LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

ASSIST STOCK MANAGEMENT v ROSHEIM Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,610, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: ASSIST STOCK MANAGEMENT, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017610, Delaware, Rosheim, Jurisdiction, Ait, Complaint, Del, Tpg, Fiduciary Duties, Manager, Motion, Limited Liability Company, Fiduciary Duty, Personal Jurisdiction, Breach, Llc, Basis, Statute, Chancellor, Limited Liability, Consent, Agreement, Implicate, Asm, Relating, Rights, Ownership, Llc Agreement, Contract, Dismiss, Watkins, Supr, Witnesses, Chrvsler First Business, Corn, Support, Chancery, Management, Stock Management, Crvo-maid, Implied Consent, Nonresident, Capital/equity, Ait Agreement , ContentID: 120239696

Case Documents
1 2000-02-03 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100226
21 pages
PDF
2 2000-01-14 DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102650
16 pages
PDF
3 2000-01-07 PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102651
20 pages
PDF
4 2000-01-07 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101576
8 pages
PDF
5 1999-12-30 DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102652
25 pages
PDF
6 1999-12-14 DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXPEDITE PROCEEDINGS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102653
7 pages
PDF
7 1999-11-30 V. ROSHEIM COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101577
7 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 7 documents , 104 pages
Price: $ 49.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANT
JURISDICTION
COURT
AIT
BASIS
CHANCELLOR
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
ROSHEIM
PERSONAL JURISDICTION
RELATING
RIGHTS
MANAGER
COMPLAINT
OWNERSHIP
TPG
ATTORNEYS
AIT AGREEMENT
CHANCERY
FIDUCIARY DUTY
EXERCISE
MANAGEMENT
FIRST CLAUSE
CAPACITY
ASM
HANA RANCH
PROPER PARTY
PURSUANT
CHANCERY RULE
  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                 I  2
                                                                Y `.           !> II
                                                            $$ig              .;:;.
                                                                              ,- _
                                                              ;...r             I" &I
                                                              ;`,i ,*q        ._. .;
                                                              I , 3 i            co
                                                            :: ."p/:q        ,:  ><
                                                            y.+-  .                    - 15
                                                            :Y  :
ASSIST STOCK MANAGEMENT L.L.C.,  )                             *z-:>`          `lL-
                                                                -2,: : *      -...-,* _
and ThePageGroup.com, L.L.C.,                               ::  -gJ-;z
                                            >                    v; ,.' )     *- -"
                                                            .-  "ST  i                 is
                                            >                  lr  a.`:>
                                                              -+.x.c          "z%1p,
                                                                              C2-s~
                         Plaintiffs,        >>
            V.                              >     Civil Action No. 17610
                                            >
IVEN ROSHEIM,                               >>
                         Defendant.         >


                                 OPINION

                    Date Submitted: January  18,200O
                     Date Decided: February  3,200O


Kenneth J. Nachbar, Esquire, of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT &
TUNNELL, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorney for Plaintiffs.

David J. Ferry, Jr., Esquire and Rick S. Miller, Esquire, of FERRY & ,
JOSEPH, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Defendant.






LAMB, Vice Chancellor



                            I.     INTRODUCTION
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • LAMB, Vice Chancellor
  • interests and management rights in Assist Integrated Technologies L.L.C.
  • , a Delaware limited liability company, and in its subsidiary,
  • The complaint was filed on November 30,
  • 1999, the defendant filed a motion, pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 12, to
  • On January 7, 2000, the plaintiffs amended
  • jurisdiction over managers of Delaware LLCs.
  • exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant.
  • ASM and Rosheim Form AIT
  • defendant Iven Rosheim to form AIT.
  • The AIT Agreement named Watkins and Rosheim
  • material transaction with a member or manager, dissolution, significant
  • creating plaintiff TPG.
  • Pursuant to Article V of the
  • ' Certain documents relating to TPG's equity ownership stated ASM's and Rosheim's specific
  • needed in his capacity as an alleged 50% owner of AIT or in his capacity as a
  • This fact is only pertinent to the present matter because it serves as one basis for
  • that he breached a fiduciary duty, Rosheim reiterates his position that the narrow
  • Hana Ranch, Inc. v. Lent, Del.
  • 24 The language of the first clause of 93114 differs from the first clause of $18-109 in
  • have to travel to Delaware or attorneys will have to travel to Florida.

  • 2 . DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEL
    BREACH
    DEFENDANT
    PLAINTIFFS
    IMPLICATE
    SUPR
    LAW
    LLC
    PERSONAL JURISDICTION
    COURT
    STATUTE
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    MANAGER
    CONTRACT
    LEXIS
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
    AIT
    LIMITED PARTNERS
    STATUTORY
    DELAWARE LLC
    REGISTER
    STATUTORY NOTICE
    COURT LACKS
    CORPORATE IMPLIED CONSENT
    MATT SLAP
    NON-RESIDENT MANAGER
    FIDUCIARY PRINCIPLES
    REGISTERED AGENT
    
                                                                                 ORIGINAL
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                 17
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ASSIST STOCK MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.,
    AND THE PAGE GROUP.COM, L.L.C.,
    
           Plaintiffs,                           ,'                                    -.
                                                                                 r
           V.                                    ;      C.A.No.  17610-NC   ';
    IVEN ROSHEIM,                                ;                                            __'
                                                 >
           Defendant.                            >                               :,           _
                                                                                 ( : ,. . 2
                                                                                 2:.          Id
                                                                                       --i
                                 DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF IN
                               SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
    
                                                 DAVID J. FERRY, JR.
                                                 RICK S. MILLER
                                                 FERRY & JOSEPH, P.A.
                                                 824 Market Street, Suite 904
                                                 P.O. Box 1351
                                                 Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                 (302) 575-1555
                                                 Attorneys for Defendant
    Dated: January  14,200O
    
    
    
                                                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    
    Table of Authorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    Preliminary Statement , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    Argument . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    I.         This Court Lacks Personal Jurisdiction Over the Defendant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
               A.         The Amended Complaint does not state a cause of action which
                          implicates a breach of the defendant's fiduciary duties.. . . . . . . . , . .
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • implicates a breach of the defendant's fiduciary duties..
  • Cusson v. Matt Slap Subaru, Inc., Del.
  • Supr., 550 A.2d 1105.
  • Ch., 1996 Lexis 155, Jacobs, V.C..
  • Plaintiffs responded to defendant's Opening Brief by filing an amended complaint,
  • acknowledging the merit of the arguments defendant has made.
  • The naked allegations of breach of fiduciary duty now alleged by the plaintiffs exist in name
  • Rather, the answers are found in the contract, the LLC
  • But they directed the Register to send the statutory notice
  • THIS COURT LACKS PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE
  • manager of a Delaware LLC.
  • implied consent statute, 10 Del.
  • This State lacks a compelling interest in litigating disputes which do not implicate such
  • Case law relating to the corporate implied consent statute may be applied by analogy to
  • Delaware LLC for claims that implicate a breach of such manager's fiduciary duties.
  • owe to AIT or its members.
  • governance process in the context of limited partnerships- the partnership agreement or common
  • that the limited partners breached a fiduciary duty to the partnership.
  • This case is not about fiduciary principles, it is about contract rights and duties.
  • The plaintiffs argue that the defendant has conceded the constitutionality of Section 18109
  • registered letters to the defendant, one addressed to the registered agent, and the second

  • 3 . PLAINTIFFS ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DELAWARE
    COURT
    COMPLAINT
    JURISDICTION
    PLAINTIFFS
    MOTION
    DEFENDANTS
    MANAGER
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    AIT
    WITNESSES
    CHRVSLER FIRST BUSINESS
    DEL
    CORN
    CRVO-MAID
    LIMITED LIABILITY
    LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
    STOCK MANAGEMENT
    HFTP INVESTMENTS
    MANCHESTER
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    LLC AGREEMENT
    TPG
    NON-PENDENCY
    POMERANCE
    FIRST BUSINESS CREDIT
    LOCUST LIMITED PARTNER
    HOLVOKE SHARES
    TECHNICORN
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    Assist Stock Management L.L.C., and
    ThePageGroup.com, L.L.C.,                                                                <`  f_
                            Plaintiffs                                       __ ;            c  -:'
                                                   1                         :               [  .-
                                                                             :              :  I
           V.                                      1          C.A. No. 1761ONC'            ;  :..,  *  :
    
    Iven Rosheim,                                                            ;  '            -13
                            Defendant.             i                         L  :           - -
                                                                             `,,  :          . .
                                                   1                                        c.1
                                                                                   :  :     i-4
    
    
                        PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
                               TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMm
    
    
                                             MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT  & TUNNELL
                                             Kenneth J. Nachbar
                                             1201 N. Market Street
                                             P.O. Box 1347
                                             Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
                                             (302) 658-9200
                                                Attorneys for Plaintiffs
    
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    Mitchell D. Raup
    Mayer, Brown & Platt
    1909 K Street
    Washington, DC 20006-l 101
    (202) 263-3000
    
    January  7,200O
    
    
    
                                                                                      1.
    
    
                                    TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                                      w
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFFS' ANSWERING BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
  • TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMm
  • This Court Has Jurisdiction Over Rosheim Pursuant To 6
  • THE COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSElD ON THE basis OF
  • Availability of Compulsory Process for Witnesses.
  • Pendency or Non-Pendency of An Action In A Different
  • Chrvsler First Business Credit Corp. v. 1500 Locust Limited Partner&,
  • Crvo-Maid.
  • HFTP Investments, L.L.C. v. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals.
  • Assist Integrated Technologies, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, improperly used
  • principally that the complaint "does not implicate fiduciary duties to."
  • Watkins (the principal of Assist Stock Management, L.L.C., which owns a majority membership
  • interest in AIT), does "not have authority to admit new members" to TPG without Rosheim's
  • duties as a manager of AIT.
  • personal jurisdiction over Rosheim to adjudicate these claims.
  • Rosheim's other claims - - that 6 Del.
  • See OB at 8-10, ~ Armstrong v. Pomerance, Del.
  • The case at bar implicates no breach of fiduciary duty on the part
  • AIT is not a party plaintiff here only because, under its LLC agreement, all members must
  • While it is true that the defendants' numerical contacts with this
  • Manchester v. Narragansset Canital, Inc., Del.
  • Technicorn reached a similar result.
  • Tavlor v. LSI Logic Corn.,
  • at 14 (citing Kolber v. Holvoke Shares, Inc., Del.

  • 4 . AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MEMBERS
    TPG
    ROSHEIM
    MANAGER
    CONSENT
    AGREEMENT
    WATKINS
    DELAWARE
    LIMITED LIABILITY
    ASM
    CAPITAL/EQUITY
    PRESIDENT
    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
    CONTROVERSIES
    BUSINESS
    FINANCING
    ADMISSION
    EQUITY
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    AUTHORITY
    DEFENDANT
    COMPLAINT
    RELIEF
    OWNERSHIP
    OWNER
    TRANSACTIONS
    SOLE MEMBER
    PURSUANT
    ADMITTING
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    Assist Stock Management L.L.C., and
    ThePageGroup.com, L.L.C.,
                            Plaintiffs
    
           V.
    
    Iven Rosheim,
                            Defendant.
    
    
    
                 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
    
                     Plaintiffs, by their undersigned counsel, allege for their Amended Complaint as
    follows:
    
                                            Nature of the Case
    
                     1.     This is a complaint for declaratory judgment and other relief, to resolve a
    
    controversy between the members of Assist Integrated Technologies L.L.C. ("AIT"), a Delaware
    
    limited liability company, regarding their respective ownership interests and management rights
    
    in that company and in its subsidiary,  ThePageGroupcom,  L.L.C.  ("TPG"), a Delaware limited
    
    liability company. In particular, as set forth below, defendant Rosheim wrongfully contends that
    
    he is a 50% owner of AIT and that, as a manager of AIT, he was required to, but did not, consent
    
    to certain transactions by which TPG issued equity to obtain needed financing. In breach of his
    
    fiduciary duties as a manager of  AIT, Rosheim is attempting to interfere with  TPG's financing
    
    transactions, and has vowed to continue to do so unless he is given a substantial cash payment
    
    and a 15% interest in TPG.
    
    
    
                                        Parties and Jurisdiction
    
                   2.     Plaintiff Assist Stock Management L.L.C. ("ASM") is a Delaware limited
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Iven Rosheim,
  • AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
  • controversy between the members of Assist Integrated Technologies L.L.C.,
  • regarding their respective ownership interests and management rights
  • In particular, as set forth below, defendant Rosheim wrongfully contends that
  • he is a 50% owner of AIT and that, as a manager of AIT, he was required to, but did not,
  • to certain transactions by which TPG issued equity to obtain needed financing.
  • liability company with its principal place of business in Sarasota,
  • On March 3, 1999, ASM and Rosheim entered into a limited liability
  • company agreement, in which they agreed to form Assist Integrated
  • AIT was then the sole member of TPG.
  • consented to service of process in Delaware, pursuant to 6 Del.
  • There are actual controversies between the parties concerning whether
  • defendant has properly exercised and is exercising his fiduciary duties as a manager of AIT,
  • Rosheim and Watkins agreed soon after AIT
  • "Following up on our discussion I will deposit capital/equity funds necessary to
  • issue that does not require the affirmative consent of all members.
  • Section 13of the AIT Agreement appoints Watkins President of AIT,
  • AIT Agreement provides that as President, Watkins has "such power and authority as persons
  • Admission of New Members to ThePageGrourxcom.
  • admitting each new member of TPG.
  • plaintiffs request the following relief:

  • 5 . DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    DEFENDANT
    JURISDICTION
    DEL
    LLC
    STATUTE
    LAW
    MOTION
    DISMISS
    PLAINTIFFS
    LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
    AIT
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    LLC AGREEMENT
    SUPPORT
    IMPLIED CONSENT
    NONRESIDENT
    CONTRACT
    COMPLAINT
    PERSONAL JURISDICTION
    BUSINESS
    LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ACT
    UNCONSTITUTIONALITY
    PERSONAM JURISDICTION
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    TPG
    ARMSTRONG
    GENERAL PARTNERS
    DIRECTORS
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ASSIST STOCK MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.,             >
    AND THE PAGE GROUP.COM, L.L.C.,              >>
          Plaintiffs,                            >>
          V.                                     >      C.A. No.  17610-N<:
                                                 >
    IVEN ROSHEIM,                                >>
          Defendant.                             >
    
    
    
                                DEFENDd4NT'S  OPENING BRIEF IN
                          SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
    
                                                 DAVID J. FERRY, JR.
                                                 RICK S. MILLER
                                                 FERRY  & JOSEPH, P.A.
                                                 824 Market Street, Suite 904
                                                 P.O. Box 1351
                                                 Wilmington, DE 19899
                                                 (302) 575-1555
                                                 Attorneys for Defendant
    Dated: December 30, 1999
    
    
    
                                                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    
    Table of Authorities . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . .
    
    Preliminary Statement . . . . . . _ . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . .
    
    Statement of Facts . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    Argument . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    I.         This Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over the Defendant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
               A.         The defendant lacks sufficient minimum contacts with Delaware to
                          satisfy the requirements, of due process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
               B          Section 18-109 does not provide the statutory authority for this
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS
  • because it is unconstitutional at least as applied to this defendant.
  • Imtituto Bnncnrio Ituliano v. Hunter Eng. Co., Del.
  • The plaintiffs filed their Complaint in this case on November 30,
  • Delaware limited liability company in which the defendant was once a manager.
  • addressed to the defendant at the registered office of the LLC, and to an attorney in Florida,
  • case for, inter alia, lack of personal jurisdiction, and insufficiency of service of process.
  • Brief in support of his motion to dismiss.
  • The Court will note that there is very little case law analyzing the statute in question.
  • Defendant's argument analogizes to th[e corporate implied consent statute,
  • the exercise of in personam jurisdiction over a nonresident director of a Delaware
  • an allegation that such director has breached his fiduciary duty to the company.
  • implicate his fiduciary duties to the company.
  • parties under a contract, the LLC Agreement.
  • The agreement which created AIT was
  • The defendant had later formed his own business in Illinois,
  • TPG was the first such
  • plaintiffs allege that a true and correct copy of the AIT LLC agreement is attached thereto
  • implied consent statute for directors of corporations,
  • See Armstrong, 423 A.2d at 175, n.2.
  • requiring the defendants to impliedly consent to the assertion of Delaware in personam
  • 8 17-109 of Delaware's Limited Partnership Act, governing service of process on general
  • obviously a motion to quash such service would be granted" due to its unconstitutionality.

  • 6 . DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXPEDITE PROCEEDINGS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    MOTION
    EXPEDITED PROCEEDINGS
    RESPONSE
    DELAWARE
    JURISDICTION
    CHANCERY
    DISCOVERY
    STOCK MANAGEMENT
    MEMBERSHIP
    SUIT
    CASTLE COUNTY
    WILMINGTON
    OPPOSITION
    MATTER
    DISPUTE
    LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
    DISMISS
    DEL
    PERSONAM
    COUNSEL
    BRIEFING
    JUSTIFY
    EXPENSE
    PARTIES
    SCHEDULE
    PENDING
    ADEQUATE
    
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ASSIST STOCK MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.,  )
    and THE PAGE GROUP.COM, L.L.C.,            ))                              :  ,,
            Plaintiffs,                        )                                        j
                                               1                                             i
            V .                                ) C.A. No.  17610-NC                          .b
                                                                                        ; .-
                                               )
    IVEN ROSHEIM,                              ))
            Defendant.                         1                          :                        -I
                                                                            _ ,
    
                                  NOTICE  OF RESPONSE
    
    TO: Kenneth J. Nachbar, Esquire
            Morris Nichols Arsht  & Tunnel1
            1201 N. Market Street
            Wilmington, DE 19801
    
            PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the within Response in Opposition to
    
    Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Proceedings shall be presented
    
    to the Honorable Stephen P. Lamb on December 14, 1999 at 4:00
    
    p.m.
    
                                        FERRY  & JOSEPH, P.A.
                                                                   2-1
                                                                  ' '
                                         /  '-- --  '
                                        DAVID  J., FERRY, JR..
                                        RICK S. /MILLER      /
                                         824 Market  St$&'t,I+ Suite 904
                                         P.O. Box 1351
                                        Wilmington, DE 19899
                                         (302) 575-1555
                                        Attorneys for Defendant
    
    
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ASSIST STOCK MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., )
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
  • ASSIST STOCK MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.,)
  • 1201 N. Market Street Wilmington,
  • Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Proceedings shall be presented
  • DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION
  • TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXPEDITE PROCEEDINGS
  • Comes Now, Iven Rosheim, defendant in the foregoing matter,
  • This case involves an alleged dispute over the ownership
  • defendant has filed a motion to dismiss
  • discovery, the parties and the Court would benefit from disposing
  • the Court lacks jurisdiction over the defendant's person,
  • discovery schedule.
  • the defendant is willing to expedite briefing on the pending
  • Aside from the issue of lack of in personam
  • no affidavits or other factual record which would justify the
  • expense of expedited proceedings.
  • limited liability company, but there is no issue of control.
  • membership interest is entirely speculative.
  • not specifically allege any directly pending matter which would
  • Steiner v. Puritan-Bennett, Del.
  • suit was filed in Delaware, a state he has never even visited.
  • this case and find Delaware counsel to defend his interests.
  • prepare an adequate

  • 7 . V. ROSHEIM COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MEMBERS
    TPG
    ROSHEIM
    AGREEMENT
    CONSENT
    WATKINS
    ASM
    LIMITED LIABILITY
    DELAWARE
    MANAGEMENT
    CAPITAL/EQUITY
    PRESIDENT
    CONTROL
    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
    BUSINESS
    ADMISSION
    PLAINTIFFS
    OWNERSHIP
    SOLE MEMBER
    PURSUANT
    AUTHORITY
    ADMITTING
    OFFICERS
    OWNER
    AUTOMOBILE
    COMPLAINT
    RELIEF
    DEL
    FORMATION
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                     
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    Assist Stock Management L.L.C., and
    ThePageGroup.com, L.L.C.,
                            Plaintiffs
    
           V.
    
    Iven Rosheim,
                            Defendant.
    
    
    
                           COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
    
                     Plaintiffs, by their undersigned counsel, allege for their Complaint as follows:
    
                                             Nature of the Case
    
                     1.     This is a complaint for declaratory judgment and other relief, to resolve a
    
    controversy between the members of Assist Integrated Technologies L.L.C., a Delaware limited
    
    liability company, regarding their respective ownership interests and management rights in that
    
    company and in its subsidiary, ThePageGroup.com, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability
    
    company.
    
    
                                          Parties and Jurisdiction
    
                     2.     Plaintiff Assist Stock Management L.L.C. ("ASM") is a Delaware limited
    
    liability company with its principal place of business in Sarasota, Florida. Stephen H. Watkins
    
    ("Watkins") is the sole member of ASM.
    
                     3.     Defendant Iven Rosheim ("Rosheim") is an individual residing in
    
    Sarasota, Florida.
    
    
    
                  4.      On March 3, 1999, ASM and Rosheim entered into a limited liability
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Assist Stock Management L.L.C., and ThePageGroup.com, L.L.C.,
  • COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
  • Plaintiffs, by their undersigned counsel, allege for their Complaint as follows:
  • controversy between the members of Assist Integrated Technologies L.L.C., a Delaware limited
  • regarding their respective ownership interests and management rights in that
  • liability company with its principal place of business in Sarasota,
  • Defendant Iven Rosheim is an individual residing in
  • On March 3, 1999, ASM and Rosheim entered into a limited liability
  • company agreement (the "AIT Agreement"), in which they agreed to form Assist Integrated
  • AIT was then the sole member of TPG.
  • consented to service of process in Delaware, pursuant to 6 Del.
  • Formation of AIT as a Delaware limited liability company
  • Rosheim and Watkins agreed soon after AIT
  • "Following up on our discussion I will deposit capital/equity funds necessary to
  • the other officers of the Company and the Members."
  • issue that does not require the affirmative consent of all members.
  • Section 13of the AIT Agreement appoints Watkins President of AIT,
  • AIT Agreement provides that as President, Watkins has "such power and authority as persons
  • Admission of New Members to ThePaPeGroup.com,
  • admitting each new member of TPG.
  • The Controversv over Ownership and Control of AIT and TPG
  • that Rosheim is a "50% owner of equity in.
  • Rosheim has refused to return the automobile to TPG, despite several demands that he do so.
  • plaintiffs request the following relief:
  •    |