 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
LETTER OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
JURISDICTION CONTRACT COURT FITZGERALD TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE PERSONAL JURISDICTION AGREEMENT PARTNERSHIP TORT CLAIM PLAINTIFFS CHANDLER EXERCISE FORDE BREACH DELAWARE FORUM SELECTION FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE SUBSTANCE ASSERT LIMITED PARTNERS MATTER JUDICIAL ECONOMY EMPLOYMENT PARTIES ALLEGING ALLEGE EFFICIENCY DISMISS ADJUDICATING |
.I :
,:
COURTOFCHANCER Y `<,,
O F T H E
S T A T E O F D E L A W A R E
M Y R O N T . S T E E L E
"ICE CHANCELLOR
David C. McBride
James P. Hughes, Jr.
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor
P.O. Box 391
Wilmington, DE 19899-039 1
Lawrence C. Ashby
Steven J. Balick
Ashby & Geddes
P.O. Box 1150
Wilmington, DE 19899
Re: Cantor Fitzgerald v. Ke in Chandler, et al.
C.A. No. 15689-NC J"
Cantor Fitzgerald v. Gregory Forde, et al.
C.A. No. 15690-NC
Submitted: July 20, 1999
Decided: October 14, 1999
Counsel:
Issue Presented
Where the parties are the same and the subject matter is closely related in an
action alleging both contract claims and a tortious interference claim can the
Delaware Court of Chancery exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendants in
the tort claim when the defendants are already subject to that same court's
Fitzgerald v. Chandler - C.A. #15689-NC
Fitzgerald v. Forde - C.A. #I 5690-NC
October 14, 1999
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
DEFENDANTS ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COUNTERCLAIMANTS LUTNICK CANTOR FITZGERALD DEFENDANTS GROUP MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT ALLEGATIONS HIGH DISTRIBUTION CFI EMPLOYEES INVESTMENT HIGH DISTRIBUTION UNITS CHANDLER GOMEZ SHALLIS AMENDED AGREEMENT GENERAL PARTNER CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION EMPLOYMENT ROBERT SHALLIS HOWARD LUTNICK SOLE GENERAL PARTNER MERELY SETS COUNTERCLAIMANTS REPEAT PLAINTIFFS KEVIN CHANDLER MICHAEL GOMEZ COUNTERDEFENDANTS INFORMATION SUFFICIENT |
\ ;. !<
\ IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
CANTOR FITZGERALD, L.P.
Plaintiff,
V.
KEVIN CHANDLER, MICHAEL GOMEZ, :
and ROBERT SHALLIS,
C.A. No. 15689
Defendants and
Counterclaim Plaintiffs, :
V.
CANTOR FITZGERALD, L.P.,
HOWARD LUTNICK, and
CANTOR FITZGERALD GROUP
MANAGEMENT,
Counterclaim Defendants. :
DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS
AGAINST CANTOR FITZGERALD, L.P., HOWARD LUTNICK,
AND CANTOR FITZGERALD GROUP MANAGEMENT
Defendants, Kevin Chandler ("Chandler"), Michael Gomez ("Gomez"), and
Robert Shallis ("Shallis") (collectively, "Defendants" or "Counterclaimants"), hereby
complaint of Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. (the "Limited Partnership") and counterclaim
Limited Partnership, Howard Lutnick ("Lutnick"), and Cantor Fitzgerald Group Management
("C.F. Group Management") (the latter three of which sometimes collectively are
herein as "Counterdefendants") as follows:
ANSWER
1. Denied.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
