LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

DUNLAP v SUNBEAM CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,048, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: DUNLAP, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017048, County: New Castle County, Sunbeam, Fees, Expenses, Dunlap, Kersh, Agreement, Legal Fees, Delaware, Restatement, Advancement Requests, Pwc, Indemnification, By-law, Bylaws, Forebearance, Connection, Mandatory, Financial Statements, Reasonableness, Financials, Restructuring, Opinion, Forebearance Agreement, Undertaking, Litigation Expenses, Forbearance Agreement, Directors, Complaint, Reason, Amounts, Discretion, Paragraph, Llp, Advancement Provision, Delaware Law, Parties, Shareholder/bondholder, Accordance, Defenses , ContentID: 120239738

Case Documents
1 1999-07-09 MEMORANDUM OPINION (REVISED
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100295
16 pages
PDF
2 1999-06-29 PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO AMEND AND CLARIFY ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102949
7 pages
PDF
3 1999-06-23 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100296
16 pages
PDF
4 1999-06-14 PLAINTIFFS PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102951
48 pages
PDF
5 1999-06-14 SUNBEAMS PRE-TRIAL BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102950
32 pages
PDF
6 1999-06-03 MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103516
13 pages
PDF
7 1999-04-19 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102022
7 pages
PDF
8 1999-03-23 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102023
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 8 documents , 147 pages
Price: $ 54.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OPINION (REVISED)

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
FEES
EXPENSES
DUNLAP
PLAINTIFFS
KERSH
LEGAL FEES
DELAWARE
ATTORNEYS
INDEMNIFICATION
FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT
DEFENDANT
OPINION
REASON
AMOUNTS
REASONABLENESS
DELAWARE LAW
AMOUNTS PAID
ACCORDANCE
LLP
LITIGATION
JUDGMENTS
PROFESSIONAL FEES
UNDERTAKING
SECOND SENTENCE
INVESTIGATIONS
CONNECTION
LIMITATIONS
PWC
WILMINGTON
   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


ALBERT J. DUNLAP and                  )
RUSSELL A. KERSH,                     ))
                         Plaintiffs, ))
                 V.                   )     Civil Action No. 17048

SUNBEAM CORPORATION,                  ))
                         Defendant. )


                       MEMORANDUM OPINION

                       Date Submitted: June 18,1999
                       Date Decided: June 23, 1999
                        Date Revised: July 9, 1999

Donald J. Wolfe, Jr., and Kevin R. Shannon, of POTTER ANDERSON &
CORROON LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Thomas J. Allingham, II, and Robert S. Saunders, of SKADDEN ARPS
SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for
Defendant.






CHANDLER, Chancellor



       This case, which was tried before me on J&e 15 and 16, 1999,

involves a discrete legal issue: whether defendant Sunbeam Corporation

("Sunbeam" or the "Company") is obligated to advance legal fees and other

expenses incurred by Albert J. Dunlap ("Dunlap") and Russell A. Kersh

("Kersh," and together with Dunlap, "Plaintiffs") following their tenure at

Sunbeam. For the reasons that follow, I conclude that Sunbeam must

advance these fees.
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Donald J. Wolfe, Jr., and Kevin R. Shannon, of POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP, Wilmington,
  • Thomas J. Allingham, II, and Robert S. Saunders, of SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP,
  • whether defendant Sunbeam Corporation
  • is obligated to advance legal fees and other
  • expenses incurred by Albert J. Dunlap and Russell A. Kersh
  • advance these fees.
  • Kersh as the Executive Vice President for Finance and Administration.
  • consent to include its opinion on Sunbeam's 1997 financial statements.
  • 180 days and addressing the issue of advancement of fees and expenses.
  • Sunbeam's bylaws, 7 3 of the Forbearance Agreement, and 9 145 of the
  • To the extent permitted by law, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended the any capacity at the request of the corporation.
  • The foregoing right of indemnification shall in no way be exclusive of any other rights or
  • Sunbeam agrees to advance to the Individuals their out-of-pocket expenses, costs and leg& nc., and the investigation of Sunbeam currently being carried out by the Division of Enforcement of re law.
  • Such advancement shall be subject to the receipt by Sunbeam of an appropriate undertaking by
  • Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver by Sunbeam of any claim for recoupment or
  • To the extent that a present or former director or officer of a corporation has been
  • against any and all judgments, tines, amounts paid in settling or otherwise disposing of
  • such as the amounts owed .to PWC) were not intended to be covered
  • interpretation of the second sentence as Sunbeam proposes leads
  • advancement of Plaintiffs' legal and other professional fees is required.
  • , Sunbeam's by-law`s, and Delaware law."
  • advancement is a quite sensible request for interim financing of litigation - costs; it is
  • problems that were at the heart of the litigation and investigations.

  • 2 . PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO AMEND AND CLARIFY ORDER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    FEES
    EXPENSES
    OPINION
    COURT
    INDEMNIFICATION
    AMOUNT
    SCHEDULE
    SUNBEAM
    CLARIFY
    INVOICES
    REQUEST
    HERETO
    MOTION
    ULTIMATE
    DISCRETE
    ATTORNEYS
    OBLIGATION
    PURPOSE
    LLP
    AMEND
    LEGAL FINDINGS
    EVIDENCE
    ASSERTION
    MANDATORY
    COUNSEL
    HEREBY
    SUPPORT
    FOREGOING
    RESPECTFULLY REQUEST
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ALRERT J. DUNLAP and RUSSELL A. KERSH,                       j>
                                Plaintiffs,                      j>
                   v.                                            >) C.A. No. 17048
    SUNl3EAM CORPORATION,                                        >
    a Delaware corporation.                                      >
    
                                Defendant.                       >
    
                  LUNTIFFS  MOTION TO AMEND AND CLARIFY
                                               __-                              0IRD:ER
    
                   Plaintiffs Albert J.  Dunlap and Russell A. Kersh, by and through their
    
    undersigned counsel, hereby move to amend and (clarify the Memorandum Opinion and Order
    
    dated June 23, 1999 (the "Opinion"). In support of their Motion, Plaintiffs state as follows.
    
            1.     In its Opinion, the Court held that Defendant Sunbeam Corporation (Sunbeam")
    
    was required to  a'dvance  fees and expenses to Plaintiffs and calculated the amount of such fees
    
    through April 30, 1999. As explained below, the sum identified by the Court does not equal the
    
    total amount of the fees and expenses set forth in the invoices of record reflecting fees and
    
    expenses incurred as of that date and, therefore, Plaintiffs request that the Opinion be amended to
    
    reflect such amounts. Plaintiffs further request that the Opinion be  cl,arified to make clear that
    
    the Court did not make any legal findings as to Plaintiffs' ultimate right to  indemnification for
    
    legal fees and expenses.
    
                   A.      The Amount of Plaintiffs' Fees And Expenses Submitted Into
                           Evidence For The Period Through April 30, 1999 Is
                                                   _                                Sll,736,589.61
    
           3-.     In its Opinion, the Court awarded `Plaintiffs the advancement of fees they seek  _ _
    
    in the amount of $1,403,322.21,  which I calculate as $1,410,655.46  through, April 30, 1999, less
    
    
    
    $7.337.25 (the amount the parties agreed to delete from the bills)." (Opinion at 16-17).
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • LUNTIFFS MOTION TO AMEND AND CLARIFY
  • undersigned counsel, hereby move to amend and (clarify the Memorandum Opinion and Order
  • In support of their Motion, Plaintiffs state as follows.
  • the Court held that Defendant Sunbeam Corporation
  • was required to a'dvance fees and expenses to Plaintiffs and calculated the amount of such
  • expenses incurred as of that date and, therefore, Plaintiffs request that the Opinion be
  • the Court did not make any legal findings as to Plaintiffs' ultimate right to indemnification
  • Plaintiffs are unable tlo reconcile the Court's nurnber with the invoices
  • April 30, 1999 and submitted into evidence at the trial is $1,736.589.61.
  • 14 and Schedule A attached hereto)
  • Plamtiffs respectfully request that the Opinion be
  • "discrete legal issue" of whether Plaintiffs are entitled to "advancement" of their legal
  • Plaintiffs disagree with Sunbe,am's assertion that it has unfettered discretion to
  • be mandatory and all-inclusive indemnification obligations.
  • support its assertion that Plaintiffs' ultimate right to indemnification for fees and
  • purpose of its legal analysis, the Court assumed that Sunbeam's argument regarding Plaintkffs
  • obligation to indemnify Plaintiffs for fees and expenses is discretionary or mandatory.
  • WHEREE'ORE, for the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs request that their Motion be
  • SUMMARY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES
  • DICKSTEIN SHAPI RO MORIN & OSHINSKY LLP

  • 3 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    FEES
    EXPENSES
    DUNLAP
    KERSH
    PLAINTIFFS
    LEGAL FEES
    DELAWARE
    ATTORNEYS
    FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT
    INDEMNIFICATION
    DEFENDANT
    REASONABLENESS
    OPINION
    REASON
    AMOUNTS
    DELAWARE LAW
    AMOUNTS PAID
    ACCORDANCE
    LLP
    LITIGATION
    JUDGMENTS
    PROFESSIONAL FEES
    UNDERTAKING
    SECOND SENTENCE
    COMPLETED ACTIONS
    CONNECTION
    LIMITATIONS
    PWC
    WILMINGTON
    
      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    ALBERT J. DUNLAP and                  >                               ;I -'
    RUSSELL A. KERSH,                     >                                 _  i
                                          >                                 *--
                             Plaintiffs,  )                                   I .,,_:
                                          >                                         ,>  I
                                                                                   3-A
                     v.                   >     Civil Action No. i7048
                                          >
    SUNBEAM CORPORATION,                  >>
                             Defendant.  )
    
    
                           MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
                           Date Submitted: June 18, 1999
                           Date Decided: June 23, 1999
    
    
    Donald J. Wolfe, Jr., and Kevin R. Shannon, of POTTER ANDERSON  &
    CORROON LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
    
    Thomas J. Allingham, II, and Robert S. Saunders, of SKADDEN ARPS
    SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for
    Defendant.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    CHANDLER, Chancellor
    
    
    
          This case, which was tried before me on June 15 and 16, 1999,
    
    involves a discrete legal issue: whether defendant Sunbeam Corporation
    
    ("Sunbeam" or the "Company") is obligated to advance legal fees and other
    
    expenses incurred by Albert J.  Dunlap ("Dunlap") and Russell A. Kersh
    
    ("Kersh," and together with  Dunlap, "Plaintiffs") following their tenure at
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Thomas J. Allingham, II, and Robert S. Saunders, of SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP,
  • whether defendant Sunbeam Corporation
  • is obligated to advance legal fees and other
  • expenses incurred by Albert J. Dunlap and Russell A. Kersh
  • ("Kersh," and together with Dunlap, "Plaintiffs")
  • advance these fees.
  • Chairman of it Board of Directors, and shortly thereafter Dunlap hired Kersh
  • consent to include its opinion on Sunbeam's 1997 financial statements.
  • 180 days and addressing the issue of advancement of fees and expenses.
  • Sunbeam's bylaws, 7 3 of the Forbearance Agreement, and 5 145 of the
  • To the extent permitted by law, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended the in any capacity at the request of the corporation.
  • The foregoing right of indemnification shall in.
  • Sunbeam agrees to advance to the Individuals their out-of-pocket expenses, costs and legal Inc., and the investigation of Sunbeam currently being carried out by the Division of Enforcement are llaw.
  • Such advancement shall be subject to the receipt by Sunbeam of an appropriate undertaking by
  • Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver by Sunbeam of any claim for recoupment or
  • To the extent that a present or former director or officer of a corporation has been
  • such as the amounts owed to PWC) were not intended to be covered
  • interpretation of the second sentence as Sunbeam proposes leads
  • advancement of Plaintiffs' legal and other professional fees is required.
  • Sunbeam's by-laws, and Delaware law," calls into the
  • advancement is a quite sensible request for interim financing of litigation

  • 4 . PLAINTIFFS PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SUNBEAM
    BYLAWS
    MANDATORY
    EXPENSES
    LEGAL FEES
    LITIGATION
    FOREBEARANCE AGREEMENT
    COURT
    PARTIES
    SHAREHOLDER/BONDHOLDER
    ADVANCEMENT REQUESTS
    DUNLAP
    PWC
    DELAWARE
    KERSH
    ADVANCEMENT PROVISION
    CONNECTION
    OBLIGATION
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    UNDERTAKING
    INDEMNIFICATION
    REASONABLENESS
    DIRECTORS
    ASSERTION
    MEMORANDUM
    AUTHORITIES
    INTERPRETATION
    PENDING CIVIL
    SUNBEAM ASSERTS
    
              IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    ALBERT J. DUNLAP and RUSSELL A.        )
    KERSH,                                 ))
                  Plaintiffs,              1 C.A. No. 17048
                                           )
                       V.                  1
    
                                           1
    SUNBEAM CORPORATION,                   ))
                  Defendant.               )
    
    
    
    
    
                       PLAINTIFFS' PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM
    
    
    
                                      Donald J. Wolfe, Jr.
                                      Kevin R. Shannon
                                      Brian C. Ralston
                                      POTTER ANDERSON  & CORROON LLP
                                      1313 North Market Street
                                      Sixth Floor
                                      P.O. Box 951
                                     Wilmington, DE 19801
                                      (302) 984-6000
    
                                     Attorneys for Plaintiffs
                                     Albert J. Dunlap and
                                      Russell A. Kersh
    
    
    
    Dated: June 14, 1999
    
    374286
    
    
    
                                          TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
                                                                                                       
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • PLAINTIFFS' PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM
  • The Shareholder/Bondholder Litigation
  • The Bylaws Provide For Mandatory
  • And Submission Of Undertakings To Sunbeam
  • E. The Forebearance Agreement.
  • Obligation To Advance Legal Fees
  • To Advance Fees And Expenses Under
  • Legal Fees And Expenses Under The Bylaws
  • The Advancement Requests Relate To
  • That They Were Directors And/Or
  • Reasonableness Of The Hourly Rates Or The Number Of Hours Charged
  • Sunbeam's Assertion That The
  • Sunbeam's Objections To The PWC
  • -iii-TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
  • The parties have engaged in expedited discovery,
  • Mr. Dunlap served as the Chief Executive Officer
  • Mr. Kersh served as the Executive Vice
  • Sunbeam is a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in Boca Raton,
  • Sunbeam restated its financial statements to
  • II herein are references to Exhib-Notebook to be provided to the Court at trial.
  • the Shareholder/Bondholder Actions and the SEC Investigation
  • Corroon LLP to defend them in connection
  • mandatory advancement provision, which provides in pertinent
  • upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay
  • any amounts advanced by Sunbeam if it was ultimately determined that they were not entitled
  • pending civil or criminal action or proceeding shall at his request be paid by the
  • Sunbeam's tortured interpretation of the Bylaws
  • to this independent and far more specific obligation, Sunbeam asserts that "[tl he

  • 5 . SUNBEAMS PRE-TRIAL BRIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    RESTATEMENT
    FEES
    AGREEMENT
    BY-LAW
    ADVANCEMENT REQUESTS
    PWC
    FOREBEARANCE
    COURT
    ATTORNEYS
    FINANCIALS
    RESTRUCTURING
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    CONNECTION
    DELAWARE
    DISCRETION
    INDEMNIFICATION
    SUBSTANTIAL PORTION
    ENGAGEMENT
    CONSULTING
    LITIGATION
    DIRECTORS
    SHAPIRO DEP
    REASONABLENESS
    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
    INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTING FIRMS
    MANDATORY INDEMNIFICATION
    PRYOR CASHMAN
    DENY ADVANCE-OF ATTORNEYS
    
            IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ________________-_-_----------------------------------------------------X
    
    ALBERT J. DUNLAP  and RUSSELL A. KERSH,                                 :
    
                                        Plaintiffs,
                      V.                                                          C.A. No. 17048
    
    SUNBEAM CORPORATION,
    
                                        Defendant.
    
    _----------------------------------------------------------------------- X
    
    
    
                     SUNBEAM CORPORATION'S PRE-TRIAL BRIEF
    
    
    
    
                                                          SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE
                                                            MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
                                                          One Rodney Square
                                                          P.O. Box 636
                                                          Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                          (302) 651-3000
    
                                                          Attorneys for Defendant
    
    
    
    Dated: June 14, 1'999
    
    
    
                                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
                                                                                                       
    
    
    PRELIMINARY STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                              
    
    STATEMENT OF FACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                           
    
    I.     NEITHER SUNBEAM'S BY-LAWS NOR THE FOREBEARANCE
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • SUNBEAM CORPORATION'S PRE-TRIAL BRIEF
  • NEITHER SUNBEAM'S BY-LAWS NOR THE FOREBEARANCE AGREEMENT ELIMINATE THE DISCRETION OF SUNBEAMS
  • BOARD UNDER SECTION 145TO GRANT OR DENY ADVANCE-OF ATTORNEYS' FEES
  • Plaintiffs' Advancement Requests
  • A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF THE ADVANCEMENT REQUESTS SHOULD BE DENIED AS UNREASONABLE UNDER THE
  • Represent Work Performed By PWC Because Of PWC's Prior Engagement To Perform Consulting
  • PLAINTIFFS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO AN AWARD OF THEIR ATTOR-NEYS' FEES INCURRED IN PROSECUTING
  • In this summary proceeding under 3 145of the Delaware General
  • Directors' discretionary decision to deny Dunlap and Kersh's demands for advancement and
  • & Lybrand for consulting and/or restructuring engagements at each of his previous
  • Sunbeam's financial statements that were restated in the 1998 restatement.
  • In re Sunbeam Securities Litigation,
  • Dunlap and Kersh's lead defense firm, Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn LLP
  • independent auditors during the periods in question) and Deloitte & Touche,
  • The foregoing right of indemnification shall in no way be exclusive of any other rights or
  • Agreement and any future litigations in which they are named as defendants by reason of the rdance with and subject to limitations of reasonableness contained in any employment agreements
  • occurs immediately after the sentence providing for mandatory indemnification only
  • (Shapiro Dep.
  • the total loss in Sunbeam's market capitalization over the period of the restated financials
  • to rebut the conclusions reached by two independent accounting firms.

  • 6 . MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEFENSES
    PROCEEDING
    REQUESTS
    COURT
    AGREEMENT
    FEES
    ASSERTS
    EXPENSES
    EXHIBIT
    MANDATORY
    INDEMNIFICATION
    OBLIGATIONS
    FOREBEARANCE AGREEMENT
    HERETO
    DUNLAP
    UNDERTAKING
    LITIGATION
    ADVANCEMENT PROVISION
    REASONABLENESS
    CHARGES
    ARBITRATION
    MOTION
    KERSH
    DEFENDANT
    AMOUNTS
    CONTRACTS
    FINANCE
    BYLAWS
    
                                                                                                gg 4 .*
                                                                                     e                 
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ALBERT J. DUNLAP and RUSSELL A. KERSH,                    >>
                               Plaintiffs,                    >>
                  V.                                          >) C.A. No. 17048
    SUNBEAM CORPORATION,                                      >
    a Delaware corporation,                                   >
                                                              >
                               Defendant.                     >
    
                                              NOTICE OF MOTION                            I'
    
    TO:           Thomas J. Allingham, II, Esquire
                  Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom                                                    
                  One Rodney Square                                                                    
                  Wilmington, DE 19899                                                                 
                                                                                                 
                                                                                                  I' ij
                  PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the within Motion to Strike'%$fe&&t's~~"'
                                                                                                       
    
    Affirmative Defenses will be presemed to the Court at the earliest convenience of the Court and
    
    counsel.
    
                                                         POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
    
    
    
                                                            Donald J. Wolfe, Jr.                       
    OF COUNSEL                                              Kevin R. Shannon
    Donald S. Zakarin, Esquire                              Brian C. Ralston
    PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN &                                  13 13 North Market Street, Sixth Floor
      FLYNN LLP                                             P.O. Box 951
    4 10 Park Avenue                                        Wilmington, DE 1980 1
    New York, NY 10022-4441                                 (302) 984-6000
    (212) 421-4100
                                                         Attorneys for Plaintiffs
                                                         Albert J. Dunlap and Russell A. Kersh
    Dated: June 3, 1999
    373656
    
    
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • T h i s day of June, 1999, the Court having considered Plaintiffs' Motion to
  • Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses,
  • IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion is granted.
  • Plaintiffs Albert J. Dunlap and Russell A. Kersh,
  • Sunbeam Corporation.
  • expenses incurred by them in connection with certain lawsuits and an SEC investigation.
  • they are not entitled to be indemnified for such amounts.
  • separate agreement that requires Sunbeam to advance legal fees and expense to Plaintiffs,
  • Thereafter, without notice to Plaintiffs, Sunbeam determined not to pay any additional
  • flatly irrelevant to the discrete issue presented in this litigation for summary disposition.
  • Sunbeam asserts for example that it is not required to advance funds to Plaintiffs because
  • have "adequate personal financial resources to finance their own defense costs" and because
  • indemnification -- a question that is not before the Court.
  • contrary to law and undermine the very purpose of a mandatory advancement provision.
  • (Exhibit A hereto).
  • threatened or pending civil or criminal action or proceeding shall at
  • the Forebearance Agreement between Plaintiffs and Sunbeam,
  • reasonableness contained in any employment agreements entered
  • receipt by Sunbeam of an appropriate undertaking.
  • advancement obligations imposed upon Sunbeam by Paragraph 3 thereof continue and survive
  • If this issue is not resolved after Sunbeam identifies the disputed charges, Plaintiffs will
  • Kersh seek advancement have resulted from their own
  • Both Sunbeam's Bylaws and the Forbearance Agreement expressly
  • a court is going to determine whether [defendant]
  • contracts for mandatory advancement `servethe salutary purpose
  • have asserted claims against Sunbeam in a separate arbitration proceeding relating to their

  • 7 . ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMPLAINT
    PARAGRAPH
    SUNBEAM DENIES
    SUNBEAM ADMITS
    COURT
    PLAINTIFFS
    EXHIBIT
    RELIEF
    DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION
    DUNLAP
    KERSH
    BALANCE
    GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
    LITIGATION EXPENSES
    SUNBEAM RESPECTFULLY REFERS
    PURSUANT
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    TRUTH
    AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
    RESPONSES
    THEREOF
    SUNBEAM REALLEGES
    INCORPORATES
    REFERENCE
    PRECEDING PARAGRAPHS
    DOCTRINES
    VICE
    FOREBEARANCE
    AGREEMENT
    
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
                                                                   X
    
    ALBERT J. DUNLAP and RUSSELL A. KERSH,                         :
    
                                   Plaintiffs,
                    V.                                                    C.A. No. 17048     ---
                                                                                             *\
    SUNBEAM CORPORATION,                                                                            !
                                   Defendant.
    
                                                                  x
    
    
                  ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO
       SECTION 145(k) OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
    
                    Defendant Sunbeam Corporation ("Sunbeam"), by and through its
    
    undersigned counsel, submits this answer to the complaint of Albert J. Dunlap
    
    ("Dunlap") and Russell A. Kersh ("Kersh") (collectively, the "Plaintiffs") for relief
    
    pursuant to Section 145(k) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "Complaint"):
    
                    1.     Sunbeam admits the allegations contained in paragraph 1 of the
    
    Complaint.
    
                    2.     Sunbeam admits the allegations contained in paragraph 2 of the
    
    Complaint.
    
    
    
                    3.      Sunbeam admits the allegations contained in paragraph 3 of the
    
    Complaint.
    
                    4.      Sunbeam admits that the Complaint is purportedly brought
    
    pursuant to Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, but denies the
    
    balance of the allegations contained in paragraph 4 of the Complaint.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO
  • submits this answer to the complaint of Albert J. Dunlap
  • pursuant to Section 145of the Delaware General Corporation Law:
  • Sunbeam admits the allegations contained in paragraph 1 of the
  • balance of the allegations contained in paragraph 4 of the Complaint.
  • belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 5 of the Complaint.
  • except that Kersh was removed as Vice Chairman and Executive Vice
  • and is without knowledge or information sufficient to
  • Sunbeam respectfully refers the Court to Section 8.1 of Article VII
  • Sunbeam denies the allegations contained in paragraph 11 of the
  • Sunbeam respectfully refers the Court to the Forebearance
  • Agreement attached as Exhibit B to the Complaint for a complete and accurate description of
  • attached as Exhibits C and D to the Complaint for the terms and contents thereof.
  • litigation expenses to Dunlap and Kersh other than the December 1998 Advancement.
  • Sunbeam realleges and incorporates by reference its responses to
  • all preceding paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.
  • SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
  • Plaintiffs' claims are barred, in whole or in part, by their own
  • Plaintiffs' claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrines

  • 8 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LITIGATION EXPENSES
    DUNLAP
    KERSH
    OFFICERS
    DIRECTORS
    INDEMNIFICATION
    AGREEMENT
    INCURRING
    REQUEST
    UNDERTAKING
    PLAINTIFFS
    OBLIGATIONS
    LAW
    LLP
    DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    FEES
    BYLAWS
    DETERMINATION
    ACCORDANCE
    REASON
    FOREBEARANCE AGREEMENT
    RELIEF
    PROVISIONS
    REPAY
    DEL
    FULLY SET
    PENDING
    CONNECTION
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                     
    
                                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ALBERT J. DUNLAP and RUSSELL A. KERSH,                         >>                                  
                                     Plaintiffs,                   >                                   
                                                                   >                                   
                       V.                                          >) C.A.No. 1 m .-
    SUNBEAM CORPORATION,                                                                    _,
                                                                   >                        - 4
    a Delaware corporation,                                        >>
                                 Defendant.                        >
    
                               COMPLAINT FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 145(k)  OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
    
                       Plaintiffs Albert J. Dunlap  and Russell A. Kersh, by and through their under-
    
    signed counsel, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP and Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn. LLP,
    
    seek relief for the claims set forth herein, pursuant to Section 145(k) of the Delaware General
    
    Corporation Law,
    
                                        PARTIES TO THE ACTION
                 1.           Plaintiff Albert J. Dunlap is a former Chief Executive Officer and Chair-
    
    man of the Board of Defendant Sunbeam Corporation. Mr. Dunlap resides in Boca Raton,  Flor-
    
    ida.
    
                 2.          Plaintiff Russell A. Kersh is a former Executive Vice President of Defen-
    
    dant Sunbeam Corporation. Mr. Kersh resides in Boca Raton,  Florida.
    
                 3.          Defendant Sunbeam Corporation ("Sunbeam") is a Delaware corporation
    
    with headquarters located in Boca Raton,  Florida.
    
    
    
                       THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF CHANCERY
                 4.        This action is initiated pursuant to 8 Del. C. 5 145(k), which vests the
    
    Court of Chancery with exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine all actions for advances of
    
    attorneys' fees, court costs, expert fees, and all other litigation expenses that are recoverable
    
    der the indemnification provisions of 8 Del. C. 5 145 and any other applicable bylaw, agreement,
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • COMPLAINT FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO
  • SECTION 145OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
  • Plaintiffs Albert J. Dunlap and Russell A. Kersh, by and through their undersigned counsel,
  • man of the Board of Defendant Sunbeam Corporation.
  • Mr. Dunlap resides in Boca Raton,
  • Mr. Kersh resides in Boca Raton,
  • THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF CHANCERY
  • attorneys' fees, court costs, expert fees, and all other litigation expenses that are
  • 5 145 and any other applicable bylaw, agreement,
  • The provisions of 8 Del.
  • Court of Chancery may summarily determine a corporation's obligation to advance litigation
  • determination with respect to their claims for the advancement of litigation expenses
  • them arising from proceedings that relate to the discharge and performance of their duties as
  • advancement of such expenses pending resolution of the underlying litigation in which those
  • Such provisions by their terms are applicable to the proceedings in which plaintiffs are
  • incurred by reason of their actions as directors or officers of Sunbeam.
  • his request be paid bv the Corporation in advance of the final disposition of such action or
  • Dunlap and Kersh the litigation expenses they may incur in actions brought against them in
  • certain litigations in which they are named as defendants by reason of the fact that they
  • Such advancement shall be subiect to the receipt by Sunbeam of an anpropriate undertaking bv
  • Pursuant to paragraph 7 of the Forebearance Agreement,
  • through 18 as if fully set forth herein.
  • litigation expenses to them with Sunbeam's Bylaws, and have provided Sunbeam with an
  • breach of its obligations under Section 8.1 of Article VIII of the Sunbeam Bylaws.
  •    |