LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

GUIDO v WARBURG PINCUS & CO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,052, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017052, Plaintiff: GUIDO, Del, Fees, Settlement, Knoll, Proposed Settlement, Expenses, Shareholders, Award, Delaware, Request, York, Transaction, Special Committee, Common Stock, Warburg, Buyout Group, Howard Lawson, Llp, Shareholder Litig, Representatives, Consolidated Action, Certification, Stockholders, Financial Advisor, Shares, Faruqi, Warburg Pincus, Directors, Minority Shareholders, Knoll Management, Relevant Times, Hereby, Individual Defendants, Proposed Transaction, Fiduciary Duties, Public Shareholders , ContentID: 120239737

Case Documents
1 1999-11-03 INC. ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100294
4 pages
PDF
2 1999-10-29 INC. PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION FO ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102948
36 pages
PDF
3 1999-03-24 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102018
9 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 49 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . INC. ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
SETTLEMENT
HEREBY
PARTIES
DIRECTORS
PURSUANT
SCHEDULING ORDER
CHANCERY RULES
PLAINTIFFS
REPRESENTATIVES
DETERMINATION
ADEQUATE
ATTORNEYS
COUNSEL
JUDGEMENT
DEFENDANTS
TRANSACTIONS
AFFILIATES
ACTS
PREJUDICE
SETTLEMENT HEARING
STIPULATION
MEMBERS
LAW
FACTS
MANNER
KNOLL
DELAWARE
CLAIMS OFTHE
                              IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                    
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   
                                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


       In re KNOLL, INC.                                          CONSOLIDATED
       SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                    C.A. No. 17052


                                             ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

                               The Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release,

       September 21, 1999 (the "Stipulation"), of the above-captioned consolidated lawsuit (the

       "Consolidated Action"), having been presented at the Settlement Hearing on November 3, 1999,

       pursuant to the Scheduling Order for Approval of Settlement of Class Action entered herein on

       September  28,1999  (the "Scheduling Order"), which Stipulation was joined and consented to

       parties to the Consolidated Action and which (with the defined terms herein) is mcorporated

       by reference; and the Court having determined that notice of said hearing was given in

       with the Scheduling Order to members of the Class as certified by the Court in the

       and that said notice was adequate and sufficient; and the parties having appeared by their

       of record; and the attorneys for the respective parties having been heard in support of the

       of the Consolidated Action, and an opportunity to be heard as provided in the notice; and

       matter of the Settlement having been considered by the Court;

                       IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,  this                           

/`1; &F
  1         _.. >.-.`4*-'       , 1999, as follows:

                        1.        The Notice of Pendency  of Class Action, Temporary and Proposed

       Determination, Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Settlement Hearing and Right to Appear

       "Notice") has been given to the Class (as defined hereinafter), pursuant to and in the

       by the Scheduling Order, proof of the mailing of the Notice to the Class was filed with the

SNIPPETS:
  • "Consolidated Action"), having been presented at the Settlement Hearing on November 3, 1999,
  • September 28,1999, which Stipulation was joined and consented to by all
  • with the Scheduling Order to members of the Class as certified by the Court in the Scheduling
  • and that said notice was adequate and sufficient; and the parties having appeared by their
  • and the attorneys for the respective parties having been heard in support of the settlement
  • of the Consolidated Action, and an opportunity to be heard as provided in the notice;
  • Determination, Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Settlement Hearing and Right to Appear
  • "Notice") has been given to the Class, pursuant to and in the manner directed
  • The form and manner of the Notice is hereby determined to have been the best
  • requirements of Delaware Court of Chancery Rule 23, and it is further determined that all
  • the claims ofthe Plaintiffs are typical of the claims ofthe Class, and Plaintiffs have fairly
  • The Court finds that Plaintiffs and their counsel have adequately represented
  • Court of Chancery Rules have been satisfied;
  • a class consisting of all persons and entities who held shares of Knoll on or after March
  • their successors in interest, transferees and assigns, except the Defendants and any person,
  • Plaintiffs are hereby certified as Class representatives and their respective
  • The Settlement and all transactions preparatory or incident thereto are found to be
  • fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best interests of the Class, and it is hereby
  • Register in Chancery is directed to enter and docket this Order and Final Judgment in the
  • The Consolidated Action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants
  • and any of their respective present or former officers, directors, agents, attorneys,
  • parents, subsidiaries (including the directors and officers of such affiliates, parents and
  • , whether under state or federal law (except for claims for appraisal
  • in the Consolidated Action, or that arise now or relate in any way to, the acts, facts or

  • 2 . INC. PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION FO ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEL
    COUNSEL
    FEES
    COURT
    SETTLEMENT
    PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
    EXPENSES
    ATTORNEYS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    KNOLL
    AWARD
    DELAWARE
    REQUEST
    YORK
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE
    BUYOUT GROUP
    TRANSACTION
    DEFENDANTS
    HOWARD LAWSON
    LLP
    SHAREHOLDER LITIG
    COMMON STOCK
    CERTIFICATION
    LITIGATION
    STOCKHOLDERS
    FINANCIAL ADVISOR
    FARUQI
    REPRESENTATIVES
    MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS
    
               IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                                                  >
    IN  RE KNOLL, INC.                            >        CONSOLIDATED
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                       >      CIVIL ACTION NO. 17052 NC
    
    
                             PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
                          PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION
                            FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES
    
    
    
    
                                               ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS
                                                 & GODDESS, P.A.
                                               Joseph A. Rosenthal
                                               Norman M. Monhait
                                               Suite  1401: Mellon Bank Center
                                               P.O. Box 1070
                                               Wilmington, DE 19899
                                               (302) 656-4433
    
                                               Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
    
    BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD  &  LIFSHITZ, LLP
    10 East 40* Street
    New York, New York 10016
    (212) 779-1414
    
    FARUQI  & FARUQI, LLP
    415 Madison Avenue,  21st Floor
    New York, New York 10017
    (212) 986-1074
    
    GOODKIND  LABATON RUDOFF
      & SUCHAROW LLP
    100 Park Avenue
    New York, New York 10017
    (2 12) 907-0700
    
    Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel
    
    
    October 29, 1999
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION
  • FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES
  • BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD & LIFSHITZ, LLP
  • New York, New York 10016
  • FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
  • Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel
  • Certification In Proper Under
  • Chaffin v. GNI Group, Inc., Del.
  • In Re AST Research Inc. Shareholder Litig.,
  • In Re BET Holdings, Inc. Shareholders Litin., Del.
  • North American Philips Stockholders' Litig,
  • and an award of counsel fees and expenses for their services in the
  • of management of Knoll: Inc. to purchase all
  • outstanding shares of Knoll common stock not already owned by members of the Buyout Group
  • At the time of the Proposed Transaction,
  • except defendants and their affiliates, seeking injunctive and other appropriate relief on the
  • requests and retained a financial advisor, Howard Lawson & Co..
  • Simultaneously, but on a parallel track, a Knoll special committee consisting of the two
  • There were approximately 17.37 million publicly-held shares of Knoll common stock.
  • represented the interests of Knoll's minority shareholders, the putative sellers), the Buyout
  • extensive discussions with representatives of Willkie Farr & Gallagher,
  • PLAINTIFFS' COUNSELS' REQUEST FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES IS REASONABLE
  • the litigation; and the standing and ability of counsel involved.

  • 3 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    KNOLL
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFF
    MEMBERS
    SHARES
    COMMON STOCK
    WARBURG PINCUS
    TRANSACTION
    KNOLL MANAGEMENT
    RELEVANT TIMES
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    PROPOSED TRANSACTION
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
    JOHN
    OUTSTANDING
    PRICE
    DIRECTORS
    VENTURES
    GENERAL PARTNER
    CONTROLLING
    DAMAGES
    MAJORITY
    STOCKHOLDER
    CONSUMMATION
    ALLEGATIONS
    OFFICERS
    LAW
    REPRESENTING
    
                                                         /
    
    
    
                                        I
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                           IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                                                                         IN AND FOR NEW
    
    
    
           "1       Civil Action No.
    
    
                             CLASS ACTION
    
                               C O M P L A I N T   .:
    
                              - against -
    
        WARBURG PINCUS & CO., BURTON B. ;
        STANIAR, JOHN H. LYNCH, JOHN W. j
       AMERMAN, ROBERT J. DOLAN, JEFFREY A. ;
       HARRIS, SIDNEY LAPIDUS, KEWSONG LEE, 1
       JOHN L. VOGELSTEIN, WARBURG PINCUS i
       VENTURES, L.P. and KNOLL, INC.;
    
                                                                                              
    
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    ..-........~
    
    
                                                                                                       
    
                                                    1.                   Plaintiff alleges on
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff alleges on information and belief, except for those allegations
  • This action arises out of an unlawful scheme and plan by Warburg Pincus
  • Ventures, L.P. and certain officers and directors of Knoll, Inc. ("Knoll" or the
  • "Company") to acquire the remaining ownership of the Company in a going-private transaction
  • in breach of defendants' fiduciary duties.
  • Plaintiff is and has been at all relevant times the owner of shares of Knoll
  • outstanding about 43,000,OOO shares of common stock.
  • approximately 60% of Knoll's outstanding common stock and is the controlling shareholder of
  • representing approximately 2.4% of the total outstanding shares.
  • a director of the Company and is a General Partner of Defendant Warburg Pincus & Co.
  • The individual defendants named above,
  • officers and/or directors of Company, and Warburg, as the majority stockholder of Knoll, owe
  • a> The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common to the Class
  • stockholder of Knoll, have fulfilled, and are capable of fulfilling, their fiduciary duties
  • proposal from Warburg and Knoll management to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Knoll's
  • common stock owned by its public shareholders at a price of $25.00 per share.
  • The price of Knoll stock has traded as high as $42 5/8 per share in March,
  • Warburg is in a position to dictate the terms of the proposed transaction.
  • consummation of the transaction without the approval of the public shareholders,
  • damages suffered and to be suffered by them as the result of the acts and transactions alleged
  •    |