LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ZUCKER v TEXACO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,423, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: ZUCKER, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018423, Texaco, Shareholders, Merger, Protect, Chevron, Stock, Adjudications, Fiduciary Duties, York, Combined Company, Proper, Price, Common Stock, Shares, Wrongful, Act, Acting, Individual Members, Executive Offices, Oil, Damages, Prosecuting, Adequate, Relief, Reasons , ContentID: 120240075

Case Documents
1 2000-10-16 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100784
5 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
SHAREHOLDERS
DEFENDANTS
MEMBERS
MERGER
PROTECT
CHEVRON
STOCK
ADJUDICATIONS
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
YORK
COMBINED COMPANY
PROPER
PRICE
COMMON STOCK
SHARES
WRONGFUL
ACT
ACTING
INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
OIL
DAMAGES
PROSECUTING
COUNSEL
LITIGATION
ADEQUATE
RELIEF
REASONS
    i  ($3
J?Lii3
                        IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE CCUNTY

          1__1__1_________________________________-------~-------"---~~~--~----~     X
          MURRAY ZUCKER and TAUBA GOLDEIERG                                               :

                                                Plaintiff,

          V.

          TEXACO, INC., ALEXANDER  CHARl..E!S   BAILLIE,
          PETER I. BIJUR, MARY K. BUSH, ECJMIJND M.
          CARPENTER, MICHAEL C. HAWLEY, FRANKLYN
          G. JENIFER, SAMUEL A. NUNN, CHARLES H.
          PRICE, CHARLES R. SHOEMATE, ROBIN 8. SMITH
          WILLIAM C. STEERE, JR., and TH0MA.S  A.
          VANDERSLICE

                                                Defendants.
          __-_________1____1______________________----------~.~-------~-~--------    X

                                                              (XHlrlPLAINT

                             Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, allege upon information and belief,

          with respect to their ownership of  Texaco,   Inc. ("Texaco" or the "Company") common

          stock as follows:

                                                                 PARTIES

                             1.       Plaintiffs own shares of common stock of Texaco.

                             2.       Texaco is a Delaware corporation with executive offices at

          Westchester Ave., White Plains, NY. Texaco, among other things, explores for,

          produces, transports, refines and markets crude oil.

                             3.        Defendant Peter I. IBijur is Chief Executive Officer and

          the Board of Directors of Texaco.



                            (ii)     Whether the Director Defendants have wrongfully
SNIPPETS:
  • TEXACO, INC., ALEXANDER CHARl..E!S BAILLIE,
  • Plaintiffs own shares of common stock of Texaco.
  • Texaco is a Delaware corporation with executive offices at 2000
  • produces, transports, refines and markets crude oil.
  • Whether plaintiffs and the other members of the Class
  • will be irreparably damaged by the Merger complained of herein.
  • Plaintiffs are committed to prosecuting this action and has retained
  • competent counsel experienced in litigation of this nature.
  • Defendants are acting or refusing to act on grounds generally
  • The prosecution of separate action:5 by individual members of the
  • Class could create a risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to
  • For the reasons stated herein, a class action is superior to other
  • share of Texaco common stock would be exchanged for 0.77 shares of Chevron
  • 2000 trading price of Chevron.
  • Following the Merger, Chevron shareholders would
  • 15 board seat of the combined company and David O'Reilly, Chevron's current CEO,
  • protect the best interests of the Texaco public shareholders in the Merger.
  • Defendants are not acting in accordance with their .fiduciary duties to protect the
  • will continue to be, wrongful, unfair and harmful to Texaco's public shareholders.
  • Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law.
  • the Class for all losses and damages suffered and to be suffered
  • Granting such other and further relief as may be just and proper.
  • New York, New York 10176
  •    |