![]() |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
ORDER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
UNITED STATES MARKETING VACCINE CANADA COUNTERCLAIMS COURT CHANCERY CASTLE COUNTY REASONS SET MARKETING VARICELLA PERMISSION REGULATORY AGENCIES JURISDICTION COUNTRIES JUDGEMENT PLAINTIFF |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWA.RE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
MERCK & CO., INC., >>
Plaintiff, >>
v. > C. A. No. 15443-NC
>
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM >
PHARMACEIJTICALS CO., >
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDINGS )
CORPORATFON, SMITHKLINE >
BEECHAM CORPORATION, and 1
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM >
BIOLOGICALS S.A., >
Defendants. )
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in this Court's Opinion entered in this case
on this date, it is
ORDERED that defendants are enjoined from marketing varicella
vaccine in the United States and Canada for a period of three years from the
date defendants receive permission from all regulatory agencies having
appropriate jurisdiction within the United States and Canada to market such
vaccine in these countries; and
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff
and against defendants on all of the defendants' counterclaims and such
counterclaims are dismissed.
-
Chancellor
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
OPINION (REDACTED)
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MERCK CELL PRODUCTION VARICELLA VACCINE DEP DIDELEZ VIRUS COURT DEFENDANTS TRADE SECRET OKA STRAIN CULTURE MO1 COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION BSA PLAINTIFF SMITHKLINE BEECHAM DELAWARE INFECTED CELLS LABORATORY NONEXCLUSIVE RIGHTS BULK VACCINE FBS KINETICS VIRAL PASSAGE CELL SHEET TAKAHASHI CULTURE MEDIUM INFECTION |
/wu " F ---`,- 0 I 4
FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO ORDER OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
--
MERCK & CO., INC.,
Plaintiff,
>
V. 1 C. A. NC,. 15443-NC
> -
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM >
PHARMACEUTICALS CO., ) -_
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDINGS ) - :
CORPORATION, SMITHKLINE >
BEECHAM CORPORATION, and )
SMITHECLINE BEECHAM -_ . .I
. >
BIOLOGICALS S.A., >> .
Defendants. 1
OPINION
Date Submitted: June 29,1999
Date Decided: August 5, 1999
Richard D. Allen, Mary B. Graham, Julia Heaney and Bradley J. Enna, of
MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELL, Wilmington, Delaware; OF
COUNSEL: Paul I?. Matukaitis and Kevin J. McGough, of MERCK & CO.,
INC., Rahway, NJ; Attorneys for Plaintiff.
Richard IS, Hemmann and Mary B. Matterer of BLANK ROME COMISKY
& MCCAULEY LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Donald R Dunner, Susan H.
Griffen, Howard W. Levine, John R Alison and York M, Faulkner of
FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT & DUNNER LLP,
Washington, D.C.; OF COUNSEL: James K. Grasty, Yuriy P. Stercho, of
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM, Philadelphia, PA; Attorneys for Defendants.
CHANDLER, Chan@lor
~`.
TABLE OF CONTENTS'
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
PUBLIC VERSION OF MERCKS POST-TRIAL REPLY BRIEF
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PUBLICATION DEFENDANTS PRODUCTION PROCESS MERCK TRADE SECRET PUBLICATIONS DISCLOSE EVIDENCE WASHING COURT MISAPPROPRIATION CONFIDENTIALITY DEFENSE COMMERCIAL PROCESS PATENT VARICELLA VACCINE KNOW-HOW PLAINTIFF SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDINGS EXPLANATION HIGH BSA ADOPTION ASSERTION CLARIFICATION INJUNCTION GENERAL WELDING POST-TRIAL OPENING TESTIMONY PENNSYLVANIA LAW INCORRECT |
IN THE COGRT OF CHANCERY- OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
MERCK & CO., INC.,
Plaintiff, j C.A. No. 15443NC
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO., :
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDINGS CORPORAXON, ; CONFIDENTIAL
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and j INFORMATION OF
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS &A., ; SB, BIKEN AND
1 MERCK REDACTED
Defendants.
PUBLIC VERSION OF
MERCK'S POST-TRIAL REPLY BRIEF j --
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL
Richard D. Allen
Mary B. Graham
Julia Heaney
Bradley J. Enna
1201 N. Market Street
OF COUNSEL: P.O. Box 1347
Wilrnington, DE 19899- 1347
Paul D. Mahlkaitis (302) 6589200
Kevin J. McGough Attorneys for Plaintiff
MERCK & CO., INC.
P.O. Box 2000
Rahway, NJ 07065-0907
June 28, 1999
Original Dated: May 18, 1999
i.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TABLE OF CITATIONS .111
ARGUMENT 1
SNIPPETS:
|
|
4
.
PUBLIC VERSION OF MERCKS PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CONCERNING MERCKS CLAIMS OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE SECRETS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
VACCINE DEFENDANTS VARICELLA VACCINE PRODUCTION COURT TRADE SECRET CELLS LAW VIRUS LYOPHILIZATION MAKING VARICELLA VACCINE OKA PLAINTIFFS CYCLE MISAPPROPRIATION COMPLICATION BIKEN KNOW-HOW CELL CULTURE PRODUCTION PROCESSES LICENSING INFECTED CELLS LABORATORY BEECHAM HOLDINGS CORPORATION CONFIDENTIALITY PROPOSED FINDINGS MANUFACTURING PUBLICATION AGREEMENT SPLIT RATIO |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTVI
LIERCK & CO., INC.,
Plaintiff, C.A. No. 15443NC
v.
S\`lITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO., ;
SklITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDINGS CORPORATION, : CONFIDENTIAL
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, and INFORMATION OF
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS S.A., SB, BIKEN AND
MERCK REDACTED
Defendants.
PUBLIC VERSION OF
AIERCK'S PROPOSED FIYDINGS OF FACT ~ -
AXD CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CONCERWING MERCK'S
CLAI>IS OF >IISAPPROPRIATIOY OF TR4DE SECRETS _
r- ?
L. ._"
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL
Richard D. Allen
Mary B. Graham
OF COUNSEL: Julia Heaney
Bradley J. Enna
Paul D. blatukaitls 1201 N. Market Street
Kuin J. McGough P.O. Box 1347
41ERC'K 8r C-O., INC. Wilmmgton, DE 19899- 1347
P.O. Box 2000 (302) 658-9200
Rah\\ a>`. NJ 07065-0907 &4ttomeys for Plaintiff
June 28, 1999
Orlginal Dated: May 26, 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Tz\BLE OF CITATIONS iv
PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT
1. BACKGROUND,
SNIPPETS:
|
|
5
.
PUBLIC VERSION OF MERCKS PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW CONCERNING DEFENDANTS COUNTERCLAIMS AND "UNCLEAN HANDS" DEFENSE
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AGREEMENT MERCK CONFIDENTIALITY CLINICAL INVESTIGATORS OPTION PERIOD CONFIDENTIALITY OBLIGATION EXTENSION DEL STATUTE CONTINUED1 BREACH COURT TAKAHASHI OKA STRAIN VACCINE EVIDENCE OBTAINED INFORMATION DEFENDANTS WOODRUFF NEGOTIATIONS CONTRACT LEXIS INTERFERENCE LANGUAGE CLINICAL TRIALS CONCEALMENT PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP THIRD PARTIES ANDRE DEP |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NE\ii: CASTLE COUNTY
\lERCK & CO., INC..
Plamtiff, C.A. No. 15443NC
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO.,
SMITHKLINE BEECHAAM HOLDINGS CORPORATION, ~CONFIDENTIAL
S\IITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, and INFORMATION OF
SUITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS S.A., SB, BIKES ASD
3fERCK REDACTED
Defendants.
PC'BLIC VERSION OF
12ERCK'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT _
ASD COSCLL'SIONS OF L-4\\' COYCERYING ;
DEFENDASTS' COUSTERCLAIMS _:3
;
AND "UNCLEAN HASDS" DEFENSE - , - .
MORRIS, NICHOLS? ARSHT & TUNNELL
Richard D. Allen
Mary B. Graham
OF COUNSEL: Julia Heaney
Bradley J. Enna
Paul D. 1LIatukaitis 1201 N. Market Street
Ke\--in J. McGough P.O. Box 1347
&CLERCK 8i CO., INC. Wilmington, DE 19899- 1347
P.O. Box 2000 (302) 658-9200
Rahway, NJ 07065-0907 Attorneys for Plaintiff
June 28, 1999
Original Dated: :%lay 26, 1999
TABLE IOF CONTENTS
Paqe
TABLE OF CITATIONS IL
I. PROPOSED FTXDINGS OF FACT.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
6
.
PUBLIC VERSION OF MERCKS POST-TRIAL ANSWERING BRIEF CORRECTED VERSION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
OPTION AGREEMENT DEL VACCINE COMMUNICATIONS OBLIGATION COURT COUNTERCLAIMS EXTENSION UNCLEAN HANDS OKA STRAIN PLAINTIFF WOODRUFF DEFENDANTS RIGHTS INTERFERENCE TESTIMONY TAKAHASHI NEGOTIATIONS CONFIDENTIALITY DELAWARE LEXIS CLINICAL TRIALS CONTRACT NEGOTIATE CINCINNATI BELL CELLULAR UNITED STATES EVIDENCE LICENSING LIMITATIONS |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
MERCK & CO., INC.,
Plaintiff,
V. C.A. No. 15443NC
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO.,
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDINGS CONFIDENTIAL
CORPORATION, INFORMATION OF SB,
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MERCK AND BIKEN
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS $A., REDACTED
Defendants.
PUBLIC VERSION OF
MERCK'S POST-TRIAL ANSWERING BRIEF
IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
COUNTERCLAIMS AND "UNCLEAN HANDS" DEFENSE
CORRECTED VERSION
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL
Richard D. Allen
Mary B. Graham
Julia Heaney
Bradley James Enna
120 1 N. Market Street
P.O. Box 1347
Wilmington, DE 19899- 1347
(302) 658-9200
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OF COUNSEL:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Paul D. Matukaitis
Kevin J. McGough
P.O. Box 2000
Rahway, NJ 070650907
June 2, 1999
Original Dated May 19, 1999
1.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
SNIPPETS:
|
|
7
.
MERCKS POST-TRIAL ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO COUNTERCLAIMS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
OPTION AGREEMENT DEL VACCINE COMMUNICATIONS OBLIGATION COURT EXTENSION OKA STRAIN COUNTERCLAIMS PLAINTIFF UNCLEAN HANDS WOODRUFF FACTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM DELAYS RIGHTS INTERFERENCE TAKAHASHI NEGOTIATIONS DEFENDANTS LEXIS CLINICAL TRIALS TESTIMONY NEGOTIATE CONFIDENTIALITY FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT CINCINNATI SMSA LICENSING LIMITATIONS |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
MERCK & CO., INC.,
Plaintiff,
C.A. No. 15443NC
V.
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO.,
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDINGS CORPORATION, PUBLIC VERSION
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, and
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS S.A.,
Defendants.
PUBLIC VERSION OF MERCK'S POST-TRIAL
ANSWERING BRIEF AND APPENDIX IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
COUNTERCLAIMS AND "UNCLEAN HANDS" DEFENSE
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL
Richard D. Allen
Mary B. Graham
Julia Heaney
Bradley James Enna
1201 N. Market Street
P.O. Box 1347
Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
(302) 658-9200
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Merck & Co., Inc.
OF COUNSEL:
Paul D. Matukaitis
Kevin J. McGough
MERCK & CO., INC.
P.O. Box 2000
Rahway, NJ 07065-0907
Dated: May 10, 1999
Sealed version filed: April 26, 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SNIPPETS:
|
|
8
.
ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MERCKS POST TRIAL OPENING BRIEF
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT PRODUCTION TRADE SECRET MERCK VARICELLA VACCINE MISAPPROPRIATION DIDELEZ DELAWARE HOLDING CIR OKA STRAIN KNOW-HOW PATENT OPENING SUPP TESTIMONY SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS PUBLISHED-IS OPTION AGREEMENT CLINICAL TRIALS UNITED STATES ACCORDINGLYF DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF PUBLIC DOMAIN RESTATEMENT MANUFACTURING PROCESS COMMERCIAL PROCESS |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
MERCK & CO., INC. )1
Plaintiff, )1
V. 1 Civ. A. No. 15443 NC
)
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO., )
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDING CORPORATION, )
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, and 1 PUBLIC VERSION
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS S.A., ))
Defendants. )
SB'S ANSWERING BRIEF AND APPENDIX IN OPPOSITION
TO MERCK'S POST TRIAL OPENING BRIEF
SMITHKL,WE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO.,
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDING CORPORATION,
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, and
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS S.A.
Of Counsel Richard K. Herrmann #405
Mary B. Matterer #2696
James K. Grasty, Esq. BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY LLP
Yuriy P. Stercho, Esq. Chase Manhattan Centre
SmithKline Beecham 120 1 Market Street, Suite 2 100
1 Franklin Plaza Wilmington, DE 1980 1
Philadelphia, P.A. 19101 302-524-6400
Donald R. Dunner, Esq.
Susan H. Griffen, Esq.
Howard W. Levine, Esq.
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
1300 I Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
202-408-4000
Dated: May 3, 1999
Sealed version filed: April 26, 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. I N T R O D U C T I O N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . .
SNIPPETS:
|
|
9
.
SBS POST TRIAL BRIEF
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
OPTION AGREEMENT UNCLEAN HANDS COURT DEFENSE WORLDWIDE EXCLUSIVE LICENSE DEL VARICELLA VACCINE OKA STRAIN INTERFERENCE CONFIDENTIALITY COUNTERCLAIMS NEGOTIATING CLINICAL TRIALS CONTAMINATION TAKAHASHI LIMITATIONS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDING AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE EXERCISES IRS OPTION EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS LEXIS TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP SAFETY DATA OBTAINING LITIGATION MERCK CONTENDS MYCOPLASMA |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
MERCK & CO., INC. ))
Plaintiff, 1)
V. ) Civ. A. No. 15443 NC
)
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO., )
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDING CORPORATION, )
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, and 1 PUBLIC VERSION
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS S.A., ))
Defendants. 1
SB'S POST TRIAL BRIEF ON COUNTERCLAIMS AND
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF UNCLEAN HANDS
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO.,
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDING CORPORATION,
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, and
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS S.A.
OfCounsel Richard K. Herrmann #405
Mary B. Matterer #2696
James IS. Grasty, Esq. BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY LLP
Yuriy P. Stercho, Esq. Chase Manhattan Centre
SmithKline Beecham 1201 Market Street, Suite 2100
1 Franklin Plaza Wilmington, DE 19801
Philadelphia, P.A. 19101 302-524-6400
/_
Donald R. Dunner, Esq.
Susan H. Griffen, Esq.
Howard W. Levine, Esq. .
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, i : : 1::;
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. -...
1300 I Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
202-408-4000
Dated: April 9, 1999
Sealed version filed: March 30, 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PJTRODUCTION
SNIPPETS:
|
|
10
.
BRIEF
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
TRADE SECRET DEFENDANTS KNOW-HOW COURT MISAPPROPRIATION PLAINTIFF VARICELLA VACCINE OPTION AGREEMENT PRODUCTION OKA STRAIN COMMERCIALIZATION FAILED EFFORTS PRIOR INFERENCE DEL VIRUS UNITED STATES REFERENCES NEGOTIATIONS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM SALSBURV LABS MANUFACTURING TAKAHASHI HOST CELLS SUCCESSFUL LICENSING INTERFERENCE LABORATORY MATUKAITIS KEVIN HINDSIGHT |
f'"' 7.. 0 ,`,? " ;> i' ,,ri
12, g sir ; b
kU>$ u k L' J-;
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
MERCK b CO., INC.,
Plaintiff,
V. iC.A. No. 15443NC
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO., i
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDINGS CORPORATION, iPUBLIC VERSION
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, and I
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS.S.A., ; .
r \ .,
Defendants.
MERCK'S PRE-TRIAL BRIEF ; '
,' _ _
_ ,- J
,' : .
P.
.- `, `. _L
-- Cl
-I..
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT &
TUNNELL
Richard D. Allen
Mary B. Graham
Julia Heaney
Bradley J. Enna
Richard H. Cross, Jr.
1201 N. Market Street
P.O. Box 1347
Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
(302) 658-9200
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OF COUNSEL:
Paul D. Matukaitis
Kevin J. McGough
MERCK & CO., INC.
P.O. Box 2000
Rahway, NJ 07065-0907
Dated: February 16, 1999
Sealed version filed: February 3, 1999
SNIPPETS:
|
|
11
.
BRIEF
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
OPTION AGREEMENT OKA STRAIN MERCK COURT TRADE SECRET TAKAHASHI CONTAMINATED SAMPLES DEL TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION CLINICAL TRIALS CIR UNITED STATES SMITHKLINE BEECHAM INDIVIDUAL ELEMENTS INTERFERENCE BIKEN EXTEND UNCLEAN HANDS COMMERCIAL PROCESS PRODUCING WORLDWIDE EXCLUSIVE LICENSE OBLIGATIONS TRADE SECRET CLAIM LIMITATIONS SUCCESSFUL SAMPLES DISRUPTED TIMING ALLEGED TRADE SECRETS DISCLOSURE PRODUCTION PLAINTIFFS |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
MERCK & CO., INC. ))
Plaintiff, 11
V. ) Civ. A. No. 15i43 NC
)
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO., )
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDING CORPORATION, )
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, and 1 PUBLIC VERSION -.
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS S.A., 11
Defendants. 1
DEFENDANTS' PRETRIAL BRIEF
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM PHARMACEUTICALS CO.,
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM HOLDING CORPORATION,
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, and
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM BIOLOGICALS S.A.
Of Counsel Richard K. Herrmann #405
Mary B. Matterer #2696
James K. Grasty, Esq. BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY LLP
Yuriy P. Stercho, Esq. Chase Manhattan Centre
SmithKline Beecham 1201 Market Street, Suite 2100
1 Franklin Plaza Wilmington, DE 1980 1
Philadelphia, P.A. 19 10 1 302-524-6400
Donald R. Dunner, Esq.
Susan H. Griffen, Esq.
Howard W. Levine, Esq.
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
1300 I Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
202-408-4000
Dated: February 11, 1999
Sealed version filed: February 3, 1999
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTIOti . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...**.....*.*..*.....*.. 1
STATEMENT OF FACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . .
SNIPPETS:
|
| | | |