LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

MCMILLAN v INTERCARGO CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 16,963, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: MCMILLAN, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00016963, Intercargo, Merger, Projections, Proxy, Stockholders, Proxy Statement, Disclosure, Defendant Directors, Preliminary Injunction, Directors, Motion, Facts, Shareholders, Del, Transaction, Delaware, Complaint, Fpk, Injunction, Agreement, Reasonableness, Allegations, Duty, Allege, Judgement, Provision, Management, Stock, Cash, Investment, Lexis, Negotiations, Price, Support, Fails, Paragraph, Proposed Merger, Disclose, Breach, Sanborn, Defendants Deny, Mem, Orion, Exculpatory, Materials, Comp , ContentID: 120239742

Case Documents
1 2000-04-20 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100304
31 pages
PDF
2 2000-02-25 DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102970
24 pages
PDF
3 2000-01-21 PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDATNS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON PLEADINGS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102971
45 pages
PDF
4 1999-05-06 ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103522
12 pages
PDF
5 1999-05-03 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100305
24 pages
PDF
6 1999-04-23 PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIM. INJUNCTION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102972
24 pages
PDF
7 1999-04-21 DEFENDANTS ANSWERING BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102973
36 pages
PDF
8 1999-04-14 PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIM. INJUNCTION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102974
42 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 8 documents , 238 pages
Price: $ 54.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANT DIRECTORS
INTERCARGO
MERGER
DEL
COURT
STOCKHOLDERS
DUTY
COMPLAINT
BREACH
LEXIS
MEM
FACTS
DELAWARE
ESQUIRE
VICE CHANCELLOR
CONSUMMATION
ALLEGATIONS
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
PROVISION
REASONABLV
TRANSACTION
MERGER AGREEMENT
PROXY STATEMENT
MATERIALS
CONNECTION
ACQUISITION
DISCLOSURE CLAIMS
EXCULPATORY CHARTER
TERMINATION FEE
      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

SCOTT McMILLAN, JOHN NORBERG,                        >
JAMES M. WILSON TRUST, Peggy Wilson                  >
Trustee, CASTILLIAN VENTURES, INC.,                  >
individually, and on behalf of all others            >
similarly situated,                                  >
                                                     >
                       Plaintiffs,                   >
                                                     >
      V.                                             >         Civil Action No. 16963
                                                      >
INTERCARGO CORPORATION, a                             >
Delaware Corporation, and ARTHUR J.                   >
FRITZ, JR., KENNETH A. BODENSTEIN,                    >
ARTHUR L. LITMAN,  ALBERT J.                          >
GALLEGOS, ROBERT B. SANBORN,                          >
MICHAEL L. SKLAR, GEORGE J. WEISE                     >
and STANLEY A. GALANSKI,                              >>
                       Defendants.                    >

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

                              Date Submitted: March 3, 2000
                               Date Decided: April 20, 2000

Ronald A. Brown, Jr., Esquire, Bruce E. Jameson,  Esquire, and Sheldon K. Rennie,
Esquire, of PRICKETT, JONES  & ELLIOTT, Wilmington, Delaware; and R.
Bruce  McNew,  Esquire, of TAYLOR GRUVER  &  McNEW,  Greenville,
Delaware, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

David C. McBride, Esquire, Danielle Gibbs, Esquire, of YOUNG,  CONAWAY,
STARGATT  & TAYLOR, Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL: David L.
Schiavone, Esquire, Christopher Q. King, Esquire, Elena B. Gobeyn, Esquire, and
Jason L. Rubin, Esquire, of SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL, Chicago,
Illinois, Attorneys for Defendants.


STlUNE, Vice Chancellor



        Several stockholders of Intercargo Corporation have sued the (now

former) directors of Intercargo (the "defendant directors") for breach of

fiduciary duty in connection with the acquisition of Intercargo by XL
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Ronald A. Brown, Jr., Esquire, Bruce E. Jameson, Esquire, and Sheldon K. Rennie, Esquire, of
  • Several stockholders of Intercargo Corporation have sued the (now
  • fiduciary duty in connection with the acquisition of Intercargo by XL
  • Inc. for $12.00 a share (the "XL merger").
  • the plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction against the
  • Intercargo stockholders on April 29,
  • which was a change of control transaction3 the defendant directors failed to
  • ' See McMillan v. Intercargo Corp. ("Infercargo I'?, Del.
  • LEXIS 95, Jacobs, V.C..
  • Which I refer to for brevity's sake as the complaint.
  • incorporation contained an exculpatory provision immunizing its directors
  • breach of the duty of loyalty.
  • l falls back on allegations that the XL merger agreement contained relatively standard
  • the complaint alleges no facts from which a reasonable inference can
  • The complaint refers to the fact that the proxy statement indicated
  • transaction did not originate with XL.
  • For a less constrained rendition of the facts, the interested reader is directed to Vice
  • Intercargo L mem.
  • The Plaintiffs' Disclosure Claims
  • and were not included in the merger proxy materials.
  • the consummation of the merger, the metaphorical merger eggs have been
  • The court may take judicial notice of an exculpatory charter provision in resolving a motion
  • Highest Value Reasonablv Attainable?

  • 2 . DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    FACTS
    PLAINTIFFS
    ALLEGE
    COURT
    INTERCARGO
    SUPPORT
    FAILS
    EXCULPATORY
    PROVISION
    PROXY
    MCMILLAN
    ENHANCED SCRUTINY
    COMPLAINT
    TRANSACTION
    PROJECTIONS
    ALLEGATION
    CERTIFICATE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    PRESUMPTIONS
    UNREASONABLE ACTION
    PROXY STATEMENT
    REASONABLENESS
    PLAINTIFFS ARGUE
    OBTAINING
    LEXIS
    DISCLOSURE
    AGREEMENT
    DEFENSIVE ACTION
    
                                                                               QxlGiNAL 35
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SCOTT  McMILLAN, JOHN  NORBERG,
    JAMES M. WILSON TRUST, Peggy Wilson
    Trustee, CASTILLIAN VENTURES, INC.,
    individually, and on behalf of all others                 i
    similarly situated,
                                                                                                .
                                                              ;
                            Plaintiffs,                       1                                      : 
                                                                                                     I
    
            V.                                                i      C.A.. No. 169.63
    
    INTERCARGO CORPORATION, a Delaware                        ;
    Corporation, and ARTHUR J. FRITZ, JR.,
    KENNETH A. BODENSTEIN, ARTHUR                             i
    L.  LITMAN,  ALBERT J. GALLEGOS,                          )
    ROBERT B.  SANBORN, MICHAEL L. SKLAR,  )
    GEORGE J. WEISE and STANLEY A.
    GALANSKI                                                  ;>
                            Defendants.                 1
    
                   DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
                       MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEAIDINGS OR
                   IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
                                    David C. McBride
                                    Danielle Gibbs
                                    YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
                                    1 lth Floor, Wilmington Trust Center
                                     1100 N. Market Street
                                    P.O. Box 391
                                    Wilmington, Delaware  19899-03'91
                                    (302)571-6600
                                    Attorneys for Defendant Intercargo Corporation
    
    OF COUNSEL:
    David Schiavone
    Christopher King
    Jason Rubin
    Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal
    8000 Sears Tower
    Chicago, lllinois 60608
    (312)876-8000                                                   Dated: February  25,200O
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
  • Overcome The Presumptions Of The
  • And The Complaint Fails To Allege
  • Board of Directors In Obtaining The
  • Claim And It Is Barred By The Exculpatory
  • Provisions Of Intercargo's Certificate
  • Facts That Were Omitted From The
  • The Projections Provided To FPK
  • The Proxy Statement Adequately Disclosed
  • DEFENDANT INTERCARGO CORPORATION DOES NOT OWE ANY FIDUCIARY DUTIES
  • In Re Frederick's Of Hollvwood, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, Del.
  • LEXIS 233, Lamb, V.C.
  • McMillan v. Intercargo, Del.
  • Count II of the complaint states a claim for which relief may be granted.
  • decided under the Business Judgment Rule or an enhanced reasonableness standard,
  • provision of the Certificate of Incorporation of Intercargo Corporation.
  • plaintiffs assert that Counts I and II both state actionable claims
  • agreement was publicly announced.
  • there is no allegation that these parties ever communicated any expression of
  • `Plaintiffs argue that the following alleged facts create an inference that the price is
  • directors can only be liable if they were interested in the transaction,
  • And The Complaint Fails To Allege Any Unreasonable Action By The
  • defendants demonstrated that enhanced scrutiny
  • should not apply to this case for two reasons: there is no allegation of defensive action
  • plaintiffs do not dispute that the Delaware Supreme Court
  • mandates the disclosure of the projections which Intercargo furnished to FPK.

  • 3 . PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDATNS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON PLEADINGS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    MOTION
    JUDGEMENT
    PROXY STATEMENT
    PROJECTIONS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    MERGER
    COMP
    DISCLOSURE
    DEL
    PLEADINGS
    FACTS
    DIRECTORS
    TRANSACTION
    REASONABLENESS
    MANAGEMENT
    FPK
    INVESTMENT
    AGREEMENT
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
    OBJECTIVES
    NEGOTIATIONS
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
    COMPLAINT
    WILMINGTON
    KENNETT PIKE
    AUTHORITIES
    
        IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SCOTT McMILLAN, et al.
    
         Plaintiffs,
    
         V. C.A. No. 16963-NC
    
    INTERCARGO CORPORATION, et al.
    
         Defendants.                     I
    
    
             .~ PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
       TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
                         OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
                               PRICKETT, JONES,  & ELLIOTT
                               Ronald A. Brown, Jr.
                               13ruce E. Jameson
                               Sheldon K. Rennie
                               l310 King Street,, P.O. Box 1328
                               Wilmington, DE 19899
                               t.302) 888-6500
    
                                      - and -
    
                               TAYLOR GRUVER & MCNEW
                               Bruce R. McNew,  Esquire
                               .3711 Kennett Pike, Suite 210
                               3reenvillc, DE 19808
    
                               Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    Dated: January 21, 1999
    
    
    
                                                                                    TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    T-ABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                     i
    
    TXBLE OF AUTHORITIES . . ..__...  . .
                                                                                                   iii
    
    NATIJRE AND STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • INTERCARGO CORPORATION, et al.
  • .~ PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE
  • OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  • Wilmington, DE 19899
  • Kennett Pike, Suite 210
  • TXBLE OF AUTHORITIES.
  • THE MERGER.
  • THE REVLON CLAIM IS NOT BARRED BY THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE.
  • Plaintiffs Have Alleged Facts to Rebut the Business Judgment Rule
  • COUNT II (DISCLOSURE) ALLEGES OMISSIONS OF MATERIAL FACTS.
  • Defendants Were Required To Disclose The Projections Given To Fox-Pitt,
  • Desert Equities v. Morgan Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund II. L.P., Del.
  • Clayton Shareholders Litigation, Del.Ch., 519 A.2d 680.

  • 4 . ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ALLEGATIONS
    PARAGRAPH
    DEFENDANTS DENY
    DEFENDANTS ADMIT
    INTERCARGO
    PROXY STATEMENT SPEAKS
    CHARACTERIZATION THEREOF
    ALLEGATIONS INCONSISTENT
    INCONSISTENT THEREWITH
    MERGER
    PROXY STATEMENT
    AGREEMENT
    STOCK
    PLAINTIFFS
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    TRUTH
    DIRECTORS
    SKLAR
    SUBSIDIARIES
    ENGAGEMENT
    INSURANCE
    FOX-PITT
    CASH
    CERTIFICATE
    DELAWARE
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    CUSTOMS
    SHARES
    COMMON STOCK
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SCOTT  McMILLAN,  JOHN  NORBERG,                    )
    JAMES M. WILSON TRUST, Peggy Wilson  .- )
    Trustee, CASTILLIAN VENTURES, INC.,                 1
    individually, and on behalf of all others           )
    similarly situated,                                 )1
                           Plaintiffs,                  11
           V.                                           1      C.A. No. 16963
                                                        1
    INTERCARGO CORPORATION, a Delaware                  )
    Corporation, and ARTHUR J. FRITZ, JR.,              1
    KENNETH A. BODENSTEIN, ARTHUR                       >
    L.  LITMAN, ALBERT J. GALLEGOS,                     >
    ROBERT B. SANBORN, MICHAEL  L, SKLAR,  )
    GEORGE J. WEISE and STANLEY A.                      >
    GAIANSKI                                            )>
                           Defendants.                  1
    
                      ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
           Defendants, by their undersigned attorneys, answer the Amended Complaint as
    
    follows. Unless specifically admitted, all properly pleaded factual allegations are denied.
    
                                           INTRODUCTION
    
            1.      Defendants admit that Arthur J. Fritz, Jr., Kenneth A. Bodenstein, Arthur L.
    
    Litman, Albert J. Gallegos, Robert B. Sanborn, Michael L. Sklar, George J. Weise and
    
    Stanley A. Galanski (collectively "Directors") are Directors of defendant Intercargo    ,  i
    Corporation ("Intercargo" or the "Company"). Directors and Intercargo are referred to herein
    
    collectively as "Defendants." Defendants admit that Intercargo is a publicly traded Delaware
    
    corporation and that Intercargo entered into a merger agreement on or about December 1,
    
    
    
    1998 (the "Merger Agreement") with X.L. America, Inc.  ("XLA"),   an indirect subsidiary of
    
    X.L. Capital Ltd. (formerly known as EXEL Limited) ("XL Capital"). The Merger
    
    Agreement speaks for itself as to its terms and defendants deny any characterization thereof or
    
    any allegations inconsistent therewith. The transaction described by the Merger Agreement
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • ROBERT B. SANBORN, MICHAEL L, SKLAR,)
  • ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT
  • Defendants, by their undersigned attorneys, answer the Amended Complaint as
  • all properly pleaded factual allegations are denied.
  • Stanley A. Galanski (collectively "Directors") are Directors of defendant Intercargo, i
  • Defendants admit that Intercargo is a publicly traded Delaware
  • corporation and that Intercargo entered into a merger agreement on or about December 1,
  • Agreement speaks for itself as to its terms and defendants deny any characterization thereof
  • Defendants admit that a proxy statement was issued on March 3 1,
  • thereof or any allegations inconsistent therewith.
  • of paragraph 2.
  • Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
  • to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 3.
  • subsidiaries, is engaged in the business of underwriting specialized insurance coverages for
  • admit that Intercargo's customers include customs brokers, freight forwarders, inter-modal
  • insurance, U.S. customs bonds, professional liability insurance, property and casualty
  • Defendants admit that Intercargo presently has approximately 7.3 million shares of common
  • stock issued and outstanding and that its common stock is listed on the NASDAQ stock
  • Defendants admit that Intercargo retained the investment banking firm of Fox-Pitt, Kelton,
  • the Company's public announcement of the engagement of Fox-Pitt was first made on
  • The proxy statement speaks for itself as to its contents,
  • approximately $41 million dollars in cash or cash equivalents,
  • Company's certificate of incorporation, pursuant to 8 De1.C.

  • 5 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    PROXY
    MERGER
    DISCLOSURE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    INJUNCTION
    CASH
    PROXY STATEMENT
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    COURT
    DEFENDANTS
    PROPOSED MERGER
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    MOTION
    FPK
    PROJECTIONS
    SUBSIDIARIES
    BOARD MEETING
    INVESTMENT AIMS
    IRREPARABLE HARM
    NEGOTIATIONS
    INSURANCE BUSINESS
    MANAGEMENT
    OMITTED FACT
    ACQUISITION
    OFFERING PRICE
    VICE CHANCELLOR
    RECORD HOLDERS
    
               IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
         SCOTT McMILLAN, JOHN NORBERG,                       >
         JAMES M. WILSON TRUST,Peggy Wilson                  )
         Trustee, CASTILLIAN VENTURES, INC.,                 >
         individually, and on behalf of all others           )
         similarly situated,                                 >)
                                Plaintiffs,                  >>
               V.                                            )        Civil Action No. 16963
                                                             >
         INTERCARGO CORPORATION, a                           )
         Delaware Corporation, and ARTHUR J.                 >
         FRITZ, JR., KENNETH A. BODENSTEIN,                  >
         ARTHUR L. LITMAN, ALBERT J.                        )
         GALLEGOS, ROBERT B. SANBORN,                       )                                   "'
         MICHAEL L. SKLAR, GEORGE J. WEISE                  )                           [W-J
                                                                                        :              
                                                                                                       
         and STANLEY A. GALANSKI,                           >)                     ,;`,               '
                                                            )                      :'  ;  "`,   ,*  1;
                                Defendants.                                                            
                                                                           :._               zi        
                                                                                   .                   
                                                                                                       
                                    Date Submitted: April 26, 1999
                                    D
    
         Ronald A. Brown, Jr. and Bruce E. Jameson,  Esquires, of PRICKETT, JONES,
         ELLIOTT & KRISTOL, Wilmington, Delaware; and Bruce R. McNew, Esquire, of
         TAYLOR GRUVER & McNEW, Greenville, Delaware; Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
                                                                           s
    
         David C. McBride, Josy W. Ingersoll and Danielle Gibbs, Esquires, of YOUNG,
         CONAWAY,  STARGATT & TAYLOR, Wilmington, Delaware; and David L.
         Schiavone, Christopher Q. King and Elena B. Gobeyn, Esquires, of
         SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL, Chicago, Illinois, Attorneys for
         Defendants.
    
    
    
         JACOBS, VICE CHANCELLOR
    
    w
    
    
    
          At issue on this motion for a preliminary injunction are the proxy
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • David C. McBride, Josy W. Ingersoll and Danielle Gibbs, Esquires, of YOUNG, CONAWAY, STARGATT
  • JACOBS, VICE CHANCELLOR
  • At issue on this motion for a preliminary injunction are the proxy
  • disclosures made by the board of directors of Intercargo Corporation ("Intercargo"
  • shareholder approval of a proposed merger of Intercargo into a
  • receive $12 cash per share.
  • The plaintiffs are record holders of Intercargo
  • the forthcoming vote on the proposed merger ("Proxy Statement") fully and fairly
  • plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction must therefore be denied.
  • Intercargo is a Delaware corporation that specializes in underwriting marine
  • As of December 3 1, 1998, Intercargo and its subsidiaries held
  • Intercargo's Board and management became
  • The Board directed FPK to prepare
  • its acquisition efforts on a separate but parallel track.
  • Thereafter, at an Intercargo Board meeting held on September 25, 1998,
  • original offering price of $12 cash per share,
  • Statement and scheduled the stockholders meeting to vote on the proposed merger
  • claiming that the defendants had breached their duty of disclosure in connection
  • approval by the shareholders) before the Court decides the motion.
  • a reasonable probability of success on the merits, irreparable harm, and a balance
  • by failing adequately to disclose the financial projections provided by
  • Supr., 700 A.2d 135, 143 (for plaintiffs to succeed, they must show a substantial likelihood
  • Mr. Sanborn's Absence from the September 25,1998 meeting and Orion's "True" Investment Aims
  • insurance business it would accept less than the highest available value for its 26%
  • statement "an account of proposals and counterproposals made by each side in the ebb and flow

  • 6 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIM. INJUNCTION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    INTERCARGO
    STOCKHOLDERS
    DISCLOSURE
    FACTS
    DELAWARE
    INJUNCTION
    PROXY STATEMENT
    PRICE
    STOCK
    MARKET
    ORION
    BRUCE MCNEW
    DISCLOSE
    INVESTMENT BANKER
    TRANSACTION
    CONFLICT
    DISCLOSURES RELATING
    DAB
    REASONABLENESS
    MATERIALS
    DIRECTORS
    POB
    VOLATILITY
    IRREPARABLE HARM
    SHAREHOLDERS
    MANAGEMENT
    
                                                                         c,) I'>- i T, \I 1 r i,#",L f<,
           IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                           '
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SCOTT McMILLAN, et al.
    
              Plaintiffs,
    
              V .                                   C.A. No. 16963-NC
    
    INTERCARGO CORPORATION, et al.
    
              Defendants.
    
    
                               PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT
                        OF THEIR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    
    
    
    
                                         PRICKETT, JONES, ELLIOTT & KRISTOL
                                         Ronald A. Brown, Jr.
                                         Bruce E. Jameson
                                         1310 King Street, P.O. Box 1328
                                         Wilmington, DE 19899
                                         (302) 888-6500
    
                                               - and -
    
                                         TAYLOR GRUVER & MCNEW
                                         R. Bruce McNew, Esquire
                                         3711 Kennett Pike, Suite 210
                                         Greenville, DE 19808
                                         (302) 655-9200
    
                                         Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    Dated:             April 23, 1999
    
    
    
    
    
    
    16591.1\85004v1
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • c,) I'>- i T, \I 1 r i,#",L f<, IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • INTERCARGO CORPORATION, et al.
  • PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT
  • OF THEIR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  • R. Bruce McNew, Esquire
  • THE PROJECTIONS MUST BE DISCLOSED.
  • MR. SANBORN'S CONFLICT AND ORION'S DIFFERING AIMS ARE NOT
  • FACTS UNDERLYING THE SALE PROCESS ARE NOT ADEQUATELY
  • ABANDONING A MAJORITY OR ALL STOCK DEAL ARE NOT
  • DISCLOSURES RELATING TO THE REDUCED OFFERING PRICE ARE
  • DEFENDANTS DO NOT RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' REVLON CLAIM.
  • BALANCING OF IRREPARABLE HARM FAVORS PLAINTIFFS.
  • A&K Railroad Materials, Inc. v.

  • 7 . DEFENDANTS ANSWERING BRIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    PROXY
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    DELAWARE
    DEFENDANTS
    PROXY STATEMENT
    SANBORN
    MOTION
    MERGER
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DEL
    PROJECTIONS
    COURT
    INVESTMENT
    HARM
    FPK
    INTERCARGO CORPORATION
    AGREEMENT
    DISCLOSURE
    TRANSACTION
    JOHN NORBERG
    MATERIALS
    INDICATION
    ACQUISITION
    DELAWARE LAW
    STOCKHOLDERS
    WILSON TRUST
    SOLICITATION PROCESS
    NEGOTIATIONS
    
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    SCOTT McMILLAN,  JOHN NORBERG,
    JAMES M. WILSON TRUST, Peggy Wilson
    Trustee, CASTILLIAN VENTURES, INC.,
    individually, and on behalf of all others
    similarly situated,
    
                            Plaintiffs,                1                        ";  /
                                                       >
           V.                                          >      C.A. No. 16963 ?"`,        !
    
    INTERCARGO CORPORATION, a Delaware
    Corporation, and ARTHUR J. FRITZ, JR.,
    KENNETH A. BODENSTEIN, ARTHUR
    L. LITMAN, ALBERT J. GALLEGOS,                    >
    ROBERT B. SANBORN, MICHAEL L. SKLAR,)
    GEORGE J. WEISE and STANLEY A.                    )
    GALANSKI                                          )
    
                            Defendants.
    
    
                 DEFENDANTS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
           TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    
    
    
    
    
                                                 David C. McBride
                                                 Josy W. Ingersoll
     OF COUNSEL:                                 Danielle Gibbs
                                                 Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP
     David L. Schiavone                          1 lth Floor, Rodney Square North
     Christopher Q. King                         P.O. Box 391
     Elena B. Gobeyn                             Wilmington, Delaware 19899
     Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal               (302) 571-6600
     8000 Sears Tower
     233 S. Wacker Drive                         Attorneys for Defendants
     Chicago, Illinois 60606
     (3 12) 876-8000
    
    Dated: April 21, 1999
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • INTERCARGO CORPORATION, a Delaware
  • ROBERT B. SANBORN, MICHAEL L. SKLAR,)
  • DEFENDANTS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  • THE SOLICITATION PROCESS
  • THE HARM, IF ANY, TO PLAINTIFFS IN DENYING
  • Arnold v. Societv For Savings Bancorn., Del.
  • Inc. Shareholders Litigation, Del.
  • On February 18, 1999, plaintiffs Scott McMillan, John Norberg, James M.
  • Wilson Trust, and Castillian Ventures, Inc. filed a Complaint against defendants
  • This merger is an arms-length merger
  • that resulted from a nearly year long search for an acquisition partner for Intercargo.
  • nearly five months since their proposed transaction was publicly-announced.
  • the shareholders of Intercargo have received a proxy
  • statement that describes the events leading to the merger agreement.
  • Board's reasons for recommending the merger, the investment banker's analysis
  • more actual material facts which were omitted from the proxy materials, Rather, this
  • challenge to the proxy statement is that there might be facts which, if disclosed, might
  • projections the investment advisor used in its analysis.
  • FPK suggested that Intercargo could either make
  • "that an additional effort should be made to improve XL Capital's indication of
  • After disclosing this detailed history of the negotiations of the Merger,
  • In order for plaintiffs to succeed on the merits of their disclosure claims,
  • this type should be disclosed is directly contrary to well-established Delaware law.
  • of mandated disclosure to stockholders"); Goodwin v. Live Entertainment, Inc., Del.

  • 8 . PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIM. INJUNCTION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    PROXY STATEMENT
    PROJECTIONS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    MERGER
    DISCLOSURE
    STOCK
    PRICE
    REASONABLENESS
    DISCLOSE
    MOTION
    FPK
    ORION
    MANAGEMENT
    DIRECTORS
    AGREEMENT
    TRANSACTION
    INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES
    NEGOTIATIONS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    PROPOSED MERGER
    INTERNAL GROWTH
    INSURANCE
    EXPLANATION
    PROSPECTS
    SUBSIDIARIES
    
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SCOTT McMILLAN, et al.
    
             Plaintiffs,
    
             V.                               C.A. No. 16963-NC
    
    INTERCARGO CORPORATION, et al.
    
             Defendants.
    
    
    
                   PLAINTIFFS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
                       MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    
                                   PRICKETT, JONES, ELLIOTT & KRISTOL
                                   Ronald A. Brown, Jr.
                                   Bruce E. Jameson
                                   1310 King Street, P.O. Box 1328
                                   Wilmington, DE 19899
                                   (302) 888-6500
    
                                         - and -
    
                                   TAYLOR GRUVER & MCNEW
                                   Bruce R. McNew, Esquire
                                   3711 Kennett Pike, Suite 210
                                   Greenville, DE 19808
    
                                   Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    Dated: April 14, 1999
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    16692.1\85004vl
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • INTERCARGO CORPORATION, et al.
  • PLAINTIFFS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
  • MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  • BACKGROUND TO THE MERGER.
  • INTERCARGO'S APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND
  • COMPANY'S UNDISCLOSED PROJECTIONS.
  • OF SUCCESS THAT DEFENDANTS' BREACHED THEIR DUTY OF
  • The Disclosure Standard.
  • Defendants Are Required To Disclose The Projections Given To Fox-Pitt,
  • The Disclosures Relating To Orion And Its Board Designee Are
  •    |