 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS JUDGEMENT DAVID DEFENDANTS COUNTERCLAIMS COURT STOCK MOTION ADMI ANDERSON YOUNG DEFENDANTS SHARES DELAWARE MACINTYRE BUTLER OPENING BACKGROUND FACTS SET ASIDE ORDERS COMMON STOCK RICHARD ANDERSON STRIKING PLAINTIFFS ELLERS LLP BROAD STREET ILLEGAL ISSUANCE PERELMUTTER BRANZBURG DIRECTORS CERTIFICATE SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS AMENDMENT |
ORIGINAL
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
ASTHMA DISEASE MANAGEMENT INC., >
RICHARD ANDERSON, A. J. HENLEY,
PAUL A. DANDRIDGE, JAMES O'CONNOR ;
and RAYMOND H. MILELY, III,
;
Plaintiffs, 1 Civil Action No. 18267-NC
VS.
GEORGE H. YOUNG, RICHARD A. MANINI,
JOHN C. DAVID, LOIS M. BUTLER, JANE B.
MACINTYRE and LEWIS L. PERELMUTTER
Defendants.
OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO
SET ASIDE ORDERS OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND ORDERS
STRIKING PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS
IUEHR, HARRISON, HARVEY,
BRANZBURG & ELLERS LLP
David S. Eagle
Denise Seastone Kraft
919 Market Street, Suite 1000
Wilmington, DE 19801
(302) 426-1189
Of Counsel: Attorneys for Plaintiffs
KLEHR, HARRISON, HARVEY,
BRANZBURG & ELLERS LLP
Frank M. Correll, Jr.
Mary B. Halfpenny
260 S. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102
(215) 568-6060
Dated: September 21,200l
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
ANSWER OF DAVID TO CROSS-CLAIMS OF YOUNG AND MANINI
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ANSWERING DEFENDANT MANINI LACKS SUFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE ANSWERING DEFENDANT LACKS DEFENDANT LACKS SUFFICIENT ADMIT DENY CROSS-CLAIMS DEFENDANT DAVID ANSWERING DEFENDANT REASSERTS RESPONSES PARAGRAPHS RICHARD PLAINTIFFS WRONGFUL PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL VII VIII RICHARD ANDERSON JAMES CL0 CORPORATION SERVICE ADMI COURT CHANCERY DELAWARE ISSUANCE EMPLOYMENT GEORGE ENRICHMENT |
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
NEW CASTLE COUNTY
ASTHMA DISEASE MGMT., INC., et al., ))
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants )
V. ; CA. No. 18267
GEORGE H. YOUNG, et al., ;1
Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs. )
ANSWER OF DEFENDANT DAVID
TO CROSS-CLAIMS OF
DEFENDANTS YOUNG AND MANINI
A. Counterclaimants and their service to Am
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Answering defendant lacks sufficient knowledge and information to admit or deny the
matters asserted.
5. Answering defendant lacks sufficient knowledge and information to admit or deny the
matters asserted.
6. Answering defendant lacks sufficient knowledge and information to admit or deny the
matters asserted.
7. Answering defendant lacks sufficient knowledge and information to admit or deny the
matters asserted.
I
8. Answering defendant lacks sufficient knowledge and information to admit or deny the
matters asserted.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
ANSWER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS DAVID BUTLER CROSS-CLAIMS ESQUIRE LLP PLAINTIFWANSWERS CROSS CLAIM MACINTYRE WILLIAM TAYLOR WILMINGTON CERTIFY COMPLAINT COUNTERCIAIMS OFDEFENDANTS DAVID JOHN PASCHETTO COUAWAY STARGATT FLOOR ALBERT DANDRIDGE ESQUIRE SCHNADER HARRISON LEWIS SUITE PHILADELPHIA MORRIS JAMES HITCHENS |
COURT OF CEfANCERY OF THE STATE OF D~LAWARlf ' : " `? '
NEW CASTLE COUNTY
8. i-8.
ASTHMA DISEASE MANAGEMENT, MC., et al,
PlaintifWAnswers to Cross Claim and Counter Claims
V.
Civil Action No. lW@$C c3
GEORGE H. YOUNG, RICHARD MANIM s:;., --
z-. c-..
LOIS BUTLER JANE MacINTYRE, :; ,- :i.z
.L
JOHN DAVID et al., i-1 ; :
2- r-0
w
z-:
Defendants I ./_' 2
--I --
-:.. ~:
-2; _
ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS DAVID, BUTLER and MaclNTYRE CROSS-W ii-12
AND COUNTER CLAIMS <
1. As to all counter claims filed by defendants David, Butler, and MacIntyre,
against the plaintiffs, they are denied.
2. Counts #l through #13. Denied, as to all claims.
ANSWERS TO DEFENDANTS YOUNG and MANINI CROSS-CLAIMS AND
COUNTER CLAIMS
1. As to all Additional Defenses they are denied.
2. COUNTER CLAIM and CROSS CLAIM AGAINST PLAlNTIFFSA, B, C, #l
through #16 are denied.
3. Count #l through # 9 are all denied.
ASTHMA DIS SE MANAGEMENT, INC.
272 South White Horse Pike
Berlin, NJ 08009
856-753-9595
In FRO SE ( attorney's for plaintiffs have with drawn).
For Plainti&, Asthma Disease Management, Inc., Richard
Anderson, A. J. Henley, Randal Miley, James O'Connor,
SNIPPETS:
|
|
4
.
ANSWER RESPONSE TO CROSSCLAIMS ...
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COUNTERCLAIMANT ALLEGATIONS PARAGRAPH COMPLAINT PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING DEFENDANTS DENY MANINI ADMIT RESPONSE CROSSCLAIM PERELMUTTER DAVID ADMI COMMON STOCK COURT INCORPORATE PLAINTIFF ANDERSON ANSWERING DEFENDANTS REPEAT COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE ADML ANSWERING DEFENDANTS LACK REPRESENTING TIME PERIOD OUTSTANDING CANCELLATION PREFATORY CHARACTERIZATIONS GEORGE I-1 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS |
IN THE? COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
1A' AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
I kiii;j . .
ASTHMA DISEASE MANAGEMENT INC., Q` a,
RICHARD ANDERSON, A.J. HENLEY, i
PAUL A DANDRIDGE, JAMES O'CONNOR, )
/'
and RAYMOND H MILELY, III, ,.."
i
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
Defendants, :>
\' Civil ,4ction No. 18267-NC
i
GEORGE 1-I. YOLJ?JG, RICHARD `4. MANINI, )
JOl-Ih C. DAVID, LOIS M. BUTLER,
JANE 13. MACINTYRE and LEWIS L. 1
PERELMUTTER, >
Defendants, Crossclaimants, 1
Counterclaimants and Crossclaim i
Defendants. >
ANSWER, RESPONSE TO CROSSCLAIMS, COUNTERCLAIMS
AND CROSSCLAIM OF DEF`EIVDANTS GEORGE H. YOUNG,
RICHARD A. MANINI Al$L)EWIS L. PBELMUTTER
1. & SWER TO THE COMPLAINT
Defendants George H. Young, Richard A. Manini and Lewis L. Perelmutter (the
"Answering Defendants"), by and through their Iundersigned attorneys, hereby answer and
respond to the allegations of the Complaint filed in this matter on August 29, 2000
I. Answering Defendants state that the allegations in paragraph 1 of the
(Complaint are prefatory characterizations of the claims made by plaintiffs to which no response is
legally required. To the extent a response is required, Answering Defendants deny the allegations
of paragraph 1 of the Complaint
2. Answering Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 2 of the
Complaint, except admit that George I-1. Young is the former Chairman and Chief Executive
SNIPPETS:
|
|
5
.
CORRECTED AMENDED ANSWER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ANSWERING DEFENDANTS BUTLER PLAINTIFFS ADMI COMMON STOCK ALLEGATIONS MACINTYRE WRONGFUL MANINI MACLNTYRE SHARES DENY LACK SUFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE ADMIT CERTIFICATES DIRECTORS JOINT TENANCY IRT DEFENDANTS JOHN WIFE ALICE CERTIFICATES REPRESENTING PARAGRAPHS STOCKHOLDERS DISCHARGE UNLAWFULLY RETAINED PROPERTY JERSEY CONSCIENTIOUS EMPLOYEES TIMES RELEVANT INTENTIONALLY MAKING FALSE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES CROSS-CLAIMS |
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
NEW CASTLE COUNTY
ASTHMA DISEASE MGMT., INC., et al., )
)
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants )
V. ; CA. No. 18267
>
GEORGE H. YOUNG, et al., >
Defendants, and
JOHN C. DAVID, LOIS M. BUTLER, and )
JANE B MACINTYRE,
;
Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs, )
C O R R E C T E D
AMElNDED ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS DAVID, BUTLER, AND MACINTYRE
WITH CROSS-CLAIMS .AGAINST DEFENDANTS YOUNG AND MANINI
AND C0UNTERCLAIM.S AGAINST PLAINTIFFS
A. Nature of the Case
1. No answer required
2. Denied as to all allegations of wrongful conduct on the part of defendants John C.
David, Lois M. Butler, and Jane B. MacIntyre.
3. Denied as to all allegations of wrongibl conduct on the part of defendants John `C.
David, Lois M. Butler, and Jane B. MacIntyre
4. Denied as to all alle:gations of wrongful conduct on the part of defendants John C.
David, Lois M. Butler, and Jane B. Maclntyre.
B. The Part&
(1) The Plaintiffs
5. Admitted.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
6
.
AMENDED ANSWER OF DAVID BUTLER AND MACINTYRE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DAVID COMMON STOCK SHARES BUTLER DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFFS MACINTYRE ALLEGATIONS WIFE ALICE MACLNTYRE JERSEY CERTIFICATES DIRECTORS EMPLOYEES WRONGFUL TIMES RELEVANT JOINT TENANCY COUNTERCLAIMS IRT ANSWERING DEFENDANTS CERTIFICATES REPRESENTING PARAGRAPHS DISCHARGE STOCKHOLDERS UNLAWFULLY RETAINED PROPERTY STOCK DIVIDEND ADM DEFENDANT DAVID RESIDES PENNSYLVANIA |
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
NEW CASTLE COUNTY
ASTHMA DISEASE MGMT., INC., et al.. )
>
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants )
V. ; CA. No. 18267
GE.ORGE J-I. YOUNG, et al.,
Defendants. and
JOHN (1. DAVID, LOIS M. 13'UTLER, and )
J 4NE R. MACINTYRE, 11
Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs,)
AMENDED ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS DAVID, BUTLER, AND MACINTYRE
WITH CROSS-CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS YOlJbJG AND MANKNI
AND COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS
-d.-- __-
A. Nature of the Case
1. No answer required.
2. Denied as to all allegations of wrongful conduct on the part of defendants John c'.
David, Lois M. Butler, and Jane B. MacIntyre.
3. Denied as *.o all allegations of wrongful conduct on the part of defendants John
David. Lois M. Butler, and Jane B. MacIntyre.
4. Denied as to a11 allegations of wrongful conduct on the part of defendants John C.
David, Lmis M. Butler, and Jane B. Maclntyre.
B. The Parties
(1) :~he'Iaintiffs
5. Admitted.
6. Admitted upon information and belief.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
7
.
ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS BUTLER PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING DEFENDANTS ADMI MACINTYRE ALLEGATIONS MANINI COMMON STOCK WRONGFUL DENY SHARES ANSWERING DEFENDANTS LACK LACK SUFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE ADMIT CERTIFICATES IRT JOINT TENANCY DEFENDANTS JOHN WIFE ALICE PARAGRAPHS STOCKHOLDERS CERTIFICATES REPRESENTING UNLAWFULLY RETAINED PROPERTY INTENTIONALLY MAKING FALSE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS CROSS-CLAIMS CANCELLATION |
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
NEW CASTLE COUNTY
ASTHMA DISEASE MGMT., INC., et al., )
>
Plaintiffs/Counter&im Defendants )
V. ; CA. No. 18267
GEORGE H. YOUNG, et al., ;
Defendants, and ;
JOHN C. DAVID, LOIS M. BUTLER, and ;
JANE B. MACINTYRE,
;
Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs, )
ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS DAVID, BUTLER, AND MACINTYRE
WITH CROSS-CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS YOUNG AND MANINI
&Q$ZOUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS
A. Nature of the Case
1. No answer required.
2. Denied as to all allegations of wrongtld conduct on the part of defendants John C.
David, Lois M. Butler, and Jane B. MacIntyre.
3. Denied as to a.ll allegations of wro:ngfld conduct on ti-re part of defendants
David, Lois M. Butler, and Jane B. MacIntyre.
4. Denied as to all allegations of wrongful conduct on the part of defendants John C.
David, Lois M. Butler, and Jane B. MacIntyre.
1
B. Tmrties
SNIPPETS:
|
|
8
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ADMI MANINI DEFENDANTS BUTLER DIRECTORS DAVID DUTY SHARES RICHARD ANDERSON PERELMUTTER LOYALTY STOCK MACINTYRE RELIEF DANDRIDGE LAW CERTIFICATE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION ASTHMA DISEASE MANAGEMENT TREATMENT REGIMENS AMENDMENT INCORPORATION CAUSED ADMI COMMON STOCK INJUNCTIVE RELIEF CONNECTION ASTHMATICS VIOLATION OUTSTANDING SHARES |
,.,., " . r ,,-.\ 3 r* -!
\,
`i iv*. `i.,, ,c J d B -
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
ASTHMA DISEASE MANAGEMENT INC.,
RICHARD ANDERSON, A.J. HENLEY,
PAUL A. DANDRIDGE, JAMES O'CONNOR
and RAYMOND H. MILELY, III,
Plaintiffs,
`&q&T
V. CA. No.
GEORGE H. YOUNG, RICHARD A.
MANINI, JOHN C. DAVID, LOIS M.
BUTLER JANE B. MACINTYRE
and LEWIS L. PERELMUTTER
Defendants.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs, Asthma Disease Management, Inc., Richard Anderson, A.J. Henley, Paul
A. Dandridge, James O'Connor and Raymond H. Milely allege and state as follows:
A. Nature of the Case
1. This case is a summary proceeding brought pursuant to Section 225 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law, and seeks declaratory relief, injunctive relief and damages in
connection with breaches of the duty of loyalty by certain former directors and officers of
Asthma Disease Management, Inc. ("ADMI"), a publicly-held healthcare company specializing in
the management of treatment regimens for asthmatics, as well as the aiding and abetting of those
violations by an employee of ADMI.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
