
    --------------------------------------------------------------x
    
    
                                      VERIFIED DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
    
             Plaintiff, by his attorneys, alleges upon personal knowledge as to himself and his own
    
    acts and upon information and belief as to all other matters, as follows:
    
                                               SUMMARY OF THE CLAIMS
    
             1.        This is a shareholders' derivative action brought pursuant to Court of Chancery
    
    Rule 23.1 for the benefit of NBTY, Inc.  ("NBTY"  or the `Company") against a majority of
    
    the members of  NBTY's Board of Directors and two of the Company's non-director senior
    
    executives, for misappropriation of corporate information and insider trading, waste of
    
    corporate assets, breach of fiduciary duty, and gross mismanagement.
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • NBTY, INC.
  • SCOTT RUDOLPH, ARTHUR RIJDOLPH, MICHAEL ASHNER, BERNARD G. OWEN GLENN COHEN, NATHAN
  • Plaintiff, by his attorneys, alleges upon personal knowledge as to himself and his own
  • the members of NBTY's Board of Directors and two of the Company's non-director senior
  • executives, for misappropriation of corporate information and insider trading, waste of
  • As alleged in detail below, the Individual Defendants issued
  • significant growth of its business.
  • because Defendants failed to disclose that sales at the Company's Vitamin World stores
  • NBTY stock, reaping proceeds of over $43 million, the Company's stock was artificially
  • information showing the Company's comparable same store sales for April were far below
  • what the market was led to expect, the Individual Defendants sold over 1.5 million shares,
  • their wrongful insider trading, reaping over $43 million in proceeds.
  • NBTY's stock price level on June
  • By causing the Company to issue misleading statements,
  • Individual Defendants utilize non-public corporate information for personal benefit to profit
  • nominal defendant NBTY.
  • (4 Defendant Arthur Rudolph ("A.
  • He is the father of Defendant Scott Rudolph.
  • Because of his position with the Company, he has had access to and use of adverse, material,
  • announcement indicating, inter da, the strength of NBTY's same store sales growth and
  • access to and use of adverse, material, non-public information about NBTY's business,
  • finances, products, markets and present and future business prospects.
  • Individual Defendants did not disclose that the Company's financial condition was subject to
  • to be made a series of materially false or misleading statements about NBTY's
  • based on their misappropriation of proprietary internal corporate information,
  • for the Individual Defendants' own gain constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty,
  • corporate assets, mismanagement, gross negligence and violations of their fiduciary duties.
  •    |