LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

IN RE ROBERTSON-CECO Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,641, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OIF C HANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017641, Plaintiff: ABOFF, Settlement, Fee, Heico, Parties, Robertson-ceco, Consolidation, Del, Expenses, Agreement, Acquisition, Proposals, Shareholders, Stipulation, Transaction, Request, Outstanding Common Shares, Special Committee, Wolf Popper Llp, Revised Acquisition, Representatives, Affiliates, Price, Michael, Bernstein Liebhard, Certification, Support Plaintiffs, Stockholder, Class Members, Robertson-ceco Corporation, Common Stock, Merger, Negotiations, Directors, Chancery, Traded Delaware Corporation , ContentID: 120239562

Case Documents
1 2001-01-10 PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CLASS CERTIFICATION PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102618
41 pages
PDF
2 2000-10-23 STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100065
16 pages
PDF
3 1999-12 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101540
6 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 3 documents , 63 pages
Price: $ 29.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CLASS CERTIFICATION PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COUNSEL
FEE
SETTLEMENT
COURT
DEL
EXPENSES
ACQUISITION
PROPOSALS
SHAREHOLDERS
HEICO
PARTIES
ATTORNEYS
AGREEMENT
TRANSACTION
REQUEST
ROBERTSON-CECO
LITIGATION
SPECIAL COMMITTEE
DEFENDANTS
WOLF POPPER LLP
REVISED ACQUISITION
REPRESENTATIVES
BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD
CERTIFICATION
SUPPORT PLAINTIFFS
AFFILIATES
STOCKHOLDER
CLASS MEMBERS
NEGOTIATIONS
                                  ORIGINAL

         IN THE COURT  OIF  C:HANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                                     
                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                        --
IN RE ROBERTSON-CECO                   1 CONSOLIDATED
CORPORATION SHAREHOLDERS                     CIVIL ACTION NO. 17641  NC&'  (3
LITIGATION                                                                      *y.-:  ._..
                                                                                ..-I.              
                        -    -                                                  :! -: I-.          
                                                                                . . . .       1
                                                                                           f"L`.   
                                                                                h,  .-;  -  .;-  ~.J
                                                                                -.7' . 0 .  .*
                                                                           T."
                        PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF                    r:`:                    
              CLASS CERTIFICATION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT  ANIf;  -i  '  2                            
              APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSE@
                                       ;j                                               :
                                                                                "i-                



                                              ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS
                                                & GODDESS, P.A.
                                              Norman M. Monhait
                                              Suite 1401, Mellon Bank Center
                                              P.O. Box 1070
                                              Wilmington, DE 19899
                                              (302) 656-4433

                                              Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs


OF COUNSEL:

Robert M. Kornreich
Chet B. Waldman
Kent A. Bronson
WOLF POPPER LLP
845 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022

Stanley D. Bernstein
Jeffrey M. Haber
BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD  & LIFSHITZ  LLP
10 East 40th Street
New York, NY 10016

SNIPPETS:
  • APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSE@
  • OF COUNSEL:
  • The Revised Acquisition Proposal D. Preliminary Agreement On The terms Of The Acquisition E.
  • Certification Is Proper 1Jnder Court Of Chancery
  • The Relevant Factors Support Plaintiffs' Fee Request 21
  • Braunschweiaer v. American .bre Shield On, Del.
  • In Re Anderson Clavton Shareholders' Litig.,, Del.
  • and an award of counsel fees and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses for the services
  • publicly owned shares of Robertson-Ceco Corporation
  • for $10 per share by defendant Heico Companies, LLC.* At the time the proposed
  • (collectively referred to hereinafter as "Heico and its Affiliates")
  • The Consolidation Order further appointed the law firms of Wolf Popper LLP and Bernstein
  • The parties to the California Action have subsequently agreed to abide by the results of this
  • transaction to the detriment of the Company's public shareholders,
  • plaintiffs' initiation and pursuit of this litigation
  • The remaining individual defendants, @egg C. Sage, Andrew G.C. Sage, II, E.A.
  • On December 8, 1999, the Board met and appointed Berman as a Special Committee
  • After December 15, 1999, negotiations; ensued between the Special Committee and its
  • class members, or substantially impair their ability to protect those interests or the party
  • Class certification is proper if there are common questions of law or fact.
  • Tvuicalitv And Atleuuacv Of Class Representatives
  • support plaintiffs' contention -that Heico exercised actual control of Robertson-Ceco.10
  • The entire fairness standard is implicated where the challenged transaction involves a
  • Berman was indeed "independent" and considered Heico's proposals with full autonomy.

  • 2 . STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SETTLEMENT
    DEFENDANTS
    HEICO
    PARTIES
    COURT
    STIPULATION
    ROBERTSON-CECO
    AGREEMENT
    OUTSTANDING COMMON SHARES
    ATTORNEYS
    COUNSEL
    MICHAEL
    ROBERTSON-CECO CORPORATION
    COMMON STOCK
    PRICE
    MERGER
    CHANCERY
    TRADED DELAWARE CORPORATION
    COMPROMISE
    EXPENSES
    CALIFORNIA
    CONDITIONS SET
    DIRECTORS
    PLAINTIFFS
    SETTLED CLAIMS
    HEICO COMPANIES
    LLC
    HEICO HOLDING
    ACCORDANCE
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF `THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                                         4
    
    IN  RI3  ROBERTSON-CECO CORPORATION                    )       CONSOLIDATED
    SHAREHOLDERS  LITIG,4TION,                             >       Civil Action No. 17641
    
    
                             STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF
                         COMPROMISE. SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE
                         -__
    
           The parties to the above-captioned consolidated class action, by and through their
    
    under-s&red  attorneys, hereby submit this Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise,,
    
    Settlement and Release (the "Settlement" or "Stipulation") for the Court's approval:'
    
           WHEREAS:
    
                   A.      Robertson-Ceco Corporation ("Robertson-Ceco") is a publicly,
    
    traded Delaware corporation that manufactures pre-engineered metal buildings for
    
    commercial and industrial uses. Defendant Michael E. Heisley, Sr. controls defendant The
    
    Heico Companies, LLC ("Heico") and defendant Heico Holding, Inc. Collectively,
    
    defendants Heisley, Heico and Heico Holding, Inc. (hereafter "Heico and its AtIiliates")
    
    own approximately 99% of Robertson-Ceco's outstanding common shares,
    
                   B.      On December 8, 1999, Robertson-Ceco announced that it had
    
    received a proposal from Heico to acquire all of Robertson-Ceco's common stock not
    
    already held by Heico and its AfIiliates  (the "Proposal") at a price of $10.00 per share.
    
    Contemporaneously with th.e announcement of Heico's Proposal, Robertson-Ceco
    
    announced that, in light of the interest of certain members of its board of directors in the
    
    Proposal, including Michael 1% Heisley, Sr. and E.A. Roskovensky, a special committ.ee
    
    (the "Special Committee") had been appointed to evaluate, negotiate and respond to the
    
    
    
    WP3:475773.5                                                                          566~S5.1001
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF `THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • under-s&red attorneys, hereby submit this Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise,,
  • Settlement and Release for the Court's approval:'
  • Robertson-Ceco Corporation is a publicly,
  • Heico Companies, LLC and defendant Heico Holding, Inc. Collectively,
  • already held by Heico and its AfIiliates at a price of $10.00 per share.
  • in light of the interest of certain members of its board of directors in the
  • Proposal, including Michael 1% Heisley, Sr.
  • On December 9, 1999, a putative class action was filed in the Court
  • Robertson-Ceco Corporation and The Heico Companies, LLC, Civil Action
  • actions (the "Consolidation Order") under the caption In Re Robertson-Ceco Cornor&
  • plaintiff's' co-lead counsel in the Consolidated Action.
  • California, Contra Costa County, California.
  • Robertson-Ceco's outstanding common shares, other than those owned by Heico and its
  • Affiliates, at $11 .OO per share, followed by a merger in which any
  • On or about April 20,2000, counsel for the parties reached an agreement in principle
  • least 90% of Robertson-Ceco's common stock.
  • H. Counsel for plaintiffs in the Consolidated Action have completed
  • certain discovery of Defendants.
  • attorneys that the settlement upon the terms and provisions set forth herein is fair,
  • and valuable consideration Iset forth below, that any and all Settled Claims, as defined
  • Action, dismissed with prejudice, upon and subject to the terms and conditions set forth
  • Agreement in accordance with the terms of Heico's Revised Proposal.
  • apply for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses in an amount not to exceed $300,000

  • 3 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFF
    ROBERTSON-CECO
    HEICO
    MEMBERS
    STOCK
    COMMON
    TRANSACTION
    HEISLEY
    LAW
    OFFICER
    CONTROLS
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    SAGE
    DIRECTORS
    SHAREHOLDERS
    BUSINESS
    BREACH
    DAMAGES
    COMMITTEE
    INADEQUATE
    PRICE
    STOCKHOLDERS
    ADJUDICATIONS
    PLAN
    DELAWARE
    DEFENDANT MICHAEL
    AFFILIATES
    REASON
    ADEQUATE
    
                   IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    _________~_________-------------------------------.--------- X
    EDWARD ABOFF,
    
                       Plaintiff,
    
                      - against -                                :    Civil Action No. / r;lb L.f/ /t41
    
    ANDREW G. C. SAGE, II, MICHAEL. E.                           :    CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    HEISLEY, SR., E. A. ROSKOVENSKY,                             :
    FRANK A. BENEVENTO, II, STANLEY                              :
    G. BERMAN, STANLEY H. MEADO'WS,                              :
    GREG C. SAGE, MICHAEL E. HEISLEY, :
    JR., ROBERTSON-CECO CORPORATION;
    and THE HEICO  COMPANIES, L.L.C.,                            :
    
                       Defendants.
    -__-____-___-__-_--_----------------------------,---------- X
    
    
                       Plaintiff, by his attorneys, alleges upon information and belief, except for
    
    paragraph 2 hereof, which is alleged upon knowledge, as follows:
    
                       1.       Plaintiff has been the owner of the common stock of Robertson-Ceco
    
    Corporation ("Robertson-Ceco" or the "Company") since prior to the transaction herein
    
    complained of and continuously to date
    
                       2.       Robertson-Ceco is a corporation duly organized and existing under
    
    the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company is a leading manufacturer of  pre-
    
    engineered metal buildings for commercial and industrial uses. The Company maintains
    
    its principal offices at Terrace Tower II, 500 Executive Parkway, Suite 425,San  Ramon,
    
    California.
    
                       3.       Defendant The Heico Companies, L.L.C. ("Heico") together with its
    
    affiliates, owns or controls approximately 69.2% of the Company's outstanding common
    
    
    
    stock. tleico is a privately owned  hollding company based in Chicago, Illinois that owns
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Plaintiff, by his attorneys, alleges upon information and belief, except for
  • Plaintiff has been the owner of the common stock of Robertson-Ceco
  • Corporation since prior to the transaction herein
  • Defendant Andrew G. C. Sage is Chairman of the Company.
  • Defendant Michael E. Heisley,
  • Officer and a Director of the Company and Chief Executive Officer of Heico.
  • Heisley owns or controls Heico.
  • Defendants E. A. Roskovensky and Stanley G. Berman are Directors
  • by reason of their corporate directorships
  • shareholders, which fiduciary duties, at all times relevant herein, required them to act in
  • best interest of the Company's minority shareholders.
  • The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.
  • its subsidiaries and/or directors and officers of the Company.
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common to the Class
  • whether the Class is entitled to injunctive relief or damages as a result of defendants'
  • Class would create a risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual
  • of the Company not held by defendant Heico and its affiliates, for $10.00 per share in cash.
  • of purportedly independent direct'ors (the "special committee") to consider the offer.
  • the possibilities of growth and profitability of Robertson-Ceco in light of its business,
  • present and future; the $10.00 per share price is
  • inadequate and offers an inadequate premium to the public stockholders of Robertson-Ceco; and
  • transaction at the expense of Robelrtson-Ceco's public stockholders.
  • The proposed plan
  • Heico has breached and will breach its duty as controlling stockholder of Robertson-Ceco
  • Plaintiff and the other members of the Class have no adequate remedy
  •    |