LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SKEEN v JO-ANN STORES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 16,836, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: JN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: SKEEN, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00016836, Merger, Disclosure, Information Statement, Del, Facts, Stockholders, Partial Summary Judgment, Shareholders, Delaware, Fca, Motion, Directors, Fiduciary Duty, Material Facts, Materials, Dismiss, Opinion, Stores, Reasonable Stockholders, Mailing, Connection, Projections, Plan, Minority Stockholders, Reasons, Merger Price, Dlj, Dlj Fairness Ranges, Merger Consideration, Jacobs, Drb/ab, King Street, Monetary Damages, Dob, Wilmington, Omitted Disclosure, Technicolor, Summary Judgment, Financials , ContentID: 120239749

Case Documents
1 1999-09-27 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100317
19 pages
PDF
2 1999-04-12 PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103015
17 pages
PDF
3 1999-02-26 BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103016
53 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 89 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
INFORMATION STATEMENT
MERGER
DISCLOSURE
SHAREHOLDERS
DEL
DEFENDANTS
FACTS
MATERIAL FACTS
DIRECTORS
MAILING
DELAWARE
OPINION
COURT
FIDUCIARY DUTY
JACOBS
OMITTED DISCLOSURE
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FCA
STOCKHOLDERS
FINANCIALS
OMITTING MATERIAL FACTS
CONNECTION
COMPLAINT
DEFENDANTS ARGUE
WILMINGTON
ATTORNEYS
FORMER SHAREHOLDERS
CLASS ACTION
PROPOSED MERGER
      JN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


WILLIAM M. SKEEN and                       )
JACQUELINE L. SKEEN                        )>
                  Plaintiffs,              >1
      V.                                   >        Civil Action No. 16836
                                           1
JO-ANN STORES, INC.,                       >
HOUSE OF FABRICS, INC.,                    >
ALAN ROSSKAMM, BRIAN                       >
P. CARNEY, DAVID E. BOLEN,                 >
JANE A. AGGERS, JOHN W.                    >
HERMSEN, R.N. HANKIN  and                 >
H. MICHAEL HECT,                          >>
                  Defendants.             >

                         MEMORANDUM OPINION

                     Date Submitted:             June 25, 1999
                     Date Decided:      Sentember 27, 1999

Ronald A. Brown, Jr., Esquire, of PRICKETT, JONES, ELLIOTT & KRISTOL,
Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for Respondents

Allen M. Terrell, Jr., Srinivas M. Raju, and Michael D. Allen, Esquires, of
RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, Wilmington, Delaware; and David J. Hooker,
Keith L. Carson and Lisa R. Battaglia, Esquires, of THOMPSON HINE & FLORY
LLP, Cleveland, Ohio; Attorneys for Defendants



JACOBS, VICE CHANCELLOR



       The plaintiffs, who are former shareholders of House of Fabrics, Inc.

("HF"), brought this class action against HF and its seven former directors,

claiming that those directors (i) breached their fiduciary duty of disclosure by

omitting material facts from an Information Statement disseminated in connection

with a proposed merger and (ii) violated 8 Del. C, $ $ 25 1 and 262 by not mailing

to the shareholders in timely fashion the Information Statement and the Notice of
SNIPPETS:
  • JN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • MEMORANDUM OPINION
  • Ronald A. Brown, Jr., Esquire, of PRICKETT, JONES, ELLIOTT & KRISTOL, Wilmington, Delaware;
  • JACOBS, VICE CHANCELLOR
  • The plaintiffs, who are former shareholders of House of Fabrics, Inc.
  • , brought this class action against HF and its seven former directors,
  • claiming that those directors breached their fiduciary duty of disclosure by
  • omitting material facts from an Information Statement disseminated in connection
  • with a proposed merger and violated 8 Del.
  • meeting at which HF shareholders would vote on that merger.
  • The defendants moved to dismiss all claims on the grounds that the
  • of summary judgment on four of their disclosure claims.
  • that all the claims alleged in the complaint are legally
  • the motion to dismiss will be granted and the crossmotion for summary judgment will be denied.
  • The pertinent facts are derived from the complaint.
  • Agreement") which provided for a two-step acquisition of HF by FCA for $4.25
  • material facts to HF shareholders in the Notice and Information Statement.
  • The plaintiffs' second claim is that the mailing of the Notice and the
  • Information Statement were untimely under 8 Del.
  • the defendants argue that the representative plaintiffs lack
  • six omitted disclosure claims.
  • they are charged with failing to mail the Notice to all HF stockholders in a timely
  • The plaintiffs have not done that in connection
  • the defendants did disclose the most up-to-date financials that were available to

  • 2 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    STOCKHOLDERS
    DISCLOSURE
    PLAN
    MERGER
    FCA
    MOTION
    REASONS
    FACTS
    REASONABLE STOCKHOLDERS
    OPINION
    DLJ FAIRNESS RANGES
    DELAWARE
    PROJECTIONS
    DRB/AB
    FEDERAL LAW
    APPRAISAL PROCEEDING
    DISCLOSURE CLAIMS
    MANAGEMENT
    CONNECTION
    ALAN ROSSKAMM
    PRICKETT
    JONES
    ELLIOTT
    KRISTOL
    WILMINGTON
    ATTORNEYS
    
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE              q
    
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    WILLIAM M. SKEEN and
    JACQUELINE L. SKEEN
    
                       Plaintiffs,
                                                     C.A. No. 16836-NC
                       V.
    
    JO-ANN STORES, INC.,
    HOUSE OF FABRICS, INC.,
    ALAN ROSSKAMM, BRIAN
    P. CARNEY, DAVID E. BOLEN,
    JANE A. AGGERS, JOHN W.
    HERMSEN, R.N. HANKIN and
    H. MICHAEL HECT
    
                       Defendants.
    
    
                                      PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF
                              IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION
                               FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
    
    
                                               PRICKETT, JONES, ELLIOTT
                                                & KRISTOL
                                               Ronald A. Brown, Jr.
                                               1310 King Street
                                              P.O. Box 1328
                                              Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                               (302)888-6500
                                              Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    Dated: April 12, 1999
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    16279.1\84148vl
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Defendants.
  • PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF
  • PRICKETT, JONES, ELLIOTT
  • & KRISTOL
  • Wilmington, Delaware 19899
  • Attorneys for Plaintiffs
  • PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON FOUR
  • OF THE DISCLOSURE CLAIMS ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT
  • A Full Explanation of the Changes to HF Made by FCA and Its
  • Designees After the Tender Offer Closed as Well as FCA's Plan for HF
  • Stockholders Were Entitled to Evaluate for Themselves
  • Would be Admissible in an Appraisal Proceeding.
  • The Reasons for the Merger Were Not Adequately Disclosed.
  • The List of Nine "Factors" Was Not Adequate Disclosure.
  • The DLJ Fairness Ranges Were Material and Should Have Been
  • The 5 Year Projections Were Material and Should Have Been
  • 12 Matador Capital Management Corp. v. BRC Holdings, Inc., Del.

  • 3 . BRIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    MERGER
    STOCKHOLDERS
    PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    DEL
    DISCLOSURE
    MOTION
    FCA
    INFORMATION STATEMENT
    MATERIALS
    FACTS
    DISMISS
    DELAWARE
    STORES
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    REASONABLE STOCKHOLDERS
    DIRECTORS
    MINORITY STOCKHOLDERS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    CONNECTION
    MERGER PRICE
    DLJ
    PROJECTIONS
    MERGER CONSIDERATION
    KING STREET
    MONETARY DAMAGES
    DOB
    TECHNICOLOR
    
    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                       '4
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY              / ,I2
                                                                            f-A
    
    WILLIAM M. SKEEN and
    JACQUELINE L. SKEEN
    
                       Plaintiffs,
                                                   C.A. No. 16836-NC
                       V.
    
    JO-ANN STORES, INC.,
    HOUSE OF FABRICS, INC.,
    ALAN ROSSKAMM, BRIAN
    P. CARNEY, DAVID E. BOLEN,
    JANE A. AGGERS, JOHN W.
    HERMSEN, R.N. HANKIN and
    H. MICHAEL HECT
    
                       Defendants.
    
    
                        PLAINTIFFS' COMBINED (1) ANSWERING BRIEF
                IN OPPOSITION TO DEFEDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS,
                 AND (2) OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLANTIFFS'
                             MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
    
    
                                            PRICKETT, JONES, ELLIOTT,
                                             KRISTOL & SCHNEE
                                            Ronald A. Brown, Jr.
                                            1310 King Street
                                            P.O. Box 1328
                                            Wilmington, Delaware 198997
                                            (302) 888-6500
                                            Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    
    
    
    Dated: February 26, 1999
    
    
    
    
    16279.1\71515v1
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFFS' COMBINED ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFEDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS,
  • 1310 King Street
  • THE COURT SHOUD DENY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND
  • Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
  • Appraisal Is Not The Exclusive Remedy For Disclosure Violations....
  • Irrelevant To Plaintiffs' Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Of Disclosure Claim
  • Defendants Have The Facts Wrong With Respect To Plaintiffs'
  • The Reasons For The Merger Were Not Adequately Disclosed .23
  • The DLJ Fairness Ranges Were Material And Should Have
  • The HF Management 5 Year Projections Were Material...........3 3
  • FCA Can Be Ordered To Pay Monetary Damages.
  •    |