LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

THE OBRIEN CORP. v HUNT-WESSON Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 16,562, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: THE OBRIEN CORP., State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00016562, Hunt-wesson, Fuller, Delaware, Successor, Declaratory Judgment, Hunt, Responsibility, Liabilities, Lead Pigment, Vice Chancellor, Lead Pigment Litigations, Products Liability, Matter, Complaint, Indemnity, Resolution, Determination, Hunt Foods, Ltv, Dgcl, Hunt-fuller, Vice Chancellor Balick, Manufacturing, Asset Purchase, Fuller Paint Company , ContentID: 120239774

Case Documents
1 1999-02-25 INC. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100364
22 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 1 document , 22 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . INC. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
FULLER
DELAWARE
SUCCESSOR
PLAINTIFFS
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
HUNT
RESPONSIBILITY
LIABILITIES
LEAD PIGMENT
VICE CHANCELLOR
LAW
LEAD PIGMENT LITIGATIONS
PRODUCTS LIABILITY
MATTER
DEFENDANT
COMPLAINT
INDEMNITY
RESOLUTION
DETERMINATION
HUNT FOODS
LTV
DGCL
HUNT-FULLER
VICE CHANCELLOR BALICK
MANUFACTURING
ASSET PURCHASE
ATTORNEYS
FULLER PAINT COMPANY
       IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


THE O'BRIEN CORPORATION,                )
an Indiana corporation,                 >>>
                    Plaintiff,          >
      V.                                >      Civil  ActionNo. 16562  `:-  \                ,
                                        >
HUNT-WESSON, INC.,                      >                                       ,._  '
a Delaware corporation,                 >>                                        (-7.I
                    Defendant.          >                              (  `I
                                                                       " -'        i-1
                                                                       12           1.  '


                MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER


                           Date Submitted: February 23,1999
                           Date Decided: February 25, 1999


M. Duncan Grant, Esquire, Tara L. Lattomus, Esquire, of PEPPER HAMILTON,
Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL: Wade R. Joyner, Esquire, of CROWLEY
BARRET & KARAE3A, Chicago, Illinois, Attorneys for Plainti&?.

Jesse A. Finkelstein, Esquire, J. Travis Laster, Esquire, of RICHARDS, LAYTON &
FINGER, Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL: James P. Fitzgerald, Esquire, John
A. Andreasen, Esquire, John J. Schirger, Esquire, of MCGRATH, NORTH, MULLIN
& KRATZ, Omaha, Nebraska, Attorneys for Defendant.



STRINE, Vice Chancellor



        In this matter, the plaintiff O'Brien Corporation ("O'Brien") seeks a

declaratory judgment: 1) that the defendant Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ("Hunt-

Wesson") is the successor-by-merger to W.P. Fuller & Company, Inc.

("Fuller") and W.P. Fuller Paint Company, Inc. ("Hunt Fuller") and is

responsible for all of their liabilities arising from or related to claims raised

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • M. Duncan Grant, Esquire, Tara L. Lattomus, Esquire, of PEPPER HAMILTON, Wilmington,
  • STRINE, Vice Chancellor
  • 1) that the defendant Hunt-Wesson, Inc. is the successor-by-merger to W.P. Fuller & Company,
  • and W.P. Fuller Paint Company,
  • in certain products liability litigation relating to the production of lead
  • of Hunt-Wesson of their responsibility for the liabilities of Fuller.
  • Hunt-Wesson has moved to dismiss the complaint under Chancery
  • not ripe for judicial determination.
  • claims are not ripe for resolution by this court and I therefore grant Hunt-Wesson's motion
  • Plaintiffs in certain products liability
  • white lead pigment manufactured by Fuller (the "Lead Pigment
  • O'Brien was named as a defendant in the Lead Pigment Litigations.
  • corporate transactions which O'Brien believes demonstrates that Hunt-Wesson is, under the
  • Fuller's corporate successor.
  • asset purchase, Fuller-O'Brien was a whollyowned subsidiary of O'Brien, an Indiana
  • Hunt-Fuller was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hunt Foods and Industries,
  • to the present is correct under the DGCL.
  • resolve this issue by determining "whether, as a matter of Delaware law,
  • The contractual indemnity dispute centers on the effect of a corporate
  • adoption of the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act);
  • Corporation sought indemnification from The LTV Corporation and certain
  • oil rig manufacturing business was purchased by LTV were defective.
  • Vice Chancellor Balick noted that "ourts
  •    |