LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BRANDIN v GOTTLIEB Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 14,819, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHA.NCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: BRANDIN, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00014819, Ams, Gottlieb, Brandin, Agreement, Settlement Agreement, Settlement, Jill, Jay, Argent, Pursuant, Expenses, Delaware, Parties, Time Charters, Del, Paragraph, Shell, Deny, Fiduciary Duties, Fees, Fee, Amount, Management, Provisions, Argent Chartering, Trust, Am0, Contract, Argent Marine Services, Vessels, Payments, Argent Group, Necessary Expenses, Counterclaimants, Argent Marine, Aci, Brother, Charters, Complaint, Ac11, Respectfully Refer, Delaware Corporation, Causing Ams, Stockholders , ContentID: 120239840

Case Documents
1 2000-08-28 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100492
5 pages
PDF
2 2000-07-13 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100493
74 pages
PDF
3 2000-06-15 DEFENDANTS REPLY TO POST-TRIAL BRIEF RELATING TO 1996-1998 CLAIMS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103385
28 pages
PDF
4 2000-04-18 DEFENDANTS POST-TRIAL BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103386
64 pages
PDF
5 2000-01-24 PRETRIAL STIPULATION AND ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103565
24 pages
PDF
6 1999-08-09 REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIMS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103387
7 pages
PDF
7 1999-07-20 ANSWER TO 4TH AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102227
30 pages
PDF
8 1999-07-01 FOURTH AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102228
51 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 8 documents , 283 pages
Price: $ 54.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
GOTTLIEB
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
AMS
AMOUNT
JUDGEMENT
DEFENDANT
CAUSING
PERMITTING
PAY
EXPENSES
FEES
PURSUANT
DISTRIBUTION
BRANDIN
REASONS
OPINION
PAID
COURT
ARGENT MARINE
HEREBY
MANAGEMENT
HEREOF
CONNECTION
DECLARATION
PAYING
CERTIFY
VICE CHANCELLOR BALICK
TIME CHARTERS
AMM PURSUANT
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY



JILL F. BRANDIN and the                      1
JILL F.  BRANDIN  REVOCABLE TRUST  )
                                             1
                              Plaintiffs,    j
                                                     Civil Action No. 14819
               V.                            ;
                                             1
STEPHEN P. GOTTLIEB,                         )

                              Defendant,     r>
     and
                                             i
ARGENT MARINE SERVICES, INC.,                )
a Delaware corporation, ARGENT               >
CHARTERING I, INC., a Delaware               >
corporation, and ARGENT CHARTERING )
11, INC., a Delaware corporation,
                                             1
                              Nominal
                              Defendants.


                              FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

               Plaintiffs' claims having been tried before this Court on January 25-28. 2000 and

on March 2,2000, and post-trial briefing and oral argument having been considered by the Court,

in accordance with and for the reasons stated in this Court's Memorandum Opinion dated July

I3, 2000 (the "July 13 Opinion"), the Memorandum Opinion of Vice Chancellor Balick dated

September 18. 1998, and the Order of Vice Chancellor Balick dated September 29, 1998, and the

parties hereto having agreed to entry of judgment herein in the form set forth below;



               IT IS HEREBY  ORDERED,  ADJUDGED AND DECREED this ii-@&day

of August, 2000, that:

               1, Final judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant Stephen
SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs' claims having been tried before this Court on January 25-28.
  • in accordance with and for the reasons stated in this Court's Memorandum Opinion dated July
  • I3, 2000, the Memorandum Opinion of Vice Chancellor Balick dated
  • Final judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant Stephen
  • P. Gotdieb ("Gottlieb") on Plaintiffs' claim that Gottlieb breached the Settlement Agreement,
  • certain other parties by causing or permitting Argent Marine
  • Inc. to pay excess management fees to Argent Marine Management.
  • Final judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant Gottlieb
  • AMS IO pay legal fees and expenses in 1995 in excess of those permitted by the Settlement
  • that should have been paid by AMM pursuant to the Settlement Agreement.
  • AMS received an amount equal to "interim hire" within the meaning of Clause Sof the
  • Time Charters, which amount has escalated on an annual basis and without interruption each
  • year from November 1990 pursuant to Clause Sof the Time Charters.
  • AMS to pay general overhead expenses during 1996, 1997, and 1998 that should have been paid
  • AMS to pay litigation fees and expenses in connection with these proceedings.
  • ten days from the date hereof, Gottlieb shall cause AMS to make a distribution to its
  • Brandin and two-thirds of which amount shall be distributed to Mr. Gottlieb),
  • AMS may, after the date hereof, maintain reasonable reserves for Necessary Expenses (as
  • Plainti Ffs' request for a declaration,
  • The Court hereby declares that the Settlement
  • Agreement prohibits AMS from paying, and prohibits Gottlieb from causing or permitting AMS
  • Settlement .4greement for the reasons and on the grounds set forth in the July 13 Opinion.
  • counsel to Plaintiffs shall certify to Mr. Gottlieb the actual amount of fees and

  • 2 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    JAY
    JILL
    SHELL
    BUSINESS
    ARGENT
    SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
    LITIGATION
    TIME CHARTERS
    GOTTLIEB
    MANAGEMENT
    VESSELS
    CONTRACT
    BROTHER
    FEE
    DELAWARE
    ATTORNEYS
    FIXED PRICE PURCHASE
    FIXED PRICE
    PROVISION
    VICE CHANCELLOR
    ARGENT GROUP
    AM0
    MARINE SERVICES
    AMO
    LNG
    INVESTMENT
    NEGOTIATIONS
    CONTINGENT
    COMPENSATION
    
           IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY 01; THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                 -ii:`:-;;
                                                                                         t, ,; L
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    JILL F. BRANDIN and the JILL F. BRANDIN                 )
    REVOCABLE TRIJST,                                       >
    
                                  Plaintiffs,               >
           V.                                               >       Civil Action No. 14819
    
    STEPHEN P, GOTTLIEB,
    
                                  Defendant,
    
    ARGENT MARINE SERVICES, INC., a                         >
    Delaware corporation, ARGENT CHARTERING I, )
    INC., a Delaware corporation, and ARGENT                >
    CHARTERING II, INC., a Delaware corporation,            )
    
                                  No-rninal Defendar ts. )
    
                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
                                   Date Submitted: June 6, 2000
                                    Date Decided:  July 13, 2000
    
    Peter  .J. Walsh, Jr., Esquire, Michael A. Pittenger, Esquire, John M. Seaman,
    Esquire, of POTTER ANDERSON  & CORROON, Wilmington, Delaware,
    Attorneys; for Plaintiffs.
    
    
    Samuel A.  Nolen, Esquire, o-f RICHARDS, LAYTON  & FINGER, Wilmington,
    Delaware: OF COUNSEL: Douglas H. Flaum, Esquire, of FRIED, FRANK,
    HARRIS.  SHRIVER  &. JACOBSON, New York, New York, Attorneys for all
    Defendants including Stephen P. Gottlieb, Pro Se.
    
    
    
    STRINE.,  Vice Chancellor
    
    
    
            This post-trial opinion addresses a number of claims brought by
    
    plaint.ff Jill F. Brandin ("Jill") against her former business partner,
    
    defendant Stephen P, Gottlieb ("Stephen"`)' regarding his management of
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Delaware corporation, ARGENT CHARTERING I,)
  • JACOBSON, New York, New York, Attorneys for all Defendants including Stephen P. Gottlieb, Pro
  • Argert Marine Services, Inc..
  • stock Jill owns the remairrder.
  • Stephen effectively ousted Jill from her management
  • positions at AMS and essentially replaced her with his brother, Jay Gottlieb
  • The ensuing litigation pursuant to 8 Del.
  • settlement agreement under which Jill gave up her role in AMS's
  • attorn:ys' fees and expenses pursuant to the Settlement Agreement's feeshifting provision.
  • During the late 1980s Stephen and Jill were principals in Argent
  • Shell Elermuda Ltd.
  • intern:rtio.?al LNG market.
  • it was required that Americ;.m taxpayer-subsidized vessels be
  • "Time Charters" or "`Charters").
  • investment in the ships plus their scrap value, which in itself would be in
  • After the Time Charters were executed, AMS --- through AM0
  • million between January `I 0 and December 3 1, 200 1 (the "Fixed Price
  • terminate and Shell would have no further commitment to AMS or AMO.
  • In exchange fo'r granting the Fixed Price Purchase Option,
  • After trial, Vice Chancellor Balick
  • obtained,a provision in the Settlement A:,;reement requiring that a contract
  • ts on AMS's scope of business and its ability to incur expenses.
  • a variable management fee to AMM,
  • contract) is on a contingent basis so that after payment of the
  • Jay Gottlieb, and with Argent Group, Stephen's former firm at which his
  • GottliEb stepped in as interim Treasurer but did not receive compensation
  • similarly do not appear to have been any hard-fought fee negotiations

  • 3 . DEFENDANTS REPLY TO POST-TRIAL BRIEF RELATING TO 1996-1998 CLAIMS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    GOTTLIEB
    AMS
    DEL
    FEES
    DEFENDANTS
    SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
    ARGENT
    CHARTERS
    DAMAGES
    COSTS
    DELAWARE
    CONTRACT
    COURT
    CONFIDENTIALITY PROVISIONS
    REIMBURSEMENT
    AWARD
    CHANCELLOR BALICK
    DAMAGES CALCULATIONS
    LEGAL FEES
    JAY GOTTLIEB
    ARGENT GROUP
    CHALLENGING AMS
    ADJUDICATION
    TIME CHARTERS
    OBLIGATIONS
    CHARTERING
    FLAGRANT VIOLATION
    DEFENDING
    VICE CHANCELLOR BALICK
    
                                         IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
                         JILL F. BRANDIN  iand the JELL  F. BRANDIN           )
                         REVOCABLE TRUST,
                                                                              i
                                                    Plaintiffs,
                                                                              i                        
                                            V.                                        Civil Action NO.
                                                                              ;
                         STECPHEN  P GOTTLIEB,
    
                                                    Defendant,                1
    .                                        and                              ;                        
                                                                              >
                         ARGENT MARINE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware )
                         corporation, ARGENT CHARTERING I, INC.,              )
                          a Delaware corporation, and ARGENT
                          CHARTERING II, `INC., a Delaware corporation, ;
    /L I                                            Nominal Defendants.
    
                                            DEFENDANTS' REPLY TO  PLAMTKFFS'  POST-TRIAL
                                                  BRIEF  IUELATWG
                                                  -~-                 TO THE 1996-1998 CLAMS
    
    
    
    
                          Of Counsel:                                      Samuel A. Nolen
                          FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS,  &RIVER                    Richards, Layton & Finger
                              & JACOB SON                                  One Rodney Square
                          (A Partnership Inclciding                        P.O. Box 551
                              :Professional  Corporatiom)                  Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                          One New York Plaza                               (302) 658-6541
                          New York, New York  10004-1980                    Attorneys for Defendants
            I_ _I         (212) 8.59-8000                                    Services, Inc., Argent
                                                                             and Argent Chartering II,
                          STEPHEN P. GOTTLIEB, pro se
    
    
                          Dated: May 15, 2000
    
    
            I        RLI:i-2156559..1
    
    
    
    I                                                              TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • STECPHEN P GOTTLIEB,
  • ARGENT MARINE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware)
  • CHARTERING II, `INC., a Delaware corporation,;
  • Charters
  • IN LIGHT OF:BRAND:b!`S FLAGRANT VIOLATION OF THE
  • AMS IS ENTITLED TO INCUR EXPENSES NECESSARY TO
  • DEFEND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS CHALLENGING AMS'
  • REQUIRE ALLOCATI~ON OF COSTS AND FEES ON EACH ISSUE
  • Defendants Should Be Reimbursed For Defending Against The Many
  • Adjudicated By Vice Chancellor Balick
  • AK AWARD OF COMF'OUND INTEREST IS l[NAPPROPlUATE UNDER
  • PLAINTIFFS DAMAGES CALCULATIONS.
  • Ch., 622 A.2d 1, affd, Del.
  • Wolfe and Pittenger, Corporate and Commercial Practice in the Delaware Court of - Chaw,
  • assailing the character of Stephen Gottlieb and Jay Gottlieb,
  • Capital Contract has added substantial value to AMS, and that contract is otherwise valid
  • I Capital Contract for violating one of the Settlement Agreement criteria (because it does,
  • Argent Group Was Hired To Assist U.S. Capital On A Limited Issue.
  • Jay Gotl:lieb was Ideally Suited to Renegotiate the Time Charters.
  • converted to obligations on the part of SBOL" - not to simply paper a pre-existing deal,
  • contingent fee and cost reimbursement not been paid."
  • O F BRANDIN'S F L A G R A N T V I O L A T I O N O F T H E S E T T L E M E N T &XEEMENT'S
  • (expended over $1 million in legal fees, and literally thousands of hours -of his own time.
  • conceded in their opening brief that most legal fees and expenses must be paid by Mr. Gottlieb
  • Agreements adjudicated by Vice Chancellor Balick -the 1994 U.S. Capital Agreement and the 1996
  • QAAMTIFFS:' DAMAGES CALCULATIONS.

  • 4 . DEFENDANTS POST-TRIAL BRIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BRANDIN
    SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
    GOTTLIEB
    COURT
    PARTIES
    COUNSEL
    PROVISIONS
    DELAWARE
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEFENDANTS
    LITIGATION
    FEE
    TIME CHARTERS
    SHELL
    DEL
    FINANCIALLYCOMPLEX
    ARGENT GROUP
    JAY GOTTLIEB
    TESTIMONY
    CONFIDENTIALITY PROVISIONS
    MANAGEMENT
    NEGOTIATING
    SHAREHOLDERS
    TRANSACTION
    RABINOWITZ
    GENERAL OVERHEAD
    PLAINTIFFS BEAR
    LNG VESSELS
    NEGOTIATE
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    JILL F. BRANDIN and the JILL F. BRANDW
    REVOCABLE TRUST,
                                                               1
                                Plaintiffs,                    1
                                                               1
                                -v.  -                         ) Civil Action No. 14819
                                                               1
    STEPHEN P. GOTTLIEB,                                       1
    
                                Defendant,
    
                                 and
    
    ARGENT MARINE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware                   )
     corporation, ARGENT CHARTERING I, INC., a                 )
     Delaware corporation, and ARGENT CHARTERING               )
     II, INC., a Delaware corporation,                         )
                                                               )
                                Nominal Defendants.            >
    
                                   DEFENDANTS'  POST-TRIAL BRIEF
                                RELATING   TO THE 1996-1998
                                                                     CLAIMS
    
    
                                                       RICHARDS, LAYTON  & FINGER
                                                       One Rodney Square
                                                       P.O. Box 551
                                                       Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                       (302) 658-6541
    
                                                        Attorneys for Certain Defendants
    Of Counsel:
    FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER
       &JACOBSON
    (A Partnership Including
       Professional Corporations)
    One New York Plaza
    New York, New York 10004- 1980
    (212) 859-8000
    STEPHEN P. GOTTLIEB, pro se
    
    
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Of Counsel:
  • BRANDIN HAS DELIBERATELY VIOLATED THE
  • SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT'S CONFIDENTIALITY PROVISIONS
  • IN AN ATTEMPT TO FOMENT FURTHER LITIGATION AGAINST
  • Provisions the Parties Agreed to and Plaintiffs Bear the Burden of
  • Other Officer of AMS, Perform Particular Services.
  • Plaintiffs are Not Entitled to an Injunction or a Declaratory Judgment
  • G. Fee Shifting Should Equitably Result in Both Sides Bearing Their
  • Accents of Nature Landscaning v. Savage, Del.
  • Wolfe and Pittenger, Corporate and Commercial Practice in the Delaware Court of Chancery, 9
  • because Jill Brandin and Stephen Gottlieb simply could not work
  • together any longer, the parties executed the August 15, 1995 Settlement Agreement (TX.
  • monthly net cash flows from Shell which were anticipated to continue until 2010.
  • the ships were in deep lay-up, Shell had no use for them, and Shell management had
  • Capital and Argent Group Ltd.) to help him.
  • sophisticated professional who during her time at AMS performed the bulk of the
  • in 1996 to find alternative uses for the vessels and later in 1997 to negotiate a transaction
  • negotiating the Settlement Agreement and to use this Court - and its liberal amendment,
  • Defendants believe that both parties' conduct, including the good they have each
  • Jill Brandin's willful violations of the confidentiality provisions contained in the 1995
  • heard from Jill Brandin, Stephen Gottlieb, Jay Gottlieb (President of U.S. Capital
  • testimony was heard from Joseph Cuneo and Andrew McAleer (Defendants'
  • Finally, the testimony of Peter Golden, Leonard Rabinowitz (AMS'

  • 5 . PRETRIAL STIPULATION AND ORDER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    BRANDIN
    PLAINTIFFS
    AMS
    SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
    PURSUANT
    DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    PARTIES
    DELAWARE
    COMPLAINT
    ARGENT
    LITIGATION
    JILL
    TRUST
    DECLARATION
    LITIGATION FEES
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    NOMINAL DEFENDANTS
    CAPITAL AGREEMENT
    ARGENT CHARTERING
    CHANCERY RULE
    CAUSING AMS
    ARGENT MARINE
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    UNCLEAN HANDS DEFENSE
    AC11
    PERMITTED AMS
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    AM0
    
               IN THE COURT OF CHA.NCERY  OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    JILL F. BRANDIN and the
    JILL F. BRANDIN REVOCABLE
    TRUST,
    
                          Plaintiffs,
    
                    V.                                    Civil ActionNo. 14819
    
    STEPHEN P. GOTTLIEB,
    
                          Defendant,
    
        and
    
    ARGENT MARINE SERVICES, INC.:
    a Delaware corporation, ARGENT
    CHARTERING I, INC., a Delaware
    corpora!ion,  and ARGENT
    CHARTERING II, INC.,
    a Delaware corporation,
    
                          Nominal Defendants.
    
    
                               PRETRIAL STIPULATION AND ORDER
    
                   Pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 16, and subject to the approval of the Court,
    
    the parties submit the following Pretrial Order in conjunction with the trial that is scheduled to
    
    commence on January 25,200O.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                  -l-
    
    
    
    I.     NATURE OF THE ACTION
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHA.NCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • JILL F. BRANDIN REVOCABLE TRUST,
  • ARGENT MARINE SERVICES, INC.:
  • a Delaware corporation, ARGENT CHARTERING I, INC., a Delaware corpora!ion, and ARGENT
  • Pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 16, and subject to the approval of the Court,
  • Plaintiffs Jill F. Brandin and the Jill F. Brandin Revocable Trust (collectively
  • "Brandin") commenced this action on February 6, 1996, naming Stephen P. Gottlieb
  • Inc. as "Nominal Defendants."
  • 1995, among Plaintiffs, Gottlieb, AMS, and certain other corporations (the "Settlement
  • Plaintiffs also alleged that Gottlieb had breached fiduciary duties owed to Brandin
  • In their original answer, Gottlieb, AMS, ACI, and AC11 disputed Plaintiffs'
  • and Supplemental Complaint, which Plaintiffs filed on March 18, 1997.
  • well as Counterclaims alleging that Brandin had breached the Settlement Agreement.
  • On November 7, 1997, the parties submitted cross-motions for summary
  • Vice Chancellor Balick granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs on Defendants'
  • Brandin sold her 21.67 shares of AM0 stock to Gottlieb in connection
  • No. 14240 in this Court (the "1995 Litigation").
  • for summary judgment on Defendants' unclean hands defense.
  • permitting AMS to pay litigation fees and expenses on behalf of and in furtherance of
  • Whether Gottlieb has breached the Settlement Agreement by causing AMS
  • to enter into an agreement dated July 23, 1997 (the "1997 U.S. Capital Agreement") with U.S.
  • A declaration that AMS, ACI, and AC11 are nominal defendants in these
  • or permitted AMS to pay are excessive and unreasonable in view of AMS's role in these

  • 6 . REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIMS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    PARAGRAPH
    DEFENDANTS
    SETTLEMENT
    AGREEMENT
    COURT
    RELIEF STATED THEREIN
    PLAINTIFFS REFER
    NOMINAL DEFENDANTS
    JILL
    BRANDIN
    RESPONSE
    ASSERT
    DOCTRINE
    GOTTLIEB
    ESQUIRE
    YORK
    ATTORNEYS
    PLAINTIFFS REPEAT
    REALLEGE PARAGRAPHS
    HEREOF
    DELAWARE
    ARGENT
    REVOCABLE TRUST
    POTTER ANDERSON
    CORROON LLP
    ALLEGATIONS
    SECOND SENTENCE
    DEFENSES
    
                 IN 7`HE CO1 RT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    JILL F. BRANDIN and the                          1
    JILL F. BRANDIN REVOCABLE                        >
    TRUST,                                           >>
                                   Plaintiffs,       >>     Civil Action No. 14819
                   v.                                >>
    STEPHEN P. GOTTLIEB,                             >>
                                   Defendant,        >>
         and                                         >>
    ARGENT MARINE SERVICES INC.,                     >
    a Delaware corporation, ARGENT                   >
    CHARTERING I, INC., a Delaware                   >
    corporation, and ARGENT CHARTERING )
    II, INC., a Delaware corporation,                )
                                                     >
                                   Nominal )
                                   Defendants.  )
    
    
                                   REPLY TO COUN:I'ERCLAIMS
    
                   Plaintiffs and CounterclaimDefendants,  Jill F. Brandin and the Jill F. Brandin
    
    Revocable Trust ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their attorneys, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP,
    
    reply to the Counterclaims of Defendants and Counterclaimantsserved on July 20, 1999, as
    
    follows:
    
                   165. Plaintiffs are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
    
    as to the truth or accuracy of the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 165. The
    
    second sentence of paragraph 165 is admitted.
    
    
    
                    166.         Admitted.
    
                    167.         Admitted.
    
                    168.         Admitted.
    
                    169.         As to the first sentence of paragraph 169, admitted that Brandin,
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN 7`HE CO1 RT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Jill F. Brandin and the Jill F. Brandin
  • Revocable Trust, by and through their attorneys, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP,
  • Plaintiffs are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
  • as to the truth or accuracy of the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph
  • AMS, ACI, ACII, and certain other corporations executed a settlement agreement on August 15,
  • The second sentence of paragraph 169 is denied as stated, and Plaintiffs refer the Court to
  • allegations) is denied as stated, and Plaintiffs refer thle Court to the ternIs of the
  • Plaintiffs repeat and reallege paragraphs 165 through 172 hereof as if fully
  • Paragraph 174 states a legal conclusion as to which no response is
  • Plaintiffs assert the following affirmative defenses to the Counterclaims:
  • The Counterclaims, and each claim for relief stated therein, fail to state a claim
  • in part by Defendants' unclean hands.
  • Certain of the Counterclaims are barred by the doctrine of acquiescence.
  • Gottlieb does not have standing to assert some or all of the Counterclaims.
  • germane to the actual and legitimate interests of Nominal Defendants.
  • Douglas H. Flaum, Esquire
  • One New York Plaza
  • Argent Marine Services, Inc.

  • 7 . ANSWER TO 4TH AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    PARAGRAPH
    DENY
    GOTTLIEB
    SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
    PLAINTIFFS
    AMS
    COURT
    COUNTERCLAIMANTS
    RESPECTFULLY REFER
    ARGENT MARINE SERVICES
    JILL
    BRANDIN REVOCABLE TRUST
    SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
    AVER
    AMS COMPANIES
    ARGENT CHARTERING
    ATTORNEYS
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    WRITTEN MATERIALS
    FULLY SET
    LITIGATION
    RABINOWITZ
    PARTIES RELATING
    DEFENDANTS REPEAT
    FIRST SENTENCE
    AMS BOARD
    CORPORATE RECORDS
    SOLE PROPERTY
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE  -
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    -                                                            x
    
    JILL F. BRANDIN and the JILL F. BRANDIN
    REVOCABLE TRUST,
    
                                          Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 14819
    
                                v .
    
    STEPIHEN P. GOTTLIEB,
    
                                          Defendant,
    
                               and
    
    A.RGENT MARINE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware :
    corporation, ARGENT CHARTERING I, INC., a
    Delaware corporation, and ARGENT CHARTERING II, :
    INC., a Delaware corporation
    
                                          Nominal
                                          Defendants.
                                                                 x
    
                              ANSWER TO FOURTH AMENDED AND
                   SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS'
    
                   Stephen P. Gottlieb ("Gottlieb"), Argent Marine Services, Inc. ("AMS"), Argent
    
    Chartering I, Inc. ("ACI"), and Argent Chartering II, Inc.  ("ACII")  (collectively "Defendants-
    
    counterclaimants"), by their undersigned attorneys, for their answer and affirmative defenses to
    
    the Fourth Amended and Supplemental Complaint of Jill F. Brandin ("Brandin") and the Jill F.
    
    Brandin Revocable Trust (the "Trust") (collectively "Plaintiffs-counterclaim defendants"), state,
    
    
           `Capitalized terms used herein that are not defined herein but are defined in the
    Complaint, have the meanings attributed to them in the Complaint.
    
    
    
    on knowledge as to themselves and their own actions and on information and belief as to all
    
    other matters, as follows:
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE -IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
  • JILL F. BRANDIN and the JILL F. BRANDIN
  • A.RGENT MARINE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware: corporation, ARGENT CHARTERING I, INC., a Delaware
  • SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS'
  • Stephen P. Gottlieb, Argent Marine Services, Inc., Argent
  • Brandin Revocable Trust (collectively "Plaintiffs-counterclaim defendants"), state,
  • Deny that there has been any breach of the Settlement Agreement or of any
  • Lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the reasons Plaintiffs
  • contained in paragraph 2.
  • have been merged into AMS.
  • Brandin Trust owns 333.33 shares of the outstanding commom stock of AMS and deny
  • Admit the allegations contained in paragraph 8, except aver that AMS is
  • Admit that an action styled In Re Argent Marine Services, Inc., et al., C.A
  • refer to the pleadings in the 1995 Litigation for their full and accurate contents.
  • Deny the allegation contained in paragraph 14 and respectfully refer to the
  • had no right to participate in the management of the AMS Companies.
  • parties relating to the subject matters hereof, &re being no oral arsreements whatsoever
  • 1995 was re-authorized and re-approved by the AMS board of directors
  • 1995 Rabinowitz letter for its full and accurate contents.
  • and written materials
  • Defendants repeat and state paragraphs 1 through 59 hereof as if fully set
  • Defendants repeat and re-allege paragraphs 1 through 7 1 hereof as if fully
  • Admit the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 79 and
  • attorneys' fees incurred in defending this action.
  • AMS' documents which are the sole property of AMS.
  • Defendants and counterclaimants Stephen P. Gottlieb and Argent Marine
  • return to the AMS Companies dozens of corporate records and other written materials.

  • 8 . FOURTH AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    GOTTLIEB
    AGREEMENT
    SETTLEMENT
    BRANDIN
    EXPENSES
    PURSUANT
    PLAINTIFFS
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    AMOUNT
    ARGENT
    PAYMENTS
    LITIGATION
    NECESSARY EXPENSES
    ACI
    TRUST
    AM0
    STOCKHOLDERS
    MANAGEMENT FEE
    CAUSED AMS
    TIME CHARTERS
    ACII
    ARGENT CHARTERING
    AC11
    DISTRIBUTION
    ARGENT MARINE
    ARGENT MARINE SERVICES
    CAUSING AMS
    CONNECTION
    ILLEGITIMATE EXPENSES
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    JILL F. BRANDIN and the                       >
    JILL F. BRANDIN REVOCABLE                     >
    TRUST,                                        >
                                                  >
                                  Plaintiffs,     >
                                                  >           Civil Action No. 14819
                   v.                             >>
    STEPHEN P. G'OTTLIEB,                         >>
                                  Defendant,      >>
         and                                      >>
    ARGENT MARINE SERVICES:, INC.,                >
    a Delaware corporation, ARGENT                >
    C'HARTERING I, INC., a Delaware               >
    corporation, and ARGENT CHARTERING )
    II, INC., a Delaware corporation,             >>
                                  Nominal         >
                                  Defendants. )
    
    
                   FOURTH AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
                  -_-                    ~-
    
                   Plaintiffs, Jill F. Brandin ("Brandin") and -:he Jill F. Brandin Revocable Trust (the
    
    ":Brandin Trust"), by their undersigned attorneys, hereby allege in support of their  Founih
    
    Amended and Supplemental Complaint as follows:
    
                                           JNTRODUCTION
                                                         -       -
    
                   1. Plaintiffs bring this action to enforce their rights pursuant to a settlement
    
    agreement dated August 15, 1995 among Brandin, the Brandin Trust, Stephen P. Gottlieb, Argent
    
    Marine Services, Inc., Argent Chartering I, Inc., Argent Chartering II, Inc., AMS Capital
    
    
    
    Corporation, Argent Marine Operations, Inc., and At-gent Marine Marketing, Inc. (the "Settlement
    
    Agreement"). Plaintiffs also seek injunctive relief and damages against defendant Stephen  :P.
    
    Gottlieb, a director  #and the Chairman and President of Argent Marine Services, Inc., Argent
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • corporation, and ARGENT CHARTERING)
  • Jill F. Brandin and -:he Jill F. Brandin Revocable Trust (the
  • ":Brandin Trust"), by their undersigned attorneys, hereby allege in support of their Founih
  • Plaintiffs bring this action to enforce their rights pursuant to a settlement
  • agreement dated August 15, 1995 among Brandin, the Brandin Trust, Stephen P. Gottlieb, Argent
  • Corporation, Argent Marine Operations, Inc., and At-gent Marine Marketing, Inc. (the
  • Gottlieb, a director #and the Chairman and President of Argent Marine Services, Inc., Argent
  • Chartering I, Inc., and Argent Chartering 11, Inc., for breaches of fiduciary duties owed to
  • AMS is The Corporation Trust Company.
  • director of AMS, ACI, and ACII, and their Executive Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer.
  • AC11 as well as the Chairman and President of each of those corporations.
  • interest in the time charters to AMS, and the bareboat charters were terminated.
  • Trust, and Gottlieb have been the sole stockholders of AMS, ACI, and ACII.
  • AM0 as well as officers of such corporation.
  • litigation being herein referred to as the " 1995 Litigation").
  • AMS, the Settlement Agreement caps the expenses of AMS, ACI, and ACII.
  • "Management Fee" to a separate corporation controlled
  • by Gottlieb for the management of AMS, and the payment of "Necessary Expenses" (as
  • determining the annual amount of the "Management Fee."
  • the citizenship or ownership of the LNG Vessels or in connection with a tax audit.
  • caused AMS to incur expenses for 1995 above those permitted by the Settlement Agreement.
  • October 15, 1995, of annual cash available for distribution by AMS to its stockholders
  • payments were made to Deloitte & Touche during 1995 with respect to such fees).
  • The Illegitimate Expenses
  • causing AMS to pay substantial expenses in excess of those permitted under the Settlement
  •    |