LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

PHELPS DODGE v CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,398, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: PHELPS DODGE, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017398, Cyprus Amax, Asarco, Phelps Dodge, Merger, Merger Agreement, Directors, Proposals, Shareholders, Mcallister, Stockholders, Ward, Transaction, Fiduciary Duties, Common Stock, Vote, Cyprus Amax Rights, Provisions, Stock, Allegation Set, Delaware Corporation, Superior, Market, Act, Rights Agreement, Injunction, Terminate, Termination Fee, Non-premium Proposed Merger, Acquisition, Poison Pill, Consummation, Asarco Rights Plan, Preferred Stock, Cav Corporation, Aav Corporation, Executive Officer , ContentID: 120239710

Case Documents
1 1999-09-27 RULING OF THE COURT ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100246
5 pages
PDF
2 1999-09-09 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101761
39 pages
PDF
3 1999-08-27 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101762
34 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 78 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . RULING OF THE COURT ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DUTY
COURT
CHANCERY
CYPRUS AMAX
REASONABLENESS
DELAWARE
ASARCO
CARE
SUCCESS
MERITS
STRETCH
MOTION
WILMINGTON
DODGE
LEGAL EQUIVALENT
WILLFUL
OLINDNESS
BLINDNESS
BREACH
MATERIAL INFORMATION
UNOCAL CLAIM
TERMINATION FEE
BREAKING
DESPITE PLAINTIFFS
SHOWING
PROBABILITY
IRREPARABLE INJURY WILI
INJUNCTION
CHANCERY COURT REPORTERS
            IN  THE COURT  OF  CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
I                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
          PHELPS-DODGE-CORPORATION,   :
          et al.,
                                             :
                              Plaintiffs,
                                             :
                      vs.                         Civil Action'
                                             :       No. 17398
          CYPRUS  AMAX MINERALS
          COMPANY, a Delaware                :
          corporation, et al.,
                                             :
                              Defendants.

     /                                 -  -  -

                                       Chancery Courtroom No. 2
                                       Herrmann Courthouse
                                       Wilmington, Delaware
                                       Monday, September 27, 1999


          BEFORE:    HON. WILLIAM B. CHANDLER, III, Chancellor.


               RULING OF THE COURT ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION
                              FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION










                              CHANCERY COURT REPORTERS
                               135  Herrmann Courthouse
                             Wilmington, Delaware  13801
                                   (302) 577-2447



          1              demonstrate that there is a reasonable threat of
)
          2              LrreparabKe  injury should the injunction not be

SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS
  • RULING OF THE COURT ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION
  • Wilmington, Delaware 13801
  • that Cyprus Amax and Asarco are under no duty to
  • 4- ?helps Dodge.
  • as this is the legal equivalent of willful
  • olindness, a blindness that may constitute a breach
  • of a board"s duty of care; that is,
  • 9:are to be informed of all material information
  • success on the merits with respect to the plaintiffs'
  • 14 required that I reach their Unocal claim.
  • 16 to the termination fee as being unduly coercive,
  • 18 stretch the definition of range of reasonableness and
  • 19 probably stretches the definition beyond its breaking
  • 1 despite plaintiffs' showing of a reasonable
  • 22 probability of success on the merits,
  • 24 this injunction is not granted.
  • CHANCERY COURT REPORTERS

  • 2 . AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ASARCO
    PHELPS DODGE
    MERGER
    DIRECTORS
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    MCALLISTER
    PLAINTIFFS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    CYPRUS AMAX RIGHTS
    COMMON STOCK
    WARD
    DEFENDANTS
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    ACT
    STOCKHOLDERS
    PROVISIONS
    ALLEGATION SET
    TRANSACTION
    POISON PILL
    INJUNCTION
    CONSUMMATION
    ASARCO RIGHTS PLAN
    PREFERRED STOCK
    TERMINATION FEE
    CAV CORPORATION
    AAV CORPORATION
    NON-PREMIUM PROPOSED MERGER
    OUTSTANDING
    
                                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
              PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION,                       >
              a New York corporation, CAV                     >
              CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation )
              and AAV CORPORATION, a Delaware                 >
              corporation,                                    >)
                                              Plaintiffs,     >>
                                       V. ) C.A. No. 17398
                                                              >
              CYPRUS  AMAX MINERALS COMPANY,                  )
              a Delaware corporation, Milton H. Ward,         1
              Linda G. Alvarado, George S. Ansell, Rockwell )
              A. Schnabel, Thomas V. Falkie, Ann Maynard )
              Gray, Theodore M. Solso, John H. Stookey,       )
              Billie B. Turner, ASARCO INCORPORATED, )
              a New Jersey corporation, Francis R.            >
              McAllister, Richard de J. Osborne, Vincent A. )
              Calarco, John D. Ong, Kevin R. Morano,          >
              Michael T. Nelligan, Manuel T. Pacheco,         >
              James Wood, James C. Cotting, David C.          >
              Garfield and James Kinnear,                     )>
                                              Defendants. )
    
                                              AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
                                       DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    
                                 Plaintiffs Phelps Dodge Corporation, CAV Corporation and AAV
    
              (collectively, "Phelps Dodge"), by and through their undersigned attorneys, upon
    
              themselves and their own acts and upon information and belief as to all other matters,
    
              follows:
    
                                                 NATURE OF THE ACTION
    
                                 1. On July 15,1999,  ASARCO Incorporated ("ASARCO") and Cyprus  Amax
    
              Minerals Company ("Cyprus Amax") announced a non-premium proposed merger (the "ASARCO
    
    
              RLFI-2049004-2
    1-i-1;
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs Phelps Dodge Corporation, CAV Corporation and AAV Corporation
  • On July 15,1999, ASARCO Incorporated and Cyprus Amax
  • Minerals Company ("Cyprus Amax") announced a non-premium proposed merger (the "ASARCO
  • Their merger agreement -- which was not publicly
  • prohibit directors of a Delaware corporation and aNew Jersey corporation from receiving,
  • Dodge until the stockholders of both companies vote on the ASARCO
  • It cannot be terminated to pursue a clearly superior transaction, such as the threeway
  • The Merger Agreement's "No Solicitation" provisions -- in reality, "no-see,
  • CAV Corporation owns 100 shares of common stock of Cyprus Amax.
  • owes fiduciary duties to Cyprus Amax and its shareholders.
  • Defendant Francis R. McAllister has been Chairman and Chief
  • Defendants Richard de J. Osborne, Vincent A. Calarco, John D. Ong, Kevin
  • Ward, Cyprus Amax's Chairman,
  • "all of the outstanding common stock of both
  • while abandoning their duties to act in the best interests of their companies and
  • is a grossly excessive termination fee and, in the case of ASARCO, would amount to 6% of its
  • consummation of the merger.
  • "Cyprus Amax Rights Agreement or the "Cyprus Amax Poison Pill"),
  • represents the right to purchase l/100 of a share of Series A Preferred Stock at a price of
  • amends the Cyprus Amax Poison Pill.
  • "ASARCO Rights Plan" or "ASARCO Poison Pill"), which was amended on September 24, 1992.
  • Plaintiffs repeat and reallege each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs
  • an injunction compelling Ward,

  • 3 . COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ASARCO
    MERGER
    PHELPS DODGE
    PROPOSALS
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    DIRECTORS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    VOTE
    TRANSACTION
    DEFENDANTS
    WARD
    STOCK
    SUPERIOR
    MARKET
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    RIGHTS AGREEMENT
    PLAINTIFFS
    TERMINATE
    COMMON STOCK
    ACQUISITION
    PROVISIONS
    ALLEGATION SET
    MCALLISTER
    EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    INJUNCTION
    AMAX MINERALS COMPANY
    NON-PREMIUM PROPOSED MERGER
    TERMINATION FEE
    
    j , / 5.:                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    !l `L
    i"l
                                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
                 PHELPS DODGE; CORPORATION,                      >
                 a New York corporation and                      >
                 CAV CORPORATION, a Delaware                     >
                 corporation,                                    >>
                                                  Plaintiff,     )
    
                                           V.
                                                                 >
                 CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS                            >
                 COMPANY, a Delaware corporation,                1      COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY
                 Milton H. Ward, Linda G. Alvarado,              >      AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
                 George S. Ansell, Rockwell A. Schnabel,         )
                 Thomas V. Falkie, Ann Maynard Gray,             )
                 Theodore M. Solso, John H. Stookey,             >
                 Billie B. Turner and                            >
                 ASARCO INCORPORATED, a                          >
                 New Jersey corporation,                         >>
                                                  Defendants.  )
    
                                    Plaintiffs Phelps Dodge Corporation and CAV Corporation
    
                 Dodge"), by and through their undersigned attorneys, upon knowledge as to themselves
    
                 own acts and upon information and belief as to all other matters, allege as follows:
    
                                                     NATUIRJX OF THE ACTION
    
                                    1.     On July 15, 1999, ASARCO Incorporated ("ASARCO") and Cyprus
    
                 Amax Minerals Company ("Cyprus  Amax")  announced a non-premium proposed merger (the
    
                 "ASARCO Cyprus Merger"). Their merger agreement (the "Merger Agreement")  - which was
    
                 not publicly disclosed until August 20, more than a month after the announcement - is
    
                 It purports to prohibit directors of a Delaware corporation from receiving, gathering,
    
                 ex.changing information concerning any merger or acquisition proposal by Phelps Dodge
    
                 RLFI-2049004-1
    
    
    
    other interested party) until the stockholders of both companies vote on the ASARCO Cyprus
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Amax Minerals Company ("Cyprus Amax") announced a non-premium proposed merger (the
  • "ASARCO Cyprus Merger").
  • Their merger agreement - which was
  • ex.changing information concerning any merger or acquisition proposal by Phelps Dodge (or any
  • other interested party) until the stockholders of both companies vote on the ASARCO Cyprus
  • It cannot be terminated to pursue a clearly superior transaction,
  • combination proposed by Phelps Dodge.
  • The Merger Agreernent's "No Solicitation" provisions - in reality, "nosee, no-hear, no-talk"
  • The directors of Cyprus Amax
  • CAV Corporation owns 100 shares of common stock of Cyprus Amax.
  • and owes fiduciary duties to Cyprus Amax and its shareholders.
  • Turner (the "Director Defendants") are current directors of Cyprus Amax and all owe fiduciary
  • breaches of fiduciary duty against ASARCO, its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Francis
  • R. McAllister, and its directors in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey.
  • Ward, Cyprus Amax's
  • The market reaction to the proposed no-premium merger was hardly
  • provisions that reflect patent violations of the fiduciary duties owed by the boards of ASARCO
  • 39" Section 7.1 of the Merger Agreement permits ASARCO to terminate
  • Amax or ASARCO could be subjected to this severe Termination Fee simply because,
  • Amax are not allowed to consider superior offers or proposals and are thereby restrained from
  • Cyprus Amax's Failure to Redeem or Amend its Shareholder Rights Agreement
  • damages and Plaintiffs, as well as other ASARCO and Cyprus Amax shareholders, have no
  • Plaintiffs repeat and reallege each and every allegation set forth in
  • thernselves adequately and to consider the Phelps Dodge proposal; an injunction compelling
  •    |