LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BESWICK v ROTHMAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,264, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: BESWICK, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018264, Cigar, Rothman, Common Stock, Fiduciary Duties, Transaction, Shares, Directors, Breaching, Relief, Damages, Adequate, John Oliva, Lewis, Individual Defendants, Faith, Prior, President, Trust, Owe, Fair Dealing, Loyalty, Care, Stockholders, Allegations, Proper , ContentID: 120240191

Case Documents
1 2000-08 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100937
7 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 7 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFF
CIGAR
ROTHMAN
MEMBERS
COMMON STOCK
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
TRANSACTION
SHARES
LAW
DIRECTORS
BREACHING
RELIEF
DAMAGES
ADEQUATE
JOHN OLIVA
LEWIS
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
FAITH
PRIOR
PRESIDENT
TRUST
OWE
FAIR DEALING
LOYALTY
CARE
STOCKHOLDERS
ALLEGATIONS
COURT
PROPER
                                                                               ~~~~~~~~-
           IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                      I
                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                   \                            J
__________---_---------------------X
KEVIN BESWICK,

             Plaintiff,                                                              G
                                                                                     0
                                                               i-                    -
     V.                                           C.A. NO.                :          6
LEWIS I.  ROTHMAN, LAVONDA  ROTHMAN,  :              /'b%~  EJc  3,
BERNIE ROSENBLUM, MAUREEN
COLLETON, JOHN OLIVA, JANE
VARGAS, JOHN F. BARRY, JR.,                                                               . _
JRC ACQUISITION CORP.,  L&LR,                                                             c '3
INC. and 800-JR CIGAR, INC.,                                                   -:         c-7

             Defendants.
-__-------___-_-------~~~~~~~~ ----- X

                                  COMPLAINT

     Plaintiff alleges upon information and belief, except as to

paragraph 1 which is alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:

                                 THE PARTIES

     1.      Plaintiff is the owner of shares of the common stock of

800-JR Cigar, Inc. ("JR Cigar" or the "Company") and has been the

owner of such shares continuously since prior to the wrongs

complained of herein.

     2.      JR Cigar is a corporation duly existing and organized

under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal offices

located at 301 Route 10 East, Whippany, New Jersey.             The Company is

a distributor and retailer of brand name premium cigars.

     3.      Lewis I.  Rothman ("Lew Rothman") is President, Chief

Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of JR Cigar.

     4.      Defendant      LeVonda    Rothman    ("LeVonda          Rothman") is
SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff alleges upon information and belief,
  • 800-JR Cigar, Inc. and has been the
  • owner of such shares continuously since prior to the wrongs
  • Lewis I. Rothman is President,
  • Executive Vice President, Secretary, and a director of JR Cigar
  • LeVonda Rothman and the Lewis I. Rothman 1998 Trust #l
  • (collectively, the "Rothman Defendants").
  • Ciga.r, the Rothman Defendants owe fiduciary duties of good faith,
  • Defendants Bernie Rosenblum, Maureen Coleton, John Oliva,
  • The Individual Defendants are in a fiduciary relationship
  • with plaintiff and the other public stockholders of JR Cigar,
  • owe plaintiff and the other members of the class the highest
  • obligations of good faith, fair dealing, due care, loyalty and full
  • CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
  • on behalf of himself and holders of JR Cigar common stock
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common to
  • making appropriate the relief sought herein with respect to the
  • in this transaction, to the detriment of JR Cigar's public
  • They have selected and elected all of JR Cigar's directors who are
  • breached and are breaching their fiduciary duties to the members of
  • Unless the proposed buyout is enjoined by the Court,
  • Plaintiff and the Class have no adequate remedy at law.
  • granting, inter alia, rescissory damages to the
  • may be just and proper.
  •    |