LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BENTAS v HASEOTES Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,223, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE I, Plaintiff: BENTAS, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017223, Directors, Custodian, Stockholders, Demetrios, Cumberland Farms, Motion, Haseotes, Del, Appointment, Deadlock, Stockholder, Election, Summary Judgment, George, Facts, Management, Bentas, Complaint, Relief, Elect, Interpretation, Support, Dismiss, Delaware, George Haseotes, Independent Directors, Byron, Annual Meeting, Byron Haseotes, Irreparable Harm, Shareholders, Successors, Reorganization Plan, Statute, Stockholder Deadlock, Irreparableharm, Partial Summary Judgment, Family Directors , ContentID: 120239722

Case Documents
1 2000-03-06 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100270
19 pages
PDF
2 2000-02-07 PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF A CUSTODIAN
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102843
33 pages
PDF
3 2000-01-17 PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF A CUSTODIAN
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102844
35 pages
PDF
4 1999-11-23 DEFENDANTS MOTIN TO DISMISS 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CUSTODIAN
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102845
8 pages
PDF
5 1999-11-05 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100271
13 pages
PDF
6 1999-11-01 AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101913
18 pages
PDF
7 1999-10-22 PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102846
23 pages
PDF
8 1999-10-08 ANSWERING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102847
20 pages
PDF
9 1999-09-13 REPLY BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102848
11 pages
PDF
10 1999-09-01 PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSTION TO MOTION TO DISMISS & OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTOIN FOR PARTIAL SUMM. JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102849
27 pages
PDF
11 1999-08-18 OPENING BRIEF OD DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102850
15 pages
PDF
12 1999-06-11 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101914
17 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 12 documents , 239 pages
Price: $ 74.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CUSTODIAN
DEFENDANTS
PLAINTIFFS
COURT
SHAREHOLDERS
STATUTE
ELECTION
MOTION
DEMETRIOS
APPOINTMENT
APPOINT
DELAWARE CORPORATION
DEL
ELECT
CUMBERLAND FARMS
STOCKHOLDERS
STATUTORY
INTERPRETATION
WILMINGTON
ELECT SUCCESSORS
STATUTORY SCHEME
AMENDED COMPLAINT
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FAMILY DIRECTORS
CONSTRUCTION
ATTORNEYS
CHANCELLOR
RENEWED MOTION
PROPOSALS
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATIE OF DELAWARE

                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

                                                                                   c:7
                                                                      :-3          c-2
                                                                                   -z
                                                                   c-l!  ;         :  -
       LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES :                            7. .-
                                                                     -,,1
                                                                   ::.             2.;
       and CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,                                 ::                       -F `*
                                                  :                                ,cI,     ;:`* ?
                                                                                     -2        -1
                         Plaintiffs,                                                c
                                                        CA. No. 17223                -k
                                                                      .- ,.ci-4       Ln
       DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES and
       GEORGE HASEOTES,

                         Defendants.


                                         OPINION

                              Date Submitted: February  10,200O
                              Date Decided: March 6, `iXQQ


       Jesse A. Finkelstein, Catherine G. Dearlove and Janine M. Salomone, Esquires, of
       RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for
       Plaintiffs

       Judith Nichols Renzulli, Esquire, of DUANE, MORRIS  & HECKSCHER LLP,
       Wilmington,  Dellaware;  and Robert J. Valihura, Jr.,  IEsquire, of ROBERT J.
       VALIHURA, JR., P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; and William F. Griffin, Jr., Esquire,
       of DAVIS MALM  & D'AGOSTINE P.C., Boston Massachusetts; Attorneys for
       Defendants







       JACOBS, VICE: CHANCELLOR

A d

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATIE OF DELAWARE
  • Jesse A. Finkelstein, Catherine G. Dearlove and Janine M. Salomone, Esquires, of RICHARDS,
  • Judith Nichols Renzulli, Esquire, of DUANE, MORRIS & HECKSCHER LLP, Wilmington, Dellaware;
  • Pending is the plaintiffs' renewed motion for appointment of a custodian for
  • Cumberland Farms, Inc. under 8 Del.
  • principal issues are whether that statute empowers this Court to appoint a
  • custodian for a Delaware corporation where the shareholders are deadlocked on
  • The plaintiffs responded by moving for partial summary judgment on
  • plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment,
  • The Opinion granted plaintiffs leave to tile an amended complaint seeking an order under 8
  • $211 for a court-ordered election of directors.
  • a second amended complaint was filed and a stockholders meeting was held.
  • Haseotes, and the defendants Demetrios:B.
  • family directors ~who had been serving in those positions for over thirty years.
  • Although Demetrios and George were willing to elect the
  • this Court may appoint a custodian for a
  • The Proper Construction Of the Applicable Statute
  • divided that they have failed to elect successors to directors whose terms have
  • That statutory language describes
  • That the plaintiffs interpretation is the more reasonable construction is
  • As former Chancellor Allen has observed, the shareholde:r vote "...is critical to the
  • it best furthers thLat statutory scheme and the policy that underlies it.
  • any board action either by voting against proposals or by simply refusing to attend

  • 2 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF A CUSTODIAN

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CUSTODIAN
    COURT
    DIRECTORS
    DEADLOCK
    RELIEF
    APPOINTMENT
    INTERPRETATION
    ELECTION
    SUCCESSORS
    ELECT
    FACTS
    HASEOTES
    MOTION
    DEMETRIOS
    CUMBERLAND FARMS
    STATUTORY
    DISCOVERY
    DISCRETION
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    DEMONSTRATED AMPLE FACTS
    GIURICICH
    SECOND SUPP
    INDEPENDENT CUSTODIAN
    STATUTORY PREREQUISITES
    PROVISION
    BOARD SEATS
    PUBLIC POLICY
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES, and            )
    CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,
                                                   ;
                            Plaintiffs,
                                                   i          C.A. No. 17223
             V.
    
                                                   t
    DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES, and
    GEORGE HASEOTES,                               1
    
                            Defendants.
    
    
    
    
                            PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
                       THEIR MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF A CUSTODIAN
    
                                                                                 r:i.,.-  .  ..'
    
                                                  Jesse A. Finkelstein
                                                  Catherine G. Dearlove           1 --  .~
                                                  Janine M. Salomone              --'  -  __._
                                                  Richards, Layton & Finger, P./k:            -,J
                                                  One Rodney Square
                                                  P.O. Box 551
                                                  Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                  (302) 654-6541
                                                   Attorneys for Plaintiffs Lily H. Bentas,
                                                   Byron Haseotes and Cumberland
                                                   Farms, Inc.
    
    
    Dated: February 7, 2000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    RLFl-2115057-l
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
  • THEIR MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF A CUSTODIAN
  • Cumberland Farms Are "So Divided" That They Have Failed
  • Be Interpreted To Provide Relief Where The Stockholders Deadlock
  • On The Election Of Successors To Any Directors,
  • PLAINTIFFS HAVE DEMONSTRATED AMPLE FACTS TO MOVE THE COURT TO EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION
  • Lily H. Bentas and Byron Haseotes
  • of the State of Delaware against Demetrios B. Haseotes
  • On July 13, 1999, defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a
  • issued its opinion denying plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment,
  • assume that y1o independent custodian appointed to oversee the operations of Cumberland
  • See Second Supp.
  • defendants' interpretation of Section 226is inconsistent with the language,
  • Farms Are "So Divided" That Thev Have Failed To Elect Directors.
  • B at 2, ownership of 50% of the voting stock of the Company does not guarantee them one-half
  • The Statutory History And Context Require That Section 226Be
  • as public policy, in interpreting the statute.
  • Business Corporation Act's deadlock provision, as cited by defendants,= AB at 18-19, n.9,
  • Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp., Del.
  • election of successors to any one of the directors satisfies the statutory prerequisites.
  • PLAINTIFFS HAVE DEMONSTRATED AMPLE FACTS TO MOVE THE COURT TO EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION TO
  • seek further discovery, claiming for the first time that the factual record is not

  • 3 . PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF A CUSTODIAN

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    PLAINTIFFS
    HASEOTES
    CUMBERLAND FARMS
    APPOINTMENT
    DIRECTORS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    DEFENDANTS
    BENTAS
    DEL
    DELAWARE
    BYRON HASEOTES
    DEMETRIOS
    MOTION
    REMEDY
    GEORGE HASEOTES
    STOCKHOLDER DEADLOCK
    INTERPRETATION
    ELECT SUCCESSORS
    GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
    CORPORATION LAW
    DISSOLUTION
    ANNUAL MEETING
    DISCRETION
    GIURICICH
    SECOND SUPP
    STATUTORY
    ROSENMILLER
    AUTHORITIES
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES, and
    CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,
    
                            Plaintiffs,
    
             V.
    
    DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES, and
    GEORGE HASEOTES,
    
                            Defendants.
    
    
    
    
                   PLAINTIFFS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION
                               FOR APPOINTMENT OF A CUSTODIAN
    
    
    
    
    
                                                  Jesse A. Finkelstein
                                                  Catherine G. Dearlove
                                                  Janine M. Salomone
                                                  Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
                                                  One Rodney Square
                                                  P.O. Box 551
                                                  Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                  (302) 654-6541
                                                   Attorneys for .Plaintiffs  Lily H. Bentas,
                                                   Byron Haseotes and Cumberland
                                                   Farms, Inc.
    
    
    Dated: January  17,200O
    
    
    
    
    
    
    RLFI-2049361-I
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES, and
  • GEORGE HASEOTES,
  • Defendants.
  • PLAINTIFFS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION
  • FOR APPOINTMENT OF A CUSTODIAN
  • TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.
  • Less Than All Directors
  • Corporation Law Requires That Section 226Be Interpreted To Provide
  • A Remedy Where The Stockholders Have Been Unable To Elect At Least A
  • Provide A Remedy Here
  • Dissolution Of The Company Is An Inappropriate Remedy
  • It Is Inappropriate For The Court To Exercise Its Discretion To Deny
  • THE CUSTODIAN SHOULD BE EMPOWERED TO CONTINUE THE BUSINESS OF CUMBERLAND FARMS AND TO EXPLORE
  • Inc. v. Atlas Corn., Del.
  • Giuricich v. Emtrol Corn., Del.
  • Rosenmiller v. Bordes, Del.

  • 4 . DEFENDANTS MOTIN TO DISMISS 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CUSTODIAN

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    STOCKHOLDER
    MOTION
    COURT
    CUSTODIAN
    DEFENDANTS
    APPOINTMENT
    DIRECTORS
    DEL
    HASEOTES
    DEADLOCK
    DISMISS
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    CUSTODIAN PURSUANT
    MEETING
    CUMBERLAND FARMS
    BENTAS
    DISCRETION
    ELECT
    DEMETRIOS
    GEORGE HASEOTES
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    RELIEF
    EXERCISE
    DELAWARE
    RENEWED MOTION
    ELECTION
    OPPOSITION
    BYRON HASEOTES
    STATUTE
    
                     IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES and                 )
    CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,                            >>
                              Plaintiffs,              >>      C.A. No. 17223
              V .                                      >
                                                       >
    DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES and GEORGE                   >
    HASEOTES,                                          >1
                              Defendants.              >
    
                                             NOTICE OF MOTION
    
    To:       Jesse A. Finklestein, Esquire
              Catherine G. Dearlove, Esquire
              Richards, Layton & Finger
              One Rodney Square
              P.O. Box 551
              Wilmington, Delaware 19899
    
              PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants Demetrios B. Haseotes and George Haseotes,
    
    by their undersigned counsel, will present the attached Motion to Dismiss Second Amended
    
    Complaint and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Custodian at a time convenient to both
    
    Court and counsel.
    
                                                        DUANE, MORRIS  & HECKSCHER LLP
    
    
    
                                                        By:
    
    
                                                               P-0. Box 195
                                                               Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                               (302) 571-5550
                                                                       Attorneys for Defendants
    
    
    WLM\1134'78.1
    
    
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants Demetrios B. Haseotes and George Haseotes,
  • Complaint and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Custodian at a time convenient to both
  • DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
  • SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND OPPOSITION TO
  • PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF A CUSTODIAN
  • their §226claim based on the alleged stockholder deadlock.
  • motion for summary judgment and to add a claim for relief under 8 Del.
  • Bentas v. Haseotes, Del.
  • it adds allegations of a stockholder deadlock at the 1998 annual meeting (Compl.
  • The stockholders of the Company met on November 15, 1999 to elect directors.
  • that meeting, the stockholders unanimously elected plaintiffs Lily Bentas and Byron Haseotes,
  • to the board of Cumberland Farms.
  • did not receive the requisite number of votes in the election.
  • The requirements of the statute have been fulfilled and no further relief
  • Plaintiffs' claim for appointment of a custodian pursuant to 8 Del.
  • Plaintiffs' renewed motion is without merit.
  • The affirmative exercise of this Court's discretionary power to appoint a custodian in this
  • exercise its discretion in favor of the appointment of a custodian and instead,

  • 5 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    CUMBERLAND FARMS
    CUSTODIAN
    MEETING
    HASEOTES
    DIRECTORS
    DEL
    SHAREHOLDER DEADLOCK
    APPOINTMENT
    DEMETRIOS
    GEORGE HASEOTES
    DELAWARE
    STOCKHOLDERS MEETING
    SHARES
    BYRON HASEOTES
    WILMINGTON
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    SIBLINGS
    FAMILY DIRECTORS
    FIRST CLAIM
    COURT-ORDERED SHAREHOLDERS MEETING
    INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
    FAMILY MEMBERS
    ELECTION
    CHANCERY
    ATTORNEYS
    VALIHURA
    MASSACHUSETTS
    
                                                                                _"  ,,'
                                                                                 /Il.
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE i--~- ">
    
                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES :
    and CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC., :
    
                      Plaintiffs,
                                                     C.A. No. 17223
    
    DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES and
    GEORGE HASEOTES,
    
                      Defendants.
    
    
                              MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
                           Date Submitted: October 26, 1999
                           Date Decided: November 5, 1999
    
    Jesse A. Finkelstein, Catherine G. Dearlove and Janine M. Salomone, Esquires, of
    RICHARDS, LAYTON  & FINGER, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for
    Plaintiffs
    
    Judith Nichols Renzulli, Esquire, of DUANE, MORRIS  & HECKSCHER LLP,
    Wilmington, Delaware; and Robert  J. Valihura, Jr., Esquire, of ROBERT J.
    VALIHURA, JR., P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; and William F. Griffin, Jr., Esquire,
    of DAVIS MALM  & D'AGOSTINE P.C., Boston, Massachusetts; Attorneys for
    Defendants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    JACOBS, VICE CHANCELLOR
    
    
    
           This action, brought under 8 Del. C. § 226, seeks the appointment of a
    
    custodian for Cumberland Farms, Inc. ((`the company"), a family-owned and
    
    controlled Delaware corporation that owns or leases and operates convenience
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE i--~- ">
  • LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES:
  • and CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,:
  • Jesse A. Finkelstein, Catherine G. Dearlove and Janine M. Salomone, Esquires, of RICHARDS,
  • Judith Nichols Renzulli, Esquire, of DUANE, MORRIS & HECKSCHER LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; and
  • This action, brought under 8 Del.
  • for the appointment of a custodian by reason of a
  • board of directors that a custodian should be appointed immediately.
  • `The motion to dismiss was originally directed to both claims for relief alleged in the
  • The defendants also informed the Court that they were withdrawing their motion to dismiss the
  • Because the Court has determined that summary judgment with respect to the first claim should
  • The litigants in this proceeding are four siblings who are the children of the
  • Haseotes Bentas and Byron Haseotes,
  • siblings, Demetrios Haseotes and George Haseotes, are
  • 2Cumberland Farms' capital structure consists of 200,008 shares of common stock, of which 8
  • District of Massachusetts.
  • "Independent Directors" plus the four " Family Directors."
  • Since then the Cumberland Farms board has consisted of the four family members,
  • calling for the election of the four Family Directors as the de jure Cumberland
  • on their shareholder deadlock claim.
  • The Court of Chancery, upon application of any stockholder,
  • any court-ordered shareholders meeting under 8 Del.

  • 6 . AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DIRECTORS
    CUMBERLAND FARMS
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    HASEOTES
    GEORGE
    BUSINESS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    MANAGEMENT
    BYRON
    REORGANIZATION PLAN
    BENTAS
    VOTE
    INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    REQUIRED VOTE
    TRANSAMERICA
    BANKRUPTCY COURT
    ELECT SUCCESSOR
    ANNUAL MEETING
    ADVERSARY PROCEEDING
    MASSACHUSETTS
    COMMON STOCK
    VOTING COMMON STOCK
    OBLIGATIONS
    EXPIRATION
    APPOINTMENT
    DIVIDED RESPECTING
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    LILY H.  BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES and  )
    CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,
                                                              ;
                              Plaintiffs,                     >          CA. No. 17223
            V.                                                ;
    
    DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES and
    GEORGE HASEOTES,
    
                              Defendants.
    
                                             AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
             Plaintiffs Lily H.  Bentas,  Byron Haseotes and Cumberland Farms, Inc. (jointly, the
    
    "Plaintiffs"), by and through their undersigned attorneys, upon knowledge as to their own conduct
    
    and upon information and belief as to all other matters, allege for their Amended Complaint1  as
    
    follows:
    
                                             NATURE OF THE ACTION
    
                1.     In this action, Plaintiffs seek appointment of a custodian or custodians
    
    8 Del. C. 5 226(a) to manage the business and affairs of Cumberland Farms, Inc. ("Cumberland
    
    Farms" or the "Company") whose (i) stockholders are equally divided and unable to elect successor
    
    directors of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") and (ii) Board is so divided respecting
    
    the management of the business and affairs of the Company that the required vote for action of the
    
    Board cannot be obtained and the stockholders are unable to terminate this division.
    
    
                `This amended complaint is filed pursuant to the Court's oral ruling of October 26, 1999
    granting plaintiffs leave to file their Amended Complaint. Pursuant to Chancery Court Rule 15(aa),
    a blacklined version of this Amended Complaint indicating the changes from the original complaint
    filed in this action is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
    
    RLFl-2073968-l
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES and)
  • Plaintiffs Lily H. Bentas, Byron Haseotes and Cumberland Farms, Inc. (jointly, the
  • Plaintiffs seek appointment of a custodian or custodians pursuant to
  • 5 226to manage the business and affairs of Cumberland Farms,
  • directors of the Company's Board of Directors and Board is so divided respecting
  • the management of the business and affairs of the Company that the required vote for action
  • Board cannot be obtained and the stockholders are unable to terminate this division.
  • `This amended complaint is filed pursuant to the Court's oral ruling of October 26, 1999
  • Cumberland Farms' capital structure consists of 200,008 authorized shares of common stock.
  • Plaintiff Lily Bentas is a resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
  • representing 25% of the outstanding voting common stock of the Company.
  • Defendant Demetrios Haseotes is a resident of the State of Rhode
  • Defendant George Haseotes ("George" and together with Demetrios,
  • "Defendants") is a resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
  • Chapter 11 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts (Western
  • Reorganization Plan, the Company made quarterly installment payments to principal, paying
  • concerned about Demetrios' continued involvement in the management of Cumberland Farms.
  • provided that if all obligations under
  • paid in ml1 at the expiration of such 4-year term,
  • and the appointment of the Independent Directors as specified by the Reorganization Plan.
  • adversary proceeding, styled Cumberland Farms.
  • outline and threatened the Independent Directors with legal action if they allowed the
  • At the 1998 annual meeting of stockholders, held on February 6, 1998, the
  • The vote on the election was recorded in the contemporaneous
  • Defendants attempted to act by written consent to elect successor directors.

  • 7 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    MOTION
    DIRECTORS
    CUMBERLAND FARMS
    DEFENDANTS
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    HASEOTES
    STOCKHOLDERS
    DEADLOCK
    PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    SUPPORT
    ANNUAL MEETING
    ELECT
    ELECTION
    GEORGE HASEOTES
    CUSTODIAN
    INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
    BENTAS AFF
    FAMILY DIRECTORS
    APPOINTMENT
    VOTING STOCKHOLDERS
    SHAREHOLDER DEADLOCK
    SUCCESSOR DIRECTORS
    CERTIFICATE
    AUTHORITIES
    GUIRICICH
    DEMETRIOS
    DAB
    AFFIDAVITS
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES and             >
    CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,
                                                   ;
                            Plaintiffs,
                                                   i          C.A. No. 17223
            V.
    
                                                   I
    DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES and                      >
    GEORGE HASEOTES,
                                                   ,'
                            Defendants.            >
    
    
    
                              PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT
                      OF THEIR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                  Jesse A. Finkelstein
                                                  Catherine G. Dearlove
                                                  Janine M. Salomone
                                                  Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
                                                  One Rodney Square
                                                  P.O. Box 55 1
                                                  Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                   Attorneys for Plaintiffs Lily H. Bentas,
                                                   Byron Haseotes and Cumberland
                                                   Farms, Inc.,
    
    
    
    Dated: October 22, 1999
    
    
    
    
    RLFl-2071900-1
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • GEORGE HASEOTES,
  • PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT
  • OF THEIR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  • The Stockholders Were Unable To Elect Successor Directors
  • At The 1999 Annual Meeting.
  • Defendants' Willingness To Elect The Four Family Directors Does
  • Not Dernonstrate The Absence Of Deadlock.
  • THERE IS NO LEGAL BASIS FOR THE COURT TO DENY RELIEF.
  • -i-TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
  • Guiricich v. Emtrol Corp., Del.
  • On June 11,1999, Cumberland Farms, Inc.,
  • On July 13, 1999, defendants Demetrios B. Haseotes and George
  • On September 1, 1999, plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment,
  • seeking summary judgment on their claim for the appointment of a custodian or custodians
  • This is plaintiffs' reply brief in support of their motion for partial summary judgment.
  • DAB at 13.
  • affidavits, to the contrary, establish that the only facts material to a claim under
  • any meeting held for the election of directors the stockholders are so divided that they have

  • 8 . ANSWERING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    DIRECTORS
    MOTION
    CUSTODIAN
    STOCKHOLDER
    DEL
    APPOINTMENT
    MEETING
    AFF
    STOCKHOLDER DEADLOCK
    FAMILY DIRECTORS
    ELECTION
    HASEOTES
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    CERTIFICATE
    DEMETRIOS
    CUMBERLAND FARMS
    REORGANIZATION
    AFFIDAVITS
    LILY BENTAS
    INCORPORATION
    OPPOSITION
    BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
    PROPOSALS
    GEORGE HASEOTES
    MANAGEMENT
    UNSECURED CREDITORS
    DEFENDANTS DISPUTE
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES and        )
    CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,                   >>
                        Plaintiffs,           >1      C.A. No. 17223
          v.                                  )                                         ,-
                                                                             TV  :
                                               >
    DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES and GEORGE           >
    HASEOTES,                                  >                                       i  I,
                                               >
                        Defendants.                                                    . _
                                               >                                      Cd :;
                                                                        ;             . I
                                                                        .             .r-`\>
                                                                              -       -we
                              ANSWERING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS
                         IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION
                                  FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
    
    
    
                                          DUANE, MORRIS & HECKSCHER LLP
                                               Judith Nichols Renzulli, Esquire
                                               1201 Market Street, Suite 1500
                                               P.O. Box 195
                                               Wilmington, Delaware 19801-o 195
                                               (302) 571-5550
                                                      Attorneys for Defendants
                                                      Demetrios B. Haseotes and
                                                      George Haseotes
    
    
    
    Dated: October 8, 1999
    
    
    
                                                     TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    I.        NATURE AND STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION
  • Paulman v. Kritzer Radiant Coils, Inc., Del.
  • 0 226against defendants Demetrios B. Haseotes and George Haseotes
  • Plaintiffs seek the appointment of a custodian or an additional five
  • directors to the Board of Directors of Cumberland Farms.
  • plaintiffs allege the existence of both stockholder and director deadlocks.
  • meeting, the stockholders were so divided that they failed to elect successor directors;
  • motion for partial summary judgment under Section 226relying on four affidavits
  • defendants' motion to dismiss and plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment at the same
  • outside directors to oversee the management of Cumberland Farms,
  • ' The affidavits of Demetrios Haseotes and George Haseotes are referenced as "D.H.
  • Aff.`" respectively.
  • The plan of reorganization of Cumberland Farms terminated at the end of December
  • Defendants dispute plaintiffs' allegation that the stockholders were deadlocked in 1998
  • with respect to the election of the four family directors of Cumberland Farms.
  • The certificate of incorporation as amended during the bankruptcy proceedings,
  • There are no proposals for Board
  • plaintiff Lily Bentas is President and CEO of the company and has the authority to manage the
  • judgment on the issue of stockholder deadlock.
  • unsecured creditors to appoint five additional outside directors to represent their interests

  • 9 . REPLY BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MEETING
    DEL
    STOCKHOLDERS
    DIRECTORS
    SUPPORT
    MOTION
    ALLEGE
    IRREPARABLE HARM
    DISMISS
    ELECT DIRECTORS
    ALLEGATIONS
    COMPLAINT
    COURT
    VALIHURA
    BOSTON
    DEFENDANTS
    WILMINGTON
    INSUFFICIENT
    APPOINTMENT
    CUSTODIAN
    DEADLOCK
    CONCLUSORY
    KILBURN ROAD
    DAVIS MALM
    NATURE
    MOLD PROCESS
    DEFICIENT
    ELECTION
    SUCCESSOR DIRECTORS
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                  :'
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES and           )
    CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,                      >>
                          Plaintiffs,            >>       C.A. No. 17223
           V .                                   >
    
                                                 >
    DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES and GEORGE             >
    HASEOTES,                                    >
    
                          Defendants.            1
    
                                  REPLY BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS
                          IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
    
                                                 DUANE, MORRIS  & HECKSCHER LLP
                                                 Judith Nichols Renzulli, Esquire
                                                 1201 Market Street, Suite 1500
                                                 P.O. Box 195
                                                 Wilmington, Delaware 19801-o 195
                                                 (302) 571-5550
                                                       Attorneys for Defendants,
                                                       Demetrios B. Haseotes and
                                                       George Haseotes
    Of Counsel:
    ROBERT J. VALIHURA, JR., P.A.
    Robert J. Valihura, Jr.
    7 18 Kilburn Road
    Wilmington, DE 19803
    (302) 477-0437
    
    Of Counsel:
    DAVIS MALM  & D'AGOSTINE P.C.
    William F. Griffin, Jr.
    One Boston Place
    Boston, MA 02108
    (617) 367-2500
    
    Dated: September 13, 1999
    
    
    
                                                      TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS
  • ROBERT J. VALIHURA, JR., P.A. Robert J. Valihura, Jr.
  • 18 Kilburn Road Wilmington,
  • DAVIS MALM & D'AGOSTINE P.C. William F. Griffin,
  • One Boston Place Boston, MA 02108
  • NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS,.
  • Plaintiffs Do No Allege That The Corporation's Stockholders Were
  • Unable To Elect Directors At A Meeting Held For That Purpose
  • Irreparable Harm Are Insufficient To State A Claim Under
  • Full Mold Process, Inc., Del.
  • Brown v. Perrette, et al., Del.
  • At the same time, in a tacit admission that their complaint was deficient on its face,
  • answering brief on Defendants' motion to dismiss, arguments in support of their motion for
  • Plaintiffs' Allegations Of Stockholder Deadlock Are Deficient Because Plaintiffs Do Not
  • concede that no meeting for the election of directors has taken place.
  • failure to allege that an actual meeting took place and that successor directors were not
  • The plaintiffs, who were seeking the appointment of a custodian under Section 226, had
  • The Court determined that Plaintiffs had established a right to relief under Section
  • Plaintiffs fail to acknowledge is the teaching of numerous cases holding that conclusory

  • 10 . PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSTION TO MOTION TO DISMISS & OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTOIN FOR PARTIAL SUMM. JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    MOTION
    FACTS
    CUSTODIAN
    COURT
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    APPOINTMENT
    STOCKHOLDERS
    MEETING
    DISMISS
    DIRECTORS
    DEL
    DEADLOCK
    SUPPORT
    COMP
    CUMBERLAND FARMS
    BENTAS AFF
    COMPLAINT
    PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    DEMETRIOS
    ELECT SUCCESSOR DIRECTORS
    IRREPARABLE HARM
    ADEQUATELV
    ANNUAL MEETING
    MANAGEMENT
    AUTHORITIES
    PETROWSKI AFF
    AFFIDAVITS
    MATERIAL FACT
    
                       IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES, and             >
    CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,                         >>
                             Plaintiffs,            >>         C.A. No. 17223
              V.                                    >
                                                    >
    DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES, and                      >
    GEORGE HASEOTES,                                >>
                             Defendants.            >
    
    
    
    
             PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
                       MOTION TO DISMISS AND OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT
                    OF THEIR CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
    
    
    
    
                                                   Jesse A. Finkelstein
                                                   Catherine G. Dearlove
                                                   Janine M. Salomone
                                                   Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
                                                   One Rodney Square
                                                   P.O. Box 551
                                                   Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                   (302) 654-6541
                                                    `4ttorneys for Plaintiffs Lily H. Bentas,
                                                    Byron Haseotes and Cumberland
                                                    Farms, Inc.
    
    
    Dated: September 1, 1999
    
    
    
    
    RI.Fl-2046749-1
    
    
    
                                                  TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
  • MOTION TO DISMISS AND OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT
  • OF THEIR CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  • TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.
  • OF FACTS
  • APPOINTMENT OF A CUSTODIAN IS WARRANTED.
  • THE COMPLAINT ADEQUATELY PLECADS A CLAIM FOR RELIEF
  • Del.
  • bre Cumberland Farms, Inc., 181 B.R. 678 (Bar&r.

  • 11 . OPENING BRIEF OD DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEL
    COMPLAINT
    DEADLOCK
    IRREPARABLEHARM
    COURT
    PLAINTIFFS
    DIRECTORS
    MEETING
    PLAINTIFFS ALLEGE
    CHANCERY
    DELAWARE
    BUSINESS
    DEFENDANTS
    CUMBERLAND FARMS
    ELECT SUCCESSOR DIRECTORS
    IRREPARABLE HARM
    ALLEGATIONS
    CUSTODIAN
    WRITTEN CONSENT
    PROCEEDING
    MANAGEMENT
    DIVIDED RESPECTING
    VOTING STOCKHOLDERS
    STRATEGIC PLAN
    IMMINENT IRREPARABLE HARM
    ANNUAL MEETING
    APPOINTMENT
    SUFFERING
    CONCLUSORY ALLEGATIONS
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES and            )
    CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,                       >>
                         Plaintiffs,              >>       C.A. No. 17223
          V .                                     >
    
                                                  >
    DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES and GEORGE               >
    HASEOTES,                                      >>
                         Defendants.               >                                    _  I
    
                                  OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS
                              IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS                     ;  :
    
                                                   DUANE, MORRIS & HECKSCHER LLP
                                                   Judith Nichols Renzulli, Esquire
                                                    120 1 Market Street, Suite 1500
                                                   P.O. Box 195
                                                   Wilmington, Delaware 19801-o 195
                                                   (302) 571-5550
                                                           Attorneys for Defendants
                                                           Demetrios B. Haseotes and
                                                           George Haseotes
    
    
    Dated: August 18, 1999
    
    
    
                                                       TABL,E OF CONTENTS
    
    
    TABLEOFCITATIONS . .  .._..................................................
                                                                                                       
    
    NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    ARGUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
              I.         There Has Been No Meeting Or Other Effort To Elect Successor Directors
                         and No Resulting Stockholder Deadlock Under 8 Del. C. 8 226(a)(l) . . . . . .
              II.        The Allegations of Plaintiffs' Complaint Fail to Show That the Directors
                         Are Deadlocked and That, As a Result, The Company Is Threatened With
                         IrreparableHarm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IrreparableHarm.
  • Full Mold Process, Inc., Del.
  • On June 11, 1999, Lily H. Bentas and Byron Haseotes (jointly, the "plaintiffs") filed this
  • directors to the Board of Directors of Cumberland Farms.
  • with irreparable harm because the Board is so divided respecting the management of the
  • On July 13, 1999, defendants filed a motion pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 12
  • to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
  • ' Plaintiffs also purported to join Cumberland Farms, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as a
  • and gas station business in New England,
  • Plaintiffs allege the existence of both stockholder and director deadlocks and seek
  • result of the reorganization of the Company in a bankruptcy proceeding.
  • perspective under its current management.
  • ' Defendants emphatically dispute the so-called "background" allegations, which comprise over
  • In any event, according to plaintiffs, the alleged director deadlock on these
  • Plaintiffs seek the appointment of a custodian or of additional directors pursuant to 8 &l.
  • Plaintiffs' claim of stockholder deadlock and inability to elect successor directors is
  • They cite no meeting at which an attempt to elect directors failed.
  • by written consent, a practice permitted by statute and commonly used in closely held,
  • necessary business decisions has caused or threatened irreparable harm to the Company.
  • is suffering irreparable harm or that threatened irreparable harm is imminent.
  • whether to appoint Custodian until after actual vote at next annual meeting).
  • Plaintiffs do not allege that an actual meeting of Cumberland Farms' voting stockholders
  • The Complaint alleges no present or imminent irreparable harm.
  • of the Company," stating that the Company is operating without a "strategic plan or focus,"
  • and conclusory allegations of imminent irreparable harm are no more than speculative.

  • 12 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DIRECTORS
    CUMBERLAND FARMS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    HASEOTES
    DEFENDANTS
    GEORGE
    BUSINESS
    MANAGEMENT
    STOCKHOLDERS
    REORGANIZATION PLAN
    BYRON
    BENTAS
    INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
    AFFAIRS
    REQUIRED VOTE
    BANKRUPTCY COURT
    TRANSAMERICA
    ATTORNEYS
    CUSTODIAN
    ELECT SUCCESSOR
    MASSACHUSETTS
    ADVERSARY PROCEEDING
    COMMON STOCK
    AGREEMENT
    EXECUTIVES
    OBLIGATIONS
    EXPIRATION
    DIVIDED RESPECTING
    
                     IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF
    
                                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    LILY H. BENTAS, BYRON HASEOTES, and
    CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC.,
    
                             Plaintiffs,
    
            V.
    
    DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES and GEORGE
    HASEOTES,
    
                             Defendants.
    
    
                                                 COMPLAINT
    
    
            Plaintiffs Lily ,H. Bentas, Byron Haseotes and Cumberland Farms, Inc. (jointly, the
    
    "Plaintiffs"), by and through their undersigned attorneys, upon knowledge as to their own conduct
    
    and upon information and belief as to all other matters, allege for their Complaint as follows:
    
                                            NATURE OF THE ACTION
    
             1.       In this action, Plaintiffs seek appointment of a custodian or custodians pursuant
    
    8 Del. C. 0 226(a) to manage the business and affairs of Cumberland Farms, Inc. ("Cumberland
    
    Farms" or the "Company") whose (i) stockholders are equally divided and unable to elect successor
    
    directors of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") and (ii) Board is so divided respecting
    
    the management of the business and affairs of the Company that the required vote for action of the
    
    Board cannot be obtained and the stockholders are unable to terminate this division.
    
                                                  PARTIES
    
             2.       Plaintiff Cumberland Farms is a corporation organized and existing under the laws
    
    of the State of Delaware. The Company's principal executive offices are located at 777 Dedham
    
    RLFl-145777-S
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • DEMETRIOS B. HASEOTES and GEORGE
  • Plaintiffs Lily,H.
  • Bentas, Byron Haseotes and Cumberland Farms, Inc. (jointly, the
  • "Plaintiffs"), by and through their undersigned attorneys, upon knowledge as to their own
  • 0 226to manage the business and affairs of Cumberland Farms,
  • Farms" or the "Company") whose stockholders are equally divided and unable to elect successor
  • directors of the Company's Board of Directors and Board is so divided respecting
  • the management of the business and affairs of the Company that the required vote for action
  • Board cannot be obtained and the stockholders are unable to terminate this division.
  • Cumberland Farms' capital structure consists of 200,008 authorized shares of common stock.
  • Plaintiff Lily Bentas is a resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
  • Defendant Demetrios Haseotes is a resident of the State of Rhode
  • "Defendants") is a resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
  • Chapter 11 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts (Western
  • Reorganization Plan, the Company made quarterly installment payments to principal, paying
  • concerned about Demetrios' continued involvement in the management of Cumberland Farms.
  • provided that if all obligations under
  • paid in full at the expiration of such 4-year term,
  • and the appointment of the Independent Directors as specified by the Reorganization Plan.
  • adversary proceeding, styled Cumberland Farms.
  • agreement to be used for working capital.
  • of a loan agreement that the Company had negotiated with its proposed lender, Transamerica
  • attempted to terminate unilaterally the employment of one of the Company's most senior
  • Oil, L.P., as custodian with authority limited to the power to vote in the event of a
  •    |