LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

LEONARD LOVENTHAL ACCOUNT v HILTON HOTELS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,803, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN I HE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LI;LI I, Plaintiff: LEONARD LOVENTHAL ACCOUNT, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017803, Hilton, Rights, Rights Plan, Common Stock, Certificate, Rights Agreement, Shares, Delaware, Trust, Holders, Del, Provisions, Stockholders, Directors, Hilton Board, Household, Agreement, Holder, Incorporation, Doctrine, Stare Decisis, Certificates, Rights Agent, Common Shares, Shareholders, Supp, Transfer Restriction, Poison Pill, Violates, Legend, Contract, Distribution, Obligations, Supr, Liability, Hilton Hotels, Fails, Lawsuit, Dgcl, Stockholder, Delaware General Corporation, Acquiescence , ContentID: 120239677

Case Documents
1 2000-12-01 JUDGMENT ORDER
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 103579
2 pages
PDF
2 2000-10-10 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100198
28 pages
PDF
3 2000-08-18 DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102529
40 pages
PDF
4 2000-04-19 DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102530
25 pages
PDF
5 2000-02-22 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101368
25 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 5 documents , 120 pages
Price: $ 39.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . JUDGMENT ORDER

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
HILTON
DIRECTORS
CHANCERY RULE
REASONS
RIGHTS
JUDGEMENT
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PURSUANT
HILTON STOCKHOLDERS
DUTIES
REDEEM
JUDGMENT ORDER
FAILURE
RELIEF
RIGHTS AGREEMENT
DUTIES ACCRUING
DELAY
EXPRESSLY DIRECTS
ENTRY
COURT DEFERS
PLAINTIFFS ENTITLEMENT
AWARD
ATTORNEYS
FEES
EXPENSES
COSTS
SUPREME COURT
MANDATE
REMANDS
                                                              ,py   ?`.  !y  ",?  7.  5

                                                              k:  I  ;  :  :  i    ;  i.  .L  i,  i
                                                                           L  .


  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                   IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY


LEONARD LOVENTHAL                         >
ACCOUNT,                                  >

                    Plaintiff,            >>
             V.                           >     Civil Action No. 17803
                                          >
HILTON HOTELS CORP.,                      >
a Delaware Corporation,                   >>
                    Defendant.            >


                            JUDGMENT ORDER

      For the reasons assigned in the Court's Memorandum Opinion entered

in this case on October 10,2000, it is

      ORDERED that:

       1.     Counts I, II, III and IV are dismissed pursuant to Court of

Chancery Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted.

      2.     For the reasons stated in the Court's October 10, 2000,

Memorandum Opinion, Count V is dismissed. Section 31 of the Hilton

Rights Agreement does not affect the rights of the Hilton stockholders in

relation to the Hilton directors, nor does Section 3 1 affect the duties owed by



the Hilton directors to the Hilton stockholders, including the duties accruing

to the directors from any decision to redeem or not to redeem the Rights.
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • JUDGMENT ORDER
  • For the reasons assigned in the Court's Memorandum Opinion entered
  • Chancery Rule 12for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
  • Memorandum Opinion, Count V is dismissed.
  • Section 31 of the Hilton
  • Rights Agreement does not affect the rights of the Hilton stockholders in
  • relation to the Hilton directors, nor does Section 3 1 affect the duties owed by
  • the Hilton directors to the Hilton stockholders, including the duties accruing
  • to the directors from any decision to redeem or not to redeem the Rights.
  • The Court, finding no just reason for delay, expressly directs
  • the entry of judgment pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 54.
  • The Court defers any consideration of plaintiffs entitlement to
  • an award of attorneys' fees, expenses and costs until after the time for taking
  • an appeal has expired or, in the event of an appeal, after the Supreme Court
  • issues its mandate and remands the case to this Court.

  • 2 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    HILTON
    COMMON STOCK
    COURT
    HILTON BOARD
    TRUST
    PLAINTIFF
    HOLDER
    DELAWARE
    DIRECTORS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    CERTIFICATE
    AGREEMENT
    POISON PILL
    SHARES
    DEL
    DEFENDANT
    TRANSFER RESTRICTION
    STOCKHOLDERS
    PROVISION
    HILTON HOTELS
    RIGHTS AGENT
    STARE DECISIS
    INCORPORATION
    HOUSEHOLD RIGHTS PLAN
    DISMISS CLAIM
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    LIABILITY
    CHASEMELLON SHAREHOLDER SERVICES
    CLASS ACTION
    
                                                                               ,  .
      IN `I`HE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE li;li  i/?
    
                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    LEONARD LOVENTHAL
    ACCOUNT,
    
                           Plaintiff,
    
                 V.                                  Civil Action No. 17803
    
    HILTON HOTELS CORP.,
    a Delaware corporation,
    
                           Defendant.
    
    
                           MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
                        Date Submitted: September 27, 2000
                          Date Decided: October  lo,2000
    
    
    h4ichael Hanrahan, Gary F.  Tray,nor, and Paul A. Fioravanti, Jr., of
    P'RKKETT,  JONES  Ck ELLIOTT, Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL:
    Terry Rose Saunders, Chicago, Illinois, Attorneys for Plaintiff.
    
    Jesse A.  FinMsteii~ and J. Travis Laster, of RICHARDS, LAYTON  &
    I-`INGER, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Defendant.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Cl MNDLER, Chancellor
    
    
    
               This lawsuit challenges a "poison pill" Rights Agreement (the "Rights Plan"
    
    or,  simpty, the "Plan") between defendant Hilton Hotels Corporation and
    
    ChaseMellon Shareholder Services L.L.C. adopted by the Hilton board of directors
    
    on November 29, `. 999. Plaintiff Leonard Loventhal Account (the "Trust") brings
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN `I`HE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE li;li i/?
  • HILTON HOTELS CORP.,
  • h4ichael Hanrahan, Gary F. Tray,nor, and Paul A. Fioravanti, Jr., of P'RKKETT, JONES Ck
  • Jesse A. FinMsteii~ and J. Travis Laster, of RICHARDS, LAYTON & I-`INGER, Wilmington,
  • This lawsuit challenges a "poison pill" Rights Agreement (the "Rights Plan"
  • the action individually and as a class action on behalf of all holders of Hilton
  • common stock on November 29,
  • directors to adopt a poison pill rights plan fifteen years ago in Momn v. Hozuehol'd
  • srrch as the flip-in fe,ature, the grand-fathering provision, or the exchange option,
  • Ch., 490 A.2d 1059, @"cl Del.
  • because l:he Stockholders are not a party to or bound by the Rights Plan ("Claim
  • issuing "clean" and unlegended stock certificates for shares of Hilton common
  • those shares without an amendment of Hilton's certificate of inc'orporation ("Claim
  • may accrue to thlz Hilton board of directors (individually,
  • has cross,-moved fix summary judgment on Claim 1.
  • The plaintiff, the `Trust, has been a holder of Hilton common stock from
  • Plan were Hilton and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services 1L.L.C.
  • as Rights Agent.
  • Chancery has also discussed stare decisis and held that "he prerequisites
  • only contained in the Household rights plan,
  • Section 141states in relevant part: I`he business and affairs of every corporation organized
  • shareholders must be a party to the Rights Plan or formally vote to accept the
  • The motion to dismiss Claim I is, therefore, granted.
  • Hcts Hilton iqmsed An Impwnissibie Transfer Restriction On Its Conmzo~z Stock In Connection
  • All such actions, calculations, interpretations and determinations below, all omissions with

  • 3 . DEFENDANTS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    RIGHTS PLAN
    DELAWARE
    LAW
    HOUSEHOLD
    PROVISIONS
    CERTIFICATES
    TRUST
    HILTON
    COMMON SHARES
    SUPP
    DEL
    COURT
    LEGEND
    COMMON STOCK
    AGREEMENT
    STOCKHOLDER
    RIGHTS AGENT
    DISTRIBUTION
    DIRECTORS
    COMPLAINT
    BASIC PROVISIONS
    SUPREME COURT
    TRANSFER RESTRICTION
    DGCL
    ORIGINAL PLAN
    PLAINTIFFS
    LIABILITY
    INSTRUMENT
    ABSOLUTE OWNER THEREOF
    
                       IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                    //
    
                                         M AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    LEONARD LOVENTHAL ACCOUNT,                      )
    
                        Plaintiff,                  1
    
              V.                                    1      C.A. No. 17803
    
    HILTON HOTELS CORP,                             ;
              a Delaware corporation,
    
                        Defendant.                  i
    
    
                                          DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF
                                      MLJPPORT  OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS
    
                                                                                       i
    
                                                         Jesse A. Finkelstein
                                                         J. Travis Laster
                                                         RICHARDS, LAYTON  & FINGER
                                                         One Rodney Square
                                                         P.O. Box 551
                                                         Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                         (302) 658-6541
    
    
    Dated: August 18, 2000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    RLFl-219567.4-l
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • a Delaware corporation,
  • F. Supp.
  • Corp. Law 4 505(Consol.
  • Del.
  • mn v. Household International, Inc., Del.
  • Wilmjngton Trust Co. v. Copeland,

  • 4 . DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COURT
    DOCTRINE
    DEL
    DELAWARE
    RIGHTS PLAN
    PLAINTIFFS
    STARE DECISIS
    SUPR
    HOUSEHOLD
    TRUST
    FAILS
    LAWSUIT
    SHARES
    COMMON STOCK
    ACQUIESCENCE
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CHARTER AMENDMENT
    DGCL
    HILTON HOTELS
    AUTHORITIES
    DELAWARE LAW
    UNENFORCEABLE CONTRACT
    DIRECTORS
    CERTIFICATE
    TRANSFER RESTRICTION
    DEFENDANT
    AGREEMENT
    IMPROPER LEGEND
    LEONARD LOVENTHAL ACCOUNT
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    LEONARD LOVENTHAL ACCOUNT,
    
                       Plaintiff,
                                                   i
             V.                                           CA. No. 17803
    
    HILTON HOTELS CORP,
             a Delaware corporation,
    
                       Defendant.
    
    
                                        DEFENDANT'S OPENING BRIEF
                                     IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS              ._  I
    
    
                                                        Jesse A. Finkelstein    :      . "
                                                        .I. Travis Laster             F`- -I
                                                                                      -' .
                                                        RICHARDS, LAYTON  & FINGER
                                                        One Rodney Square
                                                        P.O. Box 551
                                                        Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                        (302) 658-6541
    
    
    Dated: April  19,200O
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    RLFI-2147128-l
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • HILTON HOTELS CORP,
  • TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.
  • THE PLAINTIFF'S ARGUMENTS FAILS ON THEIR MERITS.
  • THE CURRENT LAWSUIT IS BARRED BY THE
  • OF ACQUIESCENCE AND LACHES
  • Supr., 452 A.2d 148.
  • Bershad v. Curtis+Wright Corp., Del.
  • Moran v. Household International.
  • "[wlhether or not Delaware law should have authorized the utilization of this
  • plaintiff Leonard Loventhal Account (the "Trust") now
  • challenges the legality of a garden-variety stockholder rights plan adopted by Hilton Hotels
  • and the doctrine of stare decisis requires that the current action be dismissed.
  • Defendant Hilton is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices in
  • The Trust alleges that it is a holder of Hilton common stock.
  • the board of directors of Hilton first adopted a rights plan
  • entered into a merger or other acquisition agreement that had been approved by the Hilton
  • Either the Trust acquired its shares after July 14, 1988, when Hilton
  • and enforceable contract between Hilton and its stockholders.
  • "Unenforceable Contract Argument")).
  • 77 3037 (the "Transfer Restriction Argument")).
  • certificate of incorporation, as purportedly required by Sections 15 1 and 242 of the DGCL,
  • 7138-40 (the "Charter Amendment Argument")).

  • 5 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    HILTON
    COMMON STOCK
    CERTIFICATE
    RIGHTS AGREEMENT
    SHARES
    HOLDERS
    PLAINTIFF
    STOCKHOLDERS
    PROVISIONS
    INCORPORATION
    VIOLATES
    CONTRACT
    OBLIGATIONS
    DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION
    RIGHTS AGENT
    HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION
    IMPOSE OBLIGATIONS
    DIRECTORS
    FUTURE HOLDERS
    LIABILITY
    TRANSFERRING
    REPRESENTING
    DISTRIBUTION
    ENFORCEABLE CONTRACT
    OUTSTANDING COMMON SHARES
    FULLY SET
    LIMITATIONS
    SURRENDER
    UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
    
                                                                    .  -  _  ._,  1                    
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARI?
    
                                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    LEONARD LOVENTHAL ACCOUNT, ;                                                                       
                        Plaintiff,
    
                        V.                              Civil Action No.                               
                                                                )  ,&DQJc  !.  I.:,
    HILTON HOTELS CORP.,                                                            3           .`L-
                                                                                    _--.  1  _
    a Delaware Corporation,                                                              --;           
                        Defendant.
    
    
                                               COMPLAINT
    
    
                                         NATURE OF THE ACTION
    
            1.          Plaintiff Leonard Loventhal Account (the "Trust") is and at all relevant
    
    times has been a holder of common stock par value $2.50 per share ("Common
    
    Stock") of Hilton Hotels Corporation ("Hilton" or the "Company"). Plaintiff
    
    challenges a November 29, 1999 Rights Agreement (the "Rights Agreement"), which
    
    is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Through that Rights Agreement Hilton purported
    
    to "attach" poison pill "Rights" (the "Rights") to the Common Stock of plaintiff and
    
    all current and future holders of Hilton's Common Stock and to impose obligations
    
    on those stockholders. The Rights Agreement, however, is a unilateral action by
    
    Hilton that does not create any valid and enforceable contract with plaintiff or the
    
    current or future holders of Hilton Common Stock.                       Moreover, the Rights
    
    Agreement, including the Summary of Rights to  Purcha.se  Preferred Shares (the
    
    
    
    17210.1\104901v1
    
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff,
  • times has been a holder of common stock par value $2.50 per share ("Common
  • Stock") of Hilton Hotels Corporation.
  • challenges a November 29, 1999 Rights Agreement, which
  • is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Through that Rights Agreement Hilton purported
  • all current and future holders of Hilton's Common Stock and to impose obligations
  • Hilton that does not create any valid and enforceable contract with plaintiff or the
  • including the Summary of Rights to Purcha.se Preferred Shares (the
  • violates provisions of the Delaware General Corporation
  • the Uniform Commercial Code and the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Hilton.
  • certificates representing shares of Hilton Common Stock.
  • held by 11,533 stockholders of record.
  • The Company hereby appoints the Rights Agent to act as
  • Agreement purports to impose obligations, restrictions and other terms on plaintiff
  • Distribution Date,
  • the surrender of such certificates for transfer of Common Stock must also transfer
  • transfer or exchange of outstanding Common Shares)
  • Directors to extend the Distribution Date shall not
  • Hilton stockholders and releases the directors from "any liability" to the
  • Agreement violates the Delaware General Corporation Law, the UCC, and Hilton's
  • as if fully set forth herein.
  • also transferring the "associated" Rights which "will automatically attach" to the
  • $151, the rights, limitations and restrictions
  •    |