LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

KOHLS v KENETECH CORP Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,763, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: KOHLS, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017763, Kenetech, Prides, Liquidation Preference, Del, Certificate, Complaint, Discovery, Rights, Designations, Motion, Preferred Stockholders, Quadrangle, Delaware, Stock, Breach, Kohls, Contract, Dismiss, Holders, Common Stock, Judgement, Supr, Paragraph, Documents Referring, Dividends, Liquidation, Class Comp, Discovery Pending, Vice Chancellor, Fiduciary Duty, Mandatory Conversion, Shares, Defendants Deny, Equity, Defendants Admit, Sale, Distribution, Bracegirdle, Preferredl, Chandler, Assets , ContentID: 120239681

Case Documents
1 2000-07-26 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100203
17 pages
PDF
2 2000-03-20 DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102548
53 pages
PDF
3 2000-03-20 DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY DISCOVER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102547
32 pages
PDF
4 2000-03-20 ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101407
10 pages
PDF
5 2000-02-23 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101408
17 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 5 documents , 129 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
KENETECH
PRIDES
DEFENDANTS
HOLDERS
VICE CHANCELLOR
DELAWARE
PREFERREDL
KOHLS
OPINION
ASSETS
QUADRANGLE
RIGHTS
ESQUIRE
DIVIDENDS
SELLING
PURPORTED CLASS
CONTRACT
LITIGATE
BUSINESS
LIQUIDATION
REPRESENTING
JUDGEMENT
COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL
VICE CHANCELLOR STEELE
PREFERENTIAL DISTRIBUTION
PRIOR SUIT
CERTIFICATE
RES JUDICATA
FIDUCIARY DUTY
       IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                     ~3'. I
                                                                                            ,4;
                                                                                        , . .  (I
                                                                                              r
                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


ROBERT 1,. KOHLS and LOUISE A.
KO`HLS)

                   Plaintiffs,

      V.                                         >     Civil A&ion No. 17763-NC

KENETECH CORPORATION and MARK D. )
LERDAL, ANGUS M. DUTHIE,                         )
GERALD R. ALDERSON  and CHARLES                  )
CHRISTENSON,                                     >                        -..1.    :,  )
                                                                                   '

                   Defendants.                                       :.~'
                                                                     -

                             MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                  Submitted: April 20, 2000
                                   Decided: July 26, 2000


Edward M. McNally, Esquire and John T. Meli, Jr., Esquire, of MORRIS, JAMES,
HITCHENS  & WILLIAMS LLP, Wilminton, Delaware, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Charles F. Richards, Jr., Esquire, Raymond J. DiCamillo, Esquire and Thad J.
Bra.cegirdle,  Esquire, of RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, Wilmington, Delaware,
Attorneys for Defendants.






LA MB, Vice Chancellor



                                       I .   INTRODUCTION

       IPlaintiffs  bring this purported class action on behalf of all holders as of

SNIPPETS:
  • KOHLS and LOUISE A. KO`HLS)
  • KENETECH CORPORATION and MARK D.)
  • Edward M. McNally, Esquire and John T. Meli, Jr., Esquire, of MORRIS, JAMES, HITCHENS &
  • Equity,Securities ("PRIDES" j.
  • contract rights, as plaintiffs say they "seekto litigate whether was
  • plaintif'fs say that they ha'd a right under the PRIDES Certificate of Designations
  • ' Kenetech PRIDES were Imarketed by selling depositary share units representing a 1150"'
  • `The nucleus of operative facts at issue here is the same as in Quadrangle
  • involving virtually the same facts and legal claims and ruled in the defendants'
  • The reader is also referred to the memorandum opinion in a companion
  • providled for the payment of a preferential distribution to PRIDES holders in the
  • In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, Idissolution, or winding up of the
  • the holders of outstanding share of I?.RIDES are entitled to receive the sum of $1,012.50 per
  • Eleginning in 1995, Kenetech's business deteriorated significantly.
  • PRIDES and this failure constituted a breach of Defendants' fiduciary duty to the
  • Pointing to Vice Chancellor Steele's post-trial Opinion in Quadrangle 11,'
  • Does Res Judiicuta: or Collateral Estoppel Apply?
  • Under the doctrine of res judicata, a judgment in a prior suit involving the;same parties, or
  • provide adequate notice tlo the purported class with respect to the action (or to
  • If, for exam:ple., they sought to litigate about an entirely different
  • hi.s decision in Quadrangle ZZ addresses the exact contract
  • x Plaintiffs argue thal because Vice Chancellor Steele denied the defendants' motion to
  • "It is oft noted that a preferred shareholder's rights are those specified in -the

  • 2 . DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    DEL
    COURT
    RIGHTS
    CERTIFICATE
    DESIGNATIONS
    PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS
    KENETECH
    COMPLAINT
    BREACH
    DELAWARE
    CONTRACT
    SUPR
    QUADRANGLE
    JUDGEMENT
    PRIDES
    CLASS COMP
    COMMON STOCK
    BRACEGIRDLE
    MANDATORY CONVERSION
    DEFENDANTS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    OUTSTANDING
    DISTRIBUTION
    COMPLAINT FAILS
    CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
    DISSOLUTION
    DELAWARE LAW
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ROBERT L. KOHLS and LOUISE A. KOHLS, )
    
                                Plaintiffs,
    
                          V.                       ) C.A. No. 17763
                                                   j
    KENETECH CORPORATION and MARK                  i
    D. LERDAL, ANGUS M. DUTHIE,
    GERALD R. ALDERSON and CHARLES                 ;
    CHRISTENSON,
                                                   ;
                                Defendants.        >
    
    
    
                       DEFENDANTS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR  :                '
                         MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT                       '
    
    
    
    
                                                        Charles F. RichLards,  Jr.
                                                        Raymond J. DiCamillo
                                                        Thad J. Bracegirdle
                                                        Richards, Layton & Finger
                                                        One Rodney Square
                                                        P.O. Box 551
                                                        Wilmington, Dlslaware 19899
                                                        (302) 658-654.1
                                                         Attorneys for Defendants
    
    
    
    
    
    Dated: March 20, 2000
    
    
    
    
    RLFI-2130389-I
    
    
    
                                            TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS ARE BARRED BY THE JUDGMENT
  • THE COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE A BREACH OF CONTRACT
  • The Rights Of Preferred Stockholders Must Be Expressly Stated
  • Even If The Liquidation Preference Had Vested,
  • THE COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE A BREACH OF FIDUCIARY
  • Ch., 184 A.2d 90 affd, Del.
  • Supr., 624 A.2d
  • Division of Child Support Enforcement ex rel. Venev v. Campbell,
  • Quadrangle Offshore LLC v. KENETECH Corporation,
  • Equity Securities ("PRIDES ") ofKENETECH Corporation,
  • has been crystal clear -- on May 14, 1998, all the outstanding shares of PRIDES would
  • the mandatory conversion, KENETECH was "winding up" its affairs Thus, plaintiffs claim
  • See Class Comp.
  • fi 10; Bracegirdle AIT., Ex.
  • Supr., 669 A.2d 59, 70; u Wheelabrator Techs., Inc. Shareholders Litig,, Del.
  • Lerdal, Christenson, Alderson and Duthie are referred to herein as the "Individual
  • common stock on May 14,
  • Certificate of Designations, Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Preferred Redeemable
  • out of the assets of the Corporation available for distribution to stockholders.
  • If upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the
  • "The Director Defendants failed to act in "If the Liquidation Preference is not good faith to
  • A finding of privity between plaintiffs here and Quadrangle is consistent with longstanding
  • in the action on the absent preferred stockholders would not be piejudicial to them.

  • 3 . DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY DISCOVER

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    MOTION
    DEFENDANTS
    DEL
    DISMISS
    DOCUMENTS REFERRING
    KENETECH
    DISCOVERY PENDING
    KOHLS
    PRIDES
    PLAINTIFFS
    QUADRANGLE
    CHANDLER
    RELATING
    COMPLAINT
    LIQUIDATION
    OPENING
    SUPPORT
    DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION
    COMMON STOCK
    MANDATORY CONVERSION
    NATIONAL UNION FIRE
    COMMUNICATION
    LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE
    DISPOSITIVE MOTION
    CLASS COMP
    DOCUMENT REQUEST
    DISTRIBUTION
    ABB FLAKT
    AMERSIG GRAPHICS
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                
    
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ROBERT L. KOHLS  and LOUISE A. KOHLS, )
                                                                                                   `  .
                               Plaintiffs,         i                                                   
                                                                                                  r,   
                         V.                        ; C.A. No. 17763                               c..> 
    
                                                                                                  7
    KENETECH CORPORATION and MARK                  ;                                             - `,--
    D. LERDAL, ANGUS M. DUTHIE,                                                                  . .
                                                                                      :. _
    GERALD R. ALDERSON and CHARLES                1                                      - .z    CD
                                                                                                 PO
    CHRISTENSON,                                  >
    
                               Defendants.        >
    
    
             DEFENDANTS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO
        STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS
    
    
    
    
                                                        Charles F. Rich.ards,  Jr.
                                                        Raymond J. DiCamillo
                                                        Thad J. Bracegirdle
                                                        Richards, Layton & Finger
                                                        One Rodney Square
                                                        P.O. Box 551
                                                        Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                        (302) 658-654.1
                                                         Attorneys for Defendants
    
    
    
    
    Dated: March 20, 2000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    RLFl-2133066-l
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • ROBERT L. KOHLS and LOUISE A. KOHLS,)
  • DEFENDANTS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF
  • Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins.
  • Corporate Property v. AmerSig Graphics, Inc., Del.
  • Ch., CA No. 12902, Chandler, V.C..,.,.....,..,,,....,_,__._...,._._...,..,.
  • Quadrangle Offshore LLC v. KENETECH Corp.,
  • 2000 --over twenty months after the mandatory conversion -- plaintiffs Robert L. Kohls and
  • complaint and subsequent amended complaint allege that prior to the mandatory conversion,
  • plaintiffs claim entitlement to a liquidation
  • preference notwithstanding the fact that the PRIDES are no longer outstanding.
  • "Certificate of Designations"), Class Comp.
  • conversion of the PRIDES into common stock which took place on May 14,
  • and subject to the rights of holders of anv other series of Preferred Stock, the holders of
  • 1998 -- eight days before the mandatory conversion date -- Quadrangle Offshore
  • assets which KENETECH might someday make; Quadrangle's right to the liquidation preference
  • to Defendants (the "Document Request") and Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories Directed
  • All documents referring or relating to the financing for any
  • merits of the action before resolution of defendants' potentially dispositive motion to
  • e.g., ABB Flakt.
  • Whenever you are requested to "identify" a communication of any type

  • 4 . ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMPLAINT
    PARAGRAPH
    DEFENDANTS DENY
    DEFENDANTS ADMIT
    KENETECH
    COURT
    RESPECTFULLY REFER
    CERTIFICATE
    THEREOF
    RESPONSIVE PLEADING
    THIRD SENTENCES
    DESIGNATIONS
    KENETECH BOARD
    COMPLAINT SET
    OFTHE
    STOCK
    LIQUIDATION
    FINANCING
    PREFERENCES
    CONVERSION
    ECOELCCTRICA
    PLAINTIFFS
    COMMON STOCK
    STOCKHOLDER
    COMMITTEE
    LIQUIDATION ANALYSIS
    FINANCIAL PROBLEMS
    ASSETS
    SALE
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ROBERT L. KOHLS and LOUISE A. KOHLS, )                                                            _
                                                                                   :'                 :
                               Plaintiffs,              i                                              
                                                                                                      y
                         V.                             ; C.A. No. 17763                              
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    KENETECH CORPORATION and MARK                       i                                              
                                                                                         /
    D. LERDAL, ANGUS M. DUTHIE,                                                          -.  j         
                                                                                         -; . ;        
    GERALD R. ALDERSON  and CHARLES                     t                                     -+._
    CHRISTENSON,                                        )
    
                               Defendants.             i
    
    
                               ANSWER TO  FlRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
             Defendants KENETECH Corporation ("KENETECH"), Angus M. Duthie, Mark D. Lerdal,
    
    Gerald R.  Alderson and Charles Christenson hereby answer the first amended complaint (the
    
    "Complaint") herein as follows:
    
                                              NATURE OF THE ACTION
    
             1. Defendants admit the allegations contained in paragraph 1 of the Complaint
    
             2. Defendants admit the allegations contained in the first and second sentences of
    
    paragraph 2 of the Complaint. Defendants deny the allegations contained in the third sentence of
    
    paragraph 2 of the Complaint, except defendants respectfully refer the Court to the Certificate of
    
    Designations, Preferences, Rights and Liabilities of Preferred Redeemable Increased Dividend
    
    Equity Securities 8-l/4% PRIDES Convertible Preferred Stock of KENETECH (the "Certificate of
    
    Designations") for the contents thereof.
    
             3. Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph 3 of the Complaint, except
    
    defendants respectfully refer the Court to the Certificate of Designations for the contents thereof.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • ANSWER TO FlRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
  • Defendants KENETECH Corporation, Angus M. Duthie, Mark D. Lerdal,
  • Defendants admit the allegations contained in paragraph 1 of the Complaint
  • Designations, Preferences, Rights and Liabilities of Preferred Redeemable Increased Dividend
  • Equity Securities 8-l/4% PRIDES Convertible Preferred Stock of KENETECH (the "Certificate of
  • Designations") for the contents thereof.
  • Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph 3 of the Complaint,
  • defendants respectfully refer the Court to the Certificate of Designations for the contents
  • as part of its response to such financial problems, the KENETECH board of directors
  • forth legal conclusions to which no responsive pleading is required.
  • The allegations contained in paragraph 11 ofthe Complaint set forth legal conclusions
  • defendants admit that from May 1994 through May 14, 1998, the only classes of KENETECH stock
  • which had shares outstanding were common stock and the PRIDES.
  • except defendants respectfully refer the Court to the resolution ofthe KENETECH Board
  • stockholder of KWI, to seek protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.
  • the committee, KENETECH agreed to provide the committee with legal and financial advisors.
  • defendants admit that the KENETECH Board reviewed a liquidation (analysis at its October 24,
  • EcoElCctrica to a potential bidder for $152 5 million.
  • except defendants admit that by mid-1997 KENETECH had sold most of its assets and
  • defendants admit that a liquidation analysis was presented to the KENETECH Board in the Summer
  • Defendants admit the allegations contained in the first, second and third sentences
  • its construction financing in December 1997.
  • the sale was used to retire the principal and accrued interest on the senior secured notes.
  • Such conversion was ultimately successful,
  • To the extent that plaintiffs seek monetary damages from Messrs.

  • 5 . FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PRIDES
    STOCK
    BUSINESS
    SHARES
    DIVIDENDS
    EQUITY
    KOHLS
    SALE
    HOLDERS
    COMMON STOCK
    DEFENDANTS
    ECOELECTRICA
    WIND-POWERED ELECTRICITY GENERATION
    BUSINESSES
    PLANT
    SENIOR NOTES
    FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    PREFERRED STOCK
    CERTIFICATE
    DESIGNATIONS
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    DIRECTORS
    PLAINTIFFS
    CONVERSION
    INVOLUNTARY CONVERSION
    KWI
    ATTORNEYS
    HOLDING COMPANY
    LIQUIDATION
    
              IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ROBERT L. KOHLS and LOUISE A.
    KOHLS,                                        i
    
                                 Plaintiffs,      i
    
              V.                                  1       Civil Action No. 177$3:NC
                                                  >
    KENETECH CORPORATION and                      1
    MARK D. LERDAL, ANGUS M.                      1
    DUTHIE, GERALD R. ALDERSON  and               )
    CHARLES CHRISTENSON,                          1
                                  Defendants.                                    _  ;
    
                                FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
                    Plaintiffs, Robert L. Kohls and Louise A. Kohls (collectively "Plaintiffs"),
    
    by and through their attorneys, allege as follows:
    
                                   NMURE  OF THE ACTION
    
                    1.     KENETECH Corporation ("KENETECH" or the "Corporation") is
    
    a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware.
    
    KENETECH was formed as a holding company whose businesses historically consisted
    
    of developing turbines and plants for wind-powered electricity generation and later
    
    developing independent thermal power projects, among other businesses.
    
                    2.     In 1994, KENETECH received approximately $100 million upon
    
    the sale of 102,492 shares of preferred stock known as Preferred Redeemable Increased
    
    Dividend Equity Securities ("PRIDES"). KENETECH issued the PRIDES primarily to
    
    fund the growth of its wind-power business and as a way of obtaining capital that would
    
    
    
    appear on its balance sheet as equity rather than debt. The PRIDES have the key
    
    characteristics of preferred stock, including a fixed rate of return and the right to receive
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs, Robert L. Kohls and Louise A. Kohls,
  • KENETECH Corporation is
  • KENETECH was formed as a holding company whose businesses historically consisted
  • of developing turbines and plants for wind-powered electricity generation and later
  • the sale of 102,492 shares of preferred stock known as Preferred Redeemable Increased
  • Dividend Equity Securities.
  • KENETECH issued the PRIDES primarily to
  • repayment of principal ahead of the common stock holders under certain conditions.
  • principal invested through the PRIDES was the winding up of KENETECH as a business.
  • "Certificate of Designations") for the PRIDES contemplated that holders of the PRIDES
  • would be repaid their principal investment and accrued dividends if prior to the PRIDES
  • conversion to KENETECH common stock KENETECH went out of business.
  • the KENETECH Board of Directors eventually determined to sell
  • Further, the Director Defendants from May, 1996 to May 14, 1998,
  • 1998 from the adverse affects of their involuntary conversion into common stock,
  • its board of directors breached its fiduciary duty to the Class.
  • Puerto Rico, a project known as "EcoElectrica", at a cost of approximately $670 million.
  • project would be sold once the plant was up and running.
  • In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation,
  • KWI lost $1 billion in expected wind-power
  • KENETECH agreed with the Senior Notes holder committee that if the Senior
  • not limited to attorneys fees and expert fees;
  • copies of the First Amended Complaint to be served via postage prepaid,
  •    |