LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ALLENTOFF v LEVEN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,333, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: ALLENTOFF, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018333, Usfs, Common, Stock, Shares, Geoga, Directors, Control, Transaction, Officer, Management Defendants, Agreement, Merger, Aronson, Power, Public Shareholders, Adequate, Proposed Transaction, Price, Damages, Michael, Steven Romaniello, Franchise, Suites, Chief, Total Voting Power , ContentID: 120240139

Case Documents
1 2000-09-20 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100872
6 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 6 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
USFS
PLAINTIFF
COMMON
STOCK
MEMBERS
SHARES
GEOGA
DIRECTORS
CONTROL
TRANSACTION
OFFICER
MANAGEMENT DEFENDANTS
AGREEMENT
MERGER
ARONSON
POWER
PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
COUNSEL
ADEQUATE
PROPOSED TRANSACTION
PRICE
DAMAGES
MICHAEL
STEVEN ROMANIELLO
FRANCHISE
LAW
SUITES
CHIEF
TOTAL VOTING POWER
               IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

-----------------------------------------------------~---------x
MICHAEL ALLENTOFF,

                  Plaintiff,

         V.                                                         C.A. No.               c
MICHAEL A. LEVEN; STEVEN ROMANIELLO;
NEAL K. ARONSON; DEAN S. ADLER, IRWIN
CHAFETZ; DOUGLAS G. GEOGA; RICHARD
D. GOLDSTEIN; DAVID T. HAMAMOTO;
JEFFREY A. SONNENFELD; BARRY S.
STERNLICHT; and U.S. FRANCHISE SYSTEMS,
INC.,

                  Defendants.



                                                  COMPLAINT

         Plaintiff alleges upon information and belief, except as to paragraph 1 which is alleged

personal knowledge, as follows:

                                                  THE PARTHa

         1.       Plaintiff is the owner of shares of the Class A common stock of U.S. Franchise

Systems, Inc.  ("USFS" or the "Company") and has been the owner of such shares continuously since

prior to the wrongs complained of herein.

         2.       USFS is a corporation duly existing and organized under the laws of the State of

Delaware. USFS acquires, markets, and services brands with potential for rapid unit growth

primarily through franchising. The Company's brands, which are in the lodging industry, include

Microtel Inn & Suites, Hawthorn Suites, and Best Inn & Suites.



       3.      Defendant Michael A. Leven ("Lever?) is and at all times relevant hereto has been

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of USFS. Leven and his nephew,

SNIPPETS:
  • MICHAEL ALLENTOFF,
  • Plaintiff alleges upon information and belief, except as to paragraph 1 which is alleged upon
  • Plaintiff is the owner of shares of the Class A common stock of U.S. Franchise
  • Inc. ("USFS" or the "Company") and has been the owner of such shares continuously since
  • Microtel Inn & Suites, Hawthorn Suites, and Best Inn & Suites.
  • Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of USFS.
  • defendant Neal K. Aronson, possess voting control over an aggregate of 1.65 million
  • Defendant Steven Romaniello is Chief Operating Officer and a
  • Defendants Leven, Romaniello, and Aronson will be collectively referred to herein
  • Defendant Douglas G. Geoga is a director of USFS.
  • which amounts to 4.8% of the total voting power of USFS.
  • The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.
  • counsel experienced in litigation of this nature.
  • plaintiff is an adequate representative of the Class and will fairly and adequately protect
  • to terminate the recapitalization agreement with the Pritzker Family and had, instead,
  • stock for $5.00 per share by means of a tender offer followed by a merger for untendered
  • Leven is able to dominate and control the other directors, all of whom were hand-picked by
  • dealings between Leven and the Pritzker Family on the one hand and the public shareholders on
  • and the Management Defendants to acquire 100% of USPS and dictate terms which are contrary to
  • future potential without paying an adequate or fair price to the Company's Class A
  • They are using such inside information to benefit themselves in the proposed transaction,
  • Plaintiff and the other members of the Class have no adequate remedy at law.
  • all damages caused to them and account for all profits and any special benefits obtained as a
  •    |