LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

TURBERG v INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,322, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: TURBERG, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018322, Digex, Intermedia, Worldcorn, Shareholders, Executive Offices, Stock, Delaware, Complaint, Outstanding Shares, Controls, Directors, Public Shareholders, Merger, Common, Acting, Adequate, Representing, Relief, Adjudications, Diqex, Market Price, Contemplated Transaction, Reason, Breaching, Principal Executive Offices, Websites , ContentID: 120240146

Case Documents
1 2000-09 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100879
9 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 9 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INTERMEDIA
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFF
WORLDCORN
MEMBERS
SHAREHOLDERS
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
STOCK
DELAWARE
COMPLAINT
OUTSTANDING SHARES
CONTROLS
DIRECTORS
PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
MERGER
COMMON
ACTING
ADEQUATE
REPRESENTING
RELIEF
ADJUDICATIONS
DIQEX
MARKET PRICE
CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTION
REASON
BREACHING
COURT
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES
WEBSITES
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                         IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


THOMAS TURBERG,

                    Plaintiff,

     -against-                                : Civil Action No. /Ew-
INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS
INC., DAVID C.  RUBERG, PHILIP
A. CAMPBELL, JOHN C. BAKER,
GEORGE F. KNAPP, JACK E.
REICH, MARK K. SHULL, ROBERT
M. MANNING, RICHARD A.
JALKUT, DIGEX, INC. and
WORLDCOM, INC.

                    Defendants.
__-_-_-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -


                           CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                                                                      L.
              Plaintiff, by his attorneys, alleges upon information and

belief, except as to paragraph  1 which plaintiff alleges upon

knowledge, as follows:

              1.    Plaintiff      Thomas    Turberg    is a    shareholder of

defendant Digex, Inc. ("Digex")  .

              2.    Defendant Digex is a Delaware corporation with

principal executive offices located at One Digex Plaza, Beltsville,

Maryland       20705.     Digex provides  website hosting services to

business     and    organizations      implementing      complex,    interactive
websites and web-based applications.

             3.     Defendant        Intermedia         Communications      Inc.
("Intermedia" or the  "Companyll) is a Delaware corporation with
principal executive offices located at One  lntermedia Way, Tampa,



SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • __-_-_- - - - - - - - - -CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
  • Plaintiff, by his attorneys, alleges upon information and
  • defendant Digex, Inc..
  • interactive websites and web-based applications.
  • ("Intermedia" or the "Companyll)
  • is a Delaware corporation with principal executive offices located at One lntermedia Way,
  • Intermedia owns approximately 62.0% of Digex's outstanding shares
  • and controls approximately 94.2% of the voting interest in Digex.
  • Defendant WorldCorn,
  • Board of Directors.
  • The individual defendants, as officers and/or
  • plaintiff and the other public shareholders of Digex and owe to
  • Chancery, on behalf of all common shareholders of Digex, or their
  • members is impracticable.
  • inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual
  • Diqex announced that second quarter 2000 sales more
  • Intermedia's stock and the upswing in the market price of Digex
  • representing a significant premium for Digex stock,
  • had each approved a definitive merger agreement whereby WorldCorn
  • Intermedia, acting through and/or with the support of the individual defendants, has
  • The only reason for WorldCorn to
  • defendants have breached and are breaching their fiduciary duties
  • Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
  • plaintiff prays for judgment and relief as
  • In the event the contemplated transaction is
  •    |