LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

OLIVER v BOSTON UNIVERSITY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 16,570, Plaintiff: OLIVER, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00016570, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF D ELAWARE, County: New Castle County, Complaint, Merger, Allegations, Ligand, Paragraph, Insider Defendants, Response, Proxy Statement, Del, Delaware, Knight, Extent Paragraph, Common Stock, Hirsch, Prior, Transactions, Shareholders, Stockholders, Agreement, Marathon, Pertains, Cassidy, Motion, Deny, Fiduciary Duty, Transaction, Nichols, Duty, Allocation, Support, Preferred Stock, Jacobs, Sac, Proxy, Class Action, Dismiss, Silber, Opinion, Disclosure, Accord Agreement, Shares, Oliver, Defendants Pertaining, Ussc, Merger Proceeds , ContentID: 120239772

Case Documents
1 2001-02-05 PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103102
14 pages
PDF
2 2001-01-08 ANSWERING BRIEF OF ALL DEFENDANTS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103103
24 pages
PDF
3 2000-08-18 ANSWER OF THE BU DEFENDANTS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102128
45 pages
PDF
4 2000-07-25 MEMORANDUM OPINION (REVISED
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100359
31 pages
PDF
5 2000-07-18 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100360
31 pages
PDF
6 1999-12-22 REPLY BRIEF IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF BU-SERAGEN DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS SECONDED AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103106
13 pages
PDF
7 1999-12-22 REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS SERAGEN INC. SERAGEN TECHNOLOGY R. PRIOR N. JACOBS AND J. NICHOLS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103105
39 pages
PDF
8 1999-12-22 REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS AND KNIGHT ACQUISITION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103104
21 pages
PDF
9 1999-11-02 PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS RELATING TO ALL ISSUES OTHER THAN BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103108
21 pages
PDF
10 1999-11-02 PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103107
59 pages
PDF
11 1999-08-23 OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS 2ND AMENDED VERIF. COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS & KNIGHT ACQUISITION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103109
25 pages
PDF
12 1999-07-09 SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102129
60 pages
PDF
13 1999-06-22 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103110
6 pages
PDF
14 1999-03-18 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103113
45 pages
PDF
15 1999-03-18 BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103112
20 pages
PDF
16 1999-03-18 BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103111
60 pages
PDF
17 1998-08-07 LETTER OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100358
5 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 17 documents , 519 pages
Price: $ 99.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
COURT
PRE-MERGER TRANSACTIONS
STOCKHOLDERS
MOTION
CLASS CERTIFICATION
WRONGDOING
CONNECTION
DEL
CHANCERY
DELAWARE
OLIVER
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
MERGER
SUPPORT
FIDUCIARY DUTY
ASHMAN THOMAS
GRIFFIN SARA
OPPOSITION
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
GAYLORD CONTAINER
SERAGEN COMMON
VOTING POWER
STOCK DILUTION
BOSTON UNIVERSITY
COUNSEL
ALLEGATIONS
CLASS PERIOD
MINORITY STOCKHOLDERS
         IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

SERGIO M. OLIVER, et al.,

                           Plaintiffs,

                   V.

BOSTON UNIVERSITY, et al.,
                           Defendants.                                       4
                                                    )



                         PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
             PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION



                                   MORRIS, JAMES,  HITCHENS &WILLIAMS LLP
                                   Michael J. Maimone
                                   222 Delaware Avenue
                                   P.O. Box 2306
                                   Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2306
                                   (302) 888-6800

                                   Attorneys for Plaintiffs



OF COUNSEL:

Kenneth J. Ashman
Thomas G. Griffin
Sara L. Spitler
ASHMAN&GRIFFIN,LLC
656 West Randolph Street, Fifth Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60661
(312) 648-1700

Dated: February  5,200l



                                                    TABLE OF CONTENTS


SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
  • OF COUNSEL:
  • Kenneth J. Ashman Thomas G. Griffin Sara L. Spitler
  • Preliminary Statement
  • BASED UPON THE WRONGDOING OF DEFENDANTS'
  • PRE-MERGER TRANSACTIONS ARE ACTIONABLE
  • A CLASS TO INCLUDE STOCKHOLDERS INJURED
  • BY DEFENDANTS' WRONGDOING IN CONNECTION
  • Del.
  • Oliver v. Boston University.
  • Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Class Certification.
  • The Answering Brief of All Defendants in Opposition to Plaintiffs'
  • Seragen common stockholders at the time of the August 12, 1998 merger may be certified
  • fiduciary duty claims based upon Defendants' pre-Merger self-dealing transactions.
  • Defendants ignore the well-pled allegations of the Second Amended
  • In Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint,
  • power dilution to Plaintiffs and the other minority stockholders constituted a "special
  • analyzed those claims based upon voting power and stock dilution (the pre-Merger
  • Delaware Supreme Court in Parnes v. Bully Entertainment
  • without limitation of the class period to a single day.
  • Likewise, in In re Gaylord Container Corp. Shareholders Litig., Del.

  • 2 . ANSWERING BRIEF OF ALL DEFENDANTS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    MERGER
    CERTIFICATION
    MOTION
    PROPOSED CLASS
    COMMON
    DELAWARE
    SAC
    MEMBERS
    DEL
    STOCKHOLDERS
    MTC
    TRANSACTIONS
    COMMON STOCK
    SHAREHOLDERS
    COURT
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    OPPOSITION
    PRE-MERGER SHAREHOLDERS
    EMERALD PARTNERS
    SUBSECTION
    COMMON QUESTIONS
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    INSIDER DEFENDANTS
    CLASS PERIOD
    ADEQUATELY PROTECT
    NOTTINGHAM
    CALIFORNIA
    CERTIFYING CLASS
    
                THE COIJRT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                            72
    
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, et al.,
    
                            Plaintiffs,
    
                      V.
    
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, et al.,
    
                            Defendants.
    
    
              ANSWERING  WRIIEF OF ALL DEFENDANTS IN OPPOSITION TO
                  PLAINTIIFFS'  MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
    
                                            MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT &
                                              TUNNELL
    OF COUNSEL:                             William 0.  LaMotte, III
    MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FECRRIS,            1201 N. Market Street
     GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.                P.O. Box 1347
    R. Robert Popeo                         Wilmington, DE 19899
    John F. Sylvia                          (302) 658-9200
    One Financial Center                    Attorneys for Defendants
    Boston, Massachusetts 021 I 1           Boston University, John R. Silber, Leon C.
    (617) 542-6000                          Hirsch, Turi Josefsen, Gerald S.J. Cassidy,
                                            Kenneth G. Condon,  and Marathon
                                            Biopharmaceuticals
    
                                            POTTER ANDERSON  & CORROON
                                              LLP
    OF COUNSEL:                             Donald J. Wolfe, Jr.
    BROBECK, PHLEGER  & HARRISON            Arthur L. Dent
        LLP                                 Hercules Plaza
    William F. Sullivan                     13 13 N. Market Street
    Christopher H. McGrath                  P.O. Box 95 1
    550 West "C" Street, Suite 1300         Wilmington, DE 19899
    San Diego, California  92101-3532       (302) 984-6000
                                            Attorneys for Defendants
                                            Reed R. Prior, Norman A. Jacobs and Jean
                                            C. Nichols
    
    January  8,200l
    
    450618
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • THE COIJRT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • BOSTON UNIVERSITY, et al.,
  • ANSWERING WRIIEF OF ALL DEFENDANTS IN OPPOSITION TO
  • PLAINTIIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
  • San Diego, California 92101-3532 984-6000
  • The Purported Insider Transactions Challenged By Plaintiffs.
  • The Ligand Merger.
  • SUSTAIN THEIR PROPOSED TWO-YEAR CLASS PERIOD
  • There Is Not A Single Issue Of Fact Or Law Common To
  • All Members Of The Proposed Class.
  • Plaintiffs' Claims Are Not Typical Of The Proposed Class
  • Because Pre-Merger Shareholders Do Not Share Them.

  • 3 . ANSWER OF THE BU DEFENDANTS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PARAGRAPH
    DEFENDANTS
    COMPLAINT
    RESPONSE
    COURT
    EXTENT PARAGRAPH
    PERTAINS
    DENY
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEFENDANTS PERTAINING
    ALLEGATIONS ARC
    HIRSCH
    CLASS ACTION
    MARATHON
    LAW
    BIJ
    PREFERRED STOCK
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    DEFENDANTS ADMIT
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    ACCORDINGLY DENY
    PROXY STATEMENT
    CHANCERY RULES
    ALLEGATIONS ARC DCNICD
    AGREEMENT
    REFERENCE
    TIME LIMITATION
    SERAGEN RECORD
    DISCLOSURE
    
                    l"J THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                 IN' AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
                            -----
    
    SERGIO ?A. OLIVER, et al..
    
                            Plaimiffs,                   I
    
                     \J.                                 I      C. A. No. 16570NC
    
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, et al.,                           :
    
                            Defendants.
    
    
                                 i$NS\YER  OF  THE BU DEFENDANTS
    
           Defendants Boston IUnivcrsity,  John Ii. Silber, Leon C. Hirsch, Turi Joscfsen, Gc-ald S.J.
    
    Cassidy, Kenneth G.  Condon,  and Marathon  Phanaccuticals, Inc. (collectively, the  "BIJ
    
    Defcndatms")  hereby  answer  and respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Verified Class Action
    
    Complaint (the "Comphrint")  as follows:'
    
           1.        Paragraph 1 of the Complaint  states  conclusions of law to which no response is
    
    i-equircd,  and also pertains in whole or in part to claims that have been dismissed by the Court.
    
    and therefore to which no response is required. To the extent Paragraph 1 of the Complaint may
    
    be read to make allegations of fact against some or all of the BU Defendants pertaining to claims
    
    that have not been dismissed by the Court, those allegations arc dcnicd. The BU Defendants also
    
    deny  ihat this action has been brought or may properly be maintained as a class action pursuant
    
       The plaintiffs' Complaint contains a number of allegations that relate solely to cla  ms that
       were dismissed by the Court in its Memorandum and Opinion as rcviscd July  .25, 2000, and
       therefore to which no response is required. In addition, the Complaint contains a number of
       allegations that arguably relate both to claims that have been dismissed by the Court and to
       claims that remain in the case. With respect to those allegations,  the  rcspoxes of the  BIJ
       Defendants~  set forth hcrcin  should be read to apply only to those claims that still remain in
       the cast.
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • i$NS\YER OF THE BU DEFENDANTS
  • Cassidy, Kenneth G. Condon, and Marathon Phanaccuticals, Inc. (collectively, the "BIJ
  • Defcndatms") hereby answer and respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Verified Class Action
  • and also pertains in whole or in part to claims that have been dismissed by the Court.
  • To the extent Paragraph 1 of the Complaint may
  • be read to make allegations of fact against some or all of the BU Defendants pertaining to
  • that have not been dismissed by the Court, those allegations arc dcnicd.
  • The plaintiffs' Complaint contains a number of allegations that relate solely to cla ms that
  • the rcspoxes of the BIJ Defendants~ set forth hcrcin should be read to apply only to those
  • The BU Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a
  • accordingly deny the allegal.ions.
  • contained in the third sentence of Paragraph 25 state conclusions of law to which no response
  • Inc. Proxy Statement for the Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held August 12,
  • The BU Defendants admit the allegations contained in the sixth znd linal
  • is vague z.nd ambiguous blxausc it does not specify any time limitation,
  • DcTcndants state that, on July 31, 1997, Scragen entered into a license agreement with USSC.
  • Serag,en Rccorcl Date, July 6, 1998, Mr. Hirsch beneficially owned more than 5% of Seragen's
  • Paragraph 29 of the Complaint, except admt that, as of the Seragen Record Date, July 6, 1998,
  • including 3,000 shares of Seragen Series B preferred stock and certain warrants and 3,000
  • To the extent Paragraph 38 of the Complaint may be read to make allegations of fact
  • action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Delaware Court of Chancery Rules.
  • defendants Maraihon, Hirsch, and Josefserl for breach of fiduciary duty of loyalty, care, or
  • disclosure, these claims have been dismissccl by the Court;
  • incorporate by reference the1.r responses to Paragraphs 1 through 116 of the Complaint.

  • 4 . MEMORANDUM OPINION (REVISED)

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    INSIDER DEFENDANTS
    MARATHON
    DELAWARE
    MERGER
    LIGAND
    COURT
    DEL
    DUTY
    CASSIDY
    STOCK
    OPINION
    COUNSEL
    HIRSCH
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    SHAREHOLDERS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    DISCLOSURE
    COMMON STOCK
    PROXY STATEMENT
    FRAUD CLAIM
    TRANSACTION
    PLAINTIFFS ARGUE
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    TECHNOLOGY
    CLASS ACTION
    ALLEGATIONS
    SELF-DEALING
    OLIVER
    WILMINGTON
    
                                                              r*  p"   f  p  r  7  "  p  fj
                                                              1,w  i.  `t, ,  \ 1,  I `L
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF D:ELAWARE
                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER, )
    EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0. GRUSE,  )
    ANN 0. GRUSE, WILLIAM M                       >
    STERRETT, BLACKSBURG TRANSFER  )
    & STORAGE, INC., DAVID MCDANIEL,  )
    WALLACE L. HUFF, DANIEL R                     >
    CANADA, WILLIAM J. CUDMORE,                   )
    DORBIN BAILEY, JOHN F. BOLAND,                )
    PHILIP FLARSHEIM, SIMONE POULAN,)
    LUCY THOMPSON, JOHN  & LORRAINE)
    MORTIMER, JENNIFER L. JANELLE,                )
    RON & SUSAN ESTES, DR. GARY                   >
    WAKE, and FIRST UNION NATIONAL )
    BANK, FOR THE ESTATE OF MARY                  )
    ELLEN DOBBINS, individually and on            )
    behalf of all others similarly situated,      >>
                 Plaintiffs,                      >>
    V.                                            >        C.A. No. 16570
                                                  >
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, JOHN R.
    SILBER, LEON C. HIRSCH, TURI                  i
    JOSEFSEN, REED R. PRIOR, GERALD               )
    S.J. CASSIDY, KENNETH G. CONDON, )
    NORMAN A. JACOBS, JEAN C.                     >
    NICHOLS, SERAGEN, INC., SERAGEN  )
    TECHNOLOGY, INC., MARATHON )
    BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,                      >
    LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,                 )
    and KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.,                 )
                                                  >
                 Defendants.                      >
    
                                Submitted: April  lo,2000
                                 Decided: July 18, 2000
                                 Revised: July 25, 2000
    
    
    
                            MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
    Michael J.  Maimone and Joseph C.  Schoell of Morris, James,  Hitchens  &
    Williams, Wilmington, Delaware. OF COUNSEL:  Kenneth1 J.  Ashman of
    Ashman & Griffin, New York, New York; Thomas G. Griffin of  Ashman &
    Griffin, Chicago, Illinois. Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF D:ELAWARE
  • SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER,) EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0.
  • S.J. CASSIDY, KENNETH G. CONDON,)
  • NICHOLS, SERAGEN, INC., SERAGEN) TECHNOLOGY, INC., MARATHON)
  • MEMORANDUM OPINION
  • OF COUNSEL: Kenneth1 J. Ashman of Ashman & Griffin, New York, New York; Thomas G. Griffin of
  • LaMotte, III of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Delaware.
  • Attorneys for Defendants Boston University, John R. Silber, L,eon C. Hirsch, Turi Josefsen,
  • Attorneys for Defendants Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and Knight Acquisition Corp.
  • Plaintiffs bring this purported class action alleging that defendants
  • being paid to the controlling shareholders.
  • fiduciary duties of care, loyalty and disclosure in executing the transactions
  • aided and abetted these breaches of fiduciary duty.
  • disclosure against certain defendants.
  • conclusory allegations made without specific allegations of fact to support
  • ' Delaware State Troopers Lodge v. O'Rourke,
  • Delaware corporation that Ligand created to effect the Seragen merger ("the
  • capital stock, is USSC's CEO, and owns 1.8% of USSC's common stock.
  • "Insider Defendants."
  • and Knight knowingly cooperated with and participated in this self-dealing
  • further allege that Seragen's majority stockholders,
  • The Loan Guarantee Transaction
  • plaintiffs argue, because the same 1997 proxy statement explains that
  • The proxy statement claims that the Insider Defendants who
  • equitable fraud claim from being brought by class action.

  • 5 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    LIGAND
    DELAWARE
    MERGER
    INSIDER DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    CASSIDY
    DEL
    DUTY
    STOCK
    OPINION
    COUNSEL
    HIRSCH
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    SHAREHOLDERS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    COMMON STOCK
    DISCLOSURE
    PROXY STATEMENT
    TRANSACTION
    PLAINTIFFS ARGUE
    MASSACHUSETTS
    CLASS ACTION
    ALLEGATIONS
    SELF-DEALING
    OLIVER
    LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS
    WILMINGTON
    MISREPRESENTATIONS
    
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER, )
    EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0. GRUSE,  )
    ANN O. GRUSE, WILLIAM M                       >
    STERRETT, BLACKSBURG TRANSFER  )
    & STORAGE, INC., DAVID MCDANIEL, )
    WALLACE L. HUFF, DANIEL R                     >
    CANADA, WILLIAM J. CUDMORE,                   )
    DORBIN BAILEY, JOHN F. BOLAND,                )
    PHILIP FLARSHEIM, SIMONE POULAN,)
    LUCY THOMPSON, JOHN & LORRAINE)
    MORTIMER, JENNIFER L. JANELLE,                )
    RON & SUSAN ESTES, DR. GARY                   >
    WAKE, and FIRST UNION NATIONAL )                                         _`.  _
                                                                             I  `.
    BANK, FOR THE ESTATE OF MARY                  )
    ELLEN DOBBINS, individually and on            )
    behalf of all others similarly situated,      >>
                 Plaintiffs,                      >
                                                  >
    V.                                            >        C.A. No. 16570
                                                  >
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, JOHN R.                    >
    SILBER, LEON C. HIRSCH, TURI                  >
    JOSEFSEN, REED R. PRIOR, GERALD               )
    S.J. CASSIDY, KENNETH G. CONDON, )
    NORMAN A. JACOBS, JEAN C.                     >
    NICHOLS, SERAGEN, INC., SERAGEN )
    TECHNOLOGY, INC., MARATHON                    )
    BIOPHARMACEUTICALS,  LLC,                     >
    LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., )
    and KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.,                 )>
                 Defendants.                      >
    
                                Submitted: April  lo,2000
                                 Decided: July 18, 2000
    
    
    
                            MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
    Michael J.  Maimone and Joseph C.  Schoell of Morris, James,  Hitchens  &
    Williams, Wilmington, Delaware. OF COUNSEL: Kenneth J.  Ashman of
    Ashrnan & Griffin, New York, New York; Thomas G. Griffin of Ashman &
    Griffin, Chicago, Illinois. Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
    
    William 0.  LaMotte,  III of Morris, Nichols, Arsht  & Tunnell, Wilmington,
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER,) EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0.
  • S.J. CASSIDY, KENNETH G. CONDON,)
  • MEMORANDUM OPINION
  • OF COUNSEL: Kenneth J. Ashman of Ashrnan & Griffin, New York, New York; Thomas G. Griffin of
  • LaMotte, III of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Delaware.
  • Attorneys for Defendants Boston University, John R. Silber, Leon C. Hirsch, Turi Josefsen,
  • Attorneys for Defendants Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and Knight Acquisition Corp.
  • Plaintiffs bring this purported class action alleging that defendants
  • being paid to the controlling shareholders.
  • fiduciary duties of care, loyalty and disclosure in executing the transactions
  • aided and abetted these breaches of fiduciary duty.
  • disclosure against certain defendants.
  • conclusory allegations made without specific allegations of fact to support
  • Delaware State Troopers Lodge v. O'Rourke,
  • LLC is a Massachusetts limited
  • Delaware corporation that Ligand created to effect the Seragen merger ("the
  • capital stock, is USSC's CEO, and owns 1.8% of USSC's common stock.
  • "Insider Defendants."
  • and Knight knowingly cooperated with and participated in this self-dealing
  • further allege that Seragen's majority stockholders,
  • The Loan Guarantee Transaction
  • plaintiffs argue, because the same 1997 proxy statement explains that
  • The proxy statement claims that the Insider Defendants who
  • misrepresentations andor committed equitable fraud.

  • 6 . REPLY BRIEF IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF BU-SERAGEN DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS SECONDED AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    TRANSACTIONS
    MARATHON
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DILUTION
    BU-SERAGEN DEFENDANTS
    CASH
    COMPLAINT
    VOTING POWER
    PRE-MERGER
    USSC
    COURT
    DELAWARE
    FAILS
    DISMISS
    SPECIAL INJURY
    MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS
    DISCLOSURE CLAIMS
    ROBERT POPEO JOHN
    MASSACHUSETTS
    POST-MERGER
    PROXY STATEMENT
    AGREEMENT
    LEVIN
    COHN
    FERRIS
    GLOVSKY
    MATTER
    LAW
    ALLEGED INVALIDITY
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE!
    
                                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, et al.,
    
                             Plaintiffs,             i
    
                       v.                            i         C. A. No. 16570NC
    
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, et al.,                       i
    
                             Defendants.
    
    
          REPLY BRIEF IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF BU-SERAGEN DEFENDANTS'
          MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    
                                              MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL
                                              William 0.  LaMotte,  III
                                              1201 N. Market Street
                                              P.O. Box 1347
                                              Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                              (302) 658-9200
                                               Attorneys for Defendants Boston
                                               University, John R. Silber, Leon C.
                                               Hirsch, Turi Josefsen, Gerald S. J.
                                               Cassidy, Kenneth G. Condon  and
                                               Marathon Biopharmaceuticals, LLP
    
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,
     GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C
    R. Robert Popeo
    John F. Sylvia
    One Financial Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111
    (617)  542-6000
    
    December 22, 1999
    
    
    
                                                                                  1.
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • REPLY BRIEF IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF BU-SERAGEN DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED
  • MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C
  • R. Robert Popeo John F. Sylvia
  • BECAUSE NONE OF THE FOUR PRI-MERGER TRANSACTIONS RESULTED IN A "SPECIAL INJURY" TO SERAGEN'S
  • "Cash Value" Or "Voting Power" Dilution.
  • AS PLAINTIFFS' DISCLOSURE CLAIMS DEPEND UPON THE ALLEGED INVALIDITY OF THE FOUR PRE-MERGER
  • PLAINTIFFS' ARGUMENT URGING THE COURT TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION OVER HIRSCH, JOSEFSEN AND
  • USSC; and the sale of Seragen's operating division to Marathon,
  • The BU-Seragen Defendants recognize that Plaintiffs do maintain that the Accord Agreement
  • do not dispute that (as stated in the Proxy Statement) USSC relinquished all of those rights
  • Plaintiffs do not challenge the fact that mere ownership of stock of a Delaware
  • Plaintiffs' attempt to hook Marathon, a Massachusetts corporation, is equally

  • 7 . REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS SERAGEN INC. SERAGEN TECHNOLOGY R. PRIOR N. JACOBS AND J. NICHOLS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFFS
    LIGAND
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    COURT
    PRIOR
    PROXY
    AGREEMENT
    DERIVATIVE CLAIMS
    JACOBS
    DEL
    SUPPORT
    NICHOLS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    TRANSACTIONS
    DISCLOSURE VIOLATION
    SAC
    ALLEGATIONS
    ACCORD AGREEMENT
    STOCKHOLDERS
    USSC
    INSIDER DEFENDANTS
    LEXIS
    NEGOTIATIONS
    MATERIAL INFORMATION
    SERAGEN TECHNOLOGY
    ALLOCATION
    SPECIAL INJURY
    SELF-DEALING TRANSACTIONS
    
               THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER,
    EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0. GRUSE,
    ANN 0. GRUSE. WILLIAM M. STERRETT.
    BLACKSBURG  T RANSFER  8~  STORAGE,  '      j
    INC., DAVID MCDANIEL, WALLACE L.
    HUFF, DANIEL R. CANADA, WILLIAM J.          I
    CUDMORE, CORBIN BAILEY, JOHN F.
    BOLAND. PHILIP FLARSHEIM. SIMONE            i
    POULAN: LUCY THOMPSON. JOHN  &
    LORRAINE MORTIMER, JENNIFER L.              j
    JANELLE, RON  & SUSAN ESTES,
    DR. GARY WAKE, and FIRST UNION              j C.A. No. 16570-NC
    NATIONAL BANK, FOR THE ESTATE OF
    MARY ELLEN DOBBINS, individually and on j
    behalf of all others similarly situated,
                            Plaintiffs,         I
                    v.                          i
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY. JOHN R. SILBER.          !
    LEON C. HIRSCH, TURi JOSEFSEN, REED
    R. PRIOR, GERALD S.J. CASSIDY,              i
    KENNETH G. CONDON, NORMAN A.
    JACOBS, JEAN C. NICHOLS, SERAGEN,           i
    INC.. SERAGEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
    MARATHON BIOPHARMACEUTICALS,                !
    LLC, LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
    and KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.,               i
                            Defendants          jj
     REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS BY
      DEFENDANTS SERAGEN, INC., SERAGEN TECHNOLOGY, INC., REED R.
                  PRIOR, NORMAN A. JACOBS AND JEAN C. NICHOLS
    
    OF COUNSEL:                                       Donald J. Wolfe, Jr.
                                                      Arthur L. Dent
    William F. Sullivan (#78353)                      POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
    Christopher H. McGrath (#149129)                  Hercules Plaza
    Sean T. Prosser (#163903)                         13 13 North Market Street
    BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP                   P.O. Box 951
    550 West "C" Street, Suite 1300                   Wilmington, Delaware 19899
    San Diego, Califorma 92101-3532                   (302) 984-6000
    (619) 234-1966                                    Attorneys for Defendants
                                                      Seragen, Inc., Seragen Technology, Inc., Reed
    Dated: December 22, 1999                          R. Prior, Norman A. Jacobs, Jean C. Nichols
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS SERAGEN, INC., SERAGEN
  • Derivative And So Do Not Survive The Merger
  • PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO ALLEGE FACTS ESTABLISHING THAT DEFENDANTS PRIOR, NICHOLS, OR JACOBS
  • Bershad v. Hartz, Del.
  • LEXIS 380, Berger,
  • upon their ability to state a direct claim for which the shareholders suffered a "special
  • the SAC is an attempt to
  • Agreement, which settled obligations arising from such past transactions and was entered
  • Plaintiffs' claims that the Proxy issued in connection with the Merger violated the
  • disclosure violation claims on nothing more than the "fact" the Proxy failed to
  • Plaintiffs Lack Standing To Pursue Their Derivative Claims
  • For Breach Of Fiduciary Duty By The Seragen Director
  • Ligand and which were only settled through receipt of the Merger consideration.
  • plaintiffs alleged that they had suffered a "special injury" when Frank
  • SAC 77 73, 74-78, SOf-g (containing allegations that the sale of Marathon and the USSC Option
  • orchestrate a master plan fully knowing that special injury would be suffered by the
  • Accord Agreement by various preferred shareholders and creditors of Seragen.
  • and the negotiations took over a year,
  • ' Plaintiffs argue that they "allege hard facts" such as "the Insider Defendants would not
  • was involved in two self-dealing transactions, one entered into in connection with the
  • The Proxy disclosed fully all material information necessary for a shareholder to

  • 8 . REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS AND KNIGHT ACQUISITION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LIGAND
    KNIGHT
    NATIONALS
    COURT
    DEFENDANTS
    DELAWARE
    DEL
    ACQUISITION
    DISMISS
    FRAUD CLAIMS
    SUPPORT
    JACKSON NATIONALS
    ACCORD AGREEMENT
    FACTS
    MOTION
    CLASS ACTION
    TRANSACTIONS
    ALLEGATIONS
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    ALLEGED BREACHES
    SHAREHOLDERS
    ABETTING CLAIMS
    KNOWING PARTICIPATION
    NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION
    OBLIGATIONS
    OLIVER
    LLC
    LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS
    AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER,
    EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0. GRUSE,
    ANN 0. GRUSE. WILLIAM M. STERRETT.
    BLACKSBURG TRANSFER  & STORAGE,  '
    INC., DAVID MCDANIEL, WALLACE L.
    HUFF, DANIEL R. CANADA, WILLIAM J.
    CUDMORE. CORBIN BAILEY. JOHN F.
    BOLAND. PHILIP FLARSHEIM. SIMONE
    POULAN,  LUCY THOMPSON, JOHN &
    LORRAINE MORTIMER, JENNIFER L.
    JANELLE, RON  & SUSAN ESTES,                      CA. No. 16570-NC
    DR. GARY WAKE, and FIRST UNION
    NATIONAL BANK, FOR THE ESTATE OF
    MARY ELLEN DOBBINS, individually and on
    behalf of all others similarly situated,
    
                            Plaintiffs,
    
                   v.
    
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, JOHN R. SILBER,
    LEON C. HIRSCH, TURl JOSEFSEN, REED
    R. PRIOR, GERALD S.J. CASSIDY,
    KENNETH G. CONDON, NORMAN A.
    JACOBS, JEAN C. NICHOLS, SERAGEN,
    INC., SERAGEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
    MARATHON BIOPHARACEUTICALS, LLC,
    LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and
    KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.,
    
                            Defendants.
    
         REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS'
            SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS
                     LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
                             AND KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.
    
    OF COUNSEL: Donald J. Wolfe, Jr.
    William F. Sullivan Arthur L. Dent
    Christopher H. McGrath POTTER ANDERSON  & CORROON LLP
    Sean T. Presser Hercules Plaza
    BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP 1313 North Market Street
    550 West "C" Street, Suite 1300 P.O. Box 951
    San Diego, California 92101-3532 Wilmington, Delaware 19899
    (619) 234-1966 (302) 984-6000
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER, EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0.
  • REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT BY
  • LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
  • AND KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.
  • THAT LIGAND OR KNIGHT AIDED AND ABETTED THE ALLEGED BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY.
  • Fraud-Based Class Action Claims
  • Satisfying Rule 9`s Requirement That Fraud Claims Be
  • Carbon Investments, Inc. v. TLC Beatrice Int'l Holdings, Inc., Del.
  • In re Frederick's of Hollywood, Inc. Shareholders Litig., Del.
  • Plaintiffs' fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims
  • similarly are defective as they do not plead any facts establishing Ligand's or Knight's
  • "Knowing participation" in directors' breach of fiduciary duty requires knowledge of the
  • and specific factual allegations implicating the aiding and abetting defendant's complicity
  • have reviewed these myriad past transactions and reached
  • Knight effectively paid a "bribe" because the Accord Agreement and the merger
  • whereby Seragen's obligations stemming from its
  • and abetting claims require an understanding between the parties "with respect to their

  • 9 . PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS RELATING TO ALL ISSUES OTHER THAN BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LIGAND
    MARATHON
    HIRSCH
    DEFENDANTS
    KNIGHT
    DEL
    ACCORD AGREEMENT
    COURT
    DELAWARE
    SAC
    OLIVER
    MERGER
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    PERSONAL JURISDICTION
    INDIVIDUAL1
    STOCK
    INSIDER DEFENDANTS
    UNJUST ENRICHMENT
    CLASS ACTION
    TRANSACTION
    PLAINTIFFS STATE
    ALLEGATIONS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    PARTICIPATION
    ABETTING CLAIM
    REPRESENTATIONS
    PROXY STATEMENT
    COMPANION
    CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
    
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                 
                                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                  
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER,
    EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0. GRUSE,
    A N N   0 .   G R U S E ,   W I L L I A M   M .
    STERRETT, BLACKSBURGTRANSFER&
    STORAGE, INC., DAVID MCDANIEL,
    W A L L A C E   L .   H U F F ,   D A N I E L   R .
    C A N A D A ,   W I L L I A M   J .  CUDMORE,
    CORBIN BAILEY, JOHN F. BOLAND,
    PHILIP FLARSHEIM, SIMONE POULAN,
    LUCY THOMPSON, JOHN  & LORRAINE                                   C. A. No. 16570NC
    MORTIMER, JENNIFER L. JANELLE,
    RON & SUSANESTES, DR. GARY WAKE,
    and FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK,
    FOR THE ESTATE OF MARY ELLEN
    DOBBINS, individual1 and on behalf of all
    others similarly situateCT,
                               Plaintiffs,
    
                       V.
    
    BOSTONUNIVERSITY, JOHNR. SILBER,
    LEON C. HIRSCH, TURI JOSEFSEN,
    REED R. PRIOR, GERALD S.J. CASSIDY,
    KENNETH G.  CONDON, NORMAN A.
    JACOBS, JEAN C. NICHOLS, SERAGEN,
    INC., SERAGEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
    MARATHON BIOPHARACEUTICALS,
    LLC, LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS,
    INC.. and KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.,
                               Defendants.
                        PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
                             MOTIONS TO DISMISS RELATING TO ALL ISSUES
                             OTHER THAN BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY
    
    OF COUNSEL:                                            MORRIS, JAMES,  HITCHENS &WILLIAMS, LLP
                                                           Michael J. Maimone
    ASHMAN & G-FIN                                         Joseph C. Schoell
    Kenneth J. Ashman                                      222 Delaware Avenue
    60 East 42"d  Street, 47* Floor                        P.O. Box 2306
    New York, New York 10 165                              Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2306
    (2 12) 557-9555                                        (302) 888-6800
                                                           Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    ASHMAN  & GRIFFIN
    Thomas G. Griffin
    10 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3600
    Chicago, Illinois 60603
    (3 12) 460-8230
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER, EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0.
  • DOBBINS, individual1 and on behalf of all others similarly situateCT,
  • PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
  • PLAINTIFFS STATE A VALID CLAIM FOR AIDING
  • AND ABETTING THE BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY.
  • Against Ligand And Knight
  • Against Hirsch, Josefson And Marathon.
  • E. THIS COURT HAS PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER
  • HiUG/Courtland Prop., Inc. v. Gray Del.
  • Motions to Dismiss the Second Amended Verified Class Action Complaint.
  • which are the subject of a companion brief tiled
  • The SAC asserts claims for aiding and abetting the Insider Defendants' breaches of
  • participation in the breach in order to state a claim.
  • All of these Defendants move to dismiss the aiding and abetting claim pending against them.
  • compromised as part of the Accord Agreement] were invalid for purposes of this motion to
  • The SAC alleges that "he Insider Defendants advised Ligand that the Insider
  • the Merger consideration identical to or substantially identical to that contained in the
  • The question becomes whether the wellpleaded allegations of the SAC indicate that Ligand had
  • such illegal conduct while negotiating a transaction.
  • The Delaware Supreme Court has defined fraud to include the following:
  • Plaintiffs have set forth the contents of the false representations, from the material
  • CalMat stock).
  • PLAINTIFFS STATE A VALID CLAIM FOR UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND THE IMPOSITION OF A CONSTRUCTIVE
  • all stockholders generally or where the wrong involves a contractual right of the
  • E. THIS COURT HAS PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER HIRSCH,

  • 10 . PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    HIRSCH
    LIGAND
    TRANSACTION
    COMMON STOCK
    INSIDER DEFENDANTS
    AGREEMENT
    MERGER
    CASSIDY
    PRIOR
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CONDON
    NICHOLS
    KNIGHT
    SHARES
    PROXY STATEMENT
    SAC
    PREFERRED STOCK
    USSC
    MINORITY STOCKHOLDERS
    SELF-DEALING TRANSACTIONS
    ACQUISITION
    CONTROLLING STOCKHOLDER
    OPERATING DIVISION
    ACCORD AGREEMENT
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    SHAREHOLDERS
    AFFILIATES
    VOTING POWER
    
                        IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                             '
                                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER,
    EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0. GRUSE, ANN
    0 .   G R U S E ,  WILLIAM   M .   S T E R R E T T ,
    BLACKSBURG TRANSFER  & STORAGE,
    INC., DAVID MCDANIEL, WALLACE L.
    HUFF, DANIEL R. CANADA, WILLIAM  5.
    CUDMORE, CORBIN BAILEY, JOHN F.
    BOLAND, PHILIP FLARSHEIM, SIMONE i
    POULAN, LUCY THOMPSON, JOHN  & >
    LORRAINE MORTIMER, JENNIFER L.                             ) C. A. No. 16570NC
    JANELLE, RON & SUSAN ESTES, DR. GARY
    WAKE, and FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK,
    FOR THE ESTATE OF MARY ELLEN
    DOBBINS, individually and on behalf of all others
    similarly situated,
    
                               Plaintiffs,
    
                       V.
    
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, JOHN R. SILBER,                         i
    LEON C. HIRSCH, TURI JOSEFSEN, REED R.
    PRIOR, GERALD S. J. CASSIDY, KENNETH G.
    CONDON, NORMAN A. JACOBS, JEAN C.
    NICHOLS,  SERAGEN, INC., SERAGEN >
    T E C H N O L O G Y ,   I N C . ,   M A R A T H O N
    BIOPHARACEUTICALS, LLC, LIGAND
    PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and KNIGHT
    ACQUISITION  CORP.,
    
                               Defendants
    
                                        PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
                                   TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS
    
    OFCOUNSEL:                                              MORRIS, Jfi~s, HITCHENS &WILLIAMS, LLP
                                                            Michael J. Maimone
    ASEIMAN  & GRIFFIN                                      Joseph C. Schoell
    Kenneth J. Ashman                                       222 Delaware Avenue
    60 East 42"d  Street, 47'" Floor                        P.O. Box 2306
    New York, New York 10 165                               Wilmington, Delaware 19899-2306
    (212) 557-9.555                                         (302) 888-6800
                                                            Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    ASIXMAN  & GRIFFIN
    Thomas G. Griffin
    10 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3600
    Chicago, Illinois 60603
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs And The Corporate Defendants
  • The Loan Guarantee Transaction
  • The Insider Defendants Made Materially False Statements
  • A 16-page brief submitted by Defendants Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and Knight
  • For the Court's convenience, Plaintiffs have organized their response according to the claim
  • stockholders, directors ancl officers of Seragen are defined in the SAC as the Insider
  • of BU, took a personal interest in Seragen, caused BU to appoint him and his trusted
  • "The Class consists of Plaintiffs and all other persons or entities, other than Defendants
  • Hirsch is Chairman of United States Surgical Corporation, a member of BU's Board of Trustees,
  • The stockholders of USSC had filed suit against Hirsch and others pertaining to self-dealing
  • and how that compared to the percentage of recovery that the minority shareholders were being
  • Defendants breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty and care that they owed to Plaintiffs
  • former owners of 1,101,577 shares of Seragen common stock, and the putative Class they
  • former minority stockholders of Seragen.
  • a party to several agreements that were integral to the negotiations and structure of the
  • By virtue of his position with BU, the controlling stockholder of
  • stock, including 7,000 shares of Seragen Series B preferred stock and certain warrants and
  • negotiations and structure of the Merger, including the Accord Agreement, the Stockholder

  • 11 . OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS 2ND AMENDED VERIF. COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS & KNIGHT ACQUISITION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LIGAND
    DEFENDANTS
    KNIGHT
    DEL
    DELAWARE
    MOTION
    DISMISS
    COURT
    SUPPORT
    COMPLAINT
    FRAUD
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    FACTS
    SAC
    ALLEGATIONS
    PARTICIPATION
    KNIGHT ACQUISITION
    COMMON LAW FRAUD
    NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIG
    INSIDER DEFENDANTS
    ALLOCATION
    ATTORNEYS
    UNDERLYING
    INHERENTLY WRONGFUL
    CONCLUSORY ALLEGATIONS
    PARTICULARITY
    TRANSACTIONS
    DIRECTORS
    
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER,               )
    EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0. GRUSE,                )
    ANN 0. GRUSE, WILLIAM M. STERRETT, )
    BLACKSBURG TRANSFER  & STORAGE,                )
    INC., DAVID MCDANIEL, WALLACE L.               )
    HUFF, DANIEL R. CANADA, WILLIAM J.             )
    CUDMORE, CORBIN BAILEY, JOHN F.                )
    BOLAND, PHILIP FLARSHEIM, SIMONE               )
    POULAN, LUCY THOMPSON, JOHN  &
    LORRAINE MORTIMER, JENNIFER L.                 j
    JANELLE, RON & SUSAN ESTES,                    ) C.A. No. 16570-NC
    DR. GARY WAKE, and FIRST UNION                 >
    NATIONAL BANK, FOR THE ESTATE OF               )
    MARY ELLEN DOBBINS, individually and on  )
    behalf of all others similarly situated,
                                                   ;
                            Plaintiffs,            1
    
    
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, JOHN R. SILBER, )
    LEON c. HIRSCH, TURI  JOSEFSEN, REED j
    R. PRIOR, GERALD S.J. CASSIDY,                 >
    KENNETH G. CONDON, NORMAN A.
    JACOBS, JEAN C. NICHOLS, SERAGEN,              j
    INC., SERAGEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,                >
    MARATHON  BIOPHARACEUTICAL.S, LLC,  )
    LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and              )
    KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.,                      >
                            Defendants.            1
        OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS'
            SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANTS
                      LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
                             AND KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.
    
    OF COUNSEL:                                 Donald J. Wolfe, Jr.
    William F. Sullivan (#78353)                Arthur L. Dent
    Christopher H. McGrath (#149 129)           POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
    Sean T. Prosser (#163903)                   Hercules Plaza
    BROBECK, PHLEGER  & HARRISON                13 13 North Market Street
    LLP                                         P.O. Box 951
    550 West "C" Street, Suite 1300             Wilmington, Delaware 19899
    San Diego, California 92 101-3532           (302) 984-6000
    (619) 234-1966                              Attorneys for Defendants
    Dated: August 23, 1999                      Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and
                                                Knight Acquisition Corp.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
  • LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
  • AND KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.
  • Attorneys for Defendants Dated: August 23,
  • PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO ALLEGE FACTS ESTABLISHING
  • Underlying Breaches Of Fiduciary Duty.
  • Categorized As "Inherently Wrongful".
  • PLAINTIFFS' COMMON LAW FRAUD AND NEGLIGENT
  • And They Cannot Maintain Class Allegations Of Fraud
  • Because Delaware Does Not Recognize The "Fraud-On-The-Market" Theory Of Reliance.
  • Plaintiffs' Conclusory Allegations Fall Far Short Of
  • Pleaded With Particularity.
  • Miller, Del.

  • 12 . SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SILBER
    MERGER
    COMMON STOCK
    CASSIDY
    AGREEMENT
    TRANSACTION
    SHARES
    LIGAND
    PRIOR
    PROXY STATEMENT
    OLIVER
    SELF-DEALING TRANSACTIONS
    MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS
    PLAINTIFFS
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    CONDON
    STOCKHOLDERS
    BENEFICIAL OWNER
    PREFERRED STOCK
    ACCORD AGREEMENT
    TIMES RELEVANT
    ALLOCATION
    UNION NATIONAL BANK
    MERGER PROCEEDS
    AFFILIATES
    OPERATING DIVISION
    USSC
    CAPITAL STOCK
    NEGOTIATIONS
    
                  IN THE COURT QF CHANCERY OF THE !XATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER, 1
    EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0. GRUSE, 1
    A N N   0 .   G R U S E ,   WILL,IAM  R/I. )
    STERRETT, BLACKSBURG TRANSFER & >
    STORAGE, INC., DAVID MCDANIEL, )
    W A L L A C E   L .   H U F F ,   D A N I E L   R . >
    C A N A D A ,   W I L L I A M   J.  CUDMORE, )
    CQRBIN BAILEY, JOHN F.  BO&AND, >
    PHILIP FLARSHEIM, SIMONE POULAN, )
    LUCY  THOMFSON, JOHN  & LORRAINE >                        C. A. No. 14570NC
    MORTIMER, JENNIFER  L,.  JANELLE, >
    RON & SUSANESTES, DR. GARY WAKE, )
    and FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, >
    FOR THE ESTATE OF MARY ELLEN >
    DOBBINS, individually and on behalf of all >
    others similarly situated,                          >1
                            Plaintiffs,                 >>
                    V.                                  >>
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, JOHN R. SILBER, >
    LEON C.  HlRSCH,  TURI JOSEFSEN, >
    REED R. PRIOR., GERALD SJ. CASSIDY, >
    KENNETH G.  CONDON, NORMAN A. >
    JACOBS, JEAN C. NICHOLS, SERAGEN, >
    INC.  4 SERAGEN TECHNOLOGY, INC., >
    MARATHON  BIOPHARACEUTICALS,                        >
    LLC, LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, >
    INC., and KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP., >1
                            Defendants.                 1
    
                  SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED CLASS  ASTION COMPLAINT
    
                    Plaintiffs Sergio M. Oliver, Ronald Oliver, Emily Oliver, Gregory 0. G-ruse, Ann 0.
    
    Gruse; William M. Sterrett, Blacksburg Transfer & Storage, Inc., David McDaniel,, Wallace L. Huff:
    
    Daniel R. Canada, William J. Cudmore, Corbin Bailey, John F. Boland, Philip Flarsheim, Simone
    
    Poulan, Lucy Thompson, John cs% Lorraine Mot-timer, Jennifer L. Janelle, Ron & Susan Estes, Dr.
    
    
    
    Gary Wake and .First Union National Bank, for the Estate of Mary Ellen Dobbins, individually and
    
    on behalf of all others similarly situated, make the following allegations upon personal knowledge
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER, 1 EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0.
  • and FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK,>
  • REED R. PRIOR., GERALD SJ.
  • LLC, LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS,>
  • Plaintiffs Sergio M. Oliver, Ronald Oliver, Emily Oliver, Gregory 0.
  • common stock of Defendant Seragen, Inc. on or about July 1 1 1996
  • through and inclu.ding August 12, 1995, the date ofseragen's forced merger with and
  • breach and derogation oftheir fiduciary duties to Seragen's minority stockholders,
  • University and its affiliates and Defendants Silber, Hirsch, Josefsen, Prior, Cassidy, Condon,
  • Ligand that unjustly enriched the Insider Defendants and their affiliates,
  • breaches of fiduc:iary duty by thlese Seragen insiders in order to effectuate the transaction,
  • times relevant to this action, Sergio Oliver has been an owner of Seragen common stoc;k.
  • of the Merger with Ligand, Sergio Oliver was the beneficial owner of 179,091 shares of Seragen
  • outstanding capital stock of Seragen, and has been able to elect a majority of the directors
  • agreements that were integral to the negotiations and structure ofthe Merger, including a
  • specifically incorporated herein BU also owned 11,800 shares of Seragen Series B preferred
  • the Accord Agreement, a so-called Option and Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Option and Asset
  • all ofwhich are referenced in Proxy Statement.
  • Hirsch also is the Chairman of USSC and beneficially
  • substantial control over the terms and the allocation of proceeds of Seragen's Merger with
  • and obligations to the minority shareholders, agreeing, among other things, to create false
  • the self-dealing transactions described below worked to enhance greatly the Insider
  • agreement far exceeded the $5 million that BU paid for the operating division.
  • Boston University, the purchaser of the Operating Division, owns
  • of the Merger proceeds as between the Insider Defendants and their affiliates and the minority

  • 13 . MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFFS
    MOTION
    COURT
    ALLEGATIONS
    DEL
    FILING
    MERGER
    DISMISS
    FACTS
    AMEND
    DELAWARE
    OLIVER
    LAW
    LITIGANT
    RESOURCES
    PARNES
    PREJUDICE
    REQUEST
    SHAREHOLDERS
    STEELE
    GRIFFIN
    SUPPORT
    PLAINTIFFS RESPECTFULLY REQUEST
    ACTION COMPLAINT
    GRANT
    CHALLENGING
    PARTIES
    
                                                                          t;,                ;?.'
                                                                          2, *  \  i  :< _ _  1.  i  : 
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                        
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, et al.,
    
                              Plaintiffs,
    
           V.
    
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, et al.,
                              Defendants.
    
                       MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS'
      MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED VERIF~D COMPLAINT
    
                       Plaintiffs Sergio M. Oliver, Ronald Oliver, Emily Oliver, Gregory 0. Gruse, Ann
    
    Gruse, William M. Sterrett, Blacksburg Transfer & Storage, Inc., David McDaniel, Wallace L. Huff,
    
    Daniel R. Canada, William J. Cudmore, Corbin Bailey, John F. Boland, Philip Flarsheim, Simone
    
    Poulan, Lucy Thompson, John & Lorraine Mortimer, Jennifer L. Janelle, Ron & Susan Estes, Dr.
    
    Gary Wake and First Union National Bank, for the Estate of Mary Ellen Dobbins, individually and
    
    on behalf of all others similarly situated, (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), respectfully submit this
    
    Memorandum of Law in Support of their Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Verified Class
    
    Action Complaint (the "Second Amended Complaint") pursuant to Delaware Chancery Rule  15(a)
    
    ("Rule 15(a)").
    
                                              INTRODUCTION
    
                       In an effort to streamline the litigation and conserve both judicial and litigant
    
    resources, Plaintiffs seek leave to file the Second Amended Complaint, which shall clarify
    
    that defendants have complained need clarification, drop allegations likely not to state a claim and
    
    establish that one of Plaintiffs' theories of the case parallels the facts and comports with the
    
    the Delaware Supreme Court's recent decision in  Parnes v. Bully Entertainment Corp., Del. Supr.,
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED VERIF~D
  • Plaintiffs Sergio M. Oliver, Ronald Oliver, Emily Oliver, Gregory 0.
  • Memorandum of Law in Support of their Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Verified Class
  • Action Complaint (the "Second Amended Complaint") pursuant to Delaware Chancery Rule 15
  • In an effort to streamline the litigation and conserve both judicial and litigant
  • resources, Plaintiffs seek leave to file the Second Amended Complaint, which shall clarify
  • that defendants have complained need clarification, drop allegations likely not to state a
  • the Delaware Supreme Court's recent decision in Parnes v. Bully Entertainment Corp.,
  • which was issued after the filing of Plaintiffs' First Amended Verified
  • for permitting leave under Rule 15and, therefore, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the
  • FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
  • On August 4, 1998, a number of individual shareholders of Seragen, Inc.
  • brought suit against some of the defendants herein challenging, among other things, the
  • of a proxy statement issued in connection with the-then proposed merger of Seragen into Ligand
  • Both prior to and after the Court's decision, the parties engaged in settlement
  • Defendants' motions to dismiss are directed towards various areas of the Amended
  • leave to amend should be "freely given when justice so requires."
  • "This is generally taken to mean that in the absence of demonstrable prejudice,
  • Therefore, the Parnes
  • Steele, V.C.;
  • Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant their
  • ASHMAN & GRIFFIN

  • 14 . BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    PROXY STATEMENT
    COMPLAINT
    MERGER
    INSIDER DEFENDANTS
    DUTY
    COURT
    ALLOCATION
    DISCLOSE
    OPINION
    COMMON STOCK
    MERGER PROCEEDS
    DISCLOSURE
    DEL
    FAIRNESS OPINION
    SHAREHOLDERS
    MISLEADING
    TRANSACTIONS
    SELF-DEALING
    STOCKHOLDERS
    PREFERRED STOCK
    MASSACHUSETTS
    PUBLIC OFFERING
    SUBSEQUENT
    ALLEGATIONS
    INADEQUATE FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
    ROBERT POPEO JOHN
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    COMMON LAW FRAUD
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, et al.,                       >>
                             Plaintiffs,            >>
                      V.                            1       C. A. No. 16570NC
    
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, et al.,
    
                             Defendants.
    
    
                            BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS'
           MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    
    
                                                MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL
                                                William 0. LaMotte,  III
                                                Karen Jacobs Louden
                                                1201 N. Market Street
                                                P.O. Box 1347
                                                Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                (302) 658-9200
                                                 Attorneys for Defendants Boston
                                                 University, John R. Silber, Leon C.
                                                 Hirsch, Turi Josefsen, Gerald S. J.
                                                 Cassidy, Kenneth G. Condon  and
                                                 Marathon Biopharmaceuticals, LLP
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,
     GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C
    R. Robert Popeo
    John F. Sylvia
    Patrick T. Clendenen
    One Financial Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111
    (6 17) 542-6000
    
    Dated: March 18, 1999
    
    
    
                                                                                    i.
    
                                     TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
  • R. Robert Popeo John F. Sylvia Patrick T. Clendenen
  • Seragen's Initial Public Offering And Subsequent
  • PLAINTIFFS HAVE FAILED TO PLEAD AN ACTIONABLE CLAIM AGAINST THE INSIDER DEFENDANTS BASED ON
  • An Independent Fairness Opinion Concerning Allocation
  • Of The Merger Proceeds, And Plaintiffs Cannot Contend
  • That The Proxy Statement Misleadingly Suggested Or
  • Plaintiffs' Claims of Inadequate Financial Disclosures Are
  • PLAINTIFFS' DUTY OF LOYALTY CLAIMS MUST BE
  • Loyalty In Connection With The Allocation Of The Merger
  • Plaintiffs' Remaining Claims Of Purported Self-Dealing
  • Hirsch, Josefsen, and Marathon Under Court Of Chancery
  • Plaintiffs' Allegations That Hirsch And Josefsen Aided
  • THE PLAINTIFFS' COMMON LAW FRAUD, NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION AND EQUITABLE FRAUD CLAIMS
  • Solash v. Telex Corn., Del.
  • In re Wheelabrator TechnoloPies Inc. Shareholders Litigation,
  • The named Plaintiffs,' former owners of common stock of Seragen, Inc.
  • April 1992 (the date of Seragen's initial public offering) through August 12,
  • To maximize the return for Seragen's common stockholders,
  • A copy of the Court's August 7, 1998 letter opinion is attached as Exhibit A to the Brief
  • Hopkinton, Massachusetts.
  • Plaintiffs devote the bulk of their Complaint to chronicling transactions between
  • Seragen Series B Preferred Stock and additional warrants,
  • The Proxy Statement failed to disclose that the interests of
  • Certain Defendants for breaching fiduciary duties of care and loyalty alleged to be owed the
  • Where, as here, the Complaint charges Defendants with disclosure violations, the
  • selected and misleading portions of such documents could not be dismissed under Rule 12

  • 15 . BRIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LIGAND
    KNIGHT
    DEFENDANTS
    DEL
    DELAWARE
    COMPLAINT
    COURT
    DISMISS
    MOTION
    SUPPORT
    FRAUD
    MERGER
    KNIGHT ACQUISITION
    PRIOR
    FACTS
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    ALLEGATIONS
    LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS
    NORTH MARKET STREET
    SHAREHOLDERS
    CORROON LLP
    WILMINGTON
    COMMON LAW FRAUD
    MISREPRESENTATION
    KNOWING PARTICIPATION
    VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    SAN DIEGO
    CALIFORNIA
    PLEAD INDIVIDUAL RELIANCE
    
                                                                                              '
                                                                                  ;:               ' 2
                                                                                        1%. I,' `,,, 
    
    
    
    
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                                                                       
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER,            )
    EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0. GRUSE,             )
    ANN 0. GRUSE, WILLIAM M. STERRETT, )
    BLACKSBURG TRANSFER & STORAGE,              )
    INC., DAVID MCDANIEL, WALLACE L.            )
    HUFF, DANIEL R. CANADA, WILLIAM J.          )
    CUDMORE, CORBIN BAILEY, JOHN F.             )
    BOLAND, PHILIP FLARSHEIM, SIMONE            )
    POULAN, LUCY THOMPSON, JOHN &               )
    LORRAINE MORTIMER, JENNIFER L.              1
    JANELLE, RON & SUSAN ESTES,                 )      C.A. No. 16570NC
    DR. GARY WAKE, and FIRST UNION              >
    NATIONAL BANK, FOR THE ESTATE OF            )
    MARY ELLEN DOBBINS, individually and on )
    behalf of all others similarly situated,
                                                j
                            Plaintiffs,
                                                i
                    V.                          >1
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, JOHN R. SILBER,          )
    LEON C. HIRSCH, TURI JOSEFSEN, REED )
    R. PRIOR, GERALD S.J. CASSIDY,
    KENNETH G. CONDON, NORMAN A.                j                                       :.
    JACOBS, JEAN C. NICHOLS, SERAGEN,           )
    INC., SERAGEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,             1
    MARATHON BIOPHARACEUTICALS, LLC, )
    LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and           )
    KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.,
    
                            Defendants.         j
      OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    AND KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP. IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
                PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    
                                                      Donald J. Wolfe, Jr.
                                                      Arthur L. Dent
    OF COUNSEL:                                       POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
    William F. Sullivan                               Hercules Plaza
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • LEON C. HIRSCH, TURI JOSEFSEN, REED) R. PRIOR, GERALD S.J. CASSIDY,
  • OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS,
  • AND KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.
  • IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
  • POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP William F. Sullivan
  • 13 13 North Market Street Sean T. Prosser
  • Wilmington, Delaware 19899 BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
  • 984-6000 550 West "C" Street, Suite 1300 San Diego, California 92 101-3532
  • PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO ALLEGE FACTS ESTABLISHING
  • ALLEGED BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY.
  • PLAINTIFFS' COMMON LAW FRAUD AND NEGLIGENT
  • MISREPRESENTATION CLAIMS ARE SIMILARLY
  • Plaintiffs Do Not Adequately Plead Individual Reliance
  • and They Cannot Maintain Class Allegations of Fraud
  • Sammons, Del.

  • 16 . BRIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    COMPLAINT
    MERGER
    PRIOR
    COURT
    LIGAND
    JACOBS
    PROXY
    NICHOLS
    DEL
    DELAWARE
    AGREEMENT
    TRANSACTIONS
    TECHNOLOGIES
    SHAREHOLDERS
    COMMON STOCK
    ALLEGATIONS
    ALLOCATION
    MERGER CONSIDERATION
    DERIVATIVE CLAIMS
    INSIDER DEFENDANTS
    ACQUISITION
    MERGER PROCEEDS
    MINORITY STOCKHOLDERS
    PREFERRED STOCK
    DISCLOSURE
    LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS
    KNIGHT ACQUISITION
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SERGIO M. OLIVER, RONALD OLIVER,                )
    EMILY OLIVER, GREGORY 0. GRUSE,                 )
    ANN 0. GRUSE, WILLIAM M. STERRETT, )
    BLACKSBURG TRANSFER & STORAGE,                  )
    INC., DAVID MCDANIEL, WALLACE L.                )
    HUFF, DANIEL R. CANADA, WILLIAM J.              )
    CUDMORE, CORBIN BAILEY, JOHN F.                 )
    BOLAND, PHILIP FLARSHEIM, SIMONE                )
    POULAN, LUCY THOMPSON, JOHN &                   )
    LORRAINE MORTIMER, JENNIFER L.                  1
    JANELLE, RON & SUSAN ESTES,                     )    C.A. No. 1657ONC
    DR. GARY WAKE, and FIRST UNION                  )
    NATIONAL BANK, FOR THE ESTATE OF                )
    MARY ELLEN DOBBINS, individually and on )
    behalf of all others similarly situated,
    
                            Plaintiffs,
    
                    V.
                                                    i
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY, JOHN R. SILBER,              )
    LEON C. HIRSCH, TURI JOSEFSEN, REED )
    R. PRIOR, GERALD S.J. CASSIDY,
    KENNETH G. CONDON, NORMAN A.                    j
    JACOBS, JEAN C. NICHOLS, SERAGEN,               )
    INC., SERAGEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
    MARATHON BIOPHARMACEUTICALS,                    1
    LLC, LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., )
    and KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.,
                                                    ;
                            Defendants.             >
    
            OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS SERAGEN, INC., SERAGEN
            TECHNOLOGIES, INC., REED R. PRIOR, NORMAN A. JACOBS,
               JEAN C. NICHOLS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
                PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    
                                                Donald J. Wolfe, Jr.
    OF COUNSEL:                                 Arthur L. Dent
    William F. Sullivan (#78353)                POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
    Christopher H. McGrath (#49129)             Hercules Plaza
    Sean T. Prosser (#163903)                   13 13 N. Market Street
    Colleen E. O'Leary (# 19 1402)              P.O. Box 951
    BROBECK,PHLEGER                             Wilmington, DE 19899
     & HARRISON LLP                             (302) 984-6000
    550 West "C" Street, Suite 1300             Attorneys for Defendants
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • LEON C. HIRSCH, TURI JOSEFSEN, REED) R. PRIOR, GERALD S.J. CASSIDY,
  • LLC, LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,)
  • and KNIGHT ACQUISITION CORP.,
  • OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS SERAGEN, INC., SERAGEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., REED R. PRIOR, NORMAN
  • 984-6000 550 West "C" Street, Suite 1300 Attorneys for Defendants San Diego, CA 92101-3532
  • Seragen, Inc., Seragen Technologies,
  • Inc., Reed R. Prior, Norman A. Jacobs, and March 181999
  • Jean C. Nichols
  • The Purported Insider Transactions Challenged By
  • The Ligand Merger.
  • UNDER KRAMER AND ITS PROGENY PLAINTIFFS' ALLEGATIONS OF BREACHES OF THE DUTIES OF LOYALTY AND
  • Claims Upon Consummation Of The Merger.

  • 17 . LETTER OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    VOTE
    STOCKHOLDERS
    APPRAI
    ENJOIN
    INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    COUNSEL
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    EXPEDITE
    CLASS ACTION
    MINORITY STOCKHOLDERS
    REASONS
    PROCEEDING
    COMPLAINT
    OPPOSE
    APPRAISAL RIGHTS
    DISSENT
    DEMAND
    MAJORITY
    DEFECTS
    TIE
    TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
    BASIS
    DISINGENUOLLE
    ADEQUATE
    PROTECTING
    ARC
    GLARING
    AVOID
    
                                                                   C0Vh-r  ec  Cl  ,CII.QEJw','
    
                                                                               OF  THE:
                                                                   S T A T E   O F  D E L A W A R E
    
    
             HYROU  I-. STLCLL
              VJOEWUWLOR                                                                              
                                                                          August 7,1998
    
    
                   Via Fax
    
                   Michael J. Maimone
                   J o s e p h                                 Schoell
                   Morris, James Hitcblens & Williams
                   P-O. Box 2306
                   WihiAgtOIl,   DE  19!899
    
                   Donald J. Wolfe, Jr.
                   Potter Anderson & Corroon
                   P-0. Box 981
                   Wilmington, DE 191399
    
                                   Re: Sergio M. Oliver, d aL v. Boston University, et aL
                                                       CA. No. 16570-NC
    
                   Counsel:
    
                             On  August  4, 1998,  ~~GAXG  filed  rNs  acUon against  rbe  "controlhng"
                   stockholders, directoss and offkers of Scragen,  Xnc. ("Seragen'~)  seeking to
                   August 12, 1998 vote of the stockholders on a proposed merger with Ligand
                   Pharmacouticale,   TUG;. ("Ligand"). Significantly, plaintiffs have made it clear
                   wish to enjoin the stockholder vote but not the consummation of the merger which
                   will occur if approved by majority vote of the stockholdera.  The parties agree that
                   57% R c.1~~ majority, of the &xkholdors arc bound by illwuc&k ~roxv to Vote  in
                   IWO; of the merger on August 12, 19%.
    
                             Plaintiffs filed this action as an individual,  rather than  ae  a  class
                   Although plaintiffs chose to file an individual action  in an attempt to enjoin the
                   merger vote, they cantcnd the prow atatcnlzrll accampanyine the. aolicitRtian to be
    
    
    
    
    
    
    __.-..
              -
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • 1998 vote of the stockholders on a proposed merger with Ligand
  • wish to enjoin the stockholder vote but not the consummation of the merger which
  • will occur if approved by majority vote of the stockholdera.
  • Plaintiffs filed this action as an individual, rather than ae a class action.
  • They urge the Court to expedite pioceedings ancil confkm a tentatively scheduled August 10 at
  • Thy suggest their reasons for opting for `k individual action rather than a class action will
  • In a telcphauc cw&~~nc;e held on Allgtlsr 5, lYY8, and by letter &April 7, 1998, I heard fkom
  • On the telephone conference, no]ocd counsel appcartd for deknnriants but I later received a
  • IS a hearing on a preliminary iqjunction warrRnf.e.d where plaintif% file tx~ kdividul as
  • Is there any significance to tie fact the preliminary injunctive relief sought dews not sadc
  • It is, my, disingenuolle of the plaktiffs to ffie this individual action, not oppose rhe
  • itself, and declare that the merger vote should be enjoined because of inadequate information
  • They gratuitously conclude it is impossible for these other third party beneficities of their
  • Plaintiffs' counsel's letter speaks as if counsel represents all minority stockholders when
  • The plaintiffs do not oppose the merger itself nor do they object to the merger consideration
  • There was some suggestion during the telephone conference that plai,ntiffs, in this
  • have no basis for a demand for an expedited proceeding.
  • preliminary injunction at 2 p.m. in New Castle County on August 10.1998,
  •    |