LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SCHNIPPER v MONTGOMERY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,426, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: SCHNIPPER, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018426, Convergent, Individual Defendants, Shares, Common Stock, Stockholders, Alleges, Internet, Outstanding, Fiduciary Duties, Execution, Management, Public Stockholders, Schlumberger, Transaction, Adequate, Adjudications, Acts, Relief, Suffer, Clients, Cinergy, Gas, Allegations, Affiliate, Proper , ContentID: 120240074

Case Documents
1 2000-10 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100783
9 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 9 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CONVERGENT
PLAINTIFF
MEMBERS
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
SHARES
COMMON STOCK
STOCKHOLDERS
ALLEGES
INTERNET
BUSINESS
OUTSTANDING
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
EXECUTION
MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC STOCKHOLDERS
SCHLUMBERGER
TRANSACTION
ADEQUATE
ADJUDICATIONS
ACTS
RELIEF
SUFFER
CLIENTS
CINERGY
COURT
GAS
ALLEGATIONS
AFFILIATE
PROPER
4'            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

      STEVE SCHNIPPER, on behalf of
      himself and all others similarly                    (
      situatled,

                                      Plaintiff,

                     -against--

      GLENN E. MONTGOMERY, JR., SCOTT M.                  /
      SCHLEY, ROBERT  SHARPE, JERRY
      MURDOCK, JOHN W. BLEND III, and
      CONVERGENT GROUP  COI~PC)RATION

                                      Defendants.
      . . . . . . . . .                                   i


                                       CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

                    Plaintiff, by his attorneys, alleges upon information and

      belief, except as to paragraph 1 which plaintiff alleges upon

      knowledge, as follows:

                    1.           Plaintiff is and has been at all relevant times a

      holder of           the      common    stock of    defendant    Convergent    Group

      Corporation ("Convergent" or the "Company").

                    2.      Convergent is a corporation duly organized and

      existing under the laws of the state of Delaware,                       with its

      principal executive offices located at 6399 S. Fiddler's Green

      Circle,. Suite 600, Englewood, Colorado 8011.1.                  Convergent is a

      provider of consulting, software engineering, systems integration

      and project management services that enable its utility and local

      government clients to implement Internet-based business solutions,

      also known as  eBusiness solutions. These solutions enable its
SNIPPETS:
  • except as to paragraph 1 which plaintiff alleges upon
  • Corporation ("Convergent" or the "Company").
  • and project management services that enable its utility and local
  • government clients to implement Internet-based business solutions,
  • approximately 43,417,119 shares of common stock.
  • more than 6% of the Company's common stock outstanding.
  • Defendants Scott M. Schley, Robert Sharpe, Jerry
  • responsibility to plaintiff and the other public stockholders of
  • network and Internet solutions industries.
  • Cinergy Corp. is incorporated in Delaware,
  • The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and PSI Energy,
  • Members of the Class are located throughout the United States.
  • piaintiff is an adequate representative of the Class and will
  • v,arying adjudications with respect to individual members of the
  • SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS
  • On October 16, 2000, Schlumberger and Convergent
  • jointly announced the execution of a definitive merger agreement
  • affiliate of Convergent's largest client Cinergy,
  • The 'Individual Defendants suffer from serious
  • tL-.e Company's public stockholders receive full and fair
  • The amount offered in the proposed transaction is grossly
  • By virtue of the acts and conduct alleged herein,
  • Unles,s enjoined by this Court, defendants will
  • breach their fiduciary duties owed to plaintiff and the other
  • plaintiff prays for judgment and relief as follows:
  • may deem just and proper.
  •    |