LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

BROWN v SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 17,932, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00017932, Plaintiff: BROWN, Seagate, Allegations, Complaint, Paragraph, Settlement, Fees, Shareholders, Veritas, Transaction, Del, Individual Defendants, Stipulation, Defendants Admit, Ofthe Complaint, Class Action, Expenses, Silver Lake, Parties, Asset Sale, Common Stock, Stockholders, Buyout, Preliminary Proxy, Proposed Settlement, Directors, Management, Response, Disclosure, Supr, Preliminary Proxy Statement, Defendants Respectfully Refer, Thereof, Stock, Class Certification, Satisfy, Chancery, Morgan Stanley , ContentID: 120239558

Case Documents
1 2001-04-12 FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 114899
5 pages
PDF
2 2001-04-04 PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 115488
42 pages
PDF
3 2001-01-12 STIPULAITON OF SETTLEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100061
16 pages
PDF
4 2000-09-28 ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED AND CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101246
18 pages
PDF
5 2000-05-01 PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102477
21 pages
PDF
6 2000-04-19 AMENDED AND CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101247
18 pages
PDF
7 2000-03-30 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101249
9 pages
PDF
8 2000-03 AMENDED COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101248
7 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 8 documents , 136 pages
Price: $ 54.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
COURT
MEMBERS
STIPULATION
HEREBY
RELEASEES
CHANCERY
JUDGEMENT
SCHEDULING ORDER
PARTIES
PLAINTIFFS
DIRECTORS
ACCORDANCE
DEFENDANTS
ASSET
ATTORNEYS
MERGER
ASSET SALE
REPRESENTATIVES
ASSERTING
TRANSACTION
DISCHARGE
RELATING
DETERMINATION
ADEQUATE
SEAGATE
AFFILIATES
SUCCESSORS
COMPLIANCE
CHANCERY RULE
                                                                         ;i';" F~ ,
                                                                               u i/ - / 1.
                                                                         k&9i,,`;;-i:;`\.,
                                                                                _ s.- %,> g Li `2
           IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE I-
                                                                               -:              --.
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY  :  i                                  ;-;
                                                                                               L 2.
                                                                                      /
                                                                          II.                 _  -
                                                                                              . r-3
                                                                          :                     -2
IN RE  SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC.  )                  Consolidated                ;              3-a
SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                     >       Civil Action No.  17932-NC                  *`*.
                                       -...A                                                    h `3
                                                                                 -              i3j

                             FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT


       A hearing having been held before the Court of Chancery (the "Court") on April 9,

2001 (the `Settlement Hearing"), pursuant to the Court's Order of February 6, 2001 (the

"Scheduling Order"), upon a Stipulation of Settlement dated as of January 11, 2001 (the

"Stipulation") in the above-captioned action (the "Action"); it appearing that due notice of the

Settlement Hearing has been given in accordance with the Scheduling Order; the respective

parties having appeared by their attorneys of record; the Court having heard and considered

evidence in support of the proposed settlement (the "Settlement"); the attorneys for the

respective parties having been heard; opportunity to be heard having been given to all other

persons requesting to be heard in accordance with the Scheduling Order; the Court having

determined that notice to the members of the Class (as defined herein) pursuant to the

aforesaid Scheduling Order, was adequate and sufficient; and the entire matter of the proposed

Settlement having been heard and considered by the Court;



           IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED this /!likt-
                                                                                     a/\ day of
April, 2001, that:
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE I-FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT
  • "Scheduling Order"), upon a Stipulation of Settlement dated as of January 11, 2001 (the
  • "Stipulation") in the above-captioned action; it appearing that due notice of the
  • Settlement Hearing has been given in accordance with the Scheduling Order;
  • parties having appeared by their attorneys of record; the Court having heard and considered
  • respective parties having been heard; opportunity to be heard having been given to all other
  • determined that notice to the members of the Class pursuant to the
  • was adequate and sufficient; and the entire matter of the proposed
  • common stock of Seagate as of March 29, 2000 (except Defendants and their affiliates), who
  • are alleged to be threatened with injury arising from the proposed merger of Seagate
  • members of Seagate's senior management, and their legal representatives, successors in
  • Action, Class Action Determination, Proposed Settlement, Settlement Hearing, and Right To
  • the Class in compliance with and as provided for in the Scheduling Order.
  • The parties have complied with Court of Chancery Rule 23.
  • it is hereby determined that plaintiffs and all members of the Class are
  • predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates and agents (including, without
  • directors and employees of Defendants and their predecessors, parents, subsidiaries,
  • otherwise referred to in the Action, including, but not limited to, the Asset Sale, the
  • and/or the Transaction, all SEC tilings regarding the Asset Sale, the Merger and/or the
  • representatively, or in any other capacity, from instituting, commencing, asserting,
  • discharge or release of, or any injunction against, any claim to enforce, or a claim arising
  • of or relating to,
  • any or all of plaintiffs' counsel (the "Additional Releasees"), arising out of, relating to,

  • 2 . PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SETTLEMENT
    FEES
    COUNSEL
    COURT
    DEL
    LITIGATION
    ATTORNEYS
    EXPENSES
    ASSET SALE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
    TRANSACTION
    DISCLOSURE
    SUPR
    DEFENDANTS
    SILVER LAKE
    CONTINGENT NATURE
    OPERATING ASSETS
    MORGAN STANLEY
    CLASS MEMBERS
    PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
    PRELIMINARY PROXY
    COMPLEXITY
    NEGOTIATING
    FAIRNESS OPINION
    STOCKHOLDERS
    REIMBURSEMENT
    ENGAGEMENT
    BUSINESS JUDGMENT
    
                  IN TH[E COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                       IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    """"""""""""""""""""-~""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~
    
    IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC.                                             CONSOLIDATE:D
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                                    C.A. NO. 17932-NC
    """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~
    
    
              PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND
      APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES
    
    
    ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS  &                                         CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP
    GODDESS, P.A.                                                        One Rodney Square
    Suite 140 1, Mellon Bank Center                                      Wilmington, DE 19801
    Wilmington, DE 1980 1                                                (302) 656-2500
    (302) 656-4433
    
                                        PLAINTIFFS' CO-LIAISON COUNSEL
    
    
    ABBEY GARDY LLP                                                      LOWEY DANNENBERG
    2 12 East 3 gth Street                                                EIEMPORAD & SELINGER, P.C.
    New York, NY 10016                                                   One North Lexington Avenue
                                                                         White Plains, NY 10601-1714
    
    
    ENTWISTLE  & CAPPUCCI LLP                                            WOLF HALDENSTEIN  ADLER
    400 Park Avenue                                                       FREEMAN & HERZ, LLP
    New York, NY 10022                                                   270 Madison Avenue
                                                                         New York, NY 100 16
    
                                          PLAINTIFFS' CO-LEAD COUNSEL
    
    
    DATED:             April 4,200l
    
    
    
                                                    TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
                                                                                                       
    
    TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN TH[E COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND
  • Disclosure
  • Solely To The Efforts Of Plaintiffs' Counsel
  • Contingent Nature of Counsel's Engagement.
  • Time and Effort Devoted To The Litigation
  • The Difficulty And Complexity Of The Litigation
  • Supr., 4,13 A.2d 876.
  • In re Amdahl Corporation Shareholders Litioation,, Del.
  • which arose from a two-step transaction
  • its operating assets to Suez Acquisition Company Limited
  • , a subsidiary of Silver Lake, for $2 billion in cash.
  • The Asset Sale was

  • 3 . STIPULAITON OF SETTLEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    STIPULATION
    COURT
    DEFENDANTS
    SEAGATE
    PARTIES
    COUNSEL
    SETTLEMENT
    VERITAS
    MEMBERS
    TRANSACTION
    DISCHARGE
    REPRESENTATIONS
    VERITAS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
    ASSET SALE
    CHANCERY
    DELAWARE
    SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY
    VERITAS SOFTWARE
    SUEZ
    CONNECTION
    PARTIES HERETO
    JUDGEMENT
    EXPENSES
    CALIFORNIA ACTIONS
    RELATING
    ATTORNEYS
    SETTLING PARTIES
    LITIGATION
    FOREVER RESOLVE
    
                  IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE  T>
                                                                                             a?;  5
                                                                                             -I,;  _
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY                             ."J----        
                                                                                        >.i.,       ;; 
                                                                                        "- -
                                                                                        &!         
                                                                                                       
                                                                                        -.;,.       -
                                                                                        .+.         ro 
                                                                                       -.a. .-
                                                                                       .'          -.e
                                                                                       mr..-         .J
    IN RE  SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC.  )                        Consolidated             .x2         I':
                                                                                       -u:.         ~3 
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                      >          .'
                                                         Civil   Action No.  17932-NC   g;,; ;;,       
                                                 >                                       ;"-           
    
    
                                 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
    
    
           This  Stipuktion  of Settlement dated as of January 11, 2001 (the "Stipulation"), is
    
    made and entered into by and among the following Settling Parties to the above-entitled
    
    litigation (the "Action"): (i) The Representative Plaintiffs (on behalf of themselves and each of
    
    the Class Members), by and through their counsel of record in the Action; and (ii) the
    
    Defendants (as defined below), by and through their counsel of record in the Action. The
    
    Stipulation is intended by the Settling Parties to fully, finally and forever resolve, discharge
    
    and settle the Released Claims (as defined in 1 6), upon and subject to the terms and
    
    conditions hereof.
    
           WHEREAS:
    
            A.      On March 29, 2000,  Seagate Technology, Inc., renamed Veritas Software
    
    Technology Corporation, a Delaware corporation, on November 22, 2000 ("Seagate")
    
    announced, inter alia, that  Seagate, VERITAS Software Corporation ("VERITAS") and Suez
    
    Acquisition Company  (Cayman) Limited ("Suez"), a company formed by a group of private
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T>
  • This Stipuktion of Settlement dated as of January 11, 2001, is
  • Defendants, by and through their counsel of record in the Action.
  • Stipulation is intended by the Settling Parties to fully, finally and forever resolve,
  • On March 29, 2000, Seagate Technology, Inc., renamed Veritas Software
  • announced, inter alia, that Seagate, VERITAS Software Corporation and Suez
  • had agreed to enter into a three-party transaction involving the sale of Seagate's
  • are referred to herein as the "California Actions."
  • Seagate, the members of Seagate's board of directors, Silver Lake Partners L.P. ("Silver
  • On September 11, 2000, plaintiffs filed a
  • ground that the conduct of the Defendants in connection with the proposed Merger and Asset
  • continued litigation in the Action, or any other action or proceeding relating to the matters
  • parties hereto, through their respective attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court
  • Asset Sale by $50 million in cash from $2.0 billion to $2.050 billion;
  • The attorneys' fees and expenses provided for in 7 11 below,
  • circumstances, allegations, transactions, events, occurrences, representations or omissions
  • the Defendants shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Order and Judgment
  • Counsel for Defendant VERITAS Software Corporation and Victory

  • 4 . ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED AND CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    COMPLAINT
    PARAGRAPH
    DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    SEAGATE
    DEFENDANTS ADMIT
    OFTHE COMPLAINT
    RESPONSE
    PRELIMINARY PROXY
    PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT
    VERITAS
    DEFENDANTS RESPECTFULLY REFER
    THEREOF
    DIRECTORS
    COMMON STOCK
    ALLEGATIONS OFPARAGRAPH
    CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION
    STOCKHOLDERS
    PLAINTIFFS PURPORT
    SECOND SENTENCE
    SILVER LAKE
    INFORMATION SUFFICIENT
    SHAREHOLDERS
    VERITAS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
    TRANSACTIONS
    FIRST SENTENCE
    MORGAN STANLEY
    UNDERSIGNED ATTORNEYS
    RECOMMENDING
    
                      IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC.                   ) CONSOLIDATED                               i
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                          1      C.A. No. 17932-NC
    
                                                                                          '
    
    
    
    
                              ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED AND
                           CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    
             Defendants Gary B. Filler,  L,awrence Perlman, Kenneth E. Haughton, Robert A. Kleist,
    
    Thomas P. Stafford, Laurel Wilkening and  Seagate Technology, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through
    
    their undersigned attorneys, answer plaintiffs' second amended  alid consolidated class action
    
    complaint (the "Complaint") as  folio ws:
    
              1. The allegations of paragraph 1  ofthe Complaint are denied, except Defendants admit
    
    that: plaintiffs purport to bring this action on behalf of the public shareholders of  Seagate
    
    Technology, Inc. ("Seagate"); Seagate is the owner of 128,059,966  shares, or approximately 32.5%,
    
    of the outstanding common stock of Veritas Software Corporation ("Veritas"); the market price of
    
    Veritas common stock increased by approximately 200% from its dOSing price on January 4, 1999,
    
    to late October 1999; the board of directors of  Seagate is recommending to the stockholders of
    
    Seagate the Stock Purchase and Merger (as defined below); and certain assets of Seagate,  including
    
    its disc-drive, tape and software businesses, and XIOtech Corporation ("XIOtech"), will be sold to
    
    an &hate of Silver Lake Management Partners, L.P. ("Silver Lake")
    
             2. The allegations of paragraph 2 of the Complaint are denied, except Defendants admit
    
    that  Seagate retained the investment banking firm  ofMorgan Stanley  & Co., Incorporated ("Morgan
    
    Stanley  ")
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
  • Thomas P. Stafford, Laurel Wilkening and Seagate Technology, Inc., by and through
  • their undersigned attorneys, answer plaintiffs' second amended alid consolidated class action
  • The allegations of paragraph 1 ofthe Complaint are denied, except Defendants admit
  • Veritas common stock increased by approximately 200% from its dOSing price on January 4, 1999,
  • an &hate of Silver Lake Management Partners,
  • The allegations of paragraph 2 of the Complaint are denied, except Defendants admit
  • The allegations ofparagraph 3 of the Complaint are denied,
  • the two transactions proposed to the Seagate stockholders must be voted on separately;
  • Seagate shareholders will receive 109,330,300 shares of Veritas common stock, an additional
  • proxy statement/prospectus, d.ated August 30, 2000 (the "Preliminary Proxy Statement"), as
  • for the full and complete terms of the transactions proposed to the stockholders of Seagate.
  • an'd the Seagate board `of directors is recommending to Seagate stockholders that they vote
  • The allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 5 of the Complaint are
  • accuracy of the allegations contained in the second sentence of para,graph 5 of the Complaint.
  • argument or conclusions of law as to which no response is necessary.
  • Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form
  • of law as to which no response is necessary, except Defendants admit that plaintiffs purport
  • Defendants respectfully refer the Court to the Preliminary Proxy Statement for the
  • The allegations ofparagraph 20 ofthe Complaint are denied,
  • refer the Court to the Preliminary Proxy Statement for the full and complete contents thereof
  • Morgan Stanley entered into an engagement agreement with Seagate.

  • 5 . PLAINTIFFS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    CLASS ACTION
    COURT
    SHAREHOLDERS
    CLASS CERTIFICATION
    MEMBERS
    SATISFY
    LITIGATION
    NUMEROSITY
    SEAGATE
    DEL
    PROPOSED TRANSACTION
    COMMON
    VERITAS
    CHANCERY
    DELAWARE
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    COMMONALITY
    REPRESENTATIVE PARTIES
    PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS
    MANAGEMENT
    PUBLIC STOCKHOLDERS
    COMMON STOCK
    VERITAS SHARES
    INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    PLAINTIFFS ALLEGE
    AUTHORITIES
    DISC DRIVES
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    
                                                                                          r;` . ^  .F--
                                                                                  j  :             : `i,
                                                                                  L-' i  i  :  I\;. ,.
    
                    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                      IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ------------------------------------------------------~
                                                               CONSOLIDATED
    IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC. :                           C.A.NO.17932-NC
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
    
    
    
    
    
    
                             PLAINTIFFS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
                       THEIR MOTION FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION
    
    
    
    
    
                                                               ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS
                                                               & GODDESS, P.A.
                                                               Suite 140 1, Mellon Bank Center
                                                               Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1070
                                                               (302) 656-4433
    
                                                               CHIMICLES  & TIKELLIS LLP
                                                               One Rodney Square
                                                               Wilmington, Delaware 1980 1
                                                               (302) 656-2.500
    
                                                               Co-Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
    
    
    Dated: May  1,200O
    
    
    
                                                      TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    PRELIMINARY STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
  • PLAINTIFFS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
  • THEIR MOTION FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION
  • TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.
  • Rule 23: Commonality
  • Del.
  • Plaintiffs, shareholders of defendant Seagate Technology, Inc. ("Seagate" and/or
  • investment of Seagate's public shareholders will be acquired by defendant Veritas Software
  • Corporation ((`Veritas") for Veritas stock and a small amount of cash,
  • but Seagate's management will be wrongfully enriched.
  • Plaintiffs seek, inter alia, injunctive relief precluding Seagate's directors and senior
  • This Brief is submitted in support of plaintiffs' motion for class certification.
  • consisting of all persons who were owners of the common stock of Seagate as of March 29,
  • and their successors in interest (except defendants and their affliates),who are or will be
  • sixteen actions were commenced in this Court challenging the proposed transaction
  • a Delaware corporation with its executive offices located in Scotts
  • It is the world's largest manufacturer of hard disc drives and magnetic
  • the "Individual Defendants") are officers and/or directors of Seagate and/or
  • Seagate currently owns about 128 million Veritas shares.
  • the stake Seagate's public stockholders hold in Veritas will be
  • The plan calls for members of Seagate's management to take
  • plaintiffs allege that the disclosure of the Proposed Transaction
  • breaching their fiduciary duties.
  • PLAINTIFFS SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 23
  • representative parties on behalf of all only if the class is so
  • To satisfy this numerosity requirement, plaintiffs are not required to precisely

  • 6 . AMENDED AND CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    DEFENDANTS
    PLAINTIFFS
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    VERITAS
    BUYOUT
    TRANSACTION
    SHAREHOLDERS
    STOCK
    SILVER LAKE
    MANAGEMENT
    STOCKHOLDERS
    OPERATING BUSINESSES
    MEMBERS
    TECHNOLOGY
    ASSETS
    DISC DRIVES
    ALLEGATIONS
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    SILVER LAKE PARTNERS
    SEAGATE SOFTWARE
    LLP
    COMMON STOCK
    EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
    AFFILIATES
    ACQUISITION
    TEXAS PACIFIC GROUP
    TRANSACTION WHEREBY
    IMMEDIATELY PRIOR
    
                     IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                         IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    ------------------------------------------------------x
    IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC. :                           CONSOLIDATED
    SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION                                    C.A. NO. 17932-NC
    ------------------------------------------------------x
    
                    AMENDED AND CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    
             Plaintiffs allege the following upon information and belief, except as to the allegations
    
    paragraph 7, which allegations are based upon personal knowledge:
    
                                                NATURE OF THE ACTION
    
              1.       This is a shareholder class action on behalf of plaintiffs and all stockholders
    
    Seagate Technology, Inc. ("Seagate" or the "Company") as of March 29,2000, other than the
    
    individual defendants named herein and their affiliates (the "Class"), arising out of a proposed
    
    acquisition of all of the stock and assets of Seagate (the "Proposed Buyout").
    
             2.        On March 29, 2000, Seagate,  Veritas Software Corporation ("Veritas") and an
    
    investor group led by Silver Lake Partners, L.P. ("Silver Lake") that includes Seagate
    
    management and Texas Pacific Group, issued a press release announcing a transaction whereby
    
    Seagate would be merged into Veritas. Immediately prior to this merger, a new company formed
    
    by an investor group led by Silver Lake will purchase all of Seagate's operating businesses for
    
    approximately $2 billion in cash. Each share of Seagate common stock would be converted into
    
    approximately 0.467 Veritas shares ("Exchange Ratio") and approximately $5 in cash, based on
    
    certain assumptions. The transaction has no collar, i.e. no mechanism to adjust the Exchange
    
    Ratio for changes in the market price of Veritas stock.
    
             3.        As a result of this transaction, Seagate's stockholders, who currently (through
    
    
    
    Seagate) own over 12X million shares of Veritas, plus Seagate's valuable hard disk drive
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • Plaintiffs allege the following upon information and belief, except as to the allegations of
  • which allegations are based upon personal knowledge:
  • Seagate Technology, Inc. as of March 29,2000, other than the
  • individual defendants named herein and their affiliates,
  • acquisition of all of the stock and assets of Seagate.
  • investor group led by Silver Lake Partners, L.P. that includes Seagate
  • management and Texas Pacific Group, issued a press release announcing a transaction whereby
  • Seagate would be merged into Veritas.
  • Immediately prior to this merger,
  • Each share of Seagate common stock would be converted into
  • The transaction has no collar, i.e. no mechanism to adjust the Exchange
  • The Proposed Buyout has clearly put Seagate into play,
  • stockholders' equity position.
  • The Company manufactures disc drives, magnetic discs and read-write heads, tape
  • February 1994 until June 1994 he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
  • Corporation and Seagate Software, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company.
  • shareholders of Seagate, and owe Plaintiffs and the other members of the Class the highest
  • The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.
  • whether defendants have breached their fiduciary duties owed to
  • Lake will purchase all of Seagate's operating businesses for approximately $2
  • Seagate's public shareholders for Seagate's operating assets.
  • ABBEY GARDY & SQUITIERI, LLP

  • 7 . CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SEAGATE
    PLAINTIFF
    MEMBERS
    INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
    COMMON STOCK
    SHARES
    VERITAS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CONTROL
    LAWS
    OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK
    BREACH
    DIRECTORS
    TRANSACTION
    DELAWARE
    DUTIES
    BUSINESSES
    EXPENSE
    RELIEF
    DAMAGES
    PLAN
    ASSETS
    PROPOSED ACQUISITION
    PURCHASE
    UNFAIR
    COURT
    CHANCERY
    FIDUCIARY DUTIES
    SUCCESS
    
                                                                                                      iI
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                           IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    Andrea Brown,
    
                                Plaintiff,
                                                                                  i  .-
                                                                    I'
          -against-                                                               -      I
                                                                    :
                                                            CLASS ACTION C&PLAINT
    
    Seagate Technology, Stephen J. Luczo,              :
    Gary B. Filler, Kenneth E. Haughton,                                          "s
    Robert A. Kleist, Lawrence Perlman,                                           CI)
    Thomas P. Stafford, Lawrence L.                                               . .
    Wilkening and Veritas Software,                                _              ..L
                                                                          - ,     -
    
                                Defendants.
    ----------------------------------------x
    
    
         Plaintiff,       by her. attorneys,         for her complaint           against
    
    defendants,      alleges upon information and belief,                   except             for
    
    paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof, which are alleged upon knowledge, as
    
    follows :
    
          1.       Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Rule 23 of the
    
    Rules of the Court of Chancery on her behalf and as a class action
    
    on behalf of all persons, other than the defendants and those in
    
    privity with them, who own common stock of  Seagate Technology
    
    (llSeagatell or the l'Companyl') .
    
          2.       Plaintiff is, and has been at all relevant times, the
    
    owner of the common stock of Seagate.
    
          3.       Defendant  Seagate is a corporation duly organized and
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to Rule 23 of the
  • other than the defendants and those in
  • who own common stock of Seagate Technology
  • organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware.
  • Luczo owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, 870,679 shares
  • of Seagate's outstanding common stock.
  • Individual Defendants as a group own approximately 1.8 million
  • The Individual Defendants owe fiduciary duties of good
  • Seagate public stockholders.
  • The class is so numerous that joinder of all members is
  • to benefit from a proposed acquisition of Seagate by the Individual
  • or damages as a result of the wrongful conduct of the defendants.
  • relief and/or corresponding declaratory relief with respect to the
  • On March 29, 2000, it was announced that Veritas was
  • including Seagate management would purchase all of Seagate's
  • operating businesses for approximately $2 billion in cash.
  • By virtue of their dominance and control over Seagate,
  • The purpose of the plan is to enable the Individual
  • Defendants to acquire 100% ownership of Seagate's assets for their
  • and at the expense of the other Seagate stockholders.
  • directors who will be considering any offer, no third party, as a
  • success of any such bid would require the consent and cooperation
  • The proposed transaction serves no legitimate business
  • it grossly and inherently unfair for the Individual Defendants to
  • defendants have breached and continue to breach their duty

  • 8 . AMENDED COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFF
    DEFENDANTS
    MEMBERS
    MANAGEMENT
    COMMON STOCK
    SHAREHOLDERS
    SHARES
    CASH
    INVESTMENT
    BUSINESS
    TRANSACTION
    MARKET
    VERITAS
    PUBLIC STOCKHOLDERS
    COURT
    LUCZO
    DIRECTORS
    FIDUCIARIES
    BUY-OUT GROUP
    OPERATING
    RELIEF
    LAW
    LEADERSHIP
    EFFICIENCY
    PRO FORMA
    AWARDING
    VERITAS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
    ACT
    PRICE
    
                                                                               ,:-`;!  1:.
                                                                               "L,  .'  in  i<~;.  ,; 
    
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                               IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    
    
    ANDREA BROWN,
    
                          Plaintiff,
                                                 1
           V.                                           CIVIL ACTION NO. 17932 NC
                                                 ;
    STEPHEN J. LUCZO, GARY B.
    FILLER, KENNETH E. HAUGHTON,                 ;
    ROBERT A. KLEIST, LAWRENCE
    PERLMAN, THOMAS P. STAFFORD,                                                                  -  ,
                                                 i                              `~  ;             :  :
    LAUREL L. WILKENING,  and SEAGATE )                                                           i`_
    TECHNOLOGY, INC.,                                                                             c3
                                                 1                                                --1
    
                          Defendants.
    
    
    
                                        AMENDED COMPLAINT
    
           Plaintiff alleges, upon information and belief, except as to allegations pertaining to
    
    herself, which are alleged upon personal knowledge, as follows:
    
                                               PARTIES
    
           1.      Plaintiff owns and owned, at all times relevant hereto, shares of  Seagate
    
    Technology, Inc. ("Seagate" or the "Company") common stock.
    
           2.      Seagate is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices located at
    
    920 Disc Drive,  Scotts  Valley, California 95066.  Seagate  designs, manufactures and markets
    
    products for storage, retrieval, and management of data on computer and data communications
    
    systems.
    
           3.      Defendant Stephen .I. Luczo ("Luczo") is President, Chief Executive Officer and
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • STEPHEN J. LUCZO, GARY B.
  • Plaintiff alleges, upon information and belief, except as to allegations pertaining to
  • Plaintiff owns and owned, at all times relevant hereto, shares of Seagate
  • Inc. ("Seagate" or the "Company") common stock.
  • He is also Chairman of the Board of Directors of Seagate Software
  • Inc. and a Director of Veritas Software Corporation.
  • Defendants Kenneth E. Haughton, Robert A. Kleist,
  • Seagate's public stockholders; govern Seagate in such a manner as to heed the expressed views
  • expense of Seagate's public shareholders.
  • Seagate management and Texas Pacific Group (collectively,
  • the Buy-Out Group will acquire the Seagate operating businesses for cash.
  • On the other hand, as fiduciaries, the members of
  • full and fair value for their investment in the Company.
  • Chancery, for declaratory, injunctive and other relief on her own behalf and as a class
  • (4 The class is so numerous that joinder of all class members is impracticable.
  • There are questions of law and fact which are common to the members of the Class and which
  • Defendants have acted and are about to act on grounds generally applicable to the Class,
  • Seagate is the global disc drive market share leader.
  • improvements in productivity and operational efficiency in a challenging business environment.
  • revenue of $1.645 billion and pro forma net income and pro forma diluted net income per share
  • We believe Seagate maintained market share leadership in both the
  • Company, and their role in this proposed transaction, it is evident that none of the
  • artificial lid on the market price of Seagate's common stock in order to justify a price
  • awarding rescissory damages to the Class;
  •    |