LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

TARAGIN v BOND Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,374, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: TARAGIN, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018374, Ibp, Transaction, Dlj, Shareholders, John, Stock, Price, Duties, Buyout Group, Management, Fiduciaries, Michael, Common, Public Stockholders, York, Adjudications, Rawhide, Donaldson, Lufkin, Alleges, Dakota, Premium, Consumer-ready, Owe, Proper, Protect , ContentID: 120240109

Case Documents
1 2000-09 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100830
7 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 7 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
IBP
PLAINTIFF
TRANSACTION
DLJ
MEMBERS
SHAREHOLDERS
JOHN
STOCK
PRICE
DUTIES
BUYOUT GROUP
MANAGEMENT
FIDUCIARIES
MICHAEL
COMMON
PUBLIC STOCKHOLDERS
YORK
COURT
ADJUDICATIONS
RAWHIDE
DONALDSON
LUFKIN
ALLEGES
DAKOTA
PREMIUM
CONSUMER-READY
OWE
PROPER
PROTECT
               ,\-!
          A$, \`. ,I," <;
       x;,;  ,F$  \  j
n `\ <`~'
`\,                             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                       IN  AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
               .                 __.             .             .         __ . . . . . .
                MICHAEL TARAGIN,

                                                         Plaintiff,

                                         -against-                                         C.A. No.

                     RICHARD L. BOND, JOHN S. CHALSTY,
                WENDY L. GRAMM, JOHN J. JACOBSON,
                     JR., ELiGENE D. LEMAN, DR. MARTIN A.
                MASSENGALE, ROBERT  I;. PETERSON,
                     MICHAEL L. SANEM, JOANN R. SMITH,
                     IBP, I N C .   A N D      DONALDSON, LUFKIN  &
                     JENRET'TE, INC.,

                                                         Defendants.


                                                          _CbASS ACTION COMPLAINT

                                         Plaintiff .alleges upon information and belief, except as

               to paragraph 1 which plaintiff alleges upon knowledge, as follows:

                                         1.    Plaintiff is a           stockholder of         

               Incorporated ("IBP" or the "Company") .

                                         2.    IBP is a corporation duly organized and existing

               under the laws of the state of Delaware,                                    with its

               executi.ve offices located at 800 Stevens Port Drive, Dakota Dunes,

               South Dakota 57049. IBP is the world's largest producer of high

               quality fresh beef and pork and is a leading supplier of premium,

               fully prepared meats and other consumer-ready foods.

                                         3.    Defendant Richard L. Bond is President and Chief

               Operating Officer of- IBP and a director.
SNIPPETS:
  • MICHAEL TARAGIN,
  • RICHARD L. BOND, JOHN S. CHALSTY,
  • to paragraph 1 which plaintiff alleges upon knowledge,
  • Incorporated ("IBP" or the "Company").
  • South Dakota 57049.
  • quality fresh beef and pork and is a leading supplier of premium,
  • fully prepared meats and other consumer-ready foods.
  • of the Board of Defendant Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc..
  • executive offices located at 211 Park Avenue New York,
  • the Chancery, on behalf of all common stockholders of IBP, or their
  • the Cl,ass are defendants herein and any person, firm, trust,
  • inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual
  • members of the Class which would establish incompatible standards
  • to protect their interests.
  • On October 2, 2000, the Company and DLJ jointly
  • The (agreement provides that Rawhide Acquisition
  • transaction and recommended that IBP shareholders approve the
  • The offer is timed to cap the price of IBP's stock.
  • sales process and, thus, have assumed enhanced duties to maximize
  • T-he Buyout Group, which includes management and IBP's
  • the detriment of IBP's public stockholders.
  • at the expense of IBP's public shareholders.
  • which fiduciaries owe to IBP's public shareholders.
  • Unless enjoined by this Court,
  • Court may seem just and proper.
  •    |