LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

KINSTON v HANNEMAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,369, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: KINSTON, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018369, Del Webb, Shareholders, Stock, Directors, Common Stock, Communities, Shea, Active Adult, Rights Plan, Public Shareholders, Proposing, Hanneman, Complaint, Entrench, Duties, Takeover, Relief, Developer, Market, Transaction, Arizona, Proper, Outstanding, Country Club Communities , ContentID: 120240112

Case Documents
1 2000-09-29 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100835
12 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 12 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFF
SHAREHOLDERS
MEMBERS
STOCK
DIRECTORS
COMMON STOCK
COMMUNITIES
SHEA
ACTIVE ADULT
RIGHTS PLAN
PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
MEETING
PROPOSING
COURT
HANNEMAN
COMPLAINT
ENTRENCH
DUTIES
TAKEOVER
RELIEF
DEVELOPER
MARKET
TRANSACTION
ARIZONA
PROPER
OUTSTANDING
COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITIES
LAW
        IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

----------------------------------------x
MICHELLE KINGSTON,

                       Plaintiff,

          - against  -                      : Civi.1 Action No. /J (g 4 ifJ(q /' j (1.

LE:ROY C. HANNEMAN, JR., GLENN W.
SCHAEFFER, C. ANTHONY WAINWRIGHT,
D. KENT ANDERSON, MICHAEL E.  ROSSI,        :
SAM YELLEN, PHILLIP J. DION, MICHAEL
0. MAFFIE, J. RUSSELL NELSON and
DEL WEBB CORPORATION,

                       Defendants.

----------------------------------------x

                          CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT


          Plaintiff, by her attorneys, Rosenthal, Monhait, Gross &

Goddess, P.A., for her complaint against defendants, alleges upon

information and belief, except for paragraph 2 hereof, which is

alleged upon knowledge as follows:

          1.    Plaintiff brings this  action  pursuant to Rule 23 of

t.he Rules of the Court of Chancery individually and as a class

action on behalf of all persons, other than defendants and those in

privity with them, who own the common stock of Del Webb Corporation

("Del Webb" or the "Company").

          2.    Plaintiff has been the owner of the common stock of

the Company since prior to the events complained of herein and

continuously  to date.

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Plaintiff, by her attorneys, Rosenthal, Monhait, Gross &
  • Goddess, P.A., for her complaint against defendants, alleges upon
  • who own the common stock of Del Webb Corporation
  • is a leading develop'er of active adult and lifestyle communities.
  • Company's Board of Directors.
  • Deferdant Leroy Hanneman, Jr., is and was at all
  • The class is so numerous that joinder of all members
  • outstanding, owned by shareholders located throughout the country.
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common
  • duties owed by them to plaintiff and the members of the class;
  • improperly seeking to entrench themselves in their own positions at
  • the expense of the public shareholders of Del Webb;
  • and whether the class is entitled to injunctive relief
  • family and country club communities located in Arizona, California,
  • to the overall market.
  • Pacific wrote a letter to defendant Hanneman requesting a meeting
  • acquiring control of the Company or proposing a business
  • California based developer of residential communities
  • pursuant to which Shea would purchase all of the
  • which would make an unsolicited takeover of the Company
  • Del Webb has a shareholder's rights plan (the
  • IDel Webb holdings either in a transaction with Shea or some other
  • just and proper in the premises.
  •    |