LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

GELFMAN v WEEDEN INVESTORS LP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,519, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: GELFMAN, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018519, Partnership Agreement, Partnership, General Partner, Del, Basic Units, Delaware, Callable Units, Distributions, Investment Partnership, Motion, Unitholders, Limited Partners, Amendments, Fiduciary Duty, Limited Partnership, Forced Redemption Scheme, Investors, Employees, Forced Redemption, Individual Defendants, Provisions, Fiduciary Duties, Breach, Kasha, Dismiss, Class Members, Contract, Complaint, Dilution Scheme, Discretion, Cplt, Basic Unitholders, Conversion Amendment, Standard , ContentID: 120240005

Case Documents
1 2001-08-24 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114878
27 pages
PDF
2 2001-04-04 REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115362
17 pages
PDF
3 2001-03-19 PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115363
40 pages
PDF
4 2001-02-22 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115364
12 pages
PDF
5 2001-02-02 OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102257
50 pages
PDF
6 2000-11-21 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100704
10 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 6 documents , 156 pages
Price: $ 44.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
GENERAL PARTNER
DEFENDANTS
EMPLOYEES
COURT
INVESTORS
DISTRIBUTIONS
STANDARD
BASIC UNITS
DISCRETION
UNITHOLDERS
CALLABLE UNITS
COMPLAINT
COMPELLED REDEMPTION PROGRAM
CONTRACTUALLV
AFFILIATES
CONVERSION AMENDMENT
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
DIRECTORS
LIMITED PARTNERS
OWNERSHIP
SUBSCRIPTION PLANS
FAVORED INVESTORS
FIDUCIARY DUTY
FAIR MARKET
LIABILITY
PROVISIONS
MANAGEMENT
       IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


ROBERT W. GELFMAN, MARK ALLEN,                        1
AMERIBANK TRUST, SHIRLEY COLLINS,                     )
DAVID DERHODES, FUMI FUKADA, MARY )
ROUNSEVILLE, P.J. HAYES, SHIRLEY                     >
SARPA-BLACKBURN, LISA SARPA                          )
SNYDER, THOMAS E. TICE, THOMAS C.                    )
HELLMAN,  and RALPH S. GIORGIO, on behalf )
of themselves and all others similarly situated,     )
                                                     >
                             Plaintiffs,             1> Civil Action No. 18519
V.                                                   >
                                                     1
WEEDEN  INVESTORS, L.P.,  WEEDEN                     >
SECURITIES CORPORATION, DONALD                       >
WEEDEN,  BARRY SMALL, ROBERT                         >
CERVONI, TIMOTHY MCDONALD, ROBERT )
WEPPLER and STEPHEN LEUTHOLD,                        >1
                             Defendants.             >

                              MEMORANDUM OPINION

                             Date Submitted: August 2, 2001
                             Date Decided: August 23, 2001

Pamela S. Tikellis and Robert J. Kriner, Jr., Esquires, of CHIMICLES  &
TIKELLIS, Wilmington, Delaware; Of Counsel: Lynda J. Grant, Esquire of
GOODKIND  LABATON RUDOFF  & SUCHAROW, New York, New York;
Robert W. Biederman, Esquire, of HUBBARD  & BIEDERMAN, Dallas, Texas; D.
Ronald Reneker, Esquire, of BUSH CR4DDOCK & RENEKER, Dallas, Texas,
Attorneys for Plaintiffs.



Bruce E.  Jameson,  Esquire, of  PRICKETT,  JONES  & ELLIOT, Wilmington,
Delaware; Of Counsel: David E. Nachman and Jeremy R. Kasha, Esquires, of
SOLOMON,  ZAUDERER,  ELLENHORN,  FRISCHER   & SHARP, New York,
New York, Attorneys for Defendants.



STRINE,  Vice Chancellor



SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • This case involves a partnership agreement that provides the general
  • bad faith standard.
  • The plaintiffs have filed a complaint alleging that the
  • general partner has breached that agreement and its fiduciary duties by
  • than fair value to non-employee unitholders.
  • it at less than fair market value.
  • and favored investors in the future from the same rules by which it is now
  • The plaintiffs are a group of former employees and outside investors,
  • shares for "Basic Units" of the Partnership.
  • Similarly, when I refer to employees or management, I refer to employees or management of the
  • When I refer to directors, I refer to directors of the General Partner.
  • holders were entitled to a share of any distributions made by the Partnership.
  • Units made it impossible for the Partnership to control the ownership
  • Callable Units" or "Callable Units."
  • the plainti'ffs and defendants agreed that the plaintiffs' claim does not turn on how the
  • the General Partner and its Affiliates.
  • accomplish the ultimate end of giving the General Partner the discretion to
  • At the same time it proposed the Conversion Amendment,
  • The Compelled Redemption Program contemplates that holders would
  • as well as the defendants' fiduciary duty of loyalty.
  • plaintiffs further contend that the provisions of the Partnership Agreement
  • defendants from liability for their actions.
  • the right .to restrict the fiduciary duties that, as a default matter, govern the
  • Partner nor the partners or shareholder, directors, officers, employees or agents of the
  • Does The Amended Complaint State A Claim That The 1998 And 1999 Distributions And

  • 2 . REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PARTNERSHIP
    DEFENDANTS
    DEL
    AMENDMENTS
    CALLABLE UNITS
    COURT
    PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
    SUPR
    GENERAL PARTNER
    DISTRIBUTIONS
    DELAWARE
    MOTION
    DISMISS
    BOSTON CELTICS
    UNITHOLDERS
    SECURITIES
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIG
    BASIC UNITS
    OPPOSITION
    COMPLAINT
    ALLEGATION
    PROVISIONS
    ROBERT
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    GOTHAM PARTNERS
    AUTHORIZES
    EMPLOYEES
    VALIDLY-ENACTED AMENDMENTS
    HEALTHTRUST
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                                                            IS
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    ROBERT W. GELFMAN, MARK ALLEN, AMERIBANK
    TRUST, SHIRLEY COLLINS, DAVID DERHODES, FUMI
    FUKADA, MARY ROUNSEVILLE, P.J. HAYES,
    SHIRLEY SARPA-BLACKBURN, LISA SARPA  SNYDER,
    THOMAS E. TICE,  THOMAS C. HELLMAN, and RALPH
    S. GIORGIO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
    situated,
    
                                           Plaintiffs,                Civil Action No. 185 19-NC
    
                             -against-
    
    WEEDEN INVESTORS, L.P., WEEDEN SECURITIES
    CORPORATION, DONALD  WEEDEN, BARRY SMALL,
    ROBERT CERVONI, TIMOTHY MCDONALD, ROBERT
    WEPPLER and STEPHEN LEUTHOLD,
    
                                           Defendants.
    
    
                                  REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT
                           OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO, DISMISS
                                                                         -
                                                  PRICKETT, JONES 6~ ELLIOT
                                                  Bruce E. Jameson
                                                  1310 King Street
                                                  Box -1328
                                                  Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                  (302) 8886500
                                                  SOLOMON,  ZAUDERER.,  ELLENHORN,
                                                     FRISCHER  & SHARP
                                                 David E. Nachman
                                                 Jeremy R. Kasha
                                                 45 Rockefeller Plaza
                                                 New York, New York 1011 1
                                                 (212) 956-3700
                                                 Attorneys for Defendants
    
    April 4,200 1
    
    
    
                                                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • ROBERT W. GELFMAN, MARK ALLEN, AMERIBANK TRUST, SHIRLEY COLLINS, DAVID DERHODES, FUMI FUKADA,
  • -against-WEEDEN INVESTORS, L.P., WEEDEN SECURITIES CORPORATION, DONALD WEEDEN, BARRY SMALL,
  • OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO, DISMISS
  • PLAINTIFFS HAVE NOT STATED A CLAIM REGARDING
  • THE VALIDLY-ENACTED AMENDMENTS TO
  • In re Boston Celtics Limited Partnership Shareholders Litig., Del.
  • Chamison v. Healthtrust, Inc., Del.
  • Gotham Partners, L.P. v. Hallwood Realty Partners Del.
  • Supr., 765 A.2d 910.__.._._..,_.,.,,__,...............,,,...........,,,..
  • provisions that simply have nothing to do with the issues at hand.
  • The (opposition also fails to
  • respond at all to' the fact that the Partnership Agreement specifically and unambiguously
  • the Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
  • Furthermore, plaintiffs have not refuted the incontrovertible proposition that, under Delaware
  • The dilution claim --whether sounding in contract or fiduciary duty -- is therefore precluded
  • make distributions of capital, which allegedly took place in 1997 and 1998.
  • restated elsewhere in the Partnership Agreement: "he General Partner shall have full power
  • generally authorizes distributions.
  • the Complaint makes no allegation to the contrary.
  • plaintiffs challenge the limited issuance of Class A Callable Units to some
  • Unitholders, but not others.
  • violation of 5 5.3's requirement that "only Basic Units may be distributed in respect of Basic
  • those who were employees at the time were simultaneously afForded the right,
  • Plaintiffs' reliance in this context on In re Boston Celtics Limited Partnership Slwgders

  • 3 . PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
    GENERAL PARTNER
    BASIC UNITS
    FORCED REDEMPTION SCHEME
    COURT
    LIMITED PARTNERS
    FORCED REDEMPTION
    DELAWARE
    DEL
    INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
    MOTION
    DILUTION SCHEME
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    INVESTORS
    DISTRIBUTIONS
    BASIC UNITHOLDERS
    CALLABLE UNITS
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    CLASS MEMBERS
    AMENDMENTS
    PROVISIONS
    CAPITAL ACCOUNT
    NET INCOME
    FAIR MARKET
    CONNECTION
    CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    SUCHAROW LLP
    
                IN THE: COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                      
                                                                                                 of3
    ____________________----------------------------------------------~----   x                  E E;
                                                                                                 :::   
                                                                                                 /  I 
    ROBERT W. GELFMAN,  et al.,                                                                  ..:I 
                                                                                                 --.
                                                                                                 .  d-.
                                       Plaintiffs,
    
                      - against -
    
    WEEDEN  INVESTORS, L.P., et al.,
    
                                        Defendants.
    
    
    
    
    
       PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF  IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
                                                                   CHIMICLES  & TIKELLIS LLP
                                                                   Pamela S. Tikellis
                                                                   Robert J. Kriner, Jr.
                                                                   One Rodney Square
                                                                   P.0. Box 1035
                                                                   Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                                   (302) 656-2500
    
    OF COUNSEL:                                                    Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    GOODKIND LAEATON  RUDOFF & SUCHAROW LLP
    100 Park Avenue
    New York, New York 10017-5563
    (2 12) 907-0700
    
    HUBBARD  & BIEDERMAN, L.L.P.
     17 17 Main Street, Suite 4700
    Dallas, Texas 75201
    (214) 857-6000
    
    BUSH CRADDOCK & RENEKER, L.L.P.
    3 100 Monticello  A.venue,  Suite 550
    Dallas, Texas 75205
    (214) 750-3550
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • - against -WEEDEN INVESTORS, L.P., et al.,
  • PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
  • GOODKIND LAEATON RUDOFF & SUCHAROW LLP
  • Overview of Ownership Structure of the Investment Partnership.
  • Rights of the Basic Units.
  • E. The Dilution Scheme.
  • F. The Forced Redemption Scheme.
  • The Partnership Agreement Does Not Authorize
  • Of Callable Units To Basic Unitholders.
  • Section 4.10 Requires That Distributions Be Made

  • 4 . MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MOTION
    DISCOVERY
    DEFENDANTS
    DISMISS
    DEL
    CIV
    DOCUMENT REQUEST
    COURT
    KASHA AFF
    PARTNERSHIP
    COMPLAINT
    CHANCERY RULE
    STAYING DISCOVERY
    CORPORATE PROPERTY
    PENDING
    REASONS
    BURDENSOME
    SUPPORT
    BALANCE
    HARDSHIPS WEIGHS
    SKUBIK
    FAILS
    PREJUDICE
    NATURE
    GREENSPAN
    CHANDLER
    WEISS
    BREACH
    RELIEF
    
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    ROBERT W. GELFMAN, MARK ALLEN,
    AMERIBANK  TRUST, SHIRLEY  COL,LINS, DAVID
    DERHODES,  FUMI  FUKADA, MARY
    ROUNSEVILLE, P.J. HAYES, SHIRLEY SARPA-
    BLACKBURN, LISA SARPA SNYDER, THOMAS E.
    TICE, THOMAS C. HELLMAN, and RALPH S.
    GIORGIO, on behalf of themselves and all others
    similarly situated,
    
                                          Plaintiffs.        : Civil Action No. 18519-NC
    
                           -against-
    
    WEEDEN INVESTORS, L.P., WEEDEN SECURITIES :
    CORPORATION, DONALD  WEEDEN, BARRY                       :
    SMALL, ROBERT CERVONI, TIMOTHY
    MCDONALD, ROBERT WEPPLER and STEPHEN                     :
    LEUTHOLD,
    
                                           Defendants. :
    
    
    
              MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT QF DEFENDANTS'
             MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY
    
                                                 PRlCKETT, JONES & ELLIOT
                                                 Bruce E. Jameson
                                                 13  10 King Street
                                                 Box 1328
                                                 Wilmington, Delaware  19S99
                                                 (302) 888-6500
                                                 SOLOMON, ZAUDERER, ELLENHORN,
                                                       FRISC HER & SHARP
                                                 David E. Nachman
                                                 Jeremy  R. Kasha
                                                 45 Rockefeller Plaza
                                                 New York., New York 10 111
                                                 (2 12) 956..3700
    February 22, 2001                            Attorneys for Defendants
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT QF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY
  • NATURE AND STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS .._................
  • III The Balance of Hardships Weighs in Favor
  • Corporate Property v. AmerSig Gghics, Inc., Del.
  • Ch., Civ A No. 1324 1, 1993
  • Skubik v.
  • Weiss v Leewards Creative Crafts,
  • 29, 2000, plaintiffs filed a putative class action amended complaint.
  • Chancery Rule 12(the "Motion to Dismiss").
  • Kasha Aff, fi 3 and Ex.
  • `This is an action by non-employee unitholders of a Delaware limited partnership,
  • ' A more complete statement of the facts al&cd in tllc Complaint, and ihe reasons why these
  • Complaint fails to state any claim upon which relief can be granted.
  • The claim for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing is cursory
  • plaintiffs served their extremely broad and burdensome Document Request.
  • the Document Request is burdensome and will require substantial effort
  • no genuine prejudice from the stay requested.
  • should exercise - the authority to stay discovery pending resolution of the Motion to Dismiss.
  • A No. 13241, `1993 WL 534986, "1, Chandler, V.C. (citing Fish Eng'g Corp. v.
  • 73 1 A.2d 811 Greenspan v.

  • 5 . OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
    GENERAL PARTNER
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEL
    DELAWARE
    LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
    COURT
    KASHA
    UNITHOLDERS
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    BREACH
    CONTRACT
    BASIC UNITS
    CALLABLE UNITS
    CPLT
    INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    DISTRIBUTIONS
    LIMITATIONS
    TRANSACTIONS
    CONTRACTUAL LIMITATIONS
    AMENDMENTS
    AUTHORIZES
    ALLEGATIONS
    PROVISIONS
    DISCRETION
    SHIRLEY COLLINS
    AUTHORITIES
    FAIR DEALING
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    ROBERT W. GELFMAN, MARK ALLEN, AMERIBANK i
    TRUST, SHIRLEY COLLINS, DAVID DERHODES, FUMI :
    FUKADA, MARY  ROUNSEVILLE,  P.J. HAYES,
    SHIRLEY SARPA-BLACKBURN, LISA SARPA SNYDER,  ;
    THOMAS E. TICE, THOMAS C. HELLMAN, and RALPH :
    S. GIORGIO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly :
    situated,
    
                                            Plaintiffs,                 Civil Action No. 185 19-NC
    
                             -against-
    
    WEEDEN INVESTORS, L.P.,  WEEDEN SECURITIES
    CORPORATION, DONALD  WEEDEN, BARRY SMALL, i
    ROBERT CERVONI, TIMOTHY MCDONALD, ROBERT :
    WEPPLER and STEPHEN LEUTHOLD,
    
                                            Defendants.
                                                                                 ::      :..     _,./
                                                                  x              :-?             ;'
                                                                                 -7
                                                                                 -..                   
                                                                                 1;
                                                                                 cf,  `..L  `I-9
                                                                                 X;-;:`,         fu
                                                                                 - ;<,.
                             OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT
                         OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS                               --c  \k3
    
                                                   PRICKETT, JONES  & ELLIOT
                                                   Bruce E. Jameson
                                                   13 10 King Street
                                                   Box 1328
                                                   Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                   (302) 888-6500
                                                   SOLOMON, ZAUDERER, ELLENHORN,
                                                      FRISCHER  & SHARP
                                                   David E. Nachman
                                                   Jeremy R. Kasha
                                                   45 Rockefeller Plaza
                                                   New York, New York 10111
                                                   (212) 956-3700
                                                   Attorneys for Defendants
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • TRUST, SHIRLEY COLLINS, DAVID DERHODES, FUMI: FUKADA, MARY ROUNSEVILLE, P.J. HAYES, SHIRLEY
  • Jeremy R. Kasha
  • Table Of Authorities.
  • The Investment Partnership..
  • The General Partner Establishes Class A Callable Units..
  • The Partnership Makes Distributions and Allows Current Employees to Subscribe to New Class A
  • The Partnership Agreement Is Amended to Eliminate Basic Units..
  • PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM FOR BREACH
  • OF CONTRACT SHOULD BE DISMISSED.
  • The Partnership Agreement Specifically Authorizes
  • Distributions to Basic Unitholders.
  • Plaintiffs Have No Preemptive or Anti-Dilution Rights.
  • E. The Amendments That Convert Basic Units Into Class
  • Good Faith and Fair Dealing Should be Dismissed.
  • OF FIDUCIARY DUTY SHOULD BE DISMISSED.
  • CONTRACTUAL LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY.
  • Contractual Limitations of Liability.
  • DEFENDANTS SHOULD BE DISMISSED.

  • 6 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
    BASIC UNITS
    DEFENDANTS
    CLASS MEMBERS
    CONVERSION
    EMPLOYEES
    GENERAL PARTNER
    PLAINTIFF
    CONVERSION AMENDMENT
    LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
    EQUITY HOLDINGS
    OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
    PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
    HOLDERS
    EXPENSE
    COURT
    MAJORITY
    APPROVING
    DISTRIBUTIONS
    ASSETS
    REDEMPTION
    OBLIGATIONS
    DELAWARE
    PREDECESSOR CORPORATION
    DEALING
    EFFECTUATE
    VOTE
    PURSUANT
    FIDUCIARY OBLIGATIONS
    
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    ROBERT W.  GELFMAN,  on behalf of himself and all :
    others similarly situated,
                                                                           : Civil Action No.
                                       Plaintiff,                          :         pmwc
                     - against -                                           : CLASS ACTION
                                                                           : COMPLAINT
    WEE;DEN  INVESTORS, L.P.;  WEEDEN   & CO., L.P.; .
    WEElDEN  SECURITIES CORPORATION, DONALD :
    WEEDEN;  BARRY SMALL; and ROBERT CERVANI,                              :
    
                                       Defendants.
    _____~_____-~-----____I____------~-~--------------------~-------------- X
    
    
                     Plaintiff alleges on information and belief, except for those allegations which
    
    pertain to plaintiff, which are alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:
    
                                           PJ_ATURE OF THE ACTION
    
             1.      This action arises in connection with the proposed conversion (the "Proposal") by
    
    defendants of the Basic Units, defined below, of  Weeden Investors, L.P (the "Investment
    
    Partnership") into Callable Class A Units, defned below, of the Investment Partnership. The
    
    Callable A Units are callable at "book value", which is and will continue to be significantly
    
    below the true value of the proportional interest in the Investment Partnership.
    
            2.       The Class consists of holders of Basic Units of the Partnership who are not
    
    current employees of  i.he Investment Partnership or the Operating Partnership, defined below. A
    
    majority of the Basic: Units are held by current employees, who have a special interest in
    
    approving the Conversion Amendment defined below.
    
    
    
           3.      The conversion will confer special benefits upon defendants at the expense of the
    
    Class and as such is subject to the entire fairness standard.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • pertain to plaintiff, which are alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:
  • This action arises in connection with the proposed conversion by
  • Partnership") into Callable Class A Units, defned below, of the Investment Partnership.
  • The Class consists of holders of Basic Units of the Partnership who are not
  • current employees of i.he Investment Partnership or the Operating Partnership,
  • The conversion will confer special benefits upon defendants at the expense of the
  • to dilute the equity holdings of the members of the Class, by making distributions which were
  • at the expense of former employees and outside investors.
  • Partnership and its assets upon themselves at the expense of the Class.
  • Units in exchange for their equity interests in the Predecessor Corporation.
  • Defendants seek to amend the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership
  • After obtaining approval of the Conversion Amendment,
  • eliminate the holdings of Class members for inadequate and unfair consideration.
  • 1986, pursuant to which the Predecessor Company, a brokerage firm dealing in institutional
  • Weeden & Co. L.P. is also a Delaware limited partnership.
  • Weeden is the president of the General Partner,
  • individually and on behalf of all other holders of Basic Units who are not current
  • majority, approximately 70 percent, of the Basic Units.
  • The Proposal seeks to amend the Partnership Agreement to add a provision
  • the Investment Partnership exceeds book value and thus, by way of this redemption, the Class
  • special interest as approving the Conversion Amendment.
  • another related amendment) will not be adopted unless they are approved by a majority vote
  • the rights and obligations of the General Partner, states in relevant part that in purchasing,
  • implied duty of good faith and fair dealing in interpreting and carrying out the provisions
  • fiduciary obligations elf good faith, fair dealing, loyalty and candor.
  • from taking any steps in order to effectuate the Conversion Amendment;
  •    |