LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ACE v CAPITAL RE Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,488, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: THE QUESTION THAT OCCUPIES THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT ON AN APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY, Plaintiff: ACE, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017488, Merger Agreement, Ace, Capitals, Terminate, Proposals, Directors, Stockholders, Restraining Order, Del, Delaware, Temporary Restraining Order, Transaction, Motion, Contract, Written Advice, Superior, Fiduciary Duties, Bid, Breach, Provision, Shares, Acquisition, Negotiations, Silver Decl, Reinsurance, Tro, Irreparable Harm, Termination, Plaintiff Ace, Strine, Preliminary Injunction, Honorable Leo, Shareholders, Memorandum, Vice Chancellor, Consummation, Ace Contends, Binding, Compl, Negotiate , ContentID: 120239705

Case Documents
1 1999-10-28 OPINION (REVISED
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100238
37 pages
PDF
2 1999-10-25 LETTER TO V.C. STRINE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102702
9 pages
PDF
3 1999-10-25 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100239
36 pages
PDF
4 1999-10-24 DEFENDANTS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102703
26 pages
PDF
5 1999-10-22 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102704
20 pages
PDF
6 1999-10-21 VERIFIED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101708
14 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 6 documents , 142 pages
Price: $ 44.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION (REVISED)

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
ACE
TERMINATE
DIRECTORS
STOCKHOLDERS
CONTRACT
BID
SUPERIOR
DELAWARE
TRANSACTION
MOTION
ACE CONTENDS
PLAINTIFF
CASH
SHARES
PROVISION
TRO
WRITTEN ADVICE
VICE CHANCELLOR
ACQUISITION
CONSUMMATION
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
TERMINATION
NEGOTIATIONS
QVC
SILVER AFF
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
RESTRAINING ORDER
NEGOTIATE
       IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                  /;T
                                                                                         /! CL;-a
                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


ACE LIMITED, a Cayman Islands limited )
liability company,                                >
                               Plaintiff,         >>
                      V.                          >
                                                  >     Civil Action No. 1748&
CAPITAL RE CORPORATION,                                                     . j
                                                  >
a Delaware Corporation,                                                     . `/
                                                  >                         P i . -i4
                                                  >                          I *
                               Defendant.         >                          $?; ->
                                                                    _. -     c  .:

                                             OPINION

                              Date Submitted: October 25, 1999
                              Date Decided: October 25, 1999
                               Date Revised: October 28, 1999

Gregory P. Williams, Esquire, Robert J. Steam, Jr., Esquire,  Megan Semple
Greenberg, Esquire, of RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, Wilmington, Delaware,
Attorneys for Plaintiffs.


Kenneth J. Nachbar, Esquire, of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT  & TUNNELL,
Wilmington, Delaware, Attorney for Defendants.


STRINE, Vice Chancellor






      Plaintiff ACE Limited ("ACE") has filed a motion requesting a

temporary restraining order ("TRO") against defendant Capital Re

Corporation ("Capital Re"). ACE requests that I issue an order that restrains

Capital Re from taking any action to terminate the June 10, 1999 Agreement

and Plan of Merger between and among ACE, Capital Re, and CapRe
SNIPPETS:
  • ACE LIMITED, a Cayman Islands limited)
  • Kenneth J. Nachbar, Esquire, of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL, Wilmington, Delaware,
  • Capital Re from taking any action to terminate the June 10,
  • Acquisition Corporation.
  • directors wishes to terminate the Merger Agreement and accept an all cash,
  • all shares bid that it believes is financially superior to the Merger
  • ACE contends that Capital Re cannot,
  • Agreement's no-talk and termination provisions,
  • provision is likely invalid; and because the risk of harm to Capital Re
  • stockholders outweighs the need to protect ACE from irreparable injury,
  • deny ACE's motion.
  • merger if the Capital Re board of directors did not terminate the Merger
  • Communications v. QVC,3 the merger is obviously a transaction of great
  • Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.,
  • Capital Re board deemed "superior," the 33.5% holders would also be free
  • Capital Re claims that the board was careful to negotiate sufficient flexibility
  • ' Silver Aff., 7 3; see also Mears Aff, 13.
  • The negotiations on this issue resulted in two important sections of the
  • Company from breaching its fiduciary duties to its stockholders
  • XL Canital Limited Makes An Unsolicited Higher Bid And Canital Re Decides To Terminate The
  • the board received written advice
  • regarded as a clear breach of contract by Capital Re,
  • If a temporary restraining order issues, the court will chill an ongoing
  • restraining order, A TRO is an injunction, and the factors relevant to
  • standard more closely resembles that for a preliminary injunction.
  • consummation of the merger in the face of the XL Capital offer was adverse
  • available to a stockholder plaintiff who proves that a transaction is tainted by
  • Because the issuance of the TRO will not result in a free choice for Capital Re stockholders

  • 2 . LETTER TO V.C. STRINE

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEL
    COURT
    TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    STRINE
    HONORABLE LEO
    IRREPARABLE HARM
    STOCKHOLDERS
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    SILVER DECL
    MOTION
    DIRECTORS
    CONTROL
    MEMORANDUM
    VICE CHANCELLOR STRIUE
    WRITTEN LEGAL ADVICE
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    STRATEGIC MERGER
    TRANSACTION
    PROVISION
    DELAWARE LAW
    RICHARDS
    CHANCERY
    IRREPARABLE HARM ABSENT
    INDEED UNIQUE
    HARM ABSENT RELIEF
    STANDARD
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    NEGOTIATE
    
                                                                                                       
    
                                 RICHARDS , L AYTON   &   F INGER
                                          A PROFESS IONAL  ASSOCIATION
    
                                             O N E   t?ODNEY   SQUARE
    
                                                    P.O.  Box 551
    
                                     W ILMINGTON , D ELAWARE  19899
    
                                         TELEPHONE:   (302)   6 5 8 - 6 5 4 1
    
                                        T E L E C O P I E R :   (302)   6 5 8 - 6 5 4 8
    
                                            WEBSITE:   w w w .   RLF.COM
    
    
                                               t%UTER'SE!-~ADDRFdSS
                                                   WILLIAMS@RLF.COM
                                           WRITEX'S  DIRECT  Drzu  N UMBER
                                                       (302)651-7734
    
                                                  October 25, 1999
    
                                                       BY HAND
    
    
    The Honorable Leo E. Strine,  Jr.
    Court of Chancery
    Public Building
    Wilmington, DE 19801
    
                      Re:    ACE Limited v. Cauital Re Comoration,
                             Del. Ch., C.A. No. 17488
    
    Dear Vice Chancellor Striue:
    
                        I write on behalf of plaintiff ACE Limited ("ACE") to reply to the arguments
    set forth in defendant Capital Re Corporation's ("Capital Re") brief in opposition to ACE's
    motion for temporary restraining order.
    
    I.                  Capital Re Has Conceded That ACE  Will Suffer Irreparable Harm
                        Absent A Temporary Restraining Order
    
                        The circumstances present here are indeed unique -- in opposing a motion for
    temporary restraining order, Capital Re has conceded that ACE will suffer irreparable harm
    absent relief. The question of irreparable ham is "the more critical question, and it is typically
    the question that occupies the attention of the Court on an application for a temporary
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • RICHARDS,
  • The Honorable Leo E. Strine,
  • Dear Vice Chancellor Striue:
  • I write on behalf of plaintiff ACE Limited to reply to the arguments set forth in defendant
  • The circumstances present here are indeed unique -- in opposing a motion for temporary
  • The question of irreparable ham is "the more critical question, and it is typically the
  • Inc. v. Fublicis S& Del.
  • That standard is required when the application for temporary restraining order is presented
  • Capital Re asserts that ACE's interpretation of Section 6.3 of the Merger Agreement would
  • Delaware law clearly distinguishes between directors' fiduciary duties in the "sale of
  • By contrast, where directors enter into a strategic stock for stock merger not involving a
  • Where directors agree to a strategic merger, they may in the exercise of their business
  • no Delaware court ever has enjoined a no solicitation provision in a stock for stock merger.
  • Even in change of control transactions, which this is not, Delaware courts have continually
  • Capital Re concedes that the ACE/Capital Re merger was a "strategic merger not involving a
  • Capital Re concedes that its board of directors did not receive written legal advice that its
  • Perhaps mindful of this fatal factual deficiency, Capital Re now attempts to rely on two
  • 12 (acknowledging that "the memorandum stated that directors involved in a sale or change of
  • ACE will ask the Court to schedule a prompt preliminary injunction hearing at which the Court
  • Register in Chancery Kenneth J. Nachbar,

  • 3 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ACE
    TERMINATE
    DIRECTORS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CONTRACT
    SUPERIOR
    DELAWARE
    BID
    TRANSACTION
    MOTION
    PLAINTIFF
    SHARES
    CONTENDS
    PROVISION
    COURT
    TRO
    ACQUISITION
    WRITTEN ADVICE
    VICE CHANCELLOR
    CONSUMMATION
    SILVER AFF
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    TERMINATION
    NEGOTIATIONS
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    DEFENDANTS
    TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
    RESTRAINING ORDER
    NEGOTIATE
    
                                                                       ,.     ,
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                                        r;
           IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                         /L53(
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    ACE LIMITED, a Cayman Islands limited )
    liability company,                               >
                                   Plaintiff,        1>
                          V.                         >
                                                     >     Civil Action No. 17488
    CAPITAL RE CORPORATION,                          )
    a Delaware Corporation,                          >>
                                   Defendant.        >
    
    
                                    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
                                  Date Submitted: October 25, 1999
                                  Date Decided: October 25, 1999
    
    Gregory P. Williams, Esquire, Robert J. Steam,  ,Jr., Esquire,  Megan Semple
    Greenberg, Esquire, of RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, Wilmington, Delaware,
    Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
    
    
    Kenneth J. Nachbar, Esquire, of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT  & TUNNELL,
    Wilmington, Delaware, Attorney for Defendants.
    
    
    STRINE, Vice Chancellor
    
    
    
          Plaintiff ACE Limited ("ACE") has filed a motion requesting a
    
    temporary restraining order against defendant Capital Re Corporation
    
    ("Capital  Re").  ACE requests that I issue an order that restrains Capital Re
    
    from taking any action to terminate the June 10, 1999 Agreement and Plan
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • ACE LIMITED, a Cayman Islands limited)
  • Kenneth J. Nachbar, Esquire, of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL, Wilmington, Delaware,
  • from taking any action to terminate the June 10,
  • of Merger between and among ACE, Capital Re, and CapRe Acquisition
  • wishes to terminate the Merger Agreement and accept an all cash, all shares
  • bid that it believes is financially superior to the Merger Agreement.
  • Because Capital Re's argument that termination is permitted by the
  • provision is likely invalid; and because the risk of harm to Capital Re
  • stockholders outweighs the need to protect ACE from irreparable injury,
  • deny ACE's motion.
  • ACE contends that a further
  • merger ifthe Capital Re board of directors did not terminate the Merger
  • QVC,3 the merger is obviously a transaction of great
  • Capital Re board deemed "superior," the 33.5% holders would also be free
  • Capital Re claims that the board was careful to negotiate sufficient flexibility
  • The negotiations on this issue resulted in two important sections of the
  • Silver Aff.,
  • Company from breaching its fiduciary duties to its stockholders
  • XL Capital Limited Makes An Unsolicited Higher Bid And Capital Re Decides To Terminate The
  • the board received written advice
  • regarded as a clear breach of contract by Capital Re,
  • If a temporary restraining order issues, the court will chill an ongoing
  • A TRO is an injunction,
  • determining whether to grant a preliminary injunction.
  • consummation of the merger in the face of the XL Capital offer was adverse
  • available to a stockholder plaintiff who proves that a transaction is tainted by
  • Because the issuance of the TRO will not result in a free choice for Capital Re stockholders

  • 4 . DEFENDANTS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFF
    DEL
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    RESTRAINING ORDER
    PROPOSALS
    COURT
    STOCKHOLDERS
    WRITTEN ADVICE
    DELAWARE
    TRANSACTION
    TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
    SHAREHOLDERS
    DIRECTORS
    SILVER DECL
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    CORN
    PROBABILITY
    NEGOTIATIONS
    LEGAL COUNSEL
    MEMORANDUM
    KONTRABECKI GROUP
    PARAMOUNT COMMUNICATIONS
    AMAX MINERALS
    FINANCIAL ADVISORS
    PARTICIPATING
    HECCO VENTURES
    TRIAD PARK
    LLC
    PHELPS DODGE CORN
    
                    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                                                             /
                                    IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    ACE LIMITED, a Cayman Islands limited
    liability company,
    
                            Plaintiff,               `,
           V.                                        j         C.A. No. 17488:NC     v  :
                                                     1                               %  i
    CAPITAL RE CORPORATION, a Delaware
    Corporation,                                     i                              :. .;
                                                     >                              1  i
                            Defendant.               >                               I_
                                                                                    - .._
    
    
    
    
                        DEFENDANT'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S
                          MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
    
                                              MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT  & TUNNELL
                                              Kenneth J. Nachbar
                                              1201 N. Market Street
                                              P.O. Box 1347
                                              Wilmington, DE 19899-l 347
                                              (302) 65 8-9200
                                                 Attorneys for Defendant
                                                 Capital Re Corporation
    
    
    
    
    
    October 24, 1999
    
    
    
                                                                                  i.
    
                                  TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    
    TABLE OF CITATIONS                                                           ii
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFF HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED ITS HEAVY BURDEN OF SHOWING ENTITLEMENT TO A TEMPORARY
  • Hecco Ventures v. Sea Land Corn.,
  • In re Wheelabrator Technologies Inc. Shareholders Litin.,
  • Jackson v. Tumbull, Del.
  • Phelps Dodge Corn.
  • Plaintiff ACE Limited seeks to acquire all the stock of defendant Capital
  • pursuant to a Merger Agreement between the parties (the
  • failed to use sufficiently specific language in the written advice upon which Capital Re's
  • Capital Re's Board could pursue a transaction with XL only if the Board "receive
  • written advice from its counsel that the board was required to enter into negotiations with XL
  • prevent the Board of Directors of the Company from breaching its
  • fiduciary duties to its stockholders under the DGCL.
  • Corporation's outside legal counsel, the Board of Directors of the
  • Corporation has concluded that participating in negotiations or
  • Corporation from breaching its fiduciary duties to its stockholders
  • Silver Decl.
  • Hartson, L.L.P., furnished the Board with a 26-page memorandum, dated
  • As used herein, "PB" shall refer to the Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for
  • Delaware law clearly recognizes the difference between exploring proposals and accepting them.
  • Phelus Dodge Corp. v. Cvprus Amax Minerals Co.,
  • financial advisors, that the XL proposal was reasonably likely to be or result in a Superior
  • While some cases have indicated that, to satisfy the probability of success prong,
  • Ch., 684 A.2d at 1244, quoting Hecco Ventures v. Sea Land
  • Paramount Communications, Inc. v. OVC Network, Inc., Del.
  • The Kontrabecki Group, Inc. v. Triad Park, LLC, Del.

  • 5 . MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MERGER AGREEMENT
    ACE
    PROPOSALS
    RESTRAINING ORDER
    COURT
    TERMINATE
    DIRECTORS
    TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
    DELAWARE
    LAW
    PLAINTIFF
    COMPL
    MOTION
    ENTERING
    UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS
    IRREPARABLE HARM
    TRANSACTION
    ACQUISITION
    WRITTEN ADVICE
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    MATERIAL BREACH
    FINANCIAL GUARANTY REINSURANCE
    STOCKHOLDERS
    TERMINATION
    THIRD PARTY
    DEFENDANT
    ENJOINING
    DOWNGRADE
    KONTRABECKI
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                               I7
    
                                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
     ACE LIMITED, a Cayman Islands                    >
     company,                                         >>
                              Plaintiff,              >>        Civil Action No. 17488
               V.                                     >
    
    
     CAPITAL RE CORPORATION, a
     Delaware corporation,
    
                              Defendant.
    
                       MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S
                         MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
    
             Pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 65, plaintiff ACE Limited ("ACE") respectfully submits
    
    this Memorandum in support of its Motion for Temporary Restraining Order against defendant
    
    Capital Re Corporation ("Capital Re") (i) restraining Capital Re from taking any action to terminate
    
    the Agreement and Plan of Merger between and among ACE, Capital Re and CapRe Acquisition
    
    Corp., dated as of June 10, 1999 (the `Merger Agreement"), (ii) enjoining Capital Re from entering
    
    into a merger agreement with XL Capital Ltd. and (iii) enjoining the running of the
    
    period, provided for under the Merger Agreement, during which ACE would be required to respond
    
    to an unsolicited proposal if one had been properly considered by the Capital Re board of directors.
    
             Capital Re has threatened to terminate the Merger Agreement after midnight on October 25,
    
    1999 and to enter into a merger agreement with another company unless ACE increases the
    
    consideration to be offered under the existing Merger Agreement. Verified Complaint ¶ 16 ("Compl.
    
    ¶ -"). These actions would constitute material breaches of the Merger Agreement and would cause
    
    ACE irreparable harm. Compl. ¶¶ 1 l- 18, 19-24. In order to prevent such harm, ACE seeks the
    
    
    RLFI-2071284.3
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CAPITAL RE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
  • MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S
  • MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  • Pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 65, plaintiff ACE Limited respectfully submits
  • this Memorandum in support of its Motion for Temporary Restraining Order against defendant
  • Capital Re Corporation restraining Capital Re from taking any action to terminate
  • the Agreement and Plan of Merger between and among ACE, Capital Re and CapRe Acquisition
  • Corp., dated as of June 10, 1999, enjoining Capital Re from entering
  • into a merger agreement with XL Capital Ltd. and enjoining the running of the
  • to an unsolicited proposal if one had been properly considered by the Capital Re board of
  • Verified Complaint ¶ 16 ("Compl.
  • Any further downgrade would have had a materially negative impact on Capital Re's
  • The parties issued a joint press release announcing the transaction on June 11,
  • the Merger Agreement addressed the treatment of unsolicited proposals.
  • a third party in connection with an "unsolicited bona fide Transaction Proposal," only if all
  • fiduciary duties to its stockholders under the [Delaware General Corporation
  • Re is not in material breach of any of the terms of the Merger Agreement,
  • This is to advise you that it is my view that, in light of these discussions, the Company's
  • `Capital Re failed to indicate in its October 18 letter whether it believed that XL Capitals
  • The issuance of a temporary restraining order is warranted where the plaintiff establishes
  • a colorable claim and a genuine threat of irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted.
  • Capital Re board concludes in good faith, based on written advice from its outside counsel,
  • This Court was faced with similar issues in Kontrabecki Group, Inc. v. Triad Park, LLC, Del.
  • Proposal -- or face termination of the Merger Agreement:
  • only two highly rated specialty reinsurers to the U.S. financial guaranty reinsurance

  • 6 . VERIFIED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    ACE
    BREACH
    TERMINATE
    REINSURANCE
    PLAINTIFF ACE
    BUSINESS
    BINDING
    PROPOSALS
    DELAWARE
    COMPLAINT
    INCORPORATES
    FINANCIAL GUARANTY
    DIRECTORS
    GROUP OFINTERNATIONAL CLIENTS
    COUNSEL
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    TERMINATION FEE
    DOWNGRADE
    RATING AGENCIES
    MATERIAL BREACH
    CAYMAN ISLANDS
    ATTORNEYS
    INSURANCE
    STOCK PURCHASE
    NEGOTIATIONS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    SUFFER IRREPARABLE HARM
    WRITTEN ADVICE
    BREACHING
    
                     IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
     ACE LIMITED, a Cayman Islands company, )
    
                              Plaintiff,
    
              V. Civil Action No. 1674  dg  UG
    
     CAPITAL RE CORPORATION, a
     Delaware corporation,
    
                              Defendant.
    
    
                                            VERIFIXD  COMPLAINT                                   CL.3
                                                                                                  . m
            Plaintiff ACE Limited ("Plaintiff' or "ACE"), by and through its attorneys; upon  k&$wledge
    
    as to its own conduct and upon information and belief as to all other matters, alleges for its
    
    as follows:
    
                                            NATURE OF THE ACTION
    
             1. Plaintiff ACE brings this action to halt the further breach of a binding and enforceable
    
    merger agreement (the "Merger Agreement") between ACE and defendant Capital Re Corporation
    
    ("Capital Re" or the "Company") and to assure that Capital Re does not improperly terminate the
    
    Merger Agreement.
    
                                                THE PARTIES
    
            2. Plaintiff ACE is a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. ACE, through its
    
    subsidiaries, provides insurance and reinsurance products for a diverse group ofinternational
    
            3. Defendant Capital Re is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business
    
    in New York, New York. Capital Re is a specialty reinsurance corporation that is engaged in the
    
    
    
    RLFI-23683994
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Plaintiff ACE Limited, by and through its attorneys;
  • Plaintiff ACE brings this action to halt the further breach of a binding and enforceable
  • merger agreement between ACE and defendant Capital Re Corporation
  • Plaintiff ACE is a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands.
  • provides insurance and reinsurance products for a diverse group ofinternational clients.
  • Defendant Capital Re is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business
  • invest $75 million in newly issued Capital Re common shares (the "February 1999 Stock Purchase
  • Capital Re experienced a significant loss and as a result faced almost certain further
  • continue its current business as a financial guaranty reinsurer would be jeopardized.
  • Following negotiations between ACE and Capital Re, on June 10, 1999 ACE and
  • the Merger Agreement provided assurance to the rating agencies and clients that Capital Re
  • Agreement specifically provided that Capital Re and "its officers, directors, agents,
  • the Merger Agreement addressed the treatment of unsolicited proposals.
  • Board of Directors of the Company from breaching its fiduciary duties to its
  • Capital Re is not in material breach of any of the terms of the Merger Agreement,
  • BY FAILING TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED ADVICE OF COUNSEL
  • Capital Re board receives written advice from its outside counsel that such discussions are
  • This is to advise you that it is my view that, in light of these discussions, the Company's
  • to enter into an agreement withXL Capital, terminate the Merger Agreement and abandon the
  • realleges and incorporates by reference each of the allegations of
  • paragraphs 1 through 24 of the Complaint as if fully set forth herein.
  • Absent injunctive and other equitable relief, ACE will suffer irreparable harm as a
  • Re to pay the termination fee as "liquidated damages" for its breach of the Merger Agreement,
  •    |