LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

MINASSIAN v MONTGOMERY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,427, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: MINASSIAN, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018427, Cgc, Management, Public Shareholders, Adequate, Common, Transaction, Directors, Breaching, Acting, Adjudications, Relief, Price, Proposed Buyout, Schley, Shares, Times Relevant Hereto, Relevant Hereto, Pursuant, Cgc Common Stock, Damages, Consummating, Allegations, Firm, Proper, Outstanding , ContentID: 120240073

Case Documents
1 2000-10 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100782
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CGC
MEMBERS
PLAINTIFF
MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
ADEQUATE
COMMON
TRANSACTION
LAW
DIRECTORS
BREACHING
ACTING
ADJUDICATIONS
RELIEF
PRICE
PROPOSED BUYOUT
SCHLEY
SHARES
TIMES RELEVANT HERETO
RELEVANT HERETO
PURSUANT
COURT
CGC COMMON STOCK
DAMAGES
CONSUMMATING
ALLEGATIONS
FIRM
PROPER
OUTSTANDING
      _(  /I;"                   11
     cl R/
P                  111           IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
              /
                                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

              -------.------------  --__ ------------~
              ARMEN MINASSIAN,
                                                                             Civil Action No
                                       Plaintiff,                                              

                          V .

              GLENN E. MONTGOMERY,, SCOTT M.                      :
              SCHLEY, ROBERT  SHARPE, JERRY
              MURDOCK, JOHN W. BLEND III, and :
              CONVERGENT GROUP CORPORATION, :

                                       Defendants.


                                                           COMPLAINT

                          Plaintiff,         by his attorneys, alleges upon information and

              belief, except as to paragraph 1 which is alleged upon personal

              knowledge, as follows:

                                                          THE PARTIES

                          1.           Plaintiff  Armen  Minassian("plaintiEf")  is the owner of

              common             stock of Convergent         Group        Corporation  ("CGC" or the

              "Company") and has been the owner of such shares continuously since

              prior to the wrongs complained of herein.

                          2.           Defendant      CGC is a         corporation duly existing and

              organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its

              principal executive offices located at 6399 S. Fiddler's Green

              Circle,.            Suite 600, Englewood, Colorado.               CGC is a provider of

              consulting, software engineering, systems integration and project

SNIPPETS:
  • SCHLEY, ROBERT SHARPE, JERRY
  • "Company") and has been the owner of such shares continuously since
  • management services that enable its utility and local government
  • the Board of Directors of CGC.
  • relevant hereto has been Executive Vice President,
  • Defendants Robert Sharpe,
  • III are and at a:Ll times relevant hereto have been directors
  • with plaintiff and the other public stockholders of CGC,
  • loyalty and full, candid and adequate disclosure.
  • GaASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
  • The C:lass is so numerous that joinder of all members
  • million shares of CGC common stock outstanding.
  • defendants have breached their fiduciary and other common law
  • or adjudications wLth respect to individual members of the Class
  • subsidiary of Schlumberger Limited pursuant to which the
  • firm's largest client, will retain equity in the firm, holding the
  • CGC's public shareholders in order to capture for SLB and CGC's
  • fair price to the Company's public shareholders.
  • clear and material conflicts of interest and is acting to better
  • Defendants have breached and are breaching their
  • maximize shareholder value in a change of control transaction.
  • Unless the proposed Buyout is enjoined by the Court,
  • plaFntiff prays for judgment and relief as follows:
  • consummating or closing the proposed transaction;
  • rescinding it and setting it aside or awarding rescissory damages
  • deem ju.st and proper.
  •    |