LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

AKINS v COBB Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,266, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: AKINS, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018266, Amended Complaint, Salient, Cobb, Hafer, Shareholders, Snyder, Del, Directors, Delaware, Stockholders, Communications, Sale, Motion, Operating Subsidiaries, Chancery, Employees, Support, Dismiss, Fiduciary Duty, Control, Common Stock, Shares, Stock, Facts, Management, Class Action, Control Group, Compensation Packages, Compensation, Philadelphia, Transactions, Bonus Awards, Allegations, Act, Michael, Supr, Arch Streets, Employment Benefits, Business Judgment Rule, Chancery Rule , ContentID: 120240189

Case Documents
1 2001-11-01 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 126769
23 pages
PDF
2 2001-07-30 REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127221
19 pages
PDF
3 2001-06-20 PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115433
34 pages
PDF
4 2001-05-04 OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115434
30 pages
PDF
5 2001-02-26 AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115253
30 pages
PDF
6 2000-08-29 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100934
21 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 6 documents , 157 pages
Price: $ 44.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS
DIRECTORS
STOCKHOLDERS
FIDUCIARY DUTY
COURT
COBB
SNYDER
HAFER
COMPENSATION
AMENDED COMPLAINT
MANAGEMENT
EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
CHANCERY
COUNSEL
COMPENSATION PACKAGES
BONUS AWARDS
OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES
COMMUNICATIONS
PLAINTIFFS CONTEND
LIQUIDATION
VOTING STOCK
ENGINEERING
CHANCERY RULE
PARTICULARIZED FACTS
XEL
INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
SAFCO
ACCORDING
      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


MICHAEL J. AKINS, et al.,
                         Plaintiffs,              >                                1

V.                                                i
                                                  >      Civil Action No. 18266         `.
TIMOTHY S. COBB, et al.,                          >

                         Defendants.

                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

                        Date Submitted: October 26, 200l
                        Date Decided: November 1,200 1


Pamela S. Tikellis, Esquire, of CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS, Wilmington, Delaware;
Of Counsel: Michael J. Boni and George W. Croner, Esquires, of KOHN, SWIFT
& GRAF, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

M. Duncan Grant and Joseph S. Naylor, Esquires, of PEPPER HAMILTON,
Wilmington, Delaware; Of Counsel: Laurence Z. Shiekman and Jacqueline V.
Guynn, Esquires, of PEPPER HAMILTON, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Attorneys
for Defendants.



STRINE, Vice Chancellor



      Stockholders of nominal defendant Salient 3 Communications, Inc.

("Salient 3") filed this action to challenge allegedly excessive compensation

packages awarded by Salient 3 to three members of its senior management

team. The plaintiffs contend that the compensation packages resulted from

breaches of fiduciary duty on the part of the directors of Salient 3.

      According to the complaint, Salient 3's performance under the

leadership of directors and officers Timothy S. Cobb, and Paul H. Snyder,

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Pamela S. Tikellis, Esquire, of CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS, Wilmington, Delaware; Of Counsel:
  • M. Duncan Grant and Joseph S. Naylor, Esquires, of PEPPER HAMILTON, Wilmington, Delaware; Of
  • Stockholders of nominal defendant Salient 3 Communications,
  • packages awarded by Salient 3 to three members of its senior management
  • The plaintiffs contend that the compensation packages resulted from
  • breaches of fiduciary duty on the part of the directors of Salient 3.
  • According to the complaint,
  • and officer Thomas F. Hafer was dismal.
  • fortunes, Cobb, Snyder, and Hafer were rewarded with compensation
  • been paid to Salient 3's stockholders in the liquidation.
  • excusal under Delaware Court of Chancery Rule 23.1.
  • of the Company's Class B voting stock.
  • power plants, through its engineering subsidiary Gilbert/Commonwealth,
  • This recitation of facts is drawn from the amended complaint, in keeping with the procedural
  • It bought XEL, a company that "designed and sold transmission products to
  • the access products market," in 1996.4 In 1997, it purchased SAFCO, which
  • plaintiffs contend that the SAFCO acquisition was of dubious wisdom.
  • Operating Subsidiaries separately,
  • Bonus Awards and Stay Bonus Awards.
  • their fiduciary duties by approving the various Employment Benefits
  • *' For the same reason, the amended complaint does not state particularized facts supporting

  • 2 . REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    DEFENDANTS
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    DELAWARE
    SUPPORT
    DEL
    SALIENT
    CONTROL
    FACTS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CHANCERY
    MOTION
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
    DELAWARE LAW
    CENCOM
    ARCH STREETS
    ALLEGATIONS
    PARTNERSHIP
    DIRECTORS
    PEPPER HAMILTON LLP
    PHILADELPHIA
    PLEADED FACTS
    ACCORDING
    CORPORATE CONTEXT
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    COMPENSATION PACKAGES
    PRINCIPLES
    SHIEKMAN JACQUELINE
    AUTHORITIES
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    MICHAEL J. AIUNS, et al.,                1
    
                             Plaintiffs,     i
    
           V.                                ;    Civil Action No. 18266-NC
    
    TIMOTHY S. COBB, et al.,                 i
    
                             Defendants.
    
    
                           REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS'
                        MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
    
                                                  M. Duncan Grant
                                                  Joseph S. Naylor
                                                  PEPPER HAMILTON  LLP
                                                  Suite 1600
                                                  1201 Market Street
                                                  P.O. Box 1709
                                                  Wilmington, DE 19899-1709
                                                  (302) 777-6500
    
                                                  Attorneys for Defendants
    Of Counsel:
    
    Laurence Z. Shiekman
    Jacqueline V. Guynn
    PEPPER HAMILTON  LLP
    3000 Two Logan Square
    18th and Arch Streets
    Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799
    (2 15) 98 l-4000
    
    Dated: July 30, 2001
    
    
    
                                                       TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
                                                                                                       
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS'
  • MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
  • Laurence Z. Shiekman Jacqueline V. Guynn
  • PEPPER HAMILTON LLP
  • 18th and Arch Streets Philadelphia,
  • Table of Authorities.
  • The Existence of a Control Group
  • Behrens v. Aerial Communications, Inc., Del.
  • In re Cencom Cable Income Partners L.P. Lit&.,
  • Seaford Funding Ltd. Partnership v.
  • -ll-The plaintiffs' Answering Brief does not adequately address the arguments in
  • have not presented any rationale for Salient 3 or Hafer to remain a defendant;
  • pleaded any facts that would rebut the presumptions of the business judgment rule.
  • reasons, upon which we elaborate below, the Amended Complaint should be dismissed.
  • has no basis in Delaware law.
  • for the proposition that "the reduction in value of the minority stockholders'
  • challenging executive compensation packages are derivative and not direct.

  • 3 . PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COBB
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    COURT
    DEL
    CONTROL GROUP
    MOTION
    SHAREHOLDERS
    SALE
    DISMISS
    SUPR
    STOCK
    SNYDER
    DELAWARE
    HAFER
    TRANSACTIONS
    OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES
    INCENTIVE PLAN
    STREET SUITE
    CONTROLLING
    DIRECTORS
    SALE BONUS
    EMPLOYEES
    TRI-STAR PICTURES
    COMPENSATION
    STOCKHOLDERS
    ALLEGATIONS
    OPPOSITION
    PHILADELPHIA
    
                 IN `THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                                          -    -    -
    
    MICHAEL J. AKINS, et al.,
    
                           Plaintiffs,
           V.
    
    TIMOTHY S. COBB, et al.,
    
                           Defendants.
                                          ---'
    
    
                       PLAINTIFFS'  BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
                        MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
    
    
                                                         Pamela S. Tikellis
                                                         CHIMICLES  & TIKELLIS LLP
                                                         One Rodney Square
                                                         P.O. Box 1035
                                                         Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                         (302) 656-2500
    
                                                         Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    Of Counsel:
    
    Michael J. Boni
    George W. Croner
    KOHN, SWIFT & GRAF, P.C.
    One South Bro'ad  Street
    Suite 2 100
    Philadelphia, PA 19 107
    (215) 2381700
    
    
    
    Dated: June 29,200l
    
    
    
                                                                                        TABLE OF
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN `THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
  • MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
  • Michael J. Boni George W. Croner KOHN, SWIFT & GRAF, P.C. One South Bro'ad Street Suite 2 100
  • Cobb, Snyder and Hafer Are Rewarded
  • STANDARD FOR A MOTION UNDER RULE 12.
  • DEMONSTRATING TH;E EXISTENCE OF A CONTROL GROUP
  • Del.
  • Supr., 262 A.2d 246.

  • 4 . OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    DEL
    SUPPORT
    DISMISS
    CHANCERY
    FACTS
    SALIENT
    SHAREHOLDERS
    MOTION
    HAFER
    DIRECTORS
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    DELAWARE
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CHANCERY RULE
    COMPENSATION PACKAGES
    LITIGATION
    ALLEGATIONS
    PEPPER HAMILTON LLP
    ARCH STREETS
    PLAINTIFFS FAIL
    REASONABLY INFER
    OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES
    REQUISITE CARE
    PHILADELPHIA
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    MICHAEL J. AKINS, et al.,                >
    
                             Plaintiffs,     i>
           V.                                      Civil Action No. 18266-NC
                                             i
    TIMOTHY S. COBB,  et al.,                >1
                             Defendants.     1
    
    
                      OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS'
                      MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
    
                                                   M. Duncan Grant
                                                   Joseph S . Naylor
                                                   PEPPER HAMILTON LLP
                                                   Suite 1600
                                                   1201 Market Street
                                                   P.O. Box 1709
                                                   Wilmington, DE 19899-1709
                                                   (302) 777-6500
    
                                                   Attorneys for Defendants
    Of Counsel:
    
    Laurence Z. Shiekman
    Jacqueline V. Guynn
    PEPPER HAMILTON  LLP
    3000 Two Logan Square
    18th and Arch Streets
    Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799
    (215) 981-4000
    
    Dated: May  4,200l
    
    
    
                                                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    
    TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .
    
    NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS'
  • MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
  • PEPPER HAMILTON LLP
  • 18th and Arch Streets Philadelphia,
  • STATEMENT OF FACTS.
  • Plaintiffs' Claim Is Derivative And Not Direct
  • Alleged In Their Amended Complaint, That Count Does Not State a Claim
  • The Director Defendants Breached Their Fiduciary Duty By
  • Approving The Compensation Packages.
  • Arnold v. Society for Savings Bancorp, Inc., Del.

  • 5 . AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    CLASS ACTION
    COMMON STOCK
    COBB
    COMMUNICATIONS
    SHARES
    SALE
    SALIENT
    SHAREHOLDERS
    MICHAEL
    SNYDER
    HAFER
    COUNSEL
    SUBSIDIARIES
    ACTION COMPLAINT
    ROBERT
    OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES
    SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
    DIRECTORS
    EMPLOYEES
    MANAGEMENT
    ATTORNEYS
    ENGINEERING
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    TRANSACTIONS
    BONUS AWARDS
    AMENDED CLASS
    BONI GEORGE
    PHILADELPHIA
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ____________-_-_--_-------~-------------------------------------------- X
    MICHAEL J. AKINS, EARL L. BLANKENBILLER,                                     :
    JODIE L. CALDWELL, JAMES A.C. CRAMP,                                         :
    MICHAEL R. DELALLO, GEORGE T. DEMOSS,                                        :
    JAYS. WHITE, PETER HAMILTON,
    LAWRENCE E. HARVEY, RAYMOND T. KASE,                                         ;    C.A. No. 18266-NC
    CONRAD KEICH, CHARLES R. KERTELL, DANIEL :
    A. PALAFERRO, LYNN N. RUBOW, DAVID B.                                        :
    STAUFFER, and JOSEPH M. TAKATS, on behalf                                    :
    of themselves and all others similarly situated,                             :
                                                                                                     
                                                    Plaintiffs,                                       -
                                                                                                      -
                                                                                                     
                       V.                                                                             .
                                                                                                      ,
    
    TIMOTHY S. COBB, ROBERT LABLANC, DENNIS F.:                                                        
    STRIGL, DONALD JOHN W. BOYER, DENNIS F.                                      :
    FOSTER, THOMAS F. HAFER, DONALD E. LYONS, :                                                       
    PAUL H. SNYDER, DONALD K. WILSON, MAURICE :                                                       
                                                                                                       
    D. JAMES, JAMIE. P. MCCONATY, FREDERIC T.                                    :
    MYERS, TIMOTHY J. O'KEEFE, and SALIENT 3                                     :
    COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
    
                                                    Defendants. :
    ____________________--~.-----------------------------------------------    X
    
                                               NOTICE OF AMENDMENT
    
    TO:                M. Duncan Grant, Esquire
                       Pepper Hamilton LLP
                       1201 Market Street, Suite 1600
                       P.O. Box 1709
                       Wilmington, DE 19899
    
                       PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT pursuant Court of Chancery Rule 15(a),
    
    plaintiffs served and filed the Amended Class Action Complaint in the form attached
    
    hereto as Exhibit A. Pursuant to Chancery Court Rule  15(aa), the Amended Class
    
    Action Complaint, in form, supercedes the pleading which it amends in its entirety,
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • plaintiffs served and filed the Amended Class Action Complaint in the form attached
  • hereto as Exhibit A. Pursuant to Chancery Court Rule 15, the Amended Class
  • Action Complaint, in form, supercedes the pleading which it amends in its entirety,
  • Robert J. Kriner, Jr.
  • Attorneys for Plaintiffs
  • KOHN, SWIFT & GRAF, P.C. Michael J. Boni George W. Croner One South Broad St. Suite 2100
  • MICHAEL J. AKINS, EARL BLANKENBILLER, JODIE CALDWELL:
  • DONALD E. LYONS, PAUL H. SNYDER, DONALD K. WILSON,: AND SALIENT 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
  • Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, submit this Complaint against defendants named
  • Plaintiffs, who are fomler employees of defendant Salient 3 Communications,
  • Inc. or its predecessor and who are present shareholders of the Company's Class A
  • common stock, bring this Complaint to challenge the excessive compensation
  • shareholders, defendants Timothy S. Cobb, Paul H. Snyder and Thomas F. Hafer.
  • 2000 there were over 5650,726 shares of Class A and 488,222 shares of Class B
  • Defendant Timothy S. Cobb is Chairman of the Board,
  • Snyder has been Senior Vice President
  • Defendant Thomas F. Hafer is a Senior Vice President,
  • Counsel and Secretary of the Company.
  • Hafer served as President of Green Hills Management
  • stock at all times relevant to the Transactions complained of herein.
  • "Individual Defendants") owed fiduciary duties, either as directors or as part of the
  • carried out through its engineering firm of Gilbert/Commonwealth,
  • Company's three primary subsidiaries:
  • The final divestiture of Salients nontelecommunications assets came in 1998 with the sale of
  • Philadelphia International Airport and taken to the office in a stretch limousine.
  • Company's Operating Subsidiaries, dissolving the corporation, and distributing the
  • Bonus Awards and Stay Bonus Awards.

  • 6 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COBB
    SHAREHOLDERS
    SNYDER
    HAFER
    PLAINTIFFS
    SALIENT
    EMPLOYEES
    CONTROL
    STOCK
    COMMUNICATIONS
    SHARES
    ACT
    SALE
    COMMON STOCK
    OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES
    COMPLAINT
    MANAGEMENT
    COMPENSATION PACKAGES
    PRESIDENT
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    ATTORNEYS
    CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDERS
    DEFENDANT TIMOTHY
    EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    DIRECTORS
    BONUS AWARDS
    EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
    TRANSACTIONS
    OPERATING REVENUE
    
                                                                                                       
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                                                                                                       
         1---"---------------_________I__________-----------------------         _-------    X
         MICHAEL J. AKINS, EARL L. BLANKENBILLER,                                            :
         JODIE L. CALDWELL, JAMES A.C. CRAMP,                                                :
         MICHAEL R. DELALLO, GEORGE T. DEMOSS,                                               :
         JAY S. WHITE, PETER HAMILTON,
         LAWRENCE E. HARVEY, RAYMOND T. KASE,                                                !
         CONRAD KEICH, CHARLES R. KERTELL, DANIEL :
         A. PALAFERRO, LYNN N. RUBOW, DAVID B.                                               :
         STAUFFER, and JOSEPH M. TAKATS, on behalf                                           :
         of themselves and all others similarly situated,                                    :
    
                                                         Plaintiffs,
         V.                                                                                          
         TIMOTHY S. COBB, ROBERT LABLANC, DENNIS F.;                                                  !
                                                                                                      i
         STRIGL, DONALD JOHN W. BOYER, DENNIS F.                                             :        <
         FOSTER, THOMAS F. HAFER, DONALD E. LYONS, :                                                   
         PAUL H. SNYDER, DONALD K. WILSON, MAURICE :                                                  .
         D. JAMES, JAMIE  P. MCCONATY, FREDERIC T.                                           :         
         MYERS, TIMOTHY J. O'KEEFE, and SALIENT 3                                            :       
                                                                                                      c
         COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
    
                                                         Defendants.                         i
         ________________------------------------------------------------------- X
    -
                                            CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                                 /
    
                  Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, submit this Complaint against defendants
    
         named herein. The allegations made in this Complaint are based both on
    
         plaintiffs' personal knowledge and on information and belief.                           
    
         information and belief are based in part on the investigation made by and through
    
         their attorneys.
    
    
    
                           SUMMARY OF THE COMPLAINT
    
          Plaintiffs, who are former employees of defendant Salient 3
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, submit this Complaint against defendants
  • who are former employees of defendant Salient 3
  • Communications, Inc. or its predecessor and who are present
  • shareholders of the Company, bring this Complaint to challenge the excessive
  • These compensation packages are an invalid and egregious
  • Takats at all relevant times hereto have been holders of Salient 3
  • approximately 42,000 shares of Class A common stock.
  • Defendant Timothy S. Cobb is Chairman of the Board,
  • Executive Officer, President and a Director of Salient.
  • Defendant Paul H. Snyder is Senior Vice President,
  • Defendant Thomas F. Hafer is a Senior Vice President,
  • Management Company, a division of Salient.
  • Defendant Timothy J. O'Keefe is Chief Financial Officer and Vice
  • O'Keefe (the "Control Group") together own over 51% of the outstanding shares
  • shares enabled them to dictate the outcome of the votes on these Transactions,
  • they are controlling shareholders of the Company who owe the duties of good
  • the "Individual Defendants") owed fiduciary duties, either as directors or as part
  • act in furtherance of the best interests of Salient and its shareholders,
  • authority as directors, officers and controlling shareholders of Salient, were able
  • telecommunications assets came in 1998 with the sale of Resource Consultants
  • Company's operating revenue for 17 out of the 20 years in the period between
  • of the Operating Subsidiaries.
  • Stay Bonus Awards.
  • and Hafer arranged for their employment agreements to become effective
  •    |