LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BOIMAL v AXA FINANCIAL Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,299, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: BOIMAL, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018299, Axa, Axa Group, Executive Vice President, Shareholders, John, Common Stock, Public Shareholders, Damages, Relief, Adequate, Directors, Acting, Miller, Michael Hegarty, William Edwin Jarmain, Senior Executive Vice, David, Donald, Greene, Haskell, Plaintif-fi Alleges, Laws, York, Chief, Chairman, Executive Board , ContentID: 120240162

Case Documents
1 2000-09 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100899
7 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 7 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AXA GROUP
DEFENDANT
PLAINTIFF
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
SHAREHOLDERS
JOHN
COMMON STOCK
MEMBERS
PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
DAMAGES
RELIEF
ADEQUATE
DIRECTORS
ACTING
COURT
MILLER
MICHAEL HEGARTY
WILLIAM EDWIN JARMAIN
SENIOR EXECUTIVE VICE
DAVID
DONALD
GREENE
HASKELL
PLAINTIF-FI ALLEGES
LAWS
YORK
CHIEF
CHAIRMAN
EXECUTIVE BOARD
                                                                        ",

          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                        :IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                                            -  - X

MAX BOIMAL,                                           C.A. No.    ] %a~ Kc
                   Plaintiff,

     -against-
                                                      CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
AXA FINANCIAL, INC,  EDWARD D.
MILLER, CLAUDE  BEBEAR,
FRANCOISE COLLOC'H, HENRI DE
CASTRIES, JEAN STEELE: CHALSTY,
JEAN-RENE FOURTOU, DIDIER
PINEAU-VALENCIENNE, ANTHONY J.
HAMILTON, MICHAEL HEGARTY,
CLAUS-MICHAEL DILL,  JOSEPH L.
DIONNE, JOHN T. HARTLEY, GEORGE
J. SELLA, JR.,  PETER J.  TOBIN,
DAVID H. WILLIAMS, DONALD J.
GREENE, WILLIAM EDWIN  JARMAIN,
JOHN H.F. HASKELL, JR. and  AXA
GROUP,

                   DefIendants.
            _  -  - _  __  _-  -  -  -  -  -  - -x

            Plaintif-fi alleges upon information and belief, except as

to paragraph 1 which plaintiff alleges upon knowledge, as follows:

            1. Plaintiff is a shareholder of  AXA Financial, Inc.

("AXA Financial" or the "Company").

            2.     AXA Financial is a corporation duly organized and

existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its

principal offices located at 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York,
New York 10104.          AXA Financial is a provider of diversified

financial services, including insurance and annuity products,

investment banking and assets management services.


SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • JOHN H.F. HASKELL, JR.
  • Plaintif-fi alleges upon information and belief,
  • to paragraph 1 which plaintiff alleges upon knowledge,
  • Plaintiff is a shareholder of AXA Financial,
  • existing under the laws of the State of Delaware,
  • principal offices located at 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York,
  • 60.0% o.E the outstanding shares of common stock of AXA Financial.
  • Defendant Edward D. Miller is a Director of AXA
  • Financial and its President and Chief Executive Officer.
  • Miller is also a Senj.or Executive Vice President of AXA Group.
  • Financial and the Chairman of the Executive Board of AXA Group.
  • Financial and a Senior Executive Vice President for Human Resources
  • Defendant Michael Hegarty is a Director of AXA
  • Defendant David H. Wil liams is a Director of AXA
  • Defendant Donald J. Greene is a Director of AXA
  • Def-endant William Edwin Jarmain is a Director of AXA
  • Deffendant John H.F. Haskell,
  • Chancery, on behalf of all common shareholders of AXA Financial, or
  • of the other members of the Class and plaintiff has the same
  • directors who are beholden to AXA Group for their offices and the
  • is engaging in self-dealing and not acting in good
  • Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
  • plaintiff prays for judgment and relief as
  • rescissory damages to the Class;
  •    |