LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

KOSACHUCK v HARPER Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,928, Plaintiff: KOSACHUCK, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017928, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STA.TE OF DELAWARE, Kosachuk, Harper, Stockholders Agreement, Latinadvisor, Del, Delaware, Paragraph, Mccausland, Allegations, Contrasena, Motion, Summary Judgment, Shares, Deny, Terminate, Draft, Stockholders, Damages, Employment, Allam, Attorney-client Privilege, Communications, Admit, Complaint, Supr, Attorney-client, Delaware Corporation, Common Stock, Christopher Kosachuk, Partial Summary Judgment, Compel, Investors, Equity, Termination, York, Counterclaims, Company Common Stock, Co-founder , ContentID: 120239670

Case Documents
1 2100-09-28 AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101252
24 pages
PDF
2 2002-07-25 MEMORANDUM OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 131708
24 pages
PDF
3 2001-12-21 PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127185
38 pages
PDF
4 2001-12-11 OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127115
28 pages
PDF
5 2001-09-07 REPLY TO AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127023
6 pages
PDF
6 2000-12-19 LETTER OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100190
4 pages
PDF
7 2000-08-23 PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102478
33 pages
PDF
8 2000-08-11 DEFENDANTS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102479
30 pages
PDF
9 2000-06-05 OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANT CONTRASENA IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STAY
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102480
20 pages
PDF
10 2000-05-30 REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIMS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101253
6 pages
PDF
11 2000-05-08 ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101254
26 pages
PDF
12 2000-03-27 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101255
18 pages
PDF
13   SECOND AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 127022
28 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 13 documents , 285 pages
Price: $ 79.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEFENDANTS
STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
PLAINTIFF
HARPER
DRAFT
TERMINATE
SHARES
LATINADVISORCOM
FILING
EMPLOYMENT
MASSIVE DILUTION
COMMON STOCK
DELAWARE
BUSINESS
THEREAFTER
DELAWARE CORPORATION
MCCAUSLAND
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
CO-FOUNDER
INCORPORATES
TERMINATION
FIDUCIARY DUTIES
CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK
CERTIFICATE
EQUITY FINANCING
ADEQUATE REMEDY
CONTRASENA
INVESTORS
PARAGRAPHS
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                                                        9c:
                              IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                              ,li-ii-i  /
-                                --.
CHRISTOPHER  KOSACHUK,

                                Plainliff,
                                                    i
V.                                                        C.A. No. 17928
                                                    i
HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY McCAUSLAND,                  )
anti OMAR ALLAM,                                    >

                                Defendants,         !,

And                                                 1
                                                                                   .
LATINADVISOR.COM,  INC., a Delaware                 ;
Corporation,
                                                    1
                             Norninal Defendant.

-          -

                       AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT

                 Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk, for his Amended and Supplemental Complaint,

alleges as follows herein upon knowledge as to his own conduct and upon information and belief

as to all o-ther matters:

                                    NATURE OF THIS ACTION

                 1. Plaintiff brings this action to rescind a "stockholders agreement" and to

obtain declaratory and other relief with respect to his ownership interest in  LatinAdvisorcom,

Inc., a Delaware corporation  ("l,atinAdvisor.com"  or the "Company"). As alleged herein,

defendants conspired to  in'duce  Plaintiff, a co-founder of the Company, to sign a draft

stockholders agreement  pumuant  to which Defendants -- just 12 days later -- purported to

terminate Plaintiffs "employment" and thereby divest him of all but 2.4% ownership interest in



LatinAdvisor.com.  Thereafter, following the filing of this action, the individual Defendants
SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk, for his Amended and Supplemental Complaint,
  • Plaintiff brings this action to rescind a "stockholders agreement" and to
  • obtain declaratory and other relief with respect to his ownership interest in LatinAdvisorcom,
  • Inc., a Delaware corporation.
  • stockholders agreement pumuant to which Defendants -- just 12 days later -- purported to
  • Thereafter, following the filing of this action, the individual Defendants
  • caused and/or permitted a massive dilution of Plaintiffs interest in the Company in an effort
  • stoc:k having rights and preferences superior to the Common stock and issued to Harper an
  • fraudulent scheme was orchestrated by Defendants after Plaintiff, a co-founder of the Company,
  • McCausland is a Director an'd Chairwoman of the Board of Directors of LatinAdvisor.corn.
  • services to Latin American and .multinational companies doing business in Latin America.
  • Contrasena S.A. is a Panamanian corporation,
  • Certificate of Incorporation of LatinAdvisor.com in Delaware.
  • authorizes 1,000 shares of capital stock of the Company.
  • solicited investors in raising approximately $1.3 million in working capital;
  • LatinAdvisoreom's New York law firm prepared the draft Stockllolders Agreement challenged
  • The Employees agree that upon the termination of employment of either of the Employees with
  • DEFENDANTS "TERMINATE" KOSAC HlJJ
  • Rather, they intended to close an Equity Financing, s,o that the holders of the Notes
  • Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference herein the allegations in
  • paragraphs 1 through 45.
  • Defendants breached their fiduciary duties owed to Kosachuk by
  • Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.

  • 2 . MEMORANDUM OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    HARPER
    STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
    LATINADVISOR
    EQUITY
    COURT
    DEFENDANTS
    DUTY
    COUNTERCLAIM
    SHARES
    PLAINTIFF
    ATTORNEYS
    ESQUIRE
    EMPLOYEES
    COMMON STOCK
    YORK
    DELAWARE
    CORPORATE CARDS
    PURCHASE
    TERMINATION
    EXPENSES
    FRAUDULENT
    WACHTELL
    TESTIMONY
    PERSONAL LOANS
    HARPER ADMITS
    AMERICAN
    BUSINESS
    SIGNATURE
    LAPTOP COMPUTERS
    
     IN  THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,                                 ))
                           Plaintiff,                     )1
                   v.                                     1      C.A. No. 17928
                                                          1
    HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY                                )
    McCAUSLAND,  and CONTRASENA,                           1
    S.A.,                                                  1
                                                           1
                           Defendants,                     >
    and                                                    >
    LATINADVISOR.COM, INC.,                                >
    a Delaware Corporation,                                >>
                           Nominal Defendant.              1
    __---_____-_______----------------------------------- -1
    HENRY E. HARPER and                                    >
    LATINADVISOR.COM, INC., ,                              )
                                                           1
                           Counterclaim-plaintiffs, )
                                                           1
                   v.                                      1
                                                           )
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,                                  11
                           Counterclaimdefendant. )
    
    
    
                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
                               Submitted: February  26,2002
                                    Decided: July 25, 2002
    
    
    Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Esquire, John M. Seaman, Esquire, POTTER
    ANDERSON  Sr CORROON, Wilmington, Delaware,  Attorrzeys  for
    PlairztifS.
    
    David C. McBride, Esquire, Christian D. Wright, Esquire, YOUNG,
    CONAWAY,  STARGATT  & TAYLOR, Wilmington, Delaware; Eric M.
    Roth, Esquire, Stephen R.  DiPrima,  Esquire, WACHTELL, LIPTON,
    ROSEN  &  KATZ,  New  York, New York,  Attorneys for  Defenahnts.
    
    
    LAMB, Vice Chancellor.
    
    
                                 I.      1R"I`IWl)UC'1`10N
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Esquire, John M. Seaman, Esquire, POTTER ANDERSON Sr CORROON,
  • David C. McBride, Esquire, Christian D. Wright, Esquire, YOUNG, CONAWAY, STARGATT & TAYLOR,
  • Christopher Kosachuk and the defendants Henry E. Harper
  • equity percentage of the nominal defendant LatinAdvisor Holdings,
  • her fiduciary duty and participated in the fraud with respect to the signing
  • of the Stockholders Agreement.
  • * Kosachuk's shares were eventually returned to him, but by then his ownership had been
  • award of` his legal fees and expenses.
  • Kosachuk forged Harper's signature on checks to withdraw funds from
  • The court concludes, after trial and post-trial briefing, that Harper
  • as well as any personal loans made to him by
  • Kosachuk began work on a formal business plan,
  • Stock if it did or its Common Stock if it did not.
  • ethic since they moved to Miami,7 asked Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
  • , McCausland's attorneys, to prepare a stockholders' agreement
  • " Harper admits in his testimony that "CK" stands for Chris Kosachuk.
  • The Employees agree that upon termination of employment of either of the Employees with the
  • Harper used a corporate American
  • corporate card, along with other employees' corporate cards, had been
  • 23 Kosachuk o.ften refers to the American Express bill and the personal loan together,
  • Kosachuk contends that Harper's fraudulent actions consisted of
  • In order to succeed in an allegation of` common law fraud, a plaintiff
  • the counterclaim will be dismissed.

  • 3 . PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    HARPER
    DEFENDANTS
    DEL
    DAMAGES
    LATINADVISOR
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    SUPR
    COURT
    STOCKHOLDERS
    MCCAUSLAND
    DELAWARE
    STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
    RESCISSORY DAMAGES
    LAW
    MOTION
    PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    COMPLAINT
    BUSINESS
    DILUTE KOSACHUK
    DIRECTORS
    COMMON STOCK
    COMPENSATION PACKAGE
    FAIRNESS
    EMPLOYEES
    SHAREHOLDER
    TERMINATE
    CHANCERY
    VIOLY MCCAUSLAND
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    
                    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,                                          >
    
                                  Plaintiff,                       i
    v.
                                                                   i     CA.  No.  17928
    HENRY  E. HARPER.  VIOLY McCAUSLAND,
    and OMAR ALLAM,                                                :
    
                                  Defendants,                      1
    And
                                                                   i
    LATINADVISOR.COM.  INC., a  Delaware  Corporation, )
    
                              Nominal Defendant.
    
    HENRY E. HARPER and LATINADVISOR
    HOLDINGS INC..
    
                              Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,             I
    \.
                                                                   :
    CHRISTOPHER  KOSACIIIJK,                                       )1
                              Counterclaim-Defendant.              1
    
                      PLAINTIFF'S  MEMORANDUM  OF LAW IN OPPOSITION
               TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOK PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
                                                          POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON  LLP
    
                                                                Peter J. Walsh. Jr.
                                                                John M. Seaman
                                                                Hercules Plaza, Sixth Floor
                                                                13 13 North Market Street
                                                                Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                                (302) 984-6000
    
    December  2 I ., 200 1                                Attorney:; for Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk
    JW23J\h
    
    
    
                                                          TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • VIOLY McCAUSLAND,
  • INC., a Delaware Corporation,)
  • HENRY E. HARPER and LATINADVISOR
  • PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOK PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  • Events Since the Filing of the Complaint
  • and to Dilute Kosachuk and the Other
  • But Instead Seeks Rescissory Damages
  • Supr., No. 372.
  • Inc., Del.

  • 4 . OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    HARPER
    DEFENDANTS
    KOSACHUK
    LATINADVISOR
    ALLAM
    SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    DEL
    COURT
    MOTION
    AGREEMENT
    SHARES
    SHAREHOLDERS
    MCCAUSLAND
    PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    VENTURE
    KOSACHUK DEP
    OMAR ALLAM
    NOTEHOLDERS
    COMPANY COMMON STOCK
    FINANCING
    LEXIS
    INVESTORS
    DECLARATION
    VIOLY MCCAUSLAND
    LATINADVISOR HOLDINGS
    COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFFS
    PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
    CONVERSION
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    
                     IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,
    
                           Plaintiff,
    
    v.
    
    HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY  McCAUSLAND,                C.A. No. 17928
    and OMAR ALLAM,
    
                           Defendants,
    
    And
    
    LATINADVISOR.COM,  WC., a Delaware corpo-
    ration,
    
                           Nominal Defendant.
    
    
    HENRY E. HARPER and LATINADVISOR
    HOLDINGS, INC.,
    
                           Counterclaim-plaintiffs,
    
    v.
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,
    
                           Counterclaim-defendant.
    
    
    
                     OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION
                              FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    
    
    
    
    
    Wl'3:712042.2                                                        56960.1001
    
    
    
                                                                                                       
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,
  • HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY McCAUSLAND,
  • No. 17928 and OMAR ALLAM,
  • HENRY E. HARPER and LATINADVISOR HOLDINGS, INC.,
  • Counterclaim-plaintiffs,
  • OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION
  • FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  • m PRELIMINARY STATEMENT.
  • Plaintiff has not suffered any damages by virtue of
  • having his LatinAdvisor shares called.
  • shareholders' agreement is moot.
  • Plaintiff is not entitled to a declaration
  • Defendant Omar Allam is entitled to summary judgment
  • CEO Agreement between the Company and Mr. Harper.

  • 5 . REPLY TO AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFF
    HARPER
    PURPORT
    COURT
    COMPANY PURPORT
    REFERENCED FLORIDA STATUTE
    PLAINTIFF RESPECTFULLY REFERS
    QUOTE
    AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
    DOCTRINE
    DELAWARE
    HENRY
    VIOLY MCCAUSLAND
    LATINADVISOR
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK
    PARAGRAPHS
    STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
    YORK
    NOMINAL DEFENDANT
    HOLDINGS
    AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
    ATTORNEYS
    PLAINTIFF REALLEGES
    INCORPORATES
    RESPONSES
    COUNTERCLAIMS FAIL
    RELIEF
    REQUEST
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,                             1
                                Plaintiff,            t
    
    ".                                                ; CA. No. 17928
                                                      1
    HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY McCAUSLAND,
    and OMAR ALLAM,
    
                                Defendants,
    
    And
    
    LATINADVISOR.COM,  INC., a Delaware
    Corporation,
    
                                Nominal Defendant.
    
    HENRY E. HARPER and LATINADVISOR
    HOLDINGS INC.,
                                                      )
                             Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, )
    
    v.                                                i1
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,
                                                      i
                             Counterclaim-Defendant. )
    
    
                          REPLY TO AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
    
           Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk, by and through his attorneys, for his reply to the
    
    Amended Counterclaims by Defendant Henry E. Harper ("Harper"),  Violy   McCausland
    
    ("McCausland") and nominal defendant  LatinAdvisor Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as
    
    LatinAdvisorcom, Inc.) (the "Company"), responds as follows:
    
           1.       Denied, except admitted that Harper and the Company purport to bring
    
    
    
    counterclaims to recover damages they claim to have sustained as a result of Kosachuk's
    
    alleged unlawful conduct.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • HENRY E. HARPER and LATINADVISOR
  • Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk, by and through his attorneys, for his reply to the
  • Amended Counterclaims by Defendant Henry E. Harper, Violy McCausland
  • and nominal defendant LatinAdvisor Holdings,
  • Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference his responses to paragraphs 1
  • Plaintiff respectfully refers the Court to the referenced Florida statute,
  • Harper and the Company purport to quote, for its true and complete contents.
  • Plaintiff respectfully refers the Court to the purported Stockholders Agreement,
  • which the Counterclaim Defendants purport to quote, for its true and complete contents.
  • The Counterclaims fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
  • SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
  • wrongful were undertaken at the express request of Harper and with his full knowledge,
  • The Counterclaim Defendants' claims are barred by the doctrine of unclean
  • New York, New York 10019

  • 6 . LETTER OPINION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    KOSACHUK
    COMMUNICATIONS
    DEFENDANTS
    ATTORNEY-CLIENT
    PRODUCTION
    DISCOVER
    COUNSEL
    MOTION
    REASONS
    DEL
    HARPER
    ADEQUATE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    REPRESENTING
    ESQUIRE
    HURPER
    COMPEL
    EMPLOYEE
    WAIVER
    MATTER
    ENCLOSURE
    WILMINGTON
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK
    HENRY
    PARTIES
    LITIGATION
    REVIEW
    WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES
    CONTEXT
    
                                       C O U R T   O F   C H A N C E R Y
                                                     OF THE
                                        S T A T E   O F   D E L A W A R E
    
    
    STEPrlEN  P. LAMB
    "ICE-CHANCELLOR
    
    
    
    
    
                                    Submitted: November 8, 2000
                                    Decided: December 19, 2000
    
    
       Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Esquire
       Kevin R. Shamron, Esquire
       Potter Anderson & Corroon
       1313 N. Market Street
       P.O. Box 951
       Wilmington, DE 19899
    
       David C. McBride, Esquire
       Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor
       Rodney Square North
       P.O. Box 391
       Wilmington, DE 19899
    
                RE: Christopher Kosachuk  v. Henry E. Hurper,  Violy McCausland
                         and Contrase,na, S.A. and Latinadvisor.com,  Inc.
                         C.A. No. 17928
    
       Dear Counsel:
    
                I understand from Mr. Walsh's letter of November 8, 2000, that the
       parties have been unable to agree upon a discontinuance of this litigation. In
       light of this development, I have reviewed the parties' submissions and the
       transcript of the October 23, 2000 hearing, and am prepared to rule on the
       pending motion to compel. For the following reasons, that motion will be
       denied.
    
    
    
    Kosachuk v. Hurper, et al.
    December 19, 2000
    Page 2
    
              Plaintiff, Christopher Kosachuk, moved to compel the production of all
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Esquire Kevin R. Shamron, Esquire
  • Wilmington, DE 19899
  • I understand from Mr. Walsh's letter of November 8, 2000, that the parties have been unable
  • In light of this development, I have reviewed the parties' submissions and the transcript of
  • For the following reasons,
  • Kosachuk v. Hurper, et al.
  • Plaintiff, Christopher Kosachuk, moved to compel the production of all documents identified
  • Before argument, the defendants produced all documents identified on that log that were dated
  • defendants also agreed to produce all documents identified on that log for which the only
  • " Kosachuk continues to press for the production of all of the documents identified on the
  • These documents all contain communications between LatinAdvisor.com and its present counsel,
  • In the context of this motion as limited by the defendants' supplemental production, I am
  • First, there is no showing that, by pursuing other avenues of discovery, Kosachuk will be
  • Del.
  • This result is fully consistent with the decision of Chancellor Chandler in In re Fuqua
  • In February and early March 2000, WLR&K rendered legal services to defendant Henry Harper and
  • the Harper and Emmerich affidavits provide an adequate basis for me to conclude that the
  • A review of the subject matters covered by the communications identified on the privilege log
  • It may, of course, have operated as a waiver of privilege by Harper or others represented by
  • communication of informatilon or advice between attorneys representing the corporation and
  • SPLJcaj Enclosure

  • 7 . PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    HARPER
    KOSACHUK
    COUNSEL
    ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
    COMMUNICATIONS
    ATTORNEY
    COURT
    DEL
    STOCKHOLDERS
    PLAINTIFF
    MOTION
    STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
    CLIENT
    EMPLOYEES
    REPRESENTING
    DELAWARE
    LEGAL SERVICES
    BUSINESS STRATEGY
    HARPER ATTACHING DRAFT
    CORROON LLP
    TERMINATION AGREEMENT
    PUNGILUPPI
    NEGOTIATIONS
    DISCOVERY
    ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP
    CONFIDENTIALITY
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK
    KOSACHUK AFF
    HARPER ATTACHING
    
                    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                                                                    `2
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,                           >
    
                                 Plaintiff,         ;
    
    V.                                              i      CA. No. 17928
    
    HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY McCAUSLAND,              ;
    and CONTRASENA S.A.,                            >
    
                                 Defendants,        i
    
    and                                             11
    LATINADVISOR.COM,  INC., a Delaware             )
    Corporation,
                                                    1
                              Nominal Defendant.
    
    
    
    
                                   PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF
                            IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO COMPEL
    
    
    
                                                    POTTER ANDERSON  & CORROON LLP
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    Alan M. Fisch,  Esq.                                  Peter J. Walsh, Jr.
    Howrey Simon Arnold  & White, LLP                     Kevin R. Shannon
    1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.                        John M. Seaman
    Washington, D.C. 20004-2402                           Hercules Plaza, Sixth Floor
    (202) 783-~0800                                       13 13 North Market Street
                                                          P.O. Box 95 1
    August 23,200O                                        Wilmington, Delaware 19899
                                                          (302) 984-6000
    
                                                    Attorneys for Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk
    431574
    
    
    
                                                                                  TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO COMPEL
  • POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP OF COUNSEL:
  • Attorneys for Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk 431574
  • WL,R&K WAS REPRESENTING THE COMPANY, NOT HARPER
  • COMMUNICATIONS PREPARED ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY TO DATE ...
  • 2000 Communication with Pungiluppi Must Be Disclosed.......
  • Communications With Other Employees are Not Entitled to the Attorney
  • Client Privilege and Must Be Disclosed..
  • Defendants' Recent Affidavit Waives The Attorney-Client Privilege Under
  • The Business Strategy Doctrine Is Inapplicable Here
  • Audio Jam, Inc. v. Faze& Del.

  • 8 . DEFENDANTS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    HARPER
    COUNSEL
    DEFENDANTS
    ATTORNEY-CLIENT
    MOTION
    BUSINESS
    DELAWARE
    COMPEL
    ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
    COURT
    ONGOING NEGOTIATIONS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    COMMUNICATIONS
    ATTORNEYS
    DISCLOSURE
    INVESTORS
    STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
    REPRESENTING
    HARPER AFF
    CONTRASENA
    DOCUMENTS RELATING
    COMPANY COMMON STOCK
    BUSINESS STRATEGY DOCTRINE
    DIRECTORS
    LLP
    WILMINGTON
    SHAREHOLDER
    ASSERTION
    INCORPORATION
    
                                                                          RIG/II/AL
                    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE       *
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK.
    
                          Plaintiff                   i
    
    V                                                 i
    
    HENRY E. HARPIER,  VIOLY McCAUSLAND,              ; C.A. No. 17928
    and CONTRASENA S.A.,
                                                      ;
                          Defendants,
                                                      1
    And
                                                      t
    LATINADVI SOR.COM,  INC., a Delaware
    Corporation,                                      i
    
                          Nominal Defendant           E)
    HENRY E. HARPER and LATWADVISOR.COM,)
    INC.,
                                                      1
                          Counterclaim-plaintiffs,
    
    V.                                                1
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,                             ;
    
                          Counterclaim-defendant.
    
    
    
    
                           DEFENDANTS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO
                               PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL
    
    
    
                                YOUNG  CONAWAY  STARGATT  & TAYLOR LLP
                                David C. McBride
                                Josy W. Ingersoll
                                John J. Paschetto
                                1 lri' Floor, Wilmington Trust Center
                                1100 N. Market Street
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE *
  • HENRY E. HARPER and LATWADVISOR.COM,)
  • DEFENDANTS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO
  • PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL
  • YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR LLP
  • lri' Floor, Wilmington Trust Center
  • Attorneys for Defendants
  • FROM DISCLOSURE BY THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT
  • DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE COMPANY'S
  • INVESTORS ARE PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE
  • UNDER THE BUSINESS STRATEGY DOCTRINE 19
  • Hoiles v. Surqior Court,
  • plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk to compel the production of certain documents
  • withheld by defendants on the basis of attorney-client privilege and the business strategy
  • Kosachuk, a shareholder and a former employee and director of the Company,
  • Contrasena, S.A., a shareholder of the Company.
  • Kosachuk's complaint challenges the validity of a Stockholders Agreement
  • 95 percent of his shares of Company common stock were purchased
  • Communications lbetween Harper and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
  • based on .IIarper's assertion of the attorney-client privilege;
  • Communications between WLR&K and directors, officers, employees and
  • other representatives of the Company commencing around the time of Kosachuk's terminatio rr,
  • Documents that relate to ongoing negotiations between the Company and prospective investors
  • Harper Aff.
  • initial certificate of incorporation and by-laws.
  • their representatives representing the same client.

  • 9 . OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANT CONTRASENA IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STAY

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DELAWARE
    KOSACHUK
    HARPER
    DEFENDANTS
    MCCAUSLAND
    PLAINTIFF
    MOTION
    COMPLAINT
    YORK
    DISMISS
    PERSONAL JURISDICTION
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    CONSPIRACY THEORY
    DEL
    MOSERES
    STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK
    VIOLY MCCAUSLAND
    LONG-ARM STATUTE
    SUBSTANTIAL ACTS
    NOMINAL DEFENDANT
    COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFFS
    ATTORNEYS
    INSUFFICIENT
    FORUM STATE
    ALLEGED CO-CONSPIRATORS
    DISCOVERY
    KATZ
    NATURE
    
                     ..I
    
    
                                                                          r
    
                    IN THE COURT IOF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                       ,
                                     IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                          /&'
    
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,
    
                               Plaintiff,
    
           V.
    
    HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY  McCAUSLAND,
    and CONTRASENA S.A.,
    
                               Defendants,
    
    
    
    LATINADVISOR.COM  INC., a Delaware
    Corporation,
    
                               Nominal Defendant.
    
                                                                                     _.
    HENRY E. HARPER and
    LATINADVISOR.COM,  INC.,
                                                                                     .!
                                                                               .
                               Counterclaim-plaintiffs,
                                                           i
           V.
    
                                                           i
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,
                                                           i
                               Counterclaim-defendant. )
    
    
    
    
                            OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANT CONTRASENA S.A.
                                IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS
                                             AND TO STAY DISCOVERY
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,
  • HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY McCAUSLAND, and CONTRASENA S.A.,
  • LATINADVISOR.COM INC., a Delaware Corporation,
  • Counterclaim-plaintiffs,
  • OPENING BRIEF OF DEFENDANT CONTRASENA S.A.
  • Attorneys for Defendants
  • New York, New York 10019
  • NATURE AND STAGE OF PIROCEEDINGS.
  • The Court Lacks Personal Jurisdiction over Contrasena Because Contrasena's Alleged
  • Committed No Substantial Acts, and Caused No
  • Discovery Against Contrasena Should Be Stayed Pending Resolution of Its Motion to Dismiss.
  • Best international Group, Inc., Del.
  • In the Complaint in this action, plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk asserts that defendant
  • so-called conspiracy theory of personal jurisdiction.
  • Christopher Kosachuk is a shareholder of nominal defendant
  • owed by the defendants to Kosachuk, and the alleged invalidity of the stockholders agreement
  • and Violy McCausland,
  • 5 3 104 was attempted on Contrasena in Panama but was rejected as insufficient.
  • Contrasena submits herewith the supporting Aflidavit of Rodolfo Moseres
  • was formed as a Delaware corporation on November 1, 1999, by Harper and Kosachuk
  • within any of the enumerated categories of the long-arm statute.
  • conspiracy occurred in the forum state;
  • WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ

  • 10 . REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIMS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFF
    COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS
    PURPORT
    COURT
    HARPER
    REFERENCE
    PARAGRAPHS
    COMPANY PURPORT
    RESPONSES
    PLAINTIFF RESPECTFULLY REFERS
    PLAINTIFF REALLEGES
    INCORPORATES
    QUOTE
    REFERENCED FLORIDA STATUTE
    DOCTRINE
    DELAWARE
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK
    ADMIT
    STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
    REQUEST
    REASON
    COUNSEL
    LLP
    ESQUIRE
    YORK
    HENRY
    MCCAUSLAND
    ATTORNEYS
    ALLEGES
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STA.TE OF DELAWARE
    
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,
                                   Plaintiff,          ; Civil Action No. 17928
                       V.
                                                       ;
    HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY McCAUSLAND,
    and CONSTRASENA S.A.,                              ;
    
                                   Defendants,
    
    And
    
    LATIN ADVISOR.COM, INC., a Delaware
    Corporation,                                                                  _-..
                                                                                 :r;            7
                             Nominal Defendant.                                  -1         `>  z.:
                                                                                 ..:. _.               
                                                                                 `2:           .`."    
                                                                                 CI>C>   .  .
                                                                                 ZT,?!                
                                                                                 --.--,        nJ
                                   REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIMS                            d.i
                                                                                     < .G-
    
           Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk, by and through his attorneys, for his reply to the
    
    Counterclaims by Defendant Henry E. Harper ("Harper") and Nominal Defendant
    
    LatinAdvisor.com, Inc. (the "Company"), alleges as follows:
    
            1. Denied, except admit that Harper and the Company purport to bring
    
    counterclaims to recover damages they claim to have sustained as a result of Kosachuk's
    
    alleged unlawful conduct.
    
           2. Admitted.
    
           3. Admitted.
    
           4. Denied.
    
           5. Plaintiff admits the  first and second sentences of paragraph 5 and denies the
    
    third sentence.
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STA.TE OF DELAWARE
  • Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk, by and through his attorneys, for his reply to the
  • Counterclaims by Defendant Henry E. Harper and Nominal Defendant
  • LatinAdvisor.com, Inc., alleges as follows:
  • except admit that Harper and the Company purport to bring
  • Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference his responses to paragraphs 1
  • Plaintiff respectfully refers the Court to the referenced Florida statute,
  • Harper and the Company purport to quote, for its true and complete contents.
  • Plaintiff respectfully refers the Court to the purported Stockholders Agreement,
  • McCausland purported to terminate Plaintiffs employment with the Company.
  • which the Counterclaim Defendants purport to quote, for its true and complete contents.
  • wrongful were undertaken at the express request of Harper and with his full knowledge,
  • The Counterclaim Defendants' claims are barred by the doctrine of unclean
  • The Fifth Counterclaim fails to state a claim for the additional reason that the
  • OF COUNSEL:
  • LLP Hercules Plaza
  • Josy W. Ingersoll, Esquire
  • New York, New York 100 19

  • 11 . ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PARAGRAPH
    HARPER
    STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
    ALLEGATIONS
    DENY
    ADMIT
    DEFENDANTS
    EMPLOYMENT
    MCCAUSLAND
    SHARES
    CONTRASENA
    COMPLAINT
    TERMINATE
    COMPANY COMMON STOCK
    RELIEF
    ATTORNEYS
    EMPLOYEE
    CO-FOUNDER
    BANK ACCOUNT
    DEFENDANTS INCORPORATE
    RESPONSE
    COUNTERCLAIMS
    TERMINATION
    REFERENCE
    ACCORDANCE
    BUSINESS
    FLORIDA ANTI-FENCING ACT
    COMPANY FUNDS
    MIAMI BEACH
    
                    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                               7
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
                                                        -1
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,                                i
                                   Plaintiff,            I
    v                                                    1       CA. No. 17928
    HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY McCAUSLAND,                   i
    and CONTRASENA S.A.,                                 >
    
                                  Defendants,            1
    
    and                                                  i
    
    LATINADVISOR.COM,  INC., a Delaware                  1
    Corporation,
                                                         i
                           Nominal Defendant.            >
    
    
    
    
                                  ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS
    
    
                     Defendants Henry  EC. Harper ("Harper"), Violy McCausland ("McCausland") and
    
    Contrasena S.A. ("Contrasena"), and nominal defendant Latin Advisor.com, Inc. (the "Com-
    
    pany"), by their attorneys, for their answer to the Complaint, respond as follows:
    
    
                     1.    Deny the allegations in paragraph 1, except admit that: (a) piaintiff
    
    Christopher Kosachuk (`Kosachuk")  seeks to rescind the stockholders agreement annexed as
    
    Exhibit A to the Complaint (the "Stockholders Agreement") and to obtain declaratory and other
    
    relief; (b) Kosachuk is a co-founder of the Company and signed the Stockholders Agreement; (c)
    
    
    
    Kosachuk's employment with the Company has been terminated; and (d) in accordance with the
    
    Stockholders Agreement, 95% of the shares of Company common stock owned by Kosachuk at
    
    the time his employment was terminated have been purchased from him.
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Contrasena S.A., and nominal defendant Latin Advisor.com, Inc., by their attorneys, for their
  • Deny the allegations in paragraph 1, except admit that:
  • Christopher Kosachuk seeks to rescind the stockholders agreement annexed as
  • Exhibit A to the Complaint (the "Stockholders Agreement") and to obtain declaratory and other
  • relief; Kosachuk is a co-founder of the Company and signed the Stockholders Agreement;
  • Kosachuk's employment with the Company has been terminated; and in accordance with the
  • 95% of the shares of Company common stock owned by Kosachuk at
  • years old and a co-founder of the Company.
  • Harper is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court by reason of 10 Del.
  • Harper and McCausland.
  • Deny the allegations in paragraph 10, except admit that: in early October 1999, Harper began
  • that his termination would allow Kosachuk "to do something that thrills" him; and before
  • Officer, Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary; under the Stockholders Agreement,
  • In response to paragraph 35, defendants incorporate by reference their responses to the
  • had not decided to terminate Kosachuk's employment and thus had no duty to disclose any such
  • Defendants Harper and the Company, by their attorneys, for their counterclaims
  • or McCausland, caused the same bank to transfer Company funds to Kosachuk's own bank account;
  • First llnion National Bank in Miami Beach.
  • The Florida Anti-Fencing Act, Florida Statutes 4 812.014, provides:

  • 12 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFF
    HARPER
    DRAFT
    TERMINATE
    EMPLOYMENT
    BUSINESS
    SCHEME
    SHARES
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK
    EXPENSES
    MCCAUSLAND
    EMPLOYEE
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    ORCHESTRATING
    TERMINATION
    CO-FOUNDER
    STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT PURSUANT
    FRAUDULENT SCHEME
    CONTRASENA
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    INCORPORATES
    PARAGRAPHS
    PLAINTIFF REALLEGES
    REFERENCE
    ALLEGATIONS
    OWNERSHIP
    INVESTED CONSIDERABLE TIME
    
                                                                                                       
    
    
                    IN THE ICOURT  OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,
    
                                   Plaintiff,
    
    V.
                                                          >
    HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY McCAUSLAND,                    >
    and CONTRASENA S.A.,                                  >>
                                   Defendants,           >>
    and                                                  >>
    LATINADVISOR.COM, INC., a Delaware                   >
    Corporation,                                         >>
                               Nominal Defendant.        >)>
    
                                                 COMPLAINT
    
                     Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk, for his Complaint, alleges as follows herein upon
    
    knowledge as to his own conduct and upon information and belief as to all other matters:
    
                                       NATURE OF THIS ACTION
    
                     1.     Plaintiff brings this action to rescind a "stockholders agreement" and to
    
    obtain declaratory and other relief with respect to his ownership interest in LatinAdvisor.com,
    
    Inc., a Delaware corporation  ("LatinAdvisor.com"  or the "Company"). As alleged herein,
    
    defendants conspired to induce Plaintiff, a co-founder of the Company, to sign a draft
    
    stockholders agreement pursuant to which Defendants -- just 12 days later -- purported to
    
    terminate Plaintiffs "employment" and thereby divest him of all but 2.4% ownership interest in
    
    
    
    LatinAdvisor.com. This fraudulent scheme was orchestrated by Defendants' after Plaintiff had
    
    invested considerable time and expense in the development of LatinAdvisor.com. Realizing that
    
    the Company was poised to command substantial value in the marketplace, Defendants violated
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk, for his Complaint, alleges as follows herein upon
  • Plaintiff brings this action to rescind a "stockholders agreement" and to
  • obtain declaratory and other relief with respect to his ownership interest in
  • a Delaware corporation.
  • defendants conspired to induce Plaintiff, a co-founder of the Company, to sign a draft
  • stockholders agreement pursuant to which Defendants -- just 12 days later -- purported to
  • This fraudulent scheme was orchestrated by Defendants' after Plaintiff had
  • invested considerable time and expense in the development of LatinAdvisor.com.
  • constituted a breach of their fiduciary duties owed to Plaintiff as majority
  • Harper is subject to the
  • McCausland is a Director and Chairwoman of the Board of Directors of LatinAdvisor.com.
  • services to Latin American and multinational companies doing business in Latin America.
  • Contrasena S.A. is a Panamanian corporation which owns
  • authorizes 1,000 shares of capital stock of the Company.
  • DEFENDANTS' FRAUDULENT SCHEME
  • Company's electronic spreadsheet showing expenses incurred,
  • LatinAdvisor.com's New York law firm prepared the draft Stockholders Agreement challenged
  • The Employees agree that upon the termination of employment of either of the Employees with
  • Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference herein the allegations in
  • paragraphs 1 through 34.
  • orchestrating the scheme and taking the corporate actions described above.
  • Stockholders Agreement and to thereafter terminate him twelve days later constitute equitable

  • 13 . SECOND AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    HARPER
    DEFENDANTS
    STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT
    PLAINTIFF
    LATINADVISOR
    DRAFT
    TERMINATE
    SHARES
    ALLAM
    DELAWARE
    EMPLOYMENT
    BUSINESS
    COMMON STOCK
    COURT
    MCCAUSLAND
    OMAR ALLAM
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK
    DELAWARE CORPORATION
    INCORPORATES
    COMPLAINT
    CO-FOUNDER
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    PARAGRAPHS
    TERMINATION
    INVESTORS
    EQUITY FINANCING
    WRITTEN CONSENT
    REFERENCE
    ALLEGATIONS
    
               IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,
                                                       i
                               Plaintiff,
                                                       1
    V.                                                 ) C.A. No. 17928                        I-,.;:
    HENRY E. HARPER, VIOLY McCAUSLAND,                 t
    and OMAR ALLAM,
                                                       t
                               Defendants,
                                                       ;
    And
                                                       i
    LATINADVISOR.COM, INC., a Delaware
    Corporation,                                       ;
    
                               Nominal Defendant.      i
    
    HENRY E. HARPER and LATINADVISOR
    HOLDINGS INC.,
    
                    Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,           t
    
    V.                                                 ;
    
    CHRISTOPHER KOSACHUK,                              ;
    
                    Counterclaim-Defendant.
    
    
                    SECOND AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
    
                    Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk, for his Second Amended and Supplemental
    
    Complaint, alleges as follows herein upon knowledge as to his own conduct and upon
    
    information and belief as to all other matters:
    
    
    
                                      NATURE OF THIS ACTION
    
                    1.     Plaintiff brings this action to rescind a "stockholders agreement" and to
    
    obtain declaratory and other relief with respect to his ownership interest in  LatinAdvisorcom,
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • HENRY E. HARPER and LATINADVISOR
  • SECOND AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT
  • Plaintiff Christopher Kosachuk, for his Second Amended and Supplemental
  • Plaintiff brings this action to rescind a "stockholders agreement" and to
  • a Delaware corporation.
  • defendants conspired to induce Plaintiff, a co-founder of the Company, to sign a draft
  • option to purchase 15,000,OOO shares of Common stock at a price of $0.25 per share so that
  • fraudulent scheme was orchestrated by defendants after Plaintiff, a co-founder of the Company,
  • constituted a breach of their fiduciary duties owed to Plaintiff.
  • Defendant Omar Allam is a director of the Company,
  • McCausland is a Director and Chairwoman of the Board of Directors of LatinAdvisor.com.
  • services to Latin American and multinational companies doing business in Latin America.
  • Amendment filed on or about August 17, 2000 LatinAdvisor changed its name to LatinAdvisor
  • Certificate authorizes 1,000 shares of capital stock of the Company.
  • solicited investors in raising approximately $1.3 million in working capital;
  • LatinAdvisorcom's New York law firm prepared the draft Stockholders Agreement challenged
  • The Employees agree that upon the termination of employment of either of the Employees with
  • DEFENDANTS "TERMINATE" KOSACHUK
  • closing its first equity financing of $2,000,000.
  • No notice of such action by written consent was given to Kosachuk,
  • Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference herein the allegations in
  • paragraphs 1 through 52.
  •    |