LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

HIRT v U.S. TIMBERLANDS SERVICES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,478, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN AND FOR IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWA, Plaintiff: HIRT, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018478, Timberlands, Partnership, Unitholders, General Partner, Public Unitholders, Duties, Adequate, Relief, Buy-out, Transaction, Adjudications, Regard, Limited Partnership, Reasons, Unfair, Damages, Enjoining, York, Hornig, Wyman, Complaint, Controls, Outstanding, Fiduciary Obligations, Injury , ContentID: 120240033

Case Documents
1 2000-11 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100738
5 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 5 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFF
MEMBERS
TIMBERLANDS
PARTNERSHIP
UNITHOLDERS
GENERAL PARTNER
PUBLIC UNITHOLDERS
DUTIES
ADEQUATE
RELIEF
BUY-OUT
TRANSACTION
ADJUDICATIONS
REGARD
COURT
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
REASONS
UNFAIR
DAMAGES
ENJOINING
YORK
HORNIG
WYMAN
COMPLAINT
CONTROLS
OUTSTANDING
FIDUCIARY OBLIGATIONS
INJURY
LAW
       IN AND FOR IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWA
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY



HAROLD HIRT,

                             Plaintiff,

         -against-


U.S. TIMBERLANDS SERVICES COMPANY,                                 :
L.L.C., JOHN M. RUDEY, A.UBREY L. COLE,                            :
GEORGE R. HORNIG, WILLIAM A. WYMAN, :
ALAN B. ABRAMSON, ROBERT F. WRIGHT                                 :
and U.S. TIMBERLANDS C'OMPANY, L.P.,                               :

                                       Defendants.
"_"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""    x


         Plaintiff, fo,r his complaint against defendants, alleges upon personal knowledge as to

himself, and upon information and belief as to all other allegations herein, as follows:

                                                    THE PARTIES

          1.       Plaintiff owns limited partnership units of U.S. Timberlands Company, L.P., a

Delaware limited partnership ("Timberlands" or the "Partnership":i.

         2.        Timberlands is engaged primarily in the business of growing trees and the sale of

logs and standing timber.

          3.       Defendant U.S. Timberlands Services Company, L.L.C. ("Timberlands LLC") is

a Delaware limited liability company and the general partner of the Partnership.



          4.    John M. Rudey is the Chairman, Chief Executive Oifficer, President and a Director

of the general partner and beneficially owns or controls 36.5% of the Partnership's total Units

outstanding.

          5.    Defendants Aubrey I,. Cole, George R. Hornig, Wi:l.liam  A. Wyman, Alan B.
SNIPPETS:
  • IN AND FOR IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWA
  • -against-GEORGE R. HORNIG, WILLIAM A. WYMAN,:
  • Plaintiff, fo,r his complaint against defendants, alleges upon personal knowledge as to
  • Delaware limited partnership ("Timberlands" or the "Partnership":i.
  • of the general partner and beneficially owns or controls 36.5% of the Partnership's total
  • good faith, candor, loyalty and fair dealing to the public unitholders of Timberlands.
  • This action is properly maintainable as a class actia'n for the following reasons:
  • (4 The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.
  • There are in excess of 12.8 m.illion units of Timberlands units whilch are outstanding,
  • There are questions of law and fact that are common to the Class,
  • Whether the defendants are violatiq their fiduciary duties to
  • Accordingly, plaintiff is an adequate
  • would create the risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual
  • applicable to, and causing injury to., the Class and, therefore, preliminary and final
  • power between defendants and the class members is unequal, making it unfair for defendants to
  • In that regard, defi,:ndants must adequately ensure
  • that no conflict of interest exists between their own interests and their fiduciary
  • Plaintiff seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief and declaratory relief
  • fiduciary duties in the proposed buy-out.
  • Enjoining the buy-out transaction or, if such transaction is consummated,
  • Awarding plaintiff and the Class compensaiory and/or rescissory damages;
  • New York, New York 10018
  •    |