LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FURTHERFIELD PARTNERS v PERELMAN Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,502, County: New Castle County, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 7 2, Plaintiff: FURTHERFIELD PARTNERS, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018502, Allegations, Paragraph, Denies, Admits, Response, Perelman, Mafco Holdings, Mafco Defendants, Panavision, Stock Purchase, Participating, Complaint States, Stock Purchase Agreement, Class Action, Refers, Firms, Mfw, Mafco, Liebman, Transaction, York, Meister, Pvi Stock, Delaware, Shares, Worldwide, Stock, Settlement, Consolidation, Holding, Objectors, Information Sufficient, Complaint, Directors, Common Stock, Committee, Denies Possessing Knowledge, Representatives, Eric Hanson, Shareholder , ContentID: 120240016

Case Documents
1 2002-05-13 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 131704
25 pages
PDF
2 2001-06-15 MFW DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO VANNINI COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115242
8 pages
PDF
3 2001-06-15 MFW DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO THE SHAREHOLDER PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115241
8 pages
PDF
4 2001-06-15 ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS HOOKSTRATTEN LIEBMAN AND MEISTER TO VANNINI COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115240
16 pages
PDF
5 2001-06-15 MAFCO DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO VANNINI COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115239
14 pages
PDF
6 2001-06-15 MAFCO DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO THE SHAREHOLDER PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115238
15 pages
PDF
7 2001-06-15 ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT OF FURTHERFIELD PARTNERS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115237
17 pages
PDF
8 2001-04-25 AMENDED DERIVATIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115243
22 pages
PDF
9 2000-11-14 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100716
10 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 9 documents , 135 pages
Price: $ 59.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PARTICIPATING
COUNSEL
FIRMS
COURT
DEFENDANTS
YORK
SETTLEMENT
CONSOLIDATION
OBJECTORS
MFW
PERELMAN
MAFCO
DELAWARE
REPRESENTATIVES
ATTORNEYS
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
DERIVATIVES
PANAVISION
NAMED PLAINTIFFS
WILMINGTON
WECHSLER HARWOOD
DISQUALIFICATION
COMPLAINT
STOCKHOLDERS
PANAVISION TRANSACTION
BRUALDI LAW FIRM
GARWIN BRONZAFT
SHAREHOLDER
INDIVIDUAL-PLAINTIFF
        IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


IN RE M&F WORLDWIDE CORP.                   ) Consolidated
SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                     ) Civil Action No. 18502


                                    OPINION

                         Date Submitted: May  10, 2002
                          Date Decided: May  13, 2002

Norman M. Monhait, Esquire, of ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS  &
GODDESS, Wilmington, Delaware; Of Counsel: John F. Harnes and Gregory E.
Keller, Esquires, of  HARNES KELLER, New York, New York;  GARWIN
BRONZAFT GERSTEIN, New York, New York, WECHSLER  HARWOOD
HALEBIAN  & FEFFER, New York, New York, THE BRUALDI LAW FIRM,
New York, New York, Attorney for Participating Plaintiffs.

Thomas J. Allingham II, Randolph K Hemdon, and Douglas E. McCann, Esquires,
of SKADDEN ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER  & FLOM, Wilmington, Delaware; Of
Counsel: Robert E. Zimet, Susan L. Saltzstein and Sharon Garb, Esquires, of
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER  & FLOM, New York, New York,
Attorneys for Defendants Ronald Perelman, Howard Gittis, MAFCO Holdmgs Inc.
and MAFCO Consolidated Group, Inc.

Jon E. Abramczyk, Esquire, of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT  & TUNNELL,
Wilmington, Delaware; Of Counsel:       MORVILLO, ABRAMOWITZ, GRAND,
IASON  & SILBERBERG, New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendants Jaymie
Duman, Theo  Folz, J. Eric Hanson, Bruce Slovin, Stephen Taub, and M&F
Worldwide Corp.

David L. Finger, Esquire, of DAVID L. FINGER, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Of
Counsel:    Paul J. Dobrowski, Esquire, of DOBROWSKI  & ASSOCIATES,
Houston Texas; William C. Rand, Esquire, of LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM
COUDERT RAND, New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendants Furtherfield
Partners, L.P., Robotti  & Company, Inc., and Ravenswood Investment Company,
L.P.


Thad J. Bracegirdle, Esquire, of RICHARDS, LAYTON  & FINGER, Wilmington,
Delaware; Of Counsel: KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS  &' FRANKEL, New York,
New York, Attorneys for Defendants Paul M. Meister, Edward G. Hookstratten, and
Lance Liebman.

STRINE, Vice Chancellor

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Norman M. Monhait, Esquire, of ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS & GODDESS, Wilmington, Delaware; Of
  • Thomas J. Allingham II, Randolph K Hemdon, and Douglas E. McCann, Esquires, of SKADDEN ARPS,
  • Jon E. Abramczyk, Esquire, of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL, Wilmington, Delaware; Of
  • Perelman, who through MAFCO also owned 35% of MFW
  • before the Panavision transaction.
  • The central allegation of the plaintiffs'
  • detriment of MFW and its public stockholders.
  • "Participating Plaintiffs") entered into a Stipulation of Settlement with
  • Plaintiffs were named plaintiffs in complaints filed in this consolidated
  • the Objectors have moved to disqualify the five
  • plaintiffs' law firms participating in the
  • stockholders with no champion to present the proposed settlement.
  • Its complaint, dated November 14,2000, was brought on behalf of MFW
  • & Feffer, LLP, of New York ("Wechsler Harwood") and Rosenthal Monhait
  • represented by The Brualdi Law Firm
  • The Panavision Transaction is Consummated.
  • Giving Rise to Class Action Claims and Consolidation bv the Court:
  • shareholder of MFW before the Panavision Transaction,
  • matter) the Participating Plaintiffs as Class representatives on behalf of all
  • the disqualification of these attorneys must be imputed to their respective
  • 1988); See aZso Pettway, 576 F.2d at 1176 (describing generally the inappropriateness of
  • `* Fe awkwardness of applying the ethical rules for individual actions in representative

  • 2 . MFW DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO VANNINI COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    RESPONSE
    RESPECTFULLY REFER
    PARAGRAPH
    EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    AGREEMENT
    COMPLAINT
    MAFCO
    PRESIDENT
    PLAINTIFFS
    STOCK PURCHASE
    DIRECTORS
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    MAFCO HOLDINGS
    YORK
    WORLDWIDE
    FOLZ
    GITTIS
    DEFENDANTS INCORPORATE
    REFERENCE
    CONNECTION
    ALLEGATIONS
    TAUB
    PERELMAN
    CHAIRMAN
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE
    LIEBMAN
    MEMBERS
    COUNSEL
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    IN RE M  &  F WORLDWIDE CORP.  ) Consolidated
    SHAREHOLDERS  LITIGATION                        ) Civil Action No.  18502-NC J
                                          ----.-    >
    
    JONATHAN P. VANNINI,                            I
    
                         Plaintiff,                 i Civil Action No.  18850-NC
           V.
    
                                                    ;
    RONALD PERELMAN, et al.,                        >
    
                         Defendants.
    
                                THE MFW DEFENDANTS' ANSWER
                                       TO THE VANNINI COMPLAINT
    
                  Defendants Jaymie Durnan, Theo W. Folz, J. Eric Hanson, Bruce Slovin, Stephen
    
    G. Taub and M&F Worldwide Corp. ("M&F") (collectively,  .the "MFW Defendants"), by and
    
    through their attorneys, hereby answer Jonathan P.  Vannini's (the "Plaintiff') Complaint as
    
    follows:
    
                  1.     Denied.
    
                  2.     Denied.
    
                  3.     Denied.
    
                  4.     Denied.
    
                  5.     Denied.
    
                  6.     Denied.
    
                  7.     Denied, except admit that M&F's corporate office is located at 35 East
    
    62"" Street, New York, New York 10021, and that as of March 20, 2001, M&F had 19,121,271
    
    shares of common stock outstanding, which shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange, and
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN RE M & F WORLDWIDE CORP.) Consolidated
  • THE MFW DEFENDANTS' ANSWER
  • except admit that M&F's corporate office is located at 35 East
  • 62"" Street, New York, New York 10021, and that as of March 20, 2001, M&F had 19,121,271
  • belief as to the truth of the averments in paragraph 8 of the Complaint,
  • Chairman of the Executive Committee ofM&F's board of directors, and that Mr. Perelman is the
  • sole stockholder of Mafco Holdings Inc., which wholly owns I\/lafco Consolidated Group.
  • Mr. Gittis serves as Chairman of M&F's Board of Directors, and is the President and Chief
  • Executive Officer of M&F.
  • except admit that Stephen G. Taub is the President and Chief
  • except admit that Theo W. Folz is a director of M&F and that Mr.
  • Folz was President and Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Cigar Corporation,
  • Hookstratten, Liebman, and Meister
  • Holdings, Inc., which wholly owns Mafco Consolidated Group, Inc. and that Mafco Holdings,
  • Denied and respectfully refer to M&F's most recent Form 10-K for a
  • were members of a special committee, advised by its own independent counsel, Iof the M&F
  • the proposed Panavision Stock Purchase.
  • April 20, 2001, for an accurate description of the Stock Purchase Agreement, its terms and
  • and any other agreemems entered into in connection with the Stolck Purchase
  • To the extent a response is required, the allegations are specifically denied.
  • Defendants incorporate by reference their responses to paragraphs 1
  • plaintiffs have failed to comply with Rule 23.1.

  • 3 . MFW DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO THE SHAREHOLDER PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    PARAGRAPH
    PLAINTIFFS
    COMPLAINT
    RESPECTFULLY REFER
    ALLEGATIONS
    EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    STOCK
    MAFCO HOLDINGS
    DELAWARE
    SHARES
    DIRECTORS
    PRESIDENT
    BUSINESS
    FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
    RESPONSES
    TRANSACTION
    DEFENDANTS INCORPORATE
    REFERENCE
    SHAREHOLDER
    FOLZ
    WORLDWIDE
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    TRUTH
    AVERMENTS
    DENY
    COMMITTEE
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    GITTIS
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE; COUNTY
    
    
    IN RE M  & F WORLDWIDE CORP.  ) Consolidated                                    J
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                        ) Civil  Action No.  18502-NC
                  -                    ___-        >
    
    JONATHAN P. VANNINI,                           1
    
                         Plaintiff,                1 Civil Action No.  18850-NC
           V.
    
                                                   1
    RONALD PERELMAN, et al.,
                                                   i
                         Defendants.               1
    
    
                 THE MFW DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO THE SHAREHOLDER
           PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED DERIVATIVE AND CLASS ACTION  COMPLAINT
    
                  Defendants Jaymie Durnan, Theo W. Folz, J. Eric Hanson, Bruce Slovin, Stephen
    
    G. Taub and M&F Worldwide Corp. ("M&F") (collectively, the "MFW Defendants"), by and
    
    through their attorneys, hereby answer the In re M & F Worldwide Corp. Shareholders Litigation
    
    plaintiffs' (the "Shareholder Plaintiffs") Amended Derivative and Class Action Complaint as
    
    follows:
    
                  1.     Denied
    
                  2.     Denied
    
                  3.     Denied, except admit the allegations in the first sentence.
    
                  4.     Denied.
    
                  5.     Denied.
    
                  6.     Denied.
    
                  7.     Denied.
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • THE MFW DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO THE SHAREHOLDER PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED DERIVATIVE AND CLASS ACTION
  • hereby answer the In re M & F Worldwide Corp. Shareholders Litigation
  • except admit the allegations in the first sentence.
  • Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a
  • belief as to the truth of the averments in paragraph 8, and therefore deny them.
  • except admit that M&F is a Delaware corporation and that M&F's
  • admit that as of March 20,2001, M&F had 19,12 1,271 shares of common stock outstanding.
  • Chairman of the Executive Committee of M&F's board of directors.
  • except admit that Theo W. Folz is a director of M&F and that Mr.
  • Folz was President and Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Cigar Corporation,
  • Mr. Gittis is the President and Chief Executive Officer of M&F.
  • except admit that Mafco Holdings is a Delaware corporation.
  • and respectfully refer to M&F's most recent Form 10-K for a
  • complete and accurate description of M&F's business and financial performance.
  • accurate description of Panavision's recapitalization transaction and the terms of the Senior
  • Defendants incorporate by reference the responses to paragraphs 1 through

  • 4 . ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS HOOKSTRATTEN LIEBMAN AND MEISTER TO VANNINI COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DENIES
    PARAGRAPH
    STOCK PURCHASE
    ADMITS
    REFERS
    PVI STOCK
    PLAINTIFF
    STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
    LIEBMAN
    MEISTER
    DEFENDANTS
    MAFCO HOLDINGS
    MFW
    COMMITTEE
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    DENIES POSSESSING
    DENIES POSSESSING KNOWLEDGE
    COMPLAINT
    TRADING PRICE
    NYSE LISTINGS
    COMMON STOCK
    ERIC HANSON
    ATTORNEYS
    TRANSACTION
    PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    FINANCIAL CONDITION
    CORRECT TERMS
    MAFCO CONSOLIDATED GROUP
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 7'; 2
                                                                                             .'        
                                                                                            r          
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                            ;,         
                                                                                                       
                                                                                            -          
                                                                                                       
    
     IN RE M & F WORLDWIDE CORP.                                  Consolidated              _.
     SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                      Civil ActionNo.  18502 b&&i'?
                                                                                                       
                                                ~_                                               --\
    
     JONATHAN  P.  VANNINI,
    
                               Plaintiff,
    
              V.                                        t
    
     RONALD PERELMAN, HOWARD                                      Civil Action No. 18850 NC
     GITTIS, EDWARD GREGORY
     HOOKSTRATTEN, LANCE A.
     LIEBMAN, PAUL M. MEISTER, THEO
     W. FOLZ, JAYMIE A. DURNAN, BRUCE;
     SLOVIN, J. ERIC HANSON, STEPHEN G.
     TAUB, MAFCO HOLDINGS INC. and
     MAFCO CONSOLIDATED GROUP, INC.,
    
                                Defendants.
    
                                             ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS
                                 EDWARD  GREGORY  HOOKSTRATTEN,
                             LANCE A. LIEBMAN, AND PAUL M. MEISTER TO
                              THE COMPLAINT OF JONATHAN P. VANNINI
    
                       Defendants Edward Gregory Hookstratten, Lance A. Liebman, and Paul M
    
    Meister (the "Special Committee"), by its undersigned attorneys, for its answer to the complaint
    
    dated April 27, 200.1 (the "Complaint"), of Jonathan P. Vannini ("Plaintiff'), states as follows:
    
                       1.      Denies the allegations in paragraph 1, except admits (1) that M&F
    
    Worldwide Corp. ("MFW")  entered into an April 19, 2001 transaction (the "PVI Stock
    
    Purchase"), as set forth in the April 19, 2001 stock purchase agreement (the "Stock Purchase
    
    
    RLFl-2323223-1
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • LANCE A. LIEBMAN, AND PAUL M. MEISTER TO
  • THE COMPLAINT OF JONATHAN P. VANNINI
  • Defendants Edward Gregory Hookstratten, Lance A. Liebman, and Paul M
  • Meister (the "Special Committee"), by its undersigned attorneys, for its answer to the
  • Denies the allegations in paragraph 1, except admits that M&F
  • Worldwide Corp. entered into an April 19, 2001 transaction (the "PVI Stock
  • Purchase"), as set forth in the April 19, 2001 stock purchase agreement (the "Stock Purchase
  • Agreement"), refers to the Stock Purchase Agreement for its correct terms, and refers to an
  • that as part of the F'VI Stock Purchase, MFW purchased certain shares
  • of common stock af Panavision Inc.: that Plaintiffs Complaint purports to seek
  • stock owned, directly or indirectly, by Mafco Holdings Inc. increased;
  • the trading price of PVI common stock was listed on the NYSE and refers to those
  • NYSE listings for the trading prices of PVI stock on the dates alleged.
  • Denies the allegations in paragraph 3, except denies possessing knowledge
  • Denies the allegations in paragraph 6, except admits that Plaintiff purports
  • Denies possessing knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
  • directly or indirectly owns 100% of the stock of Mafco Consolidated Group Inc. ("Mafco
  • MFW, and was, for certain periods of time, the President and Chief Executive Officer of MFW.
  • those SEC Forms 10-K describe MFW's financial condition for those years,
  • Some or ah of Plaintiffs claims are barred by lathes.

  • 5 . MAFCO DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO VANNINI COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MAFCO
    ALLEGATIONS
    MAFCO DEFENDANTS
    COMPLAINT STATES
    PARAGRAPH
    REFER
    STOCK
    STOCK PURCHASE
    AGREEMENT
    HOLDINGS
    PLAINTIFF
    EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    TRADING HISTORY
    PANAVISION
    YORK
    COMMON STOCK
    WORLDWIDE
    YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
    SHARES
    CONSOLIDATED GROUP
    CONNECTION
    EXHIBIT
    AVER
    PRESIDENT
    GITTIS
    DIRECTORS
    PERELMAN
    CHAIRMAN
    FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
    
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                   T"
                                                                                       czzp,  52
                                                                                       -.  .:          
                                                                                                       
    -----------------"-------------------~------..---------x
    IN RE M & F WORLDWIDE CORP.                                :    CONSOLIDATED      i            .-  
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                         CIVIL ACTION NO. 18502  NC `j
    -------------------------------------~------~~-~--~---x                            r               
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    -------------------------------------~------~--~--~---x                            ;:              
                                                                                       -.              
    JONATHAN P. VANNINI,
    
                                Plaintiff;
                       V.                                           CIVIL ACTION NO. 18850 NC
    
    RONALD PERELMAN, ET AL.,
    
                                Defendants.
    --------------------------------------------~---------x
    
                             THE MAFCO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER
                                  TO THE VANNINI COMPLAINT
                                  -              -
    
             Defendants Ronald Perelman, Howard Gittis, Mafco Holdings Inc., ("Mafco
    
    Holdings") and Mafco Consolidated Group Inc. ("Mafco Consolidated Group")
    
    (collectively the "Mafco Defendants"), by and through their attorneys, hereby answer
    
    Jonathan P. Vannini's (the "Plaintiff `) Complaint as follows:
    
              1.       Denied. Paragraph 1 of the Complaint states a legal conclusion to
    
    which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, the allegations
    
    are specifically denied. The Mafco Defendants refer to M&F Worldwide Corp.`s
    
    ("M&F") Form 8-K, tiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC")
    
    on April 20,2001, for an accurate description of the Stock Purchase Agreement, its
    
    
    
    terms and consideration, and any other agreements entered into in connection wilth
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • THE MAFCO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER
  • Defendants Ronald Perelman, Howard Gittis, Mafco Holdings Inc., ("Mafco
  • Holdings") and Mafco Consolidated Group Inc.
  • Jonathan P. Vannini's (the "Plaintiff `) Complaint as follows:
  • Paragraph 1 of the Complaint states a legal conclusion to
  • To the extent a response is required,
  • The Mafco Defendants refer to M&F Worldwide Corp.`s
  • on April 20,2001, for an accurate description of the Stock Purchase Agreement, its
  • These allegations are specifically denied.
  • and any other agreements entered into in connection with the Stock Purchase
  • Agreement (see, e.g., pp. l-3, Exhibit 2.1) and an April 19 Press Release entitled
  • "M&F Worldwide Corp. Purchases 7,320,225 Shares of Panavision Inc.
  • M&F's principal executive office is located at 35 East 62"d Street, New York, New
  • Perelman is a M&F director and is Chairman of the Executive Committee
  • The Mafco Defendants further aver that Mafco Consolidated
  • Howard Gittis is a M&F director.
  • serves as M&F's Chairman of the board of directors, President, and Chief Executive
  • Stephen G. Taub is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Mafco Worldwide
  • M&F's financial performance.
  • common stock and publicly traded debt.
  • the trading history of Panavision's common stock on the New York Stock Exchange.

  • 6 . MAFCO DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO THE SHAREHOLDER PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ALLEGATIONS
    MAFCO DEFENDANTS
    CLASS ACTION
    COMPLAINT STATES
    PARAGRAPH
    STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
    MAFCO HOLDINGS
    SHARES
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEFENDANTS REFER
    PANAVISION
    PURSUANT
    DELAWARE
    RONALD PERELMAN
    CONSOLIDATED GROUP
    YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
    SHAREHOLDER PLAINTIFFS
    HOWARD GITTIS
    WORLDWIDE CODAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
    HOLDING SOLD
    COMMON STOCK
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    TRADING HISTORY
    TRANSACTION
    DEFENSE
    FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
    DIRECTORS
    PRESIDENT
    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE
    
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                          
                                                                                              ci,-3  - -
                                                                                              -.       
    -------------------------------------~------~.~-"------x                                  I:,      
                                                                                               . .  ._
    IN RE M & F WORLDWIDE CORP.                                 :    C O N S O L I D A T E D   I       
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                          CIVIL ACTION NO. 18502 NC7
    ------------------------------------~.------~---------x                                            
    -------------------------------------~------~~-"------x                                        
                                                                                                    ,-.
                                                                                                    
    JONATHAN P. VANNINI,                                                                               
    
                                Plaintiff,
                       V.                                            CIVIL ACTION NO. 18850 NC
    
    RONALD PERELMAN, ET AL.,
    
                                Defendants.
    ------------------------------------~.------~---------x
    
    THE MAFCO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO THE SHAREHOLDER PLAIN-
        TIFFS' AMENDED  DERIVATIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    
             Defendants Ronald Perelman, Howard Gittis, Mafco Holdings Inc. ("Mafco
    
    Holdings"), and Mafco Consolidated Group Inc. ("Mafco Consolidated Group")
    
    (collectively the "Mafco Defendants"), by and through their attorneys, hereby answer
    
    the In re M & F Worldwide Codareholders  Litigation plaintiffs' (the "Share-
    
    holder Plaintiffs") Amended Derivative and Class Action Complaint as follows:
    
              1.       Denied. Paragraph 1 of the Amended Derivative and Class Action
    
    Complaint states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a
    
    response is required, the allegations are specifically denied except admitted that on
    
    April 19,2001, M&F Worldwide Corp ("M&F") and PX Holding Corporation ("PX
    
    
    
    Holding") entered into a stock purchase agreement (the "Stock Purchase Agree-
    
    ment"), pursuant to which PX Holding sold 7,320,225  shares of Panavision Inc.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • THE MAFCO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO THE SHAREHOLDER PLAIN-TIFFS' AMENDED DERIVATIVE AND CLASS
  • Defendants Ronald Perelman, Howard Gittis, Mafco Holdings Inc. ("Mafco
  • and Mafco Consolidated Group Inc.
  • the In re M & F Worldwide Codareholders Litigation plaintiffs' Amended Derivative and Class
  • Paragraph 1 of the Amended Derivative and Class Action
  • Complaint states a legal conclusion to which no response is required.
  • the allegations are specifically denied except admitted that on
  • Holding") entered into a stock purchase agreement, pursuant to which PX Holding sold
  • Defendants refer to M&F's most recent Form 1 O-K, filed with the SEC on March 30,
  • Defendants refer to the publicly available data on the trading history of Panavision's
  • Panavision common stock.
  • common stock for prices these shares traded on the New York Stock Exchange on
  • M&F's board of directors.
  • has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Cigar Corporation
  • Mafco Holdings' principal executive office is located at 35 East 62"d Street,
  • M&F's business and financial performance.
  • Panavision's recapitalization transaction.
  • FIRST AFFtRMATIVE DEFENSE
  • Defendants;' Answer to the Shareholder Plaintiffs' Amended Derivative and Class

  • 7 . ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT OF FURTHERFIELD PARTNERS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PARAGRAPH
    DENIES
    ADMITS
    PLAINTIFFS
    PANAVISION
    DEFENDANTS
    LIEBMAN
    HOLDING
    MEISTER
    TRANSACTION
    MAFCO HOLDINGS
    MFW
    SHARES
    REFERS
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    DENIES POSSESSING KNOWLEDGE
    COMMON STOCK
    CLASS ACTION
    COMMITTEE
    ACTION COMPLAINT
    WORLDWIDE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    TRADING PRICE
    EDWARD GREGORY
    ERIC HANSON
    NYSE
    NYSE LISTINGS
    CONSOLIDATED GROUP
    UNDERSIGNED ATTORNEYS
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    IN RE M & F WORLDWIDE CORP                                     Consolidated                 :.-
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                                                           
                                                                   Civil Action No. 18502 NC  1~~.
                                                                                    - = - - ;         
                                                                                                      
                                                                                           I           
    JONATHAN P. VANNINI,                                                                               
    
                              Plaintiff,
    
              V
    
    
    RONALD PERELMAN, HOWARD                                        Civil Action No. 18850 NC
     GITTIS, EDWARD GREGORY
    HOOKSTRATTEN, LANCE A.
     LIEBMAN, PAUL M. MEISTER, THEO
    W. FOLZ,  JAYMIE  A. DURNAN, BRUCE
     SLOVIN, J. ERIC HANSON, STEPHEN G.
     TAUB, MAFCO HOLDINGS INC. and
     MAFCO  CONSOLIDATED  GROUP, INC.,
    
                               Defendants.
    
                        ANSWER TO THE AMENDED DERIVATIVE AND CLASS
                      ACTION COMPLAINT OF FURTHERFIELD  PARTNERS, L.P.
    
                       Defendants Edward Gregory Hookstratten, Lance A. Liebman, and Paul M.
    
    Meister (the "Special Committee"), by its undersigned attorneys, for its answer to the Amended
    
    Derivative and Class Action Complaint (the "Amended Complaint"), filed by the plaintiffs in h
    
    re M&F Worldwide Shareholders Litigation (the "Plaintiffs"), states as follows:
    
                        1.    Denies the allegations in paragraph 1, except admits that Plaintiffs
    
    to "bring[] this action to rescind" the April 19, 2001 purchase (the "Transaction") by M&F
    
    Worldwide Corp. ("MFW")  of certain Panavision, Inc. ("Panavision") shares that had been
    
    
    RLFI-2323237-1
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Defendants Edward Gregory Hookstratten, Lance A. Liebman, and Paul M.
  • Meister (the "Special Committee"), by its undersigned attorneys, for its answer to the Amended
  • Derivative and Class Action Complaint, filed by the plaintiffs in h
  • re M&F Worldwide Shareholders Litigation,
  • to "bringthis action to rescind" the April 19, 2001 purchase (the "Transaction") by M&F
  • Worldwide Corp. of certain Panavision, Inc. shares that had been
  • owned, directly or indirectly, by PX Holding Corp., and refers to the contract
  • documents that comprise the Transaction for their correct terms, and refers to the SEC Form
  • Denies the allegations in paragraph 2, except admits that an SEC Form
  • refers to those public listings for the trading price of Panavision stock during 1998 and
  • November 9, 2000, Mafco Holdings Inc. sent a letter to MFW proposing that MPW
  • stock was listed on the NYSE and refers to that NYSE listing for the trading price of
  • Denies the allegations in paragraph 6, except denies possessing knowledge
  • Denies possessing knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
  • Consolidated Group Inc.; and that Mafco Consolidated owned,
  • April 19, 2001, approximately 6,648,800 shares of the outstanding common stock of MFW.
  • and refers to those NYSE listings for the trading price of Panavision

  • 8 . AMENDED DERIVATIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFF
    MAFCO HOLDINGS
    PANAVISION
    TRANSACTION
    STOCK
    WORLDWIDE
    YORK
    DELAWARE
    CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    DERIVATIVELV
    SHAREHOLDER
    STAKE
    HOWARD GITTIS
    DEBT
    FURTHERFIELD PARTNERS
    ERIC HANSON
    LANCE LIEBMAN
    DIRECTORS
    BRUCE SLOVIN
    NOMINAL DEFENDANT
    MARKET PRICE
    CASH FLOW
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    SUBSIDIARIES
    HARNES KELLER
    THIRD AVENUE
    OUTSTANDING DEBT
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    
                                                        ORIGINAL                                       
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------~
    FURTHERFIELD PARTNERS, L.P.,
    
                                 Plaintiff,
    
                       -against-
                                                                          :    Civil Action No. 18502 NC
    RONALD 0. PERELMAN, THEO W. FOLZ,
    HOWARD GITTIS, JAYMIE A. DURNAN,
    J. ERIC HANSON, ED GREGORY
    HOOKSTRATTEN, LANCE LIEBMAN,
    PAUL M. MEISTER, BRUCE SLOVIN,
    STEPHEN G. TAUB, PX HOLDING
    CORPORATION, and MAFCO HOLDINGS,
    INC.,
    
                                 Defendants.
    
                       -and-
    
    M  & F WORLDWIDE CORP.,
    
                                 Nominal Defendant.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------`~
    
    
    
                   NOTICE  OF FILING AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    
    
    TO:                 Thomas J. Allingham, II, Esquire
                        Skadden Arps Slate Meagher  & Flom LLP
                        One Rodney Square
                        Wilmington, Delaware 19801
    
    
                        PLEASIX TAKE NOTICE  that plaintiff herewith files the attached Amended
    
    Derivative And Class Action Complaint as of right pursuant to Rule  15'(a).
    
                        In compliance with Rule 15(aa), plaintiff avers that the Amended Complaint is in
    
    full substitution for the Complaint heretofore filed on November 14,  2ClOO.
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • ---------------------------------------------------------------~ FURTHERFIELD PARTNERS, L.P.,
  • CORPORATION, and MAFCO HOLDINGS,
  • Defendants.
  • -and-M & F WORLDWIDE CORP.,
  • Nominal Defendant.
  • PLEASIX TAKE NOTICE that plaintiff herewith files the attached Amended
  • Derivative And Class Action Complaint as of right pursuant to Rule 15'.
  • Suite 700, 964 Third Avenue
  • New York, New York 10022
  • Panavision, Inc. at a price which was four times the market value of Panavision's
  • stock.
  • Perelman, approved by a conflicted M&F board of directors, designed to provide needed cash to
  • It has strong earnings and cash flow, and very little debt.
  • connection with a leveraged recapitalization in which Perelman's acquired his controlling
  • on its outstanding debt, and its shareholder equity is negative, at -$25 per share.
  • The market price of Panavision's stock declined from $26 per share in 1998
  • When plaintiff immediately challenged this inconceivably one-sided proposal, defendants
  • directly or through Mafco Holdings and its subsidiaries, including the Company, of seven of
  • and Chief Executive Officer of M&F from 1997 to 1999.
  • (Derivativelv for Breach of Fiduciarv Duty)
  • The defendants have a fiduciary duty to ensure that any transaction between
  • HARNES KELLER LLI'

  • 9 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANT
    MAFCO
    HOLDINGS
    PANAVISION
    WORLDWIDE
    OFFICER
    EMPLOYEE
    DIRECTORS
    CONTROLLING
    STAKE
    SUBSIDIARIES
    BUSINESS
    PLAINTIFF
    GRACES
    TRANSACTION
    STOCK
    PRESIDENT
    VIRTUE
    OWES
    CONTINUED EMPLOYMENT
    FOLZ
    MAHER
    MACANDREWS
    FORBES
    ABEX
    LICORICE
    PRICE
    UNFAIR
    RELIEF
    
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    FURTHERFIELD PARTNERS,  L-P.,
    
                        Plaintiff,
    
               -against-                               Civil Action No.@.$-~a~-#c-
    RONALD 0. PERELMAN, THEO W. FOLZ,
    HOWARD GITTIS, JAMES  R.  MAHER,
    JAYMIE A. DURNAN, J. ERIC HANSON,
    ED GREGORY HOOKSTRATTEN, LANCE
    LIEBMAN, PAUL M.  MEI!STER, BRUCE
    SLOVIN, and STEPHEN  G. TAUB,
    
                        Defenldants.
    
               -and-
    
    M SC F WORLDWIDE CORP.,
    
                        Nominal  Deffendant.  :
    
                                        COMPLAINT
    
               Plaintiff,       Furtherfield         Partners, L.P.,    for    its
    
    complaint against defendants, alleges as follows:
    
                                         PARTIES
    
               1.       Plaintiff  FurtherfieldPartners, L.P. ("Furtherfield
    
    Partners" or `Plaintiff") owns over 55,000 shares of stock of
    
    nominal defendant M & F Worldwide Corp., and has owned such shares
    
    at all  ti.mes material hereto.             Plaintiff brings this action
    
    derivatively on behalf of M & F Worldwide Corp.
    
               2.       Nominal Defendant M & F Worldwide Corp. (I'M & F" or
    
    the ffCompany")  is a Delaware corporation, with principal executive
    
    offices located at 35 East  62"" Street, New York, NY 10021, which
    
    is also the principal office of defendant Ronald 0. Perelman and
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • -and-M SC F WORLDWIDE CORP.,
  • Plaintiff FurtherfieldPartners, L.P. ("Furtherfield
  • Partners" or `Plaintiff") owns over 55,000 shares of stock of
  • nominal defendant M & F Worldwide Corp.,
  • because Perelman is the sole shareholder of Mafco Holdings
  • members of the board of directors of the Company,
  • Defendant Theo W. Folz is a director of the
  • and for over five years has been the President and Chief
  • Officer of the Company from 1997 to 1999.
  • By virtue of his positions as a director and officer
  • Gittis owes his continued employment and salary to the good graces of Perelman.
  • Defendant James R. Maher is a director of
  • Maher h.as held executive positions with MacAndrews &
  • Forbes and various affiliates of Perelman since 1995.
  • his position as an employee of the Company and of various Perelman
  • its operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, Pneumo Abex
  • business of producing licorice flavors and other flavoring agents,
  • _PERELMAN'S PANAVISION STAKE
  • PX Holdings acquired its controlling stake in Panavision for $27
  • Mafco determined this price not through any assessment of the
  • that any transaction between the Company and any entity controlled
  • Perelman's 83% stake in Panavision is unfair because,
  • Holdings and its subsidiaries, and are therefore interested in the
  • the plaintiff prays for relief as follows:
  •    |