LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

FRANKINVO v NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,208, CourtName: UNFORTUNATELY, THE PRESS OF OTHER BUSINESS BEFORE THE COURT IMPINGES UPON, Plaintiff: FRANKINVO, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017208, CourtCode: CC, Annual Meeting, Directors, Quo Order, Frankino, Stockholders, Election, Nac, Postpone, William, Motion, Modify, Paragraph, Chancery, Operating, Vote, Ordinary Course, Marshall, Gleason, Agreement, Seats, Consent, Rice, Chandler, Nominees, Honorable William, Del, Dodero, Nominations, Certificate, Esquire, National Auto Credit, Control, Prior, Reasons, Exercise Control, Incumbent, Employee, Delaware, Court Rules, Majority, Respectfully Requests, Auditor, Resignation, Special Committee, Dispute , ContentID: 120239723

Case Documents
1 1999-09-28 LETTER OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100272
7 pages
PDF
2 1999-09-21 LETTER TO CHANCELLOR CHANDLER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102868
11 pages
PDF
3 1999-09-09 LETTER OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103583
2 pages
PDF
4 1999-09-08 MOTION TO POSTPONE ANNUAL MEETING
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102869
10 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 4 documents , 30 pages
Price: $ 34.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . LETTER OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
DIRECTORS
BUSINESS
PLAINTIFF
FRANKINO
ELECTION
MODIFY
DEFENDANTS
OPERATING
DODERO
LITIGATION
ORDINARY COURSE
AGREEMENT
REASONS
PARAGRAPH
EXERCISE CONTROL
MEETING
INCUMBENT
EMPLOYEE
CHANCERY
SUBSIDIARIES
ROUTINE
PARTIES
CONSULTANT
WILLIAM
COUNSEL
ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS
RICE
DISPUTES
                                                             C OURT OF  C H A N C E R Y
                                                                        OF THE
                                                              S TATE OF  D E L A W A R E


     WICLIAM  8.  CH A N D L E R   I I I                                                      T H E
               CHANCELLOR                                     September 28, 1999                   
                                                                                            G E O R



                VIA FAX & U.S. MAIL

                William M. Lafferty
                Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel1
                P.O. Box 1347
                Wilmington, DE 19899

                Edward M. McNally
                Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams
                P.O. Box 2306
                Wilmington, DE 19899

                                            Re: Frankino v. National Auto Credit, Inc.
                                                  Civil Action Nos. 17208 & 17209
                                                  Frankino v. Gleason
                                                  Civil Action No. 17399

                Dear Counsel:

                             Having considered the arguments set forth in your letters to the

                well as during our telephone conference on September 24*, I grant plaintiffs

               motion to modify the status quo order. A copy of the modified status quo order is

                attached to this letter for your records.

                             Unfortunately, the press of other business before the Court impinges

               my ability to provide counsel with a detailed explanation of the reasons for this

               decision. What follows is an abbreviated version of my rationale.






SNIPPETS:
  • William M. Lafferty
  • Dear Counsel:
  • Having considered the arguments set forth in your letters to the Court,
  • A copy of the modified status quo order is
  • the press of other business before the Court impinges upon
  • Paragraph 1 of that Order provided that the named director defendants (at
  • that time) would exercise control of the day-to-day operating affairs of the
  • Paragraph 3 of the Order further provided that the Court "may modify
  • the company held its 1999 annual stockholders' meeting (pursuant to this Court's
  • At that meeting, Frankino and
  • Dodero were elected to the board and the two incumbent directors (defendants
  • Although Rice announced Frankino's nominees had been elected,
  • having authority to exercise control of the company.
  • Frankino's right to office as a result of the September 15 election,
  • plaintiff seeks to modify the status quo order to reflect Frankino and Dodero's
  • No one disputes their right to office.
  • litigation and that such changes properly should be reflected in the Order.
  • Chancery resolves the $ 225 action.
  • Accordingly, I have, for these reasons, entered the modified status quo order
  • the routine day-today operations of the Company or its subsidiaries conducted in the ordinary
  • any routine agreements required in the ordinary course of business operations which do not
  • Employ any person (as an employee or consultant of the Company or
  • consultant as of August 30, 1999 including, but not limited to, entering into or amending any
  • existing employment agreement, management retention agreement, consulting agreement, "golden
  • connection with litigation between the parties in this now pending litigation action or in

  • 2 . LETTER TO CHANCELLOR CHANDLER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    DIRECTORS
    DEFENDANTS
    ELECTION
    ANNUAL MEETING
    WILLIAM
    FRANKINO
    MARSHALL
    GLEASON
    MOTION
    BUSINESS
    PLAINTIFF
    SEATS
    PARAGRAPH
    CHANDLER
    MODIFY
    NOMINEES
    HONORABLE WILLIAM
    CHANCERY
    VOTE
    NOMINATIONS
    CERTIFICATE
    COUNSEL
    ORDINARY COURSE
    ESQUIRE
    RICE
    OPERATING
    DELAWARE
    AGREEMENT
    
                             M ORRIS , N ICHOLS , A RSHT  &  TUNNELL
                                        I   201  N O R T H  M A R K E T  S T R E E T
                                                  P.O.  B o x   1 3 4 7
                                 W I L M I N G T O N ,   D E L A W A R E   19899-l   3 4 7
    
                                            T ELEPHONE   i302)  658-9200
                                             T ELECOPY   1302)  658-3989
    
    
    
                                                     (302)575-7341
    
                                               September 2 1, 1999
              R                                                                               ANDREW 
                                                                                              DAVID  A.
                                                                                              WALTER 
    
                                                                                                      
    
    
    
    
    VIA FACSIMILE
    
    The Honorable William B. Chandler III
    Chancellor
    Court of Chancery
    Family Court Building
    The Circle
    Georgetown, DE 19947
    
    
           Re:     Frankino v. National Auto Credit, Inc., C.A. N
    
    
    Dear Chancellor Chandler:
    
                   This letter is respectfully submitted in support of plaintiff Sam  J. Frankino's
    
    motion to modify the Stipulated Order Maintaining Status Quo ("Status Quo Order") entered by
    
    the Court on September 3, 1999 in C.A. No. 17399-NC (the "Section 225 Action").
    
                   As Your Honor no doubt recalls, on September 8, 1999, National Auto Credit,
    
    Inc.  ("NAC"  or the "Company") filed a motion to postpone the Company's 1999 annual
    
    stockholders' meeting ("Annual Meeting") that was ordered previously by the Court in C. A.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • The Honorable William B. Chandler III
  • Chancellor Court of Chancery Family Court Building The Circle Georgetown,
  • Frankino v. National Auto Credit, Inc., C.A. N
  • This letter is respectfully submitted in support of plaintiff Sam J. Frankino's
  • Inc. filed a motion to postpone the Company's 1999 annual
  • stockholders' meeting ("Annual Meeting") that was ordered previously by the Court in C.
  • At the Ann;1 Meeting on September 15, two items of business were conducted the election of
  • In addition to the nominations made by the incumbent directors to fill the two seats
  • (defendants Marshall and Gleason), on August 30, 1999, Mr. Frankino nominated, in compliance
  • Neither the Company nor the director defendants challenged the validity of Mr.
  • entitled to vote) voting 15,743,012 shares in favor of his nominees and in favor of approving
  • Mr. Frankino's nominees received
  • meeting (defendant Rice) announced that Mr. Frankino's nominees had won and that Grant
  • Mr. Frankino's counsel noted their objection to, and disagreement with, Mr.
  • Rice's statement regarding the meaning of the Status Quo Order,
  • the Court should modify the Status Quo Order accordingly.
  • day-to-day operating affairs of the Company until this Court has entered its final judgment
  • The defendants' reliance on paragraph 1 of the Status Quo Order in asserting that the two
  • of the ordinary course of business pending resolution of the Section 225 Action.
  • Edward M. McNally, Esquire
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • existing employment aeeement, management retention agreement, consulting agreement, "golden
  • Certificate of Incorporation;

  • 3 . LETTER OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    NAC
    STOCKHOLDERS
    COURT
    AUDITORS
    POSTPONEMENT
    WILLIAM
    MORRIS
    WILMINGTON
    COUNSEL
    ELECTION
    GRANT
    THORNTON
    BUSINESS
    REQUESTS
    UPCOMING SHAREHOLDER MEETING
    BUSINESS MEDIA
    EXTREMELY LIMITED RECORD
    APPRISE STOCKHOLDERS
    NAC ARGUES
    ATTENTION
    KIND FORCE
    VACUUM
    UNHAPPY
    EMPHASIZE
    RECOGNITION
    STANDSTILL ORDER
    DELAWARE LAW
    REGISTER
    CHANCERY
    
                                                      C OURT  OF   C HANCERY
                                                               OF THE
                                                       STATE  OF   D ELAWARE
    
    
    WILLIAM  B. C HANDLER  III                                                          T HE   F AMILY 
           C H A N C E L L O R                         September 9, 1999                         P.0. 
                                                                                      GEORGETOWN , D
    
    
    
                    VIA FAX & U.S. MAIL
    
                    William M. Lafferty
                    Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel1
                    P.O. Box 1347
                    Wilmington, DE 19899
    
                    Edward M. McNally
                    Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams
                    P.O. Box 2306
                    Wilmington, DE 19899
    
                                        Re: Frankino v. National Auto Gedit, Inc.
                                              Civil Action Nos. 1720&l 7209
    
                    Dear Counsel:
    
                                  I deny National Auto Credit, Inc.`s ("NAY)  motion to postpone the
                    September 15, 1999 stockholder meeting. The September 15 meeting was
                    agreed to by counsel (and ordered by the Court) in order to resolve plaintiff
                    Frankino's Section 211 Action, an action brought because NAC had not had
                    a stockholder's meeting for over two years.
    
                                  NAC's request to postpone the September 15 meeting is based on its
                    contention that the stockholders need to be informed about Mr. Frankino's
                    Section 225 Action, his purported expansion and election of new members
                    to the NAC board and the possibility that NAC's outside, independent
                    auditors (Grant Thornton) may not continue as NAC's auditors in the event
                    of a change of control of NAC. Mr. Frankino claims to own about 55% of
                    NAC stock. The election of two new directors and approval of Grant
                    Thornton as NAC's auditors therefore is not likely to be affected even if
                    additional information about Mr. Frankino's Section 225 Action is provided
                    to NAC's stockholders. But I decline NAC's invitation to postpone the
                    September 15 meeting because I am not persuaded that the circumstances in
    
    
    
    this case justify a postponement. The meeting has been scheduled since late
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • William M. Lafferty
  • Wilmington, DE 19899
  • Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams
  • Dear Counsel:
  • September 15, 1999 stockholder meeting.
  • an action brought because NAC had not had
  • contention that the stockholders need to be informed about Mr. Frankino's
  • auditors (Grant Thornton) may not continue as NAC's auditors in the event
  • The election of two new directors and approval of Grant
  • NAC already has issued a press release regarding the upcoming shareholder meeting that was
  • I also note that NAC's application for a postponement comes before this Court only seven days
  • Last minute requests of this kind force the Court to make decisions in a vacuum, an
  • I emphasize that part of the background for this decision is my recognition that a Standstill
  • oc: Register in Chancery

  • 4 . MOTION TO POSTPONE ANNUAL MEETING

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    COURT
    NAC
    FRANKINO
    POSTPONE
    DIRECTORS
    PLAINTIFF
    CONSENT
    ELECTION
    DEL
    NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT
    MEMBERS
    CONTROL
    PRIOR
    MOTION
    COURT RULES
    MAJORITY
    RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS
    AUDITOR
    RESIGNATION
    SPECIAL COMMITTEE
    VOTE
    DISPUTE
    STIPULATION
    RESOLVING
    EXERCISE
    MINORITY
    DISCLOSURES
    CHAIRMAN
    
                    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    SAM J. FRANKINO,                                >>
                                     Plaintiff,     >>     C.A. No. 17208NC  Q,"
                     V.                             >
                                                    >
    NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT, INC., a                   )
    Delaware corporation,                           >>
                                     Defendant, )
    
    SAM J, FRANKINO,                   --+>
                                     Plaintiff,     )
                                                    >      C.A. No. 17209-NC
                     V.                             >
                                                    >
    NATIONAL, AUTO CREDIT, INC., a                  )
    Delaware corporation,                           >>
                                     Defendant,  )
    
                                             NOTICE OF MOTION
    
    TO: William M. Lafferty (#2755)
           Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel1
            1201 N. Market Street
           P.O. Box 1347
           Wilmington, DE 19899
    
           PLE.ASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached Motion to Postpone The Annual Meeting of
    
    the Stockholders of National Auto Credit, Inc., will be presented to the Court at a time to be set
    
    by the Court
    
                                                    MORRIS, JAMES, HITCHENS  & WILLIAMS
    
    DATE: September 8, 1999
    
                                                    222 Delaware Avenue - 10th Fl.
                                                    P. 0. Box 2306
                                                    Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                    302/888-6800
                                                    Attorneys for Defendant, National Auto Credit. Inc.
    
    
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                               .
    SAM J. FRANKINO,                                 >>
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • the Stockholders of National Auto Credit, Inc., will be presented to the Court at a time to
  • MOTION TO POSTPONE THE ANNUAL MEETING
  • !DF THE STOCKHOLDERS OF NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT,
  • 60 days after this Court rules on a related summary proceeding which Plaintiff, Sam J.
  • to thirteen members and elected seven new directors to till these newly-created directorships.
  • NAC states as follows.
  • Mr. Franklmo's recent attempts to seize control of NAC and thwart the Company's substantial
  • are subject to election at this time, he has suddenly purported to use a stockholder consent
  • Mr. Frankino has been the Company's majority stockholder.
  • From the initial public offering until March 3 1, 1998, Mr. Frankino was Chairman of NAC's
  • In response to Deloitte's resignation, a special committee comprised of three
  • Grant Thornton LLP was retained as the Company's new outside auditor.
  • On March 9, 1998, the Special Committee preliminarily concluded that Deloitte's
  • On June 2 1, 1999, Plaintiff and the Company entered into a Stipulation and Order
  • of Dismissal resolving the pending actions.
  • The parties':stipulation was so ordered by this Court on June 22,
  • Those bylaws required a 66-2/3% vote to enlarge the board of directors.
  • See 8 Del.
  • Court rules on Plaintiffs Section 225 Action.
  • should exercise its broad discretion and postpone the meeting date.
  • dispute prlecipitated by Mr. Frankino is resolved by this Court.
  • This dispute is important to the minority shareholders,
  • That Order further provides that Mr. Frankino is to receive prior notice of transactions not
  • Disclosures regarding the Board's dispute with Mr. Frankino,
  • the Company respectfully requests that the Court amend its prior June 22
  •    |