 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
.
LETTER OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
CONSENT SOLICITATION COURT LIPITOR AGREEMENTS WARNER SCHEDULE MERGER INJUNCTION CONTRACT CLAIMS LAWSUITS RESOLVE BREACH STANDSTILL PROVISION FIDUCIARY DUTY AHP RULING DEAL PROTECTIONS INSISTENCE DISCOVERY BUSINESS CHANCERY MERITS PARTIES MANNER PROMPT LITIGATION REASON LAUNCHING DESPITE |
C OURT OF C HANCERY
OF THE
STATE OF D ELAWARE
W I L L I A M B C H A N D L E R Ill T
CHANCELLOR
G E O
December 22, 1999
R. Franklin Balotti Joseph A. Rosenthal
Richards Layton & Finger Rosenthal Monhait Gross &
P.O. Box 551 P. 0. Box 1070
Wilmington, DE 19899 Wilmington, DE 19899
(fax) 6586548 (fax) 658-7567
Michael D. Goldman Pamela S. Tiltellis
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP Chimicles & Tiltellis, LLP
P.O. Box 951 P. 0. Box 1035
Wilmington, DE 19899 Wilmington, DE 19899
(fax) 658-l 192 (fax) 656-9053
A. Gilchrist Sparks, III James C. Strum
Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel1 Chimicles & Tikellis, LLP
P.O. Box 1347 P. 0. Box 1035
Wilmington, DE 19899- 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899
(fax) 658-3989 (fax) 656-9053
Dear Counsel:
This is my decision on Warner-Lambert's application to schedule a
injunction hearing on January 10, 2000. Warner's motion, filed on December 17,
1999, seeks to enjoin PGzer's consent solicitation, and to maintain the status quo
this Court rules on the merits of Pfizer's and Warner's contract claims arising out of
the Lipitor Agreements.
CA. No. 17524
December 22, 1999
Page 2
SNIPPETS:
|
|
2
.
PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO ENFORCE THE DISCOVERY OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
WARNER DISCOVERY OPINION DOCUMENTS RELATING COURT DIET DRUG DELAWARE ADVICE PFIZER DEFENDANT MOTION DIRECTORS PRIVILEGE POB MERGER ENFORCE LITIGATION MATERIALS WORK PRODUCT PRODUCTION WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE AHP PARTIES ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE WARNER LETTER BOARD MEETING BOARD BOOKS DEPOSITION DAIRV MART MERGER AGREEMENT JOEL KATCOFF |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
PFIZER INC
Plaintiff,
V. ; C.A. No. 17524NC
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, et al., i FILED UNDER SEAL
Defendants. ; REDACTED
' VERSION
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION TO ENFORCE THE DISCOVERY OPINION
OF COUNSEL: R. Franklin Balotti
Jesse A. Finkelstein
Jonathan M. Hoff Robert 3. Stearn, Jr.
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft J. Travis Laster
100 Maiden Lane Richards, Layton & Finger
New York, NY 10038 One Rodney Square
(212) 504-6000 P.O. Box 551
Wilmington, Delaware 19899
David Klingsberg (302) 658-6541
Myron Kirschbaum Attorneys for Plaintiff Pfizer Inc.
Joel Katcoff
Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler
425 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022-3598
Dated: December 21, 1999
.
RLFI-7.095727-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SNIPPETS:
|
|
3
.
DEFENDANT AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND IN OPPOSTION TO CROSS-MOTION OF PLAINTIFF
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PRIVILEGE MATERIALS DIET DRUG LITIGATION WARNER-LAMBERT COURT DEFENDANTS COUNSEL AHP AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS WARNER MERGER WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY MOTION MATERIALS RELATING PLAINTIFF PROTECTIVE ORDER ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE GEORGE CROSS-MOTION MERGER AGREEMENT CONFIDENTIALITY MEMORANDUM OPPOSITION GRAY HOWELL LORCH ALEX MANDL PRODUCTS CORPORATION |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
PFIZER INC.,
Plaintiff,
V . ) Civil Action No. 17524-NC
>
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, ROBERT >
N. BURT, DONALD D. CLARK, LODEWIJK >
J . R . D E VlNK, J O H N A . GEORGE& >
WILLIAM H. GRAY, III, B. WILLIAM R. >
HOWELL, LASALLE D. LEFAL, JR., M.D., 1
GEORGE A. LORCH, ALEX J. MANDL, >
AND M I C H A E L I . SOVERN AND >
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP., )1
Defendants 1
DEFENDANT AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION'S
REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
IN OPPOSITION TO CROSS-MOTION OF PLAINTIFF
Defendant American Home Products Corporation ("AH,"), through its
undersigned counsel, hereby submits its Reply Memorandum in support of its motion for a
protective order with respect to highly confidential and privileged materials relating to certain
products liability litigation involving diet drugs (the "Diet Drug Litigation") and in opposition to
the cross-motion of plaintiff Pfizer Inc.
As the Court is well aware, these are expedited proceedings in which the parties,
represented by sophisticated counsel, are working diligently to prepare for a hearing on an
important matter. While defendants have strived to accommodate Pfizer's requests for relevant
information, it is Pfizer's tactics, not the defendants' as Pfizer asserts, that have prevented the
2.
SNIPPETS:
|
|
4
.
PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO ENFORCE THE DISCOVER OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MOTION DEFENDANTS PFIZER DISCOVERY WARNER MATERIALS AHP DISCOVERY OPINION DRUG LITIGATION COUNSEL MERGER AGREEMENT FACTS DISCLOSURE DEL PRIVILEGE PROTECTIVE ORDER DIET DRUG INFORMATION DIET DRUG WARNER BOARD STOCKHOLDERS SETTLEMENT PLAINTIFF TRANSACTION BOARD MEETINGS DOCUMENTS RELATING WARNER DIRECTORS WORK PRODUCT DISCOVERY GAMESMANSHIP TERMINATION PROVISION |
,;yj ~~ ; ( -'
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARl!? ii a ' "' '
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
PFIZER INC.
;
Plaintiff,
;
V. ) CA. No. 17524NC
1
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, et al., ) FILED UNDER SEAL
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
AND OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION TO ENFORCE THE DISCOVERY OPINION
17
OF COUNSEL: R Franklin Balotti I
r;; /.I
Jesse A. Finkelstein 5..:-
., .'
;
Jonathan M. Hoff Robert J. Stearn, Jr.
i. I __
Cadwalader, Wicker-sham & Taft J. Travis Laster - -
100 Maiden Lane Richards, Layton & Finger
New York, NY 10038 One Rodney Square k.1
-.
(2 12) 504-6000 P.O. Box 551 <
I;<
Wilmington, Delaware 19899 _ --..l
(302) 658-6541 z
Dated: December 14, 1999 Attorneys for Plaintiff Pfizer Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS '
SNIPPETS:
|
|
5
.
PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO ENFORCE THE DISCOVERY OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PRIVILEGE MOTION DEFENDANTS PFIZER DISCOVERY WARNER AHP DISCOVERY OPINION DRUG LITIGATION COURT MERGER AGREEMENT PROTECTIVE ORDER WAIVER JEDWAB DIET DRUG INFORMATION DIET DRUG WARNER BOARD MATERIALS STOCKHOLDERS MERGER NEGOTIATIONS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS RELATING BOARD MEETINGS PLAINTIFF WORK PRODUCT TRANSACTION WARNER DIRECTORS DISCLOSURE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE |
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
PFIZER INC.
Plaintiff,
;
V. ) C.A. No. 17524NC
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, etal., ; FILED UNDER SEAL
Defendants. ; REDACTED
> VERSION
PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
AND OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION TO ENFORCE THE DISCOVERY OPINION
OF COUNSEL: R Franklin Balotti
Jesse A. Finkelstein
Jonathan M. Hoff Robert J. Steam, Jr.
Cadwalader, Wickersham & TatI J. Travis Laster
100 Maiden Lane Richards, Layton & Finger
New York, NY 1003 8 One Rodney Square
(212) 504-6000 P.O. Box 551
Wilmington, Delaware 19899
David Klingsberg (302) 658-6541
Myron Kirschbaum Attorneys for Plaintiff Pfizer Inc.
Joel Katcoff
Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler
425 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022-3 598
Dated: December 14, 1999
RLFI-2092562-I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SNIPPETS:
|
|
6
.
LETTER OPINION
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
WARNER PRIVILEGE DISCOVERY PLAINTIFFS RELATING DIRECTORS ATTORNEY-CLIENT CHANCERY PFIZER AGREEMENT BUSINESS MOTION COMPEL LITIGATION IMMUNITY VALUATION STANDARD SHIELD PROTECT PLANS USC STOCK OPTIONS PRODUCTION MERGER AGREEMENT INTERNAL VALUATION MATTER ANTICIPATE DEFENDAU BUSINESS JUDGMENT |
LIEC-08-99 WED 06:45 PM CHANCERY CHAMBERS FAX NO. 3028565251
-Q&L
COURT OF CYANCEGY
OF THE
STATE OF DELAWARE
TklL FAMILY COURT
Dcccmbcr 8, 1999 P.O. 50x 501
GEORGETOWN, Dw~~VAR~
R. Franklin Balotti A. Gilchrist Sparks, III
Richards, Layton & I'ingcr hkm-is, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel1
l',O, Box 551 P.0. Box 1347
jVilnfingtot7, DE 19S99 Wilmington, DE 19899
Michael D. Golchm
Potter hndcrson & Corroon
P.0. Box 951
Wihnington, DB 19899
Joseph A. Rosenthal
I
SNIPPETS:
|
|
7
.
ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COMPLAINT ALLEGATION DENY WARNER-LAMBERT PFIZER ADMIT MERGER AGREEMENT COURT RESPECTFULLY REFER THEREOF RESPONSE VINK AMENDED COMPLAINT SETS TRANSACTION STEERE REALLEGE FULLY SET BUSINESS DEFENDANTS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY DIRECTORS STANDSTILL AGREEMENT AHP THIRD PARTY INFORMATION SUFFICIENT LODEWIJK UNDERSIGNED ATTORNEYS CDA DENY KNOWLEDGE STOCK OPTION |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
>
PFIZER INC., >
Plaintiff,
>
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, ROBERT N. )
BURT, DONALD D. CLARK, LODEWIJK J.R. DE ) Civil Action No. 17524-NC
VINK, JOHN A. GEORGES WILLIAM H. GRAY, ) ,. -<"
r..-..: `.
III, WILLIAM R. HOWELL, LASALLE D. -: F",,
> 1 f
LEFFALL, JR., M.D., GEORGE A. LORCH, >
ALEX J. MANDL, MICHAEL I. SOVERN and ) I
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP., >>
Defendants. > ; ,.>
> __
ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants Warner-Lambert Company, Robert N. Burt, Donald D. Clark,
Lodewijk J.R. de Vink, John A. Georges, William H. Gray, III, William R. Howell, LaSalle D.
Leffall, Jr., M.D., George A. Larch, Alex J. Mandl, and Michael I. Sovern (collectively, the
Warner-Lambert Defendants"), by their undersigned attorneys, hereby respond to the numbered
paragraphs of the Amended Complaint of Pfizer, Inc. ("Pfizer"), as follows:
1. Deny each and every allegation of paragraph 1 of the Amended
Complaint, except admit that Warner-Lambert Company ("Warner-Lambert") and American
Home Products Corporation ("AHP") announced on November 4, 1999 that they had entered
into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") dated as of November 3, 1999,
respectfully refer the Court to the Merger Agreement for the true and accurate contents thereof,
and admit that, on November 4, 1999, Pfizer Inc. ("Pfizer") announced a proposal for a
SNIPPETS:
|
|
8
.
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
AHP COMPLAINT INSOFAR DENIES RESPONSE MERGER LAW PURPORTS WARNER MERGER AGREEMENT DENIES KNOWLEDGE INFORMATION SUFFICIENT TRUTH AGREEMENT SPEAKS AHP RESPECTFULLY REFERS FULLY SET PLAINTIFF AHP REPEATS REALLEGES PRECEDING DEFENDANT AMERICAN CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS AMENDED COMPLAINT DEFENDANT AMERICAN HOME PROPOSED TRANSACTION ENTAILS WARNER STOCK SHAREHOLDERS AMERICAN WARNER ENTITY |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
<
-f--f
._
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
PFIZER INC., >
Plaintiff,
>
v. >>
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, >
ROBERT N. BURT, DONALD D. CLARK,)
LODEWIJK, J.R. DE VINK, JOHN A. )
GEORGES, WILLIAM H. GRAY, III, )
B. WILLIAM R. HOWELL, LASALLE D. )
LEFFAL, JR., M.D., GEORGE A. LORCH, )
ALEX J. MANDL, AND MICHAEL I. )
SOVERN AND AMERICAN HOME >
PRODUCTS CORP., >
>
Defendants. )
DEFENDANT AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS
CORPORATION'S ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendant American H:ome Products Corporation ("AHP"), by its undersigned
counsel, hereby responds as follows to each numbered paragraph of the Amended Complaint (the
"Complaint") filed in the above-captioned case:
1. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 1 of the Complaint insofar
as they attempt to place a dollar value on the proposed merger of equals between AHP and
Warner-Lambert Company ("Warner"), and states that the proposed transaction entails an
cschange of 1.4919 shares of AHP sto& for each share of Warner stock, giving Warner
shareholders a 50.1% ownership of the combined American Warner entity. Further, AHP denies
the allegations of paragraph 1 of the Complaint to the extent they characterize Pfizer's statements
regarding Warner as an "$82 billion proposal." First, the highly conditional statements made by
SNIPPETS:
|
|
9
.
LETTER TO CHANCELLOR CHANDLER
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MERGER AGREEMENT COURT STOCKHOLDERS SCHEDULE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CHANDLER AHP HONORABLE WILLIAM STOCK OPTION REQUEST DEFENDANTS STOCK-FOR-STOCK TRANSACTION PROVISIONS PROPOSALS IRREPARABLE INJURY RELATED DOCUMENTS COMPLAINT CHANCELLOR CONSENT SOLICITATION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT EXPEDITED PROCEEDINGS DIRECTORS CHALLENGED PROVISIONS ADJUDICATION TERMINATION FEE DISCOVERY SCHEDULING IRREPARABLE HARM COMMON STOCK |
RlCHARD i. SUTTON
JOHAN,,ES R. KRAHMER
0. FRANClS BlONDI
LEWIS 5. BLACK, JR.
p*, II
-c \A,,:, =$.I
..,__-.,
LLIAM 0. LAMOTTE. I,, M ORRIS , N ICHOLS , A RSHT & T UNNELL
I201 NORTH MARKET STREET
P.O. Box 1347
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19899-1347
TELEPHONE (302) 658-9200
DONALD NELSON ISKEN
DONALD E. REID T E L E C O P Y (302) 6 5 8 - 3 9 8
OENISON H. H*TCH. JR.
THOMAS C. GRIMM
KENNETH J. NACHBAR WRITER'S D I R E C T DIAL N U M B E
ANDREW M. JOHNSTON
MARY S GRAHAM (302)575-7276
MICH*EL HOUGHTON
MATTHEW 8. LEHR
THOMAS R. PULSIFER
JON E. ABR*MCMK November 18, 1999
- _ _. -. -
JONATI-IAN I. iESSNER
ROBERT J. DEHNEY
COLM F. CONNOLLY
VIA FACSIMILE & HAND DELIVERY
The Honorable William B. Chandler, III
Chancellor
Court of Chancery
SNIPPETS:
|
|
10
.
MOTION FOR EXPEDITED PROCEEDINGS
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PFIZER WARNER COURT WARNER-AHP DEFENDANTS MERGER PROPOSALS MERGER AGREEMENT EXPEDITED PROCEEDINGS COMPLAINT DELAWARE COURTS STOCKHOLDERS WARNER DIRECTORS WARNER SHAREHOLDERS MOTION NO-PREMIUM PROVISIONS IRREPARABLE HARM ORDER EXPEDITING CONSENT SOLICITATION DEFENDANT AMERICAN HOME TRANSACTION AMENDED COMPLAINT AHP IRREPARABLE INJURY PROMPT HEARING AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS FRANCHISE RIGHTS PERMISSION TERMINATION |
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
PFIZER INC.
;
Plaintiff, >>
V. ) C.A. No. 17524
>
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, et )
al.,
Defendants.
NOTICE OF MOTION
TO: Michael D. Goldman, Esquire A. Gilchrist Sparks, Esquire
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel1
Hercules Plaza 1201 Market Street
Wilmington, DE 1980 1 Wilmington, DE 19801
Attorneys for the Individual Attorneys for American Home Products Co.
Defendants and Warner-Lambert
Company
PLEASE TARE NOTICE that the attached Motion for Expedited Proceedings will
be presented to the Court at the earliest convenience of the Court and counsel.
I-
f7cd&$
I /ii ,
OF COUNSEL: R. Franklin Balotti
Jesse A. Finkelstein
Dennis J. Block
J. Travis Laster
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft Richards, Layton & Finger
100 Maiden Lane One Rodney Square
New York, NY 1003 8 P.O. Box 551
(212) 504-6000 Wilmington, Delaware 19899
(302) 658-6541
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Dated: November 16, 1999
RLFl-2078653-2
SNIPPETS:
|
|
11
.
AMENDED COMLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MERGER PFIZER PROPOSALS SHAREHOLDERS PLAINTIFF TRANSACTION INFORMATION/NO MERGER AGREEMENT DEFENDANTS VINK WARNER-AHP MERGER PROVISION STOCKHOLDERS WARNER DIRECTORS PREMIUM AHP TERMINATION FEE ALLEGATION SET FIDUCIARY DUTIES HIGHEST DUTIES SIGNIFICANT PREMIUM POISON POOLING PROVISION SUPERIOR MERGER PROPOSALS DEAL PROVISIONS FIDUCIARY OBLIGATIONS REASONABLENESS DEFENDANTS OWE CONSENT SOLICITATION ADEQUATE REMEDY |
. . .
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
PFIZER INC.,
Plaintiff,
V.
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, ROBERT N. BURT, Civil Action No.
DONALD D. CLARK, LODEWIJK J.R. DE VINK,
JOHN A. GEORGES, WILLIAM H. GRAY, III, B.
WILLIAM R. HOWELL, LASALLE D. LEFFAL, JR.,
M.D., GEORGE A. LORCH, ALEX J. MANDL, MICHAEL
1. SOVERN AND AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS
CORP.,
Defendants.
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned counsel, alleges as and for its amended
complaint, upon personal knowledge as to itself and its own acts, and as to all other matters upon
information and belief, as follows:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. On November 4, 1999, Warner-Lambert Company ("Warner") and American
Ho-me Products Corporation ("AHP") publicly announced a non-premium stock-for-stock $72
bilhon merger (the "Merger" or the "Warner-AHP Merger"). On the same day, Pfizer Inc.
("F%zer") announced its own $82 billion proposal to merge with Warner in a transaction that
(unlike the Warner-AHP Merger) would entail the payment of a significant premium to Warner
shareholders (the "Pfizer Proposal").
SNIPPETS:
|
|
12
.
COMPLAINT
|
EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
MERGER AGREEMENT PFIZER PROPOSAI DIRECTORS AMERICAN HOME LAMBERT CONNECTION STOCK OPTION REPRESENTATIVES BREAK-UP FEE BREACH WARNER-LAMBERT SHAREHOLDER FEE PROVISIONS SUPERIOR PLAINTIFF ENTERING PARTICIPANT WILLIAM AMERICAN HOME-WARNER ACQUISITION PARTIES STANDSTILL PERMISSION PREMIUM EXPRESSIONS PREVENTING REQUESTS PAVMENT |
:,.'
-,`,. -4 ,.- i ,,*
/
j `ah:
t -+ `! `- I
2, _
i ;
`\ -*-`-
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF
ZN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COL%TY
PFIZER INC.
PI aintiff,
>
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, >
ROBERT N. BURT, DONALD D. CLARK, )
LODEWIJK J.R. DE VINK, JOHN A. )
GEORGE& WILLIAM H. GRAY, III, )
B. WILLIAM R. HOWELL, LASALLE D. )
LEFFAL, JR., M.D., GEORGE A. LORCH, )
ALEX J. MANDL AND MICHAEL 1. )
SOVERN AND AMERICAN HOME 1
PRODUCTS CORP. >
Defendants. 1
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned
upon personal knowledge as to itself and its own acts, and as to
and belief based upon, among other things, the investigation of
THE PARTIES
1. Plaintiff Pfizer Inc ("Pfizer") is a
place of business in New York, New York
3
A. Defendant Warner-Lambert Company
corporation with its principal place of business in Morris
SNIPPETS:
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
