LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE FREEPORT-MCMORAN SULPHUR Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 16,729, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00016729, Fsc, Shareholders, Merger, Freeport, Special Committee, Transaction, Moxy, Business Judgment Rule, Second Amended Complaint, Delaware, Del, Directors, Sulphur, Moffett, Disinterestedness, Complaint, Stockholders, Esquires, Recommendation, Vote, Wilmington, Facts, Standard, Mec, Freeport-mcmoran Sulphur, Freeport Copper, Amended Consolidated Complaint, Defendants James, Shares, Allegation, Dismiss, Motion, Brown, Chancery Court Rule, Pursuant, Freeport-mcmoran, Proxy Statement, Latiolais , ContentID: 120239758

Case Documents
1 2001-04-30 FSC DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115548
28 pages
PDF
2 2001-01-11 MEMORANDUM OPINION (REVISED
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100333
15 pages
PDF
3 2001-01-05 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100334
15 pages
PDF
4 2000-06-30 DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF TO BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103056
7 pages
PDF
5 2000-06-29 FSC DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103057
13 pages
PDF
6 2000-02-18 AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102111
16 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 6 documents , 94 pages
Price: $ 44.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . FSC DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
SHAREHOLDERS
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
TRANSACTION
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
COURT
DISINTERESTEDNESS
DEFENDANTS
SULPHUR
MERGER
DELAWARE
DEL
DIRECTORS
RECOMMENDATION
VOTE
MOXY
FREEPORT-MCMORAN SULPHUR
ALLEGATION
NON-COERCED VOTE
JOINT PROXY STATEMENT
MERGER AGREEMENT
COMMON STOCK
STOCKHOLDERS
CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDER
EXCULPATORY PROVISION
MCMORAN EXPLORATION
APPLICABLE STANDARD
JUDGMENT RULE PROTECTS
                                                                                                   
         IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

                                                                                               /  :
IN RE FREEPORT-MCMORAN
SULPHUR, INC. SHAREHOLDERS                   t         C o n s .   C . A .   -No.  16729-NC    ~~
LITIGATION                                   >
                                                                                               c





           FSC DEFENDANTS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
           MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT




MORRIS, NICHOLS,  ARSHT                      RICHARDS, LAYTON  & FINGER, P.A.
  & TUNNELL                                  Allen M. Terrell, Jr.
A. Gilchrist Sparks, III                     Zoe A. Forrester
Alan J. Stone                                One Rodney Square
1201 r\Jorth Market Street                   P.O. Box 551
P.O. Box 1347                                Wilmington, Delaware 19899
Wilmington, Delaware 19899                   (302) 658-6541
(302) 658-9200

DAVIS POLK  & WARDWELL                       JONES, DAY, REAVIS  & POGUE
Dennis E. Glazer                             Terence M. Murphy
John J. Clarke, Jr.                          James P. Karen
450 Lexington Avenue                         2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 2300
New York, New York 10017                     Dallas, Texas 7520'1
(212) 450-4000                               (214) 220-3939

Attorneys for Defendants                     Attorneys for Defendants
 James R. Moffett, Rene L. Latiolais,             Terre11 J. Brown and Thomas D. Clark, Jr.
 B.M. Rankin, Jr., .Richard  C. Adkerson,
 Robert M. Wohleber and
 Freeport-McMoRdn Sulphur, Inc.



                                                                                     1.


                                   TABLE OF CONTENTS
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • FSC DEFENDANTS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED
  • The Transaction at Issue
  • THE APPLICABLE STANDARD
  • COMPLAINT SHOULD BE DISMISSED UNDER THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
  • The Business Judgment Rule Protects -the FSC Board's
  • Actions Based on the Recommendation of a Disinterested
  • Special Committee
  • The Fully Informed, Non-Coerced Vote of FSC
  • Shareholders Also Requires Review Under the Business
  • PLAINTIFFS' C L A I M S A R E B A R R E D B Y THE EXCULPATORY PROVISION OF FSC'S CHARTER
  • PageArnold v. Societv for Savings Bancorp., Del.
  • InTreenort-McMoRan Sulphur, Inc. Shareholders Litig., Del.

  • 2 . MEMORANDUM OPINION (REVISED)

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    FSC
    MOFFETT
    MERGER
    COMPLAINT
    DELAWARE
    ESQUIRES
    MOXY
    COURT
    DIRECTORS
    STANDARD
    WILMINGTON
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE
    ATTORNEYS
    DEFENDANTS JAMES
    SHAREHOLDERS
    FACTS
    DEL
    LATIOLAIS
    TRANSACTION
    PROXY STATEMENT
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    FREEPORT COPPER
    CONSULTING FEES
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
    MEC
    MORRIS
    JONES
    GAS COMPANY
    
         IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF .DELAWARE
                                                                                          %
                         IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                          s*z                     
                                                                            $.;;                       
                                                                           `.- --.I                    
                                                                           rr: -;                      
    IN RE FREEPORT-MCMORAN                             >                          -~ ,               -q
                                                                         ".
    SULPHUR, INC. SHAREHOLDERS                         >      CONSQLID ATED=                           
    LITIGATION,                                         >     C.A. -N@$6729  2                         
                                                                     =a: i :-;                 -_ .,
                                                                         :a
                             MEMORANDUM OPINION                         Y                      2'
    
                          Date Submitted: September 26,200O
                          Date Decided:         January 5,2001
                          Date Revised:         Januarv 11) 200 1
    
    Pamela S. Tikellis, Robert J. Kriner, Jr., and Timothy R. Dudderar, Esquires, of
    CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS, Wilmington, Delaware and Norman M. Monhait,
    Esquire, ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS & GODDESS, P.A., Wilmington,
    Delaware; and GOODKIND LABATON, RUDOFF  & SUCHAROW LLP, New
    York, New York; Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    Henry N. Herndon, Jr., and Lewis H. Lazarus, Esquires, of MORRIS, JAMES,
    HITCHENS & WILLIAMS, Wilmington, Delaware; and Robert B. Bieck,  Jr., David
    G. Radlauer and Amy L. Landry, Esquires of JONES, WALKER, WAECHTER,
    POITEVENT, CARRERE & DENEGRE, L.L.P.; Attorneys for Defendant McMoRan
    Oil & Gas Company
    
    A. Gilchrist Sparks, III, Alan J. Stone and Christopher F. Carlton, Esquires, of
    MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL, Wilmington, Delaware, and Dennis E.
    Glazer and John J. Clarke, Jr., Esquires of DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL, New
    York, New York; Attorneys for Defendants James R. Moffett, Rene L. Latiolais, B.M.
    Rankin,  Jr., Richard C. Adkerson, Robert M. Wohleber and Freeport-McMoRan
    Sulphur Inc.
    
    Allen M. Terrell, Jr. and Peter B. Ladig, Esquires of RICHARDS, LAYTON &
    FINGER, Wilmington, Delaware, and Terrence M. Murphy and James P. Karen,
    Esquires, of JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE, Dallas, Texas; Attorneys for
    Defendants Terre11 J. Brown and Thomas D. Clark, Jr.
    
    
    JACOBS, VICE CHANCELLOR
    
    
    
            The plaintiffs in this shareholder class action challenge a stock-for-
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF .DELAWARE
  • The plaintiffs in this shareholder class action challenge a stock-for-stock merger on the
  • That transaction took the form of FSC and MOXY
  • FSC and MOXY would receive, as consideration, stock of MEC in exchange
  • The pertinent facts are as alleged in the complaint and documents incorporated therein by
  • would be allocated among FSC's and MOXY's shareholders on the basis of
  • The merger was negotiated on behalf of FSC by a special committee
  • The Legal Standard
  • The original complaint, captioned Krasner v. Moffett, et al., C.A.
  • Grobow v. l?erot, Del.
  • Merger transaction, the applicable standard of review is entire fairness.
  • standard of review is business judgment,
  • the business judgment rule presumption the plaintiff must allege that the
  • Yet, the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated
  • directors--Richard M. Wohleber and Kene L. Latiolais
  • alleged that Wohleber served as senior vice president of Freeport Copper,
  • 28 In discussing consulting fees paid to Senator George Mitchell, the Court stated that the

  • 3 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    FSC
    MOFFETT
    MERGER
    COMPLAINT
    MOXY
    COURT
    DELAWARE
    DIRECTORS
    STANDARD
    ESQUIRES
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DEL
    WILMINGTON
    FACTS
    PROXY STATEMENT
    ATTORNEYS
    DEFENDANTS JAMES
    LATIOLAIS
    TRANSACTION
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    FREEPORT COPPER
    CONSULTING FEES
    BOARD MEMBERS
    MEC
    DISINTEREST
    MORRIS
    GAS COMPANY
    
                                                                                           AL  '51
         IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                                          .      <..-I.
                         IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY I, "1                      r':
                                                                    :            :  :  _~_
                                                                    ,:                          _
                                                                    -           . C.-i       .. (.. .'
                                                                    : ._
    IN RE FREEPORT-MCMORAN                            )                           -"
    SULPHUR, INC. SHAREHOLDERS                        >     CONSGLIDATE~
    LITIGATION,                                       >     C.A. No&729 ..;
                                                                          -:     c 2
    
                             MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
                          Date Submitted: September 26,200O
                          Date Decided:         January 5,200l
    
    Pamela S. Tikellis, Robert J. Kriner, Jr., and Timothy R. Dudderar, Esquires, of
    CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS, Wilmington, Delaware and Norman M. Monhait,
    Esquire, ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS  & GODDESS, P.A., Wilmington,
    Delaware; and GOODKIND LABATON, RUDOFF  & SUCHAROW LLP, New
    York, New York; Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    Henry N. Herndon, Jr., and Lewis H. Lazarus, Esquires, of MORRIS, JAMES,
    HITCHENS & WILLIAMS, Wilmington, Delaware; and Robert B. Bieck,  Jr., David
    G. Radlauer and Amy L. Landry, Esquires of JONES, WALKER, WAECHTER,
    POITEVENT, CARRERE & DENEGRE, L.L.P.; Attorneys for Defendant McMoRan
    Oil & Gas Company
    
    A. Gilchrist Sparks, III, Alan J. Stone and Christopher F. Carlton, Esquires, of
    MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL, Wilmington, Delaware, and Dennis E.
    Glazer and John J. Clarke, Jr., Esquires of DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL, New
    York, New York; Attorneys for Defendants James R. Moffett, Rene L. Latiolais, B.M.
    Rankin,  Jr., Richard C. Adkerson, Robert M. Wohleber and Freeport-McMoRan
    Sulphur Inc.
    
    
    
    JACOBS, VICE CHANCELLOR
    
    
    
            The plaintiffs in this shareholder class action challenge a stock-for-
    
    stock merger on the basis that the interestedness of the directors of the
    
    subject corporation resulted in its stockholders receiving an unfair price for
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • The plaintiffs in this shareholder class action challenge a stock-for-stock merger on the
  • All defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint under Court of
  • ' The pertinent facts are as alleged,in the complaint and documents incorporated therein by
  • ' Both MOXY and FSC are majority-owned by Freeport-McMoran,
  • See Proxy Statement at 27-28.
  • The MEC stock they would receive would be allocated among
  • FSC's and MOXY's shareholders on the basis of .625 MEC shares for each
  • The merger was negotiated on behalf of FSC by a special committee
  • The Legal Standard
  • The original complaint, captioned Krasner v. Moffett, et al., C.A.
  • Grobow v. Perot, Del.
  • Merger transaction, the applicable standard of review is entire fairness"
  • standard of review is business judgment,
  • sufficient number of board members to constitute a majority.14 A director is
  • only the disinterest and independence of the two remaining
  • directors-Richard M. Wohleber and Rene L. Latiolais
  • alleged that Wohleber served as senior vice president of Freeport Copper,
  • 29 In discussing consulting fees paid to Senator George Mitchell, the Court stated that the

  • 4 . DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF TO BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MOXY
    ALLEGE
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE
    BREACH
    FSC
    DEFENDANTS
    DIRECTORS
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    COURT
    DISMISS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    BROWN
    CHANDLER
    REASONS
    FREEPORT-MCMORAN
    DEL
    DELAWARE LAW
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
    ALLEGATIONS
    IMPUTATION
    MOTIVATION
    ASSERTION
    CONSISTENT
    TRANSACTION
    MOREOVER
    MEMBERS
    MOTION
    ROBERT
    AUTHORITY
    
               IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    IN RE FREEPORT-MCMORAN                 >
    SULPHUR:, INC. SHAREHOLDERS                      Consol. C.A. No. 16729-NC
    LITIGATION                             ;                                           -.  ,
                                                                                  !-`..,               
                                                                                      :              
                                                                                    :/,,  -.`.
                                                                                      :"' `7
                                                                                      , ,.;:           
                  DEFENDANT McMORAN OIL & GAS CO.`S REPLY BRIEF .L;".' Ty,
                            TO PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN                                   ,.
                      OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
    
    
                                           MORRIS, JAMES, HITCHENS  &WILLIAMS LLP
    
                                           Henry N. Herndon, Jr. (#606)
                                           Lewis H. Lazarus (#2374)
                                           222 Delaware Avenue, 10th Floor
                                           P.O. Box 2306
                                           Wilmington, DE 19899
                                           (302) 888-6800
                                                Attorneys for Defendant
                                                McMoRan Oil & Gas Co.
    
    
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    JONES, WALKER, WAECHTER,  POITEVENT
    CARRERE  & DENEGRE,  L.L.P.
    
    Robert B. Beick, Jr.
    David G. Radlauer
    Amy L. Landry
    201 St. Ch.arles Avenue, 49th Floor
    New Orleans, LA 70170
    (504) 582-8000
    
    
    Dated: June 30. 2000
    
    
    
                                                      TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
  • Robert B. Beick, Jr.
  • Fiduciary Duty By The FSC Directors, Plaintiffs Have Failed
  • To State A Claim That MOXY Knowingly Participated In That Breach
  • Brown v. l?erette De1x'C.A.
  • No. 13531, Chandler, C..
  • In re Vitallnk Communications Coruoration Shareholders Litigation, Del.
  • Plaintiffs Have Failed To Allege A Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
  • Bv The Directors of Freeport-McMoRan,
  • Moreover, the plaintiffs fail to allege that MOXY "knowingly" aided and abetted
  • fiduciary duty by relying instead on the imputation of knowledge to the MOXY board and to
  • See Plaintiffs' Answering Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss,
  • I& The plaintiffs' sole authority is Brown v. Perette,
  • Contrary to plaintiffs' assertion, the court in Brown did not require imputation of
  • knowledge in all instances where directors stand on both sides of a transaction.
  • and cannOt allege similar facts concerning the members of the special committees appointed to
  • Unable to allege a special committee conflict of interest,
  • These allegations do not, under any construction, demonstrate knowledge by MOXY of any
  • committee is entirely consistent with its "duty to attain the highest price reasonably
  • " In re Vitalink Communications Corporation Shareholders Litigation,
  • The alleged absence of such motivation by the FSC special committee cannot
  • attack, contradicts long-standing Delaware law.
  • For the foregoing reasons, and those reasons previously asserted in support of dismissal,

  • 5 . FSC DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    FSC
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    DEFENDANTS
    DEL
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
    DELAWARE
    MOTION
    AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
    FSC BOARD
    DISMISS
    BROWN
    JUDGMENT RULE REVIEW
    FACTS
    ALLEGATIONS
    WOHLEBER
    ROSS AVENUE
    WILMINGTON
    ATTORNEYS
    INDEPENDENCE
    DIRECTORS
    DISCLOSURE CLAIM
    FREEPORT COPPER
    CHANCERY
    LADIG JONES
    RODNEY SQUARE
    DEFENDANTS TERRE11
    AUTHORITIES
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    -------------------____________I__   x
    IN RE FREEPORT MCMORAN SULPHUR,               :  CONSOL. C.A. No.  16729-NC
    INC. SHAREHOLDER  LITI.GATION,
    
    
    
    
     FSC DEFENDANTS REPLY BRKEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    OF COUNSEL:                                   MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT  &
    Dennis E. Glazer                              TUNNELL                              i     ;I:
                                                                                -:...                  
    John J. Clarke, Jr.                           A. Gilchrist Sparks, III      ;;:"  :'  -=          ;
    Davis Polk & Wardwell                         Alan J. Stone                 .            ,:        
                                                                                             i\;
    450 Lexington Avenue                          Christopher F. Carlton        `;            i .T
    New York, New York 10017                      1201 North Market Street                    ---:
                                                                                              ,
    (212) 450-4000                                P.O. Box 1347                               - -
                                                  Wilmington, Delaware 19899  
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
     
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • FSC DEFENDANTS REPLY BRKEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS
  • ter B. Ladig Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
  • One Rodney Square 2001 Ross Avenue,
  • Wilmington, Delaware 19899 220-3939
  • Attorneys for Defendants Terre11 J. Brown Dated:
  • TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.
  • II A MAJORITY OF TIE FSC BOARD WAS NOT INTERESTED IN THE MERGER.
  • Shareholders Litig., Del.
  • Brown v. Perrette
  • Directors of FSC, respectfully submit this
  • TB[JC MERGER IS ENTITLED TO BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE REVIEW.
  • In their Answering Brief, plaintiffs attack the special committee, stating in conclusory
  • there are no particularized allegations
  • Second, and even more fundamental, plaintiffs' single disclosure claim amounts to nothing
  • according,to the Amended Consolidated Complaint, not subject to coercion, the Merger is

  • 6 . AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFFS
    MOXY
    STOCKHOLDERS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    SHARES
    MEC
    MERGER
    CHANCERY COURT RULE
    PURSUANT
    STOCK
    YORK
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
    FREEPORT-MCMORAN
    SULPHUR
    RANKIN
    EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    BUY-BACK PROGRAM
    VICE PRESIDENT
    FTX
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    RELEVANT TIMES
    COMMON STOCK
    FREEPORT COPPER
    EXCHANGE RATIO
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE
    SUCHAROW LLP
    PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE
    
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ________________________________________-------~-------- X
    IN RE FREEPORT-MCMORAN SULPHUR, :                                  CONSOLIDATED
    INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                  :    CIVIL ACTION NO. 16729
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
     
  • Pursuant to Chancery Court Rule lS, the Amended Consolidated Complaint supercedes the
  • GOODKIND, LABATON, RUDOFF & SUCHAROW LLP
  • New York, New York 10017
  • Plaintiffs, as and for their complaint, allege upon personal knowledge as to
  • the merger of Freeport and McMoRan Oil & Gas Co. to form McMoRan
  • Chairman of Freeport and who held significantly more MOXY shares than Freeport shares.
  • decision of the individual defendants, who constituted Freeport's Board of Directors, to
  • certain of the Individual Defendants and denied the Company's shareholders
  • that they and the other public stockholders of Freeport are entitled to recover damages.
  • of sulphur.
  • and gas operations of Freeport-McMoRan Resource Partners, Limited Partnership, later named
  • In connection with the merger of FTX into IMC Global Inc.,
  • Company's common stock were distributed by PLP to its unitholders, including FTX, and the
  • Defendant James R. Moffett was, at all relevant times, Co-Chairman of the Board
  • Board of Freeport and Co-Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of MOXY.
  • Adkerson also has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Freeport Copper since
  • 1997 and as its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
  • Defendant B.M. Rankin, Jr.
  • of MEC shares improperly favored MOXY shareholders by giving them the majority of MEC
  • On May 6, 1998, Freeport announced an expansion to its buy-back program
  • with a more favorable exchange ratio for their MOXY shares.
  • Special Committee") and a special committee of the Freeport board (the "Freeport Special
  •    |