LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

WINTHROP v CENTRAL COAL and COKE CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,162, Plaintiff: WINTHROP, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017162, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE; COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Winthrop, Fees, Wood, Shareholders, Costs, Motion, Beekman Winthrop, Complaint, Delaware, Moran, Directors, Paragraph, Allegations, Winthrop Wmi Trust, Ukropina, Shares, Annual Meeting, Memorandum, Trustee, Del, Stockholders, Written Consents, Dividend, Phelps, Wood Slate, Chancery, Amendments, Suit, Barton, Affidavit, Barton Robert, First Set, Disputed Shares, Dudley Winthrop, Proceeding, Infantino, Bruce Franke, Altman, Allied Artists Pictures, Payment, Beneficial Ownership, Partnership , ContentID: 120239727

Case Documents
1 2000-01-28 LETTER OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100280
5 pages
PDF
2 1999-12-03 PLAINTIFFS REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102887
22 pages
PDF
3 1999-11-24 DEFENDANTS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES (REDACTED
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102888
28 pages
PDF
4 1999-11-01 PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102889
20 pages
PDF
5 1999-07-20 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103509
4 pages
PDF
6 1999-06-11 PLAINTIFFS REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102890
10 pages
PDF
7 1999-06-07 MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103510
6 pages
PDF
8 1999-06-07 ANSWER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101946
9 pages
PDF
9 1999-05-14 VERIFIED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101947
16 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 9 documents , 120 pages
Price: $ 59.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . LETTER OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
FEE
DEFENDANTS
LITIGATION
DIRECTORS
WRITTEN CONSENT
COMPLAINT
JUDITH NICHOLS RENZULLI
FRANKLIN BALOTTI
MOOT
ENTITLEMENT
STOCKHOLDERS
PETITION
ALLIED ARTISTS
ELECTION
SUIT
PURPOSE
REASON
COUNSEL
DISMISSING
DEL
CENTRAL COAL STOCKHOLDERS
MEETING
DECLARATION
CHALLENGING
CONFERENCE
SUFFICIENCY
SLATE
REVIEW
                                      C O U R T   O F   C H A N C E R Y
                                                    OF THE
                                       S TATE  OF   D ELAWARE


 S T E P H E N   P.   L A M B
  "ICE-CHANCELLOR                        January 28, 2000


Judith Nichols Renzulli, Esquire
Duane, Morris  & Heckscher, LLP
1201 Market Street, Suite 1500
P.O. Box 195
Wilmington, DE 19899

R. Franklin Balotti, Esquire
Richards, Layton  & Finger
One Rodney Square
P.O. Box 551
Wilmington, DE 19899

Re:         Winthrop v. Central Coal and Coke Corp.
            C.A. No. 17162

Dear Counsel;

            Plaintiffs have petitioned for an award of counsel fees and expenses in this

dismissed Section 225 action that was rendered moot by acts of the individual

defendants after the filing of the complaint. They rely on the familiar doctrine entitling

plaintiff's counsel to fees where (1) the action was meritorious when filed, (2) the

defendant takes steps to moot the claim and in so doing produces a corporate benefit,

and (3) there is a causal connection between the lawsuit and the benefit. See, e.g.,

Allied Artists Picture Corp. v. Baron, Del. Supr. 413 A.2d 876, 878 (1980). The

central and insurmountable problem in applying this familiar theory to the facts of this

case is that, to justify a fee award, the "benefit" produced by the defendants' action



Judith Nichols Renzulli, Esquire
R. Franklin Balotti, Esquire
January 28, 2000
SNIPPETS:
  • Judith Nichols Renzulli, Esquire
  • R. Franklin Balotti, Esquire
  • Plaintiffs have petitioned for an award of counsel fees and expenses in this
  • defendants after the filing of the complaint.
  • defendant takes steps to moot the claim and in so doing produces a corporate benefit,
  • Allied Artists Picture Corp. v. Baron,
  • complaint on grounds of mootness was the execution and delivery of a written consent
  • Winthrop filed this action to contest the validity of the election of directors at
  • 1999 annual meeting of Central Coal stockholders.
  • challenged slate as the board of directors.
  • pretrial conference, I adjourned the trial date and directed that plaintiffs be allowed to
  • review the written consents for form and sufficiency.
  • the parties' consent dismissing the action as moot,
  • this fee petition.
  • For that reason, I am unable to conclude that the defendants' actions mooting the
  • litigation "producethe same or similar benefit sought by the.
  • I am also unable to credit plaintiffs' revisionist view of the purpose of their
  • they now say that their suit "sought the declaration of
  • brought suit for the purpose of declaring their entitlement to office.
  • Similarly, in Tandycraft, Inc. v. Znitio Partners, Del.
  • the complaint challenging the sufficiency of proxy disclosures was

  • 2 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    WINTHROP
    PLAINTIFFS
    ATTORNEYS
    FEES
    COSTS
    COURT
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP
    DELAWARE
    MOTION
    MEMORANDUM
    COUNSEL
    SHAREHOLDERS
    BARTON
    DIRECTORS
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
    GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
    PHELPS WOOD
    AFFIDAVIT
    WRITTEN CONSENTS
    DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PROCEDURES
    BARTON ROBERT
    ALLIED ARTISTS PICTURES
    LEGAL WORK
    LEGITIMATE BOARD
    PROPER CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
    FINANCIAL BENEFIT
    SECURITIES
    PLOTKIN LLP
    
              IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP, et al.,
    
                                Plaintiffs,
                                                      Civil Action No. 17162
                   V.
    
    CENTRAL COAL AND COKE
    CORPORATION, et al.,
    
                                Defendants.
    
    
                         PLAINTIFFS' REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
                   OF THEIR MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                                c.      ,'    i. 7
                                                DUANE, MORRIS & HECIGXHEI&  LLR"
                                                Judith Nichols Renzulli                `.r  xJ
                                                1201 Market Street, Suite 1500
                                                P.O. Box 195
                                                Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                (302) 571-5550
                                                Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    Of Counsel:
    
    Roger E. Barton
    Robert A. Altman
    Hillary H. Hughes
    BARTON BARTON  &  PLOTKIN  LLP
    420 Lexington Avenue
    New York, New York 10170
    (212) 687-6262
    
    Dated: December 3, 1999
    
    
    
                                                          TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFFS' REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
  • OF THEIR MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES
  • Of Counsel:
  • Roger E. Barton Robert A. Altman Hillary H. Hughes
  • BARTON BARTON & PLOTKIN LLP
  • Have Beekman Winthrop Join The Central Board
  • Defendants Have Left Them With No Other Choice
  • Baron v. Allied Artists Pictures Corporation,
  • In re Dunkin' Donuts Shareholders Litin.,
  • Delaware General Corporation Law $225.
  • December 2,1999 (the "Harty Affidavit"); William Levy, sworn to on December 2, 1999 (the "Levy
  • The Court should grant Plaintiffs' Motion for Costs and Attorneys' Fees because Plaintiffs
  • rather than as directors, strain credibility.
  • to obtain the written consents.
  • A legitimate Board, elected via proper corporate governance procedures, is essentially
  • ' While Phelps Wood claims to have paid for the cost of getting the written consents, he
  • The Court then proceeded to analyze whether a financial benefit had, in fact,
  • as required under the Securities law, the Winthrops understandably did not attempt to object.
  • Denby's legal work which

  • 3 . DEFENDANTS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES (REDACTED)

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    WOOD
    SHAREHOLDERS
    ATTORNEYS
    PLAINTIFFS
    WINTHROP
    MOTION
    COSTS
    PHELPS
    MORAN
    COURT
    DEL
    UKROPINA
    ANNUAL MEETING
    PROCEEDING
    DIRECTORS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    INFANTINO
    BRUCE FRANKE
    WRITTEN CONSENTS
    ALTMAN AFF
    WINTHROP DEP
    AUTHORITIES
    DELAWARE LAW
    EXPENDITURES
    PROSECUTING
    SUBSTANTIAL BENEFIT
    CORPORATE BENEFIT
    LITIGATION
    
                                                                                  .     ^.    `-  .e* 
                                                                             :
                                                                             %~                        
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                  - IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                       
              `1
                                                                                                       
              d
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP, individually and as trustee         )                                            
              `J
                                                                                                       
               R
    for the DUDLEY WINTHROP WMI TRUST and as              )                                            
    the representative of the general partner of          )                                            
                                                                                                       
    WINTHROP HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP;  )                                                          
                    J
                                                                                                       
    DUDLEY WINTHROP; PHOEBE JANE                          )                                            
                    1
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
         i
    WINTHROP, as trustee for the BEEKMAN                  )                                            
    '         .,
                                                                                                       
    WINTHROP BIRTHDAY TRUST and as co-trustee             i
    for the BEEKMAN WINTHROP WMI TRUST, and               >
    WILLIAM LEVY,  mdividuahy,                            1>
                                     Plaintiffs,          )>
                            V.                           ) C.A. No. 17162
                                                         >
    CENTRAL COAL AND COKE CORPORATION,
    PHELPS M. WOOD as Director, RAY INFANTINO
    as Director, BRUCE FRANKE as Director,
    PATRICK J. MORAN as Director, PHELPS C.
    WOOD as Director and JAMES UKROPINA as
    Director,
    
                                     Defendants.
    
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • PHELPS M. WOOD as Director, RAY INFANTINO as Director, BRUCE FRANKE as Director, PATRICK J.
  • MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES
  • TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.
  • OF ATTORNEYS' FEES INCURRED IN PROSECUTING
  • Substantial Benefit To The Corporation Or Its Shareholders.
  • The Public Policy Underlying The Corporate Benefit Doctrine
  • EVEN LF THE COURT DETERMINES THAT PLAINTIFFS ARE ENTITLED TO AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES,
  • Baron, Del.
  • occurred at the most recent annual meeting of stockholders of Central Coal and Coke
  • Delaware law does not permit such a result.
  • Plaintiffs have not conferred any benefit upon Central or its stockholders.
  • have inflicted a burden on Central by causing it to defend this litigation which was designed
  • Plaintiff Beekman Winthrop ("B.
  • Winthrop Dep.
  • Defendants Phelps C. Wood ("P.C.
  • Wood"), Patrick J. Moran, James
  • Ukropina, Ray Infantino and Bruce Franke have been directors of Central since April 21,
  • The delivery of the written consents was in no way timed to occur "at the eleventh hour,
  • See Altman Aff.
  • 225 proceeding is an in rem action in which the office of director is the

  • 4 . PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    FEES
    ATTORNEYS
    MOTION
    COSTS
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP
    ANNUAL MEETING
    CHANCERY
    COUNSEL
    SUIT
    AMENDMENTS
    DELAWARE
    LAW
    ALTMAN
    SHAREHOLDERS
    MEMORANDUM
    BARTON ROBERT
    SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
    ALLIED ARTISTS PICTURES
    DIRECTORS
    SUPREME COURT
    WRITTEN CONSENTS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CAUSAL CONNECTION
    PROPOSALS
    CASTLE COUNTY
    ZASKY
    RESTRAINING ORDER
    
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP, et al.,
    
                                 Plaintiffs,
                                                      Civil Action No. 17 162
                   V.
    
    CENTRAL COAL AND COKE
    CORPORATION, et al.,
    
                                 Defendants.
    
    
    
    
                         PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
                   OF THEIR MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                DUANE, MORRIS  & HECKSCHER, LLP
                                                Judith Nichols Renzulli
                                                1201 Market Street, Suite 1500
                                                P.O. Box 195
                                                Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                (302)  5715550
                                                Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    Of Counsel:
    
    Roger E. Barton
    Robert A. Altman
    Hillary H. Hughes
    BARTON & ZASKY
    420 Lexington Avenue
    New York, New York 10170
    (2 12) 687-6262
    
    Dated: November 1, 1999
    
    
    
                                                       TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
  • OF THEIR MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES
  • BARTON & ZASKY
  • Counsel Fees and Expenses
  • AndThis Suit
  • Baron v. Allied Artists Pictures Corporation,
  • Plaintiffs, BEEKMAN WINTHROP, individually and as trustee for the DUDLEY
  • this memorandum of law together with the accompanying afhdavit of Robert S. Altman,
  • fees against Defendants and Central Coal & Coke Corporation.
  • The third element, a causal connection, is assumed to be
  • such debts existed allowed the preferred shareholders of the corporation to elect the Board
  • of Directors of the merged company.
  • Supreme Court affirmed the Chancery Court's award of attorneys fees where the plaintiff sued
  • about improper notice and amendments mailed in advance of the corporation's annual meeting.
  • On July 29, 1999, the eve of trial, Defendants submitted written consents to this Court,
  • Roger E. Barton Robert S. Altman
  • Stroud et al v. Milliken et al Civil Action No. 8969 - New Castle County
  • Plaintiffs, owners of stock in defendant Milliken Enterprises, Inc., filed this action
  • Plaintiffs applied for a temporary restraining order to
  • is to provide the corporation with time to consider the points that have been raised in the
  • motion to dismiss the supplemental complaint, essentially dismissing most, but not all, of

  • 5 . MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    AMEND
    COURT
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEFENDANTS
    MOTION
    AMENDMENTS
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    BARTON
    YORK
    DEL
    PREJUDICE
    PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT
    CHANCERY
    DELAWARE
    COUNSEL
    PLEADINGS
    DISMISS
    CONFORM
    EVIDENCE
    DEPOSITIONS
    HEREBY
    HERETO
    PARTY
    LIBERALITY
    MATTER
    CANTOR
    MAJORITY
    PROXIES
    EXHIBIT
    
                   IN THE; COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP et al
                                 >--0,
                                 Plaintiffs,
                    -against-                                 C.A. No. 17162
    
     CENTRAL COAL ,4ND COKE CORPORATION,
                                 Defendants.
    
    
    
                                                NOTICE OF MOTION
    
    TO:    R. Franklin  13alotti, Esquire
           Richards, Layton  & Finger
           One Rodney Square
           P.O. Box 551
           Wilmington, Delaware 19899
    
    
           PLEASE TAKE NOTICE  that the attached Motion for Leave to File an Amended
    
    Complaint will be presented to the Court at the convenience of the Court and counsel.
    
    
                                                          DUANE, MORRIS & HECKSCHER, L.L.P.
    
    
                                                       B y :   <~~~~~~~/  --$f*  /it/?-
    
                                                           1201 Market Street, Suite 1500
                                                           P.O. Box 195
                                                           Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                           (302)  571-5550
                                                           Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    Of Counsel:
    
    Roger E. Barton
    Robert A. Altman
    Hillary H. Hughes
    BARTON & ZASKY
    420 Lexington Avenue
    New York, New York 10170
    (2 12) 687-6262
    
    Dated: July 20, 1999
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached Motion for Leave to File an Amended
  • Complaint will be presented to the Court at the convenience of the Court and counsel.
  • BARTON & ZASKY
  • New York, New York 10170
  • MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
  • Plaintiffs hereby move the Court, -pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 15, for an order
  • A party should be freely granted leave to amend its complai.nt when justice
  • Amendments to pleadings are liberally allowed unless serious prejudice to the o:pposing
  • Del.
  • Liberality of amendment is a tradition in the courts of this state and
  • The amendments sought by the plaintiffs are merely ones that conform the
  • evidence as late as the trial of a matter.
  • R. 15; Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v.
  • particularity the invalidity of the proxies for the SECOND SET OF DISPUTED SHARES,
  • The proposed Amended Complaint also eliminates Count Three of the original
  • eliminati:ng the need for the defendants to defend that claim.
  • The overwhelming majority of the amendments simply seek to note that various
  • defendants did not have legal proxies as became evident in depositions conducted on July 20,
  • A "red-lined" version of the Amended Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
  • to the evidence that was uncovered during depositions.
  • Defendants' Motion to Dismiss moot.

  • 6 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    WOOD
    DEFENDANTS
    PAYMENT
    PLAINTIFFS
    PAST PRACTICE
    WINTHROP
    WOOD SLATE
    QUO ORDER
    DIRECTORS
    COURT
    DECLARE
    AFFIDAVIT
    MOTION
    CONSISTENT
    CONTRACT
    DELAWARE
    LAW
    HARM
    PROPER
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP
    ARGUE
    CENTS
    MANDATORV INJUNCTION
    PAID
    LEGITIMACY
    YORK
    EXPENDITURES
    SHAREHOLDERS
    EXPENSES
    
                    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP et al
                                   ,--*,
                                   Plaintiffs,
    
                      -against-                         C.A. No. 17162
    CENTRAL COAL AND COKE CORPORATION,
    gt t&l.,
    
                                   Defendants.
    
    
    
    
    
    
                  PLAINTIFFS' REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF
                                THEIR MOTION FOR A STATUS QUO ORDER
    
    
    
    
    
                                                    DUANE, MORRIS & HECKSCHER LLP
                                                    Judith Nichols Renzulli
                                                    1201 Market Street, Suite 15qO
                                                    Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                    (302) 571-5550
    
    OF COUNSEL:
    Roger E. Barton
    Robert S. Altman
    Hillary H. Hughes
    BARTON & ZASKY
    420 Lexington Avenue
    New York, New York 10170
    (2 12) 687-6262
    
    Dated: Wilmington, Delaware
                June 11,1999
    
    
    
                             NATURE AND STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS
    
           Plaintiffs, BEEKMAN WINTHROP, individually and as trustee for the DUDLEY
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFFS' REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF
  • THEIR MOTION FOR A STATUS QUO ORDER
  • New York, New York 10170
  • Plaintiffs, BEEKMAN WINTHROP, individually and as trustee for the DUDLEY
  • CENTRAL will suffer irreparable harm by the planned expenditures of the WOOD
  • to the WOOD SLATE.
  • The WOOD SLATE argues in favor of allowing the payment of a fifty cents per share
  • the authority of the Board to declare this dividend is at the heart of this action.
  • Next, contrary to the Defendants assertions, Plaintiffs do not seek mandatory relief.
  • they seek to maintain the status quo - no dividend has yet to be paid, so no harm is yet done.
  • Defendants believe that the dividend is consistent with past practice.
  • the WOOD SLATE argues for the advancement of legal expenses.
  • directors and, arguably, never really were.
  • they state that upon declaration of the dividend, the shareholders had a contractual right to
  • they argue that any delay in payment of the dividend is the equivalent of a mandatory
  • Wood (the "Wood Affidavit"), at 75.
  • questionable legitimacy is the reason for this litigation.
  • and the WOOD SLATE never was the proper Board.
  • The Status Ouo Order Would Not Be the Eauivalent of a Mandatorv Injunction.
  • directors and any contract rights that existed under the by-laws of CENTRAL were never

  • 7 . MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    WOOD
    DEFENDANTS
    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
    DISMISS
    VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    CHANCERY
    MOTION
    MORAN
    JURISDICTION
    DEL
    REGULATIONS
    BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
    SHARES
    STOCK
    VIOLATIONS
    EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION
    DELAWARE
    PHELPS
    PURSUANT
    DIRECTORS
    ALLEGES
    TEKTEST
    UNITED STATES
    ELECTION
    EMPLOYEE
    DISCLOSE
    FAILURE
    ANNUAL MEETING
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                     65
    
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP, individually and as trustee                )
    for the DUDLEY WINTHROP WMI TRUST and as                     )
    the representative of the general partner of                 1
    WINTHROP HOLDINGS LIMITED                                    >
    PARTNERSHIP; DUDLEY WINTHROP; PHOEBE                         )
    JANE WINTHROP, as trustee for the BEEKMAN                    )
    WINTHROP BIRTHDAY TRUST and as co-trustee                    )     Civil Action No. 17 162
    for the BEEKMAN WINTHROP WMI TRUST, and                      )
    WILLIAM LEVY, individually,                                  >>
                                    Plaintiffs,                  >>
            V.                                                   >
                                                                 >
    CENTRAL COAL AND COKE CORPORATION,                           )
    PHELPS M. WOOD as Director, RAY INFANTINO                    )
    as Director, BRUCE FRANKE as Director,                       )
    PATRICK J. MORAN as Director, PHELPS C.                      >
    WOOD as Director and JAMES UKROPINA as                       >
    Director,                                                    >>
                                    Defendants.                  >
    
                                           NOTICE OF MOTION
    
    TO:     Judith Nichols Renzulli
            Duane, Morris & Heckscher LLP
             120 1 North Market Street
             Suite 1500
            Wilmington, DE 1980 1
    
                       PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached Motion to Dismiss will be presented
    
    to the Court at the convenience of the Court and counsel.
    
    
                                                        R. Fr&klin  Bafotti
                                                        Megan Semple Greenberg
                                                        Richards, Layton & Finger
                                                        One Rodney Square
                                                        P.O. Box 551
                                                        Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                        (302) 658-6541
    Dated: June 7, 1999                                   Attorneys for Defendants
    
    RLFl-2017724-1
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached Motion to Dismiss will be presented
  • Defendants Central Coal and Coke Corporation, Phelps M. Wood, Ray Infantino, Bruce
  • Plaintiffs have filed this action pursuant to 8 Del.
  • Count IV of plaintiffs' Verified Complaint alleges that defendant
  • Phelps M. Wood serves as trustee of Tektest Inc. Pension Trust,
  • all of which are employee benefit plans regulated by 29 U.S.C.
  • Wood last filed a Form 13D with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Company's stock.
  • 13-D to reflect any change in his beneficial ownership of shares of the Company,
  • Plaintiffs similarly attack the purported failure of defendant Patrick J.
  • Moran to file a Form 13-D or Forms 4 and 5 with the SEC to reflect changes in his beneficial
  • defendants' failures to disclose this material information,
  • Wood and Moran tainted the election of directors at the annual meeting of the Company.
  • regulations promulgated pursuant to that statute.
  • Plaintiffs seek to use the alleged violations as
  • state cannot grant relief for purported violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
  • Securities Exchange Act vests exclusive jurisdiction in the federal courts to enforce its

  • 8 . ANSWER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMPLAINT
    ALLEGATIONS
    DEFENDANTS
    RESPONSE
    STOCKHOLDERS
    PROXY
    COMPUTATION CONTAINED THEREIN
    DEFENDANTS REPEAT
    REALLEGE PARAGRAPHS
    FULLY SET
    THEREOF
    MEETING
    DISMISS
    DOCTRINES
    JUDGMENTS
    COURT
    AWARDING
    COSTS
    EXPENSES
    ATTORNEYS
    FEES
    HEREBY CERTIFY
    FOREGOING
    DELIVERY
    COUNSEL
    CHANCERY
    DELAWARE
    VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    DECLARATIONS
    
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                ( i'
    
    
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP, individually and as                  >
    trustee for the DUDLEY WINTHROP WMI                    >
    TRUST and as the representative of the general         >
    partner of WINTHROP HOLDINGS                           >                                     .-
    LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; DUDLEY                            >                                     p.3
    WINTHROP; PHOEBE JANE WINTHROP,                        )                                     c-
    as trustee for the BEEKMAN WINTHROP                    >
    BIRTHDAY TRUST and as co-trustee for the               >
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP WMI TRUST, and                        >
    WILLIAM LEVY, individually,                            >>
                             Plaintiffs,                   >>
                      V.                                   >>
    CENTRAL COAL AND COKE                                  >
    CORPORATION, PHELPS M. WOOD as                         1
    Director, RAY INFANTINO as Director,                   >
    BRUCE FRANKE as Director, PATRICK J.                   1
    MORAN as Director, PHELPS C. WOOD as                   >
    Director and JAMES UKROPINA as Director,               >)
                             Defendants.                   >
    
                                                  ANSWER
    
            AND NOW, come the defendants, and answer the complaint in the above-captioned
    
    action as follows:
    
             1.       The allegations of paragraph 1 of the Verified Complaint are denied except that it
    
    is admitted that the complaint seeks declarations as set forth in paragraph 1 of the complaint.
    
             2.       The allegations of paragraph 2 of the complaint are admitted.
    
            3.        The allegations of paragraph 3 of the complaint are admitted.
    
             4.       The allegations of paragraph 4 of the complaint are admitted.
    
    
    RLFl-2016967-1
    
    
    
            5.        The allegations of paragraph 5 of the complaint are admitted.
    
            6.        The allegations of paragraph 6 of the complaint are admitted.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • AND NOW, come the defendants, and answer the complaint in the above-captioned
  • The allegations of paragraph 1 of the Verified Complaint are denied except that it
  • is admitted that the complaint seeks declarations as set forth in paragraph 1 of the
  • The allegations of paragraph 2 of the complaint are admitted.
  • Central Coal & Coke Corporation as of the date thereof.
  • stockholders of Central Coal held on April 21, 1999, plaintiff B. Winthrop held a proxy.
  • which no response is necessary.
  • admitted that at the meeting of stockholders referred to in paragraph 50 above,
  • The defendants repeat and reallege paragraphs 1 through 55 of this Answer as if
  • fully set forth herein.
  • admitted that the arithmetical computation contained therein is accurate.
  • the motion to dismiss COUNT FOUR of the complaint filed contemporaneously herewith.
  • Count One of the complaint is barred by the doctrines of waiver and acquiescence.
  • the defendants pray that the Court enter its judgments and orders:
  • Awarding to the defendants their costs and expenses (including reasonable
  • attorneys' fees) incurred in defending this action.
  • I hereby certify that on June 7, 1999, two copies of the foregoing were served by hand
  • delivery upon the following counsel of record:

  • 9 . VERIFIED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    WINTHROP
    WINTHROP WMI TRUST
    MORAN
    SHARES
    UKROPINA
    TRUSTEE
    PLAINTIFFS
    BEEKMAN WINTHROP
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DELAWARE
    DIRECTORS
    FIRST SET
    DISPUTED SHARES
    DUDLEY WINTHROP
    MEETING
    WOOD SLATE
    PARTNERSHIP
    BIRTHDAY TRUST
    BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
    POTENTIAL CONFLICT
    BENEFICIAL OWNER
    GENERAL PARTNER
    RAY INFANTINO
    COMPLAINT
    DEFENDANTS
    SECOND SET
    EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
    TEKTEST EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
    CENTRAL STOCK
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                                                                   I
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
     BEEKMAN WINTHROP, individually and as trustee
     for the DUDLEY WINTHROP WMI TRUST and as
     the representative of the general partner of
     WINTHROP HOLDINGS LIMITED
     PARTNERSHIP; DUDLEY WINTHROP; PHOEBE
     JANE WINTHROP, as trustee for the BEEKMAN
     WINTHROP BIRTHDAY TRUST and as co-trustee
     for the BEEKMAN WINTHROP WMI TRUST, and
     WILLIAM LEVY, individually,
                                  Plaintiffs,
                     -against-                               C.A. NO/~/& -A.-&.
     CENTRAL COAL AND COKE CORPORATION,,
     PHELPS M. WOOD as Director, RAY INFANTINO
     as Director, BRUCE FRANKE as Director,
     PATRICK J. MORAN as Director, PHELPS C.
     WOOD as Director and JAMES UKROPINA as
     Director,
                                  Defendants.
    
    
                                           VERIFIED COMPLAINT
    
                    For their Complaint against defendants, Central Coal and Coke Corporation
    
    ("CENTRAL"), Phelps M. Wood ("P.M. WOOD"), Ray Infantino  ("INFANTINO"), Bruce Franke
    
    ("FRANKE"),  Patrick J. Moran ("MORAN"), Phelps C. Wood ("P.C. WOOD") and James
    
    Ukropina ("UKROPINA"), herein, plaintiffs Beekman Winthrop ("B. WINTHROP"), individually
    
    and as trustee for the Dudley Winthrop WMI Trust and as the representative of the general partner
    
    of Winthrop Holdings Limited Partnership; Dudley Winthrop ("D. WINTHROP"); Phoebe Jane
    
    Winthrop ("P.J. WINTHROP"), as trustee for the Beekman Winthrop Birthday Trust and as co-
    
    
    
    trustee for the Beekman Winthrop WMI Trust, and William J. Levy ("LEVY"), by and through their
    
    undersigned attorneys, state:
    
    
                                            INTRODUCTION
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • BEEKMAN WINTHROP, individually and as trustee for the DUDLEY WINTHROP WMI TRUST and as the
  • WINTHROP HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; DUDLEY WINTHROP; PHOEBE
  • JANE WINTHROP, as trustee for the BEEKMAN WINTHROP BIRTHDAY TRUST and as co-trustee for the
  • PHELPS M. WOOD as Director, RAY INFANTINO as Director, BRUCE FRANKE as Director, PATRICK J.
  • For their Complaint against defendants,
  • , Phelps M. Wood, Ray Infantino, Bruce Franke
  • , Patrick J. Moran, Phelps C. Wood ("P.C.
  • Ukropina, herein, plaintiffs Beekman Winthrop ("B.
  • Section 225 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the purported elections of the five
  • CENTRAL stock; as to who are the rightful current directors of CENTRAL; and that the
  • information that was material to CENTRAL and its shareholders, and were designed to conceal
  • business of leasing mineral rights to developers whose shares are and were publicly traded.
  • PARTNERSHIP was and is a beneficial owner of shares of CENTRAL.
  • On April 2 1, 1999, CENTRAL held its annual meeting in Kansas City,
  • Including shares in dispute, the WOOD SLATE received 17 1,270 shares (the
  • MORAN was not the record owner of the FIRST SET OF DISPUTED
  • MORAN did not have proxies for the FIRST SET OF DISPUTED SHARES.
  • MORAN or the LOUISE J. MORAN TRUST (the "SECOND SET OF DISPUTED SHARES").
  • was a TEKTEST employee benefit plan regulated by the provisions of the Employee
  • Securities and Exchange Commission reflecting beneficial ownership of 99,449 shares
  • a potential conflict of interest that was material and needed to be disclosed to the
  •    |