LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES v LEEBURG Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CaseNo: C.A. No. 18,021, CourtCode: CC, CourtName: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff: LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, State: DE Delaware, UniqueCaseRef: DE>CC>00018021, Stock, Lightpath, Settlement, Representatives, Texas, Stockholders, Delaware, Del, Shares, Shareholders, Common Stock, Redemption, Certification, Objector, Fees, Certificate, Texas Plaintiffs, Conversion, Supr, Chancery, Objection, Directors, Leeburg, Class Members, Barrett, Class E-2, Lightpath Technologies, Complaint, Targets, Expenses, Reasonableness, Declaratory Judgment, Amendment, Vote, Class E-l, Holders, Class E-3, Pursuant, Designations, Evidence, Cir, Lawson, Annual Meeting, Donald , ContentID: 120239557

Case Documents
1 2001-01-04 PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102389
28 pages
PDF
2 2001-01-04 DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102388
37 pages
PDF
3 2000-12-21 OBJECTION OF H. HARRIS TO PROPOSED CLASS CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102390
43 pages
PDF
4 2000-11-10 STIPULAITON OF SETTLEMENT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100060
14 pages
PDF
5 2000-10-04 PLAINTIFFS POST-TRIAL REPLY BRIEF ON THE ISSUE OF REDEMPTION FO CLASS E STOCK
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102391
8 pages
PDF
6 2000-09-29 DEFENDANTS ANSWERING BRIEF
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102392
21 pages
PDF
7 2000-09-22 PLAINTIFFS POST-TRIAL BRIEF ON THE ISSUE OF REDEMPTION OF CLASS E STOCK
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102393
29 pages
PDF
8 2000-08-03 PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 102394
15 pages
PDF
9 2000-08-03 AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL CLAS ACTION COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101139
20 pages
PDF
10 2000-05 COMPLAINT
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 101140
8 pages
PDF
Total Documents: 10 documents , 223 pages
Price: $ 64.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
LIGHTPATH
PLAINTIFFS
REPRESENTATIVES
SETTLEMENT
DELAWARE
OBJECTION
STOCK
OBJECTOR
DEFENDANTS
PURSUANT
TEXAS PLAINTIFFS
DEL
LITIGATION
CHANCERY
STOCKHOLDERS
SUPPORT
PROPOSED CLASS
CHANCERY RULE
COMMON STOCK
CLASS MEMBERS
SHAREHOLDERS
MONEY DAMAGES
RECAPITALIZATION
BARRETT
OPPOSITION
LIGHT PATH
INVESTORS
IPO
OBJECTOR CONTENDS
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE  OF DELAWARE

                                 IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

_________________________________I______-------"-------~-~----- X

LIGHTPATH  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.,                                      C.A.  No.  18021  NC

                           Plaintiff,

         V.

LOUIS G. LEEBURG, WILLIAM
LEEBURG and DONALD E.
LAWSON, as representatives
of a class of ALL CLASS E STOCKHOLDERS
OF LIGHTPATH  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.,

                           Defendants,

         and

MICHAEL J. REARDON, ALBERT E.
RAIZNER, JOHN ABUKHALIL,  RICHARD
A. GOLDFARD, MILTON NIRKEN, OSAMA
MIKHAIL,  WELDON GUEST,  MORDECHAJ
BLANKFELD,  HERMAN LAPIN, JAMES  T.
FOX, NORMAN  RAPPAPORT, MARK
BERGER, CAROL SUE FINKELSTEIN,
GREGARIO  CASAR, RANDOLPH  W. EVANS,
MARTIN BARRASH,  RICHARD M.
BARRETT, M.D.P.A., DANIEL BARRETT,
CYNTHIA A. BARRETT, ROBERT GORDON,
as Trustee  of ALAN J. and SHERRI
GORDON EISENMAN  FAMILY TRUST,  and
LARRY I. LIPSHULTZ,

         Additional Defendants.

________________-------~---------~----~----~-----------"-"----- X

       PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSED CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO THE OBJECTION OF HAROLD L. HARRIS



                           PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

           Plaintiff LightPath submits this brief in support of the
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • as representatives of a class of ALL CLASS E STOCKHOLDERS
  • Additional Defendants.
  • PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO THE
  • Plaintiff LightPath submits this brief in support of the
  • as a class action pursuant to Chancery Rule 23and,
  • This case meets the criteria of Chancery Court
  • Such investors were issued common stock,
  • had approximately 5.5 million shares of common stock outstanding.
  • Path would engage in a recapitalization,
  • shareholders and the public offering, based on a prospectus, dated
  • Because the IPO was completed later than expected,
  • consented to class certification pursuant to Chancery Rule 23
  • against Light Path and certain of its directors at the time of the
  • and furnished to class members.
  • Despite the fact that the Texas Plaintiffs were invited
  • This is especially true in complex litigation,
  • Supr., 570 A.2d 259, 265; Nottinqham Partners v. Dana, Del.
  • Objector does not contend that its terms are unfair.
  • are entitled to money damages and the right to
  • Finally, Objector contends, he and the Texas Plaintiffs

  • 2 . DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    PLAINTIFFS
    COURT
    SETTLEMENT
    DEL
    LIGHTPATH
    FEES
    SUPR
    SHARES
    SHAREHOLDERS
    TEXAS PLAINTIFFS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    DELAWARE
    ATTORNEYS
    EXPENSES
    REASONABLENESS
    LITIGATION
    OBJECTOR
    COMPLAINT
    CHANCERY
    REPRESENTATIVES
    EVIDENCE
    DIRECTORS
    ROBERT GORDON
    FAMILY TRUST
    REDEMPTION
    OFFICERS
    ISSUANCE
    ACCORDING
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES
    
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                                    1N AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
                                                                    i
                             Plaintiff,
                                                                    ;
                             V.                                                    C.A. No.: 18021
                                                                    i
    LOUIS G. LEEBURG, WILLIAM LEEBURG  and DONALD                   )
    E. LAWSON, as representatives of a class of ALL CLASS E         )
    STOCKHOLDERS OF LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., )>
                             Defendants,
                                                                    i
                             and                                                                  .    
                                                                    ;                    r  `,         
    MICHAEL J. REARDON, ALBERT E. R&IZNER,  JOHN                    1.
    ABLKHALIL,  RICHARD A.  GOLDFrUIB,  MILTON  NZRKEN,  )                                             
    OSAMA MIKHAIL,WELDON  GUEST, MORDECHAJ                          1                                 
                                                                                   .'
    BLANKFELD, HERMAN LAPIN, JAMES T. FOX, NORMAN >
    RAPPAPORT, MARK BERGER, CAROL SUE FINKELSTEIN, )                                                  
    GREGARIO CASAR, RANDOLPH W. EVANS, MARTIN                       )                                  
                                                                              :
    BARRASH, RICHARD M. BARRETT, M.D. P.A., DANIEL                   )                                
                                                                                         :  .:        
    BARRETT, CYNTHIA A, BARRETT, ROBERT GORDON, as >
    Trustee of AL-AN J. and SHERRI GORDON EISENMAN                   1
    FAMILY TRUST, and LARRY I. LIPSHULTZ,
                                                                     i
                             Additional Defendants.                      )
    
    
                        DEFENDANTS' MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
             CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES
    
    
                                                          BIGGS AND BATTAGLIA
    
    
                                                          Victor F. Battaglia, Sr. (ID No. 156)
                                                          Robert D. Goldberg [ID No. 63 1)
                                                               1800 Mellon Bank Center
                                                          Wilmington DE 19899
                                                          (302) 655-9677
    Date: January 4,200 1                                 Attorneys for Defendants
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • STOCKHOLDERS OF LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,)>
  • BARRETT, CYNTHIA A, BARRETT, ROBERT GORDON, as>
  • DEFENDANTS' MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES
  • The Fees and Expenses Requested Are Fair and Reasonable and Should Be Awarded.
  • Supr., 144 A.2d 155.
  • Allied Artists Picture Corp v. Baron, Del.
  • In re Anderson Clayton Shareholders' Litigation,
  • and Donald E. Lawson as representatives of the Class E stockholders of LightPath.
  • Complaint, LightPath sought a judicial determination that the holders of its Class E common
  • Trustee of Alan J. and Sheni, Gordon Eisenman Family Trust, and Larry I. Lipshultz (the "Texas
  • The Texas Plaintiffs are holders of Class E stock who reside in Texas and who
  • LightPath and its officers and directors made false and misleading representations to them
  • the Class E shares were issued as part of the Company restructuring completed on February 22,
  • directors had engaged in no improper conduct in connection with the issuance of the C%SS E
  • Plaintiffs could have an opportunity to present evidence at a later date.
  • of whether or not the Amended Certificate of Incorporation extended the redemption date I?om
  • Other sources of financing were equally unavailing and ultimately, according to
  • Objector incorrectly complains that defendants served only one discovery request,

  • 3 . OBJECTION OF H. HARRIS TO PROPOSED CLASS CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    LIGHTPATH
    REPRESENTATIVES
    COURT
    PLAINTIFFS
    SETTLEMENT
    DEFENDANT
    DELAWARE
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CERTIFICATION
    DEL
    OBJECTOR
    LEEBURG
    DIRECTORS
    CLASS MEMBERS
    CIR
    FIDUCIARY DUTY
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES
    SHAREHOLDERS
    COMPLAINT
    MONETARY DAMAGES
    WILLIAM LEEBURG
    OBJECTION
    FIRST CITY TOWER
    ABSENT CLASS
    LITIGATION
    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
    MONEY DAMAGES
    CLASS NOTICE
    ATTORNEYS
    
        IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                          IN AND :FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
    
                   Plaintiff,
    
          V.
    
    LOUIS G. LEEBURG,  WILLIAM
    LEEBURG and DONALD E. LAWSON,
    as representatives of a class of ALL
    CLASS E STOCKHOLDERS OF
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
    
                   Defendants.
    
    
     OBJECTION OF HAROILD  L. HARRIS TO THE: PROPOSED CLASS
                        CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT
    
                                            PRICKETT,  JONE:S   & ELLIOTT
    
                                            Bruce E. Jameson (DE Bar No. 2931)
                                            1310 King Street
                                            P.O. Box 1328
                                            Wilmington, DE 19899
                                            TEL: (302) 888-6500
                                            FAX: (302) 6513-8111
                                            Attorneys for Objector
    OF COUNSEL:
    
    VINSON & ELKINS LLP
    Adam P. Schiffer
    Charles W. Schwartz
    Jeffrey L. Raizner
    2300 First City Tower
    1001 Fannin
    Houston. Texas 77002-6760
    
    DATE:          December 21, 2000
    
    
    
                                                                            TABLE OF CONTENTS
    
    
                                                                        Page
    TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
  • LOUIS G. LEEBURG, WILLIAM LEEBURG and DONALD E. LAWSON, as representatives of a class of ALL
  • OBJECTION OF HAROILD L. HARRIS TO THE:
  • Attorneys for Objector OF COUNSEL:
  • VINSON & ELKINS LLP Adam P. Schiffer Charles W. Schwartz Jeffrey L. Raizner 2300 First City
  • Texas 77002-6760
  • CLASS CERTIFICATION IS INAPPROPRIATE.
  • The Representative Parties Are Not Adequate Representatives
  • of the Class E Stockholders.
  • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Can Only Be Certified Under Rule
  • 23And Class Members Must Be Afforcled An Opportunity
  • This Action Is Primariliy For Money Damages.
  • A Defendant Class Action is Permissible Only Under Rule
  • THE RELEASE OF CLAIMS CONTEMPLATED IN THE STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT IS IMPERMISSIBLY BROAD.

  • 4 . STIPULAITON OF SETTLEMENT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SETTLEMENT
    STOCK
    COURT
    JUDGEMENT
    AGREEMENT
    DEFENDANTS
    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
    TEXAS
    EXHIBIT
    CLASS MEMBERS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    APPROVING
    LITIGATION
    ATTORNEYS
    CHANCERY
    DELAWARE
    DIRECTORS
    PARTIES
    HERETO
    FEE
    LITIGATION COMMITTEE
    LEEBURG
    COMMON STOCK
    PLAINTIFFS
    HOLDERS
    DETERMINATION
    RESTRUCTURING
    PARTY
    FEE AWARD
    
                                                              i    h
                IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE  '
    
                                IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                                                   ---x
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
    
                             Plaintiff,
                                                           C.A. No. 18021 NC
                     V .
    
    LOUIS G.  LEEBURG, WILLIAM
    LEEBURG and DONALD E.
    LAWSON, as representatives
    of a class of ALL CLASS E:
    STOCKHOLDERS OF LIGHTPATH
    TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
    
                             Defendants,
    
                     and
    
    MICHAEL J. REARDON, ALBERT E.
    RAIZNER, JOHN ABUKHALIL, RICHARD :
    A. GOLDFARB, MILTON NIRKEN,  OSAMA  :
    MIKHAIL,  WELDON GUEST,  MORDECHAJ  :
    BLANKFELD, HERMAN LAPIN, JAMES  '1'.  :
    FOX, NORMAN RAPPAPORT, MARK
    BERGER, CAROL SUE FINKELSTEIN
    GREGARIO CASAR, RANDOLPH W. EVANS, :
    MARTIN  BARRASH, RICHARD M.
    BARRETT, M.D. P.A., DANIEL BARRETT,:
    CYNTHIA A. BARRETT, ROBERT GORDON, :
    as Trustee of ALAN J. and SHERRI                  :
    GORDON EISENMAN FAMILY TRUST, and :
    LARRY I. LIPSHULTZ,
    
             Additional Defendants.
    ____---__------_---------.---------- s
    
                                  STIPULATION  OF SETTLEMENT
    
                     THIS     STIPULATION    OF      SETTLEMENT         ("Settlement" or
    
    lzSettlement  Agreement"), made as of November 18 , 2000, is entered
    
    into, subject to preliminary and final approval by the Delaware
    
    Court     0 "    Chancery,     between  (i)  LightPath Technologies, Inc.
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE '
  • LOUIS G. LEEBURG, WILLIAM
  • STOCKHOLDERS OF LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
  • Additional Defendants.
  • lzSettlement Agreement"), made as of November 18, 2000, is entered
  • Court 0 " Chancery, between LightPath Technologies, Inc.
  • and on behalf of all holders of Class E common stock of LightPath
  • judgment declaring that the Class E stockholders have no right to
  • LightPath or any of its ofificers or directors ("LightPath's
  • the Texas Action contend that false and misleading representations
  • recapitalization of LightPath in 1995 ("the 1995 Restructuring").
  • The plaintiffs in the Texas Action demand trial by jury.
  • Since the Declaratory Judgment Action was commenced prior
  • 2000 but was adjourned at the request of the parties
  • attorneys for the plaintiffs in the Texas Action (the "Texas
  • litigation committee.
  • The Litigation Committee
  • Settlement and the Exhibits attached hereto are defined as follows,
  • which the Court's Order and Final Judgment Approving the
  • "Notice of Pendency of Class Action, Class Determination,
  • to Appear," attached he:reto at Exhibit B, which shall be
  • mailed to all Class Members as described herein and as
  • LightPath will not object to any such request for a Fee Award of up
  • party shall be returned to the position in the litigation which

  • 5 . PLAINTIFFS POST-TRIAL REPLY BRIEF ON THE ISSUE OF REDEMPTION FO CLASS E STOCK

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SHARES
    DEL
    REDEMPTION
    MEETING
    SHAREHOLDERS
    REDEEM
    CONVERSION
    PROPOSED AMENDMENT
    DEFENDANTS
    EXTEND
    CLASS E-2
    CERTIFICATE
    TCG SECURITIES
    PROXY
    ANNUAL MEETING
    REASON
    EXTENSION
    VOTE
    PRIOR
    PURPOSE
    BARRETT
    SOUTHERN UNION
    CLASS E-L
    AUTHORITIES
    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
    DIRECTING
    EVIDENCE
    INTENT
    CLASS E-3
    
                                                                                        4)     *i
                                                                                         0  I\
                                                                                          i       /
              IN THE COUR'I OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                       ~  '  x
    
                             IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    LIGHTPATH  TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,                  )
    
                         Plaintiff,
    
                 v. C.A. No. 18021 NC
    
    LOUIS C.  LEEBURG, WILLIAM  LEEBURG  )
    and DONALD E. -LAWSON, as                       1
    representatives of a class of                   1
    ALL  CLASS E STOCKHOLDERS OF                    )
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,                   )
    
                         Defendants,                )
    
                 and
    
    M I C H A E L   J. REARDON, ALBERT E.           )
    RAIZNER, JOHN ABUKHALIL, RICHARD  )
    A.  GOLDFARB, MILTON NIRKEN,  OSAMA  )                                   *  I
    MIKHAIL, WELDON  GUEST, MORDECHAI  )                                     <  .-.
                                                                             c->
    BLANKFELD, HERMAN LAPIN, JAMES T.  )
    FOX, NORMAN RAPPAPORT, MARK                     )
    BERGER; CAROL SUE FINKELSTEIN,                  )
    GREGARIO CASAR,  RANDOLPH W. EVANS,  )
    MARTIN  BARRASH, RICHARD M.                     )
    BARRETT, M.D. P.A., DANIEL BARRETT,)
    CYNTHIA A. BARRETT, ROBERT GORDON,  )
    as Trustee of ALAN  c-. and SHERRI              )
    GORDON  EISENMAN FAMILY TRUST, and  )
    LARRY  L. LIPSHULTZ,                            )
    
                 Additional. Defendants.  )
    
                PLAINTIFF'S POST-TRIAL REPLY BRIEF ON THE ISSUE
                        OF THE REDEMPTION OF THE CLASS E STOCK
                        .~---
    
    
                                        Grover C. Brown
                                        Gordon, Fournaris  &  Mamrrarella, P.A.
                                        1220 Market Street Building
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • BARRETT, M.D. P.A., DANIEL BARRETT,) CYNTHIA A. BARRETT, ROBERT GORDON,)
  • OF THE REDEMPTION OF THE CLASS E STOCK
  • In Re 'Giant Portland Cement Co., Del.
  • Southern Union Co., Del.
  • OTHER AUTHORITIES
  • A Declaratory Judgment Should Be Entered Authorizing And Directing Lightl?ath To Redeem All
  • T1-.e defendants' argument that any shareholder reviewing the
  • Inc. would have good reason
  • 2001 by the proposed amendment j.s not
  • supported by the evidence.
  • Cefendants do not dispute the fact that there was no intent by
  • the company to extend the redemption date for all Class E shares to
  • refused to agree to an extension for the
  • cr that the proxy statement clearly
  • extend the redemption date for the Class E-2 and Class E-3 stock,
  • a target for the conversion of the Class E-l shares had also been
  • requirements with respect to the stock price levels and revenue attainrr,ent for the
  • been converted prior to the original date of redemption for all
  • certificate of incorporation in full
  • :I1 The Class E Shareholders Are Not Entitled to One Vote Per Share At LightPat:h's Upcoming
  • purpose ot § 2:L3 is to enable a corporation to readily identify its
  • decisilon in TCG Securities Inc. v.

  • 6 . DEFENDANTS ANSWERING BRIEF

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SHARES
    COURT
    SHAREHOLDERS
    LIGHTPATH
    STOCK
    DELAWARE
    DEFENDANTS
    VOTE
    CERTIFICATE
    REDEMPTION
    DEL
    VOTING
    STOCKHOLDERS
    MEETING
    AMENDMENT
    CONVERSION
    COMMON STOCK
    E-3 SHARES
    CHANCERY
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES
    BARRETT
    INCORPORATION
    MILESTONES
    EXTENSION
    ANNUAL MEETING
    DESIGNATIONS
    REPRESENTATIVES
    RICHARD
    SHERRI GORDON EISENMAN
    
                 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                     rN Ah:, FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
    
                           Plaintiff,
                                                      ;
                                      V.                    C.A. h'o.: 18021
                                                      i
    LOUIS G. LEEBURG, WILL.IAM                        )                                   .,
    LEEBURG and DONALD E. LAWSON,
    as representatives of a class
    ofALL CLASS E STOCKHOLDERS
    OF LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,                                                           ._
                                                                                          .
                                                                                   .-
                           Defendants,                                             I..
    
    
                           and
    
    MICHAEL J. REARDON, ALBERT E.
    RAIZNER, JOHN ABUKHA:LIL,  RICHARD
    A. GOLDFARB, MILTON  NlRKEN, OSAMA
    MIKHAIL,  WELDON GUEST, MORDECHAI
    BLANKFELD, HERMAN LAPlN, JAMES T.
    FOX, NORMAN RAPPAPORT, MARK
    BERGER, CAROL SUE FINKELSTEIN,
    GREGARIO CASAR, RANDOLPH W. EVANS,
    M.4RTIN BARRASH, RICHARD M.
    BARRETT, M.D. P.A., DANIEL BARRETT,
    CYNTHIA A. BARRETT, ROBERT GORDON,
    as Trustee of ALAN J. and SHERRI
    GORDON EISENMAN FAMILY `TRUST, and
    LARRY I. LIPSHULTZ,
    
                           Additional Defendants.
    
                                     DEFENDANTS  ' ANSWERING BRIEF
    
                                                      BIGGS AND BATTAGLIA
                                                      Robert D. Goldberg (ID No. 63 1)
                                                      1800 Mellon Bank Center
                                                      P.O. Box 1489
                                                      Wilmington, DIE 19899
                                                      (302) 655-967:'
    Date: September 29, 2000                          Attorney for Defendants
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • MICHAEL J. REARDON, ALBERT E. RAIZNER, JOHN ABUKHA:LIL, RICHARD
  • Additional Defendants.
  • E SHARES UNTIL SEPTEMBER 30,2001.
  • THE CLASS E SHAREHOLDERS ARE ENTITLED TO VOTE IN
  • STOCK AS OF THE SEPTEMBER 6,200O RECORD DATE.
  • Cinerama v. Technicolor, Del.
  • The Plaintiff is a Delaware Corporation, LightPath Technologies, Inc. (the "Company" or
  • as representatives of the class of E stockholders of the Company.
  • Be:cause the annual meeting of the Company is scheduled for October 6,200O and it is
  • while the voting issue is relatively straight forward.
  • Cass E shareholders are not entitled to vote at the October 6,200O corporate election.
  • new A Common Stock for each five and one-half shares of its A Stlock then outstanding.
  • The terms governing the Class E Shares were set forth in a Certificate of Designations
  • Amendme:nt to the Certificate of Incorporation tiled on November 12,
  • Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation itself both provide that the Class E Shares are
  • LightPath Technologies, Inc. are entitled to vote at the annual meeting to be held on October
  • Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation extends the redemption date from September 30,
  • of certain earnings and stock price milestones or a buyout or merger.
  • conversion and redemption rates of the Class E-l,
  • recapitalization to agree to an extension for all the Class E Shares.

  • 7 . PLAINTIFFS POST-TRIAL BRIEF ON THE ISSUE OF REDEMPTION OF CLASS E STOCK

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    REDEMPTION
    SHARES
    CERTIFICATE
    SHAREHOLDERS
    CLASS E-2
    CLASS E-3
    FACTS
    AMENDMENT
    CLASS E-L
    LIGHTPATH
    COMMON STOCK
    DEL
    CONVERSION
    BLAIR
    DESIGNATIONS
    INCORPORATION
    DEFENDANTS
    FARM INDUSTRIES
    EVIDENCE
    PROXY STATEMENT
    MANAGEMENT
    BARRETT
    WAQQONER
    ANNUAL MEETING
    PUBLIC OFFERING
    PROPOSED AMENDMENT
    CONVERSION GOALS
    EXTENSION
    UNDERWRITER
    
              IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE           A7
                            IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,             )
    
                        Plaintiff,
    
               V .                                  C.A. No. 18021 NC
                                              )
    LOUIS  G.. LEEBURG, WILLIAM  LEEBURG      )
    and DONALD E. LAWSON, as                  )
    representatives of a class of             )
    ALL CLASS E STOCKHOLDERS OF               )
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,             ))
                        Defendants,           ))
               and                            1
    
    MICHAEL J. REARDON, ALBE:RT E.
    RAIZNER, JOHN  ABUKHALIL, RICHARD  )
    A. GOLDFARB, MILTON NIRKEN, OSAMA  )
    MIKHAIL,  WELDON GUEST,  MORDECHAJ  )
    BLANKFE:LD, HERMAN LAPIN, JAMES T.  )
    FOX, NORMAN RAPPAPORT, MARK               )
    BERGER, CAROL SUE  FINKELSTEIN,           )
    GREGARIO CASAR, RANDOLPH W. EVANS,  )
    MARTIN  BARRASH, RICHARD M.               )
    BARRETT, M.D. P.A., DAN:IEL BARRETT,)
    CYNTHIA A. BARRETT, ROBERT GORDON,  )
    as Trustee of ALAN J. and SHERRI          )
    GORDON EISENMAN FAMILY TRUST, and  )
    LARRY I. LIPSHULTZ,                       ))
               Additional Defendants.  )
    
                      PLAINTIFF'S POST-TRIAL BRIEF ON THE ISSUE
                       OF THE REDEMPTION OF THE CLASS E STOCK
    
    
    
                                       Grover C. Brown
                                       Gordon, Fournaris  & Mammarella, P.A.
                                       1220 Market Street Building
                                       Suite 700
                                       P.O. Box 1355
                                       Wilmington, DE     19899-1355
                                       (302) 652-2900
    
    Dated:    September 22, 2000
    
    
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • BARRETT, M.D. P.A., DAN:IEL BARRETT,) CYNTHIA A. BARRETT, ROBERT GORDON,)
  • OF THE REDEMPTION OF THE CLASS E STOCK
  • Statement of Facts
  • Douqlas v. Thrasher, Del..
  • This is a defendant class action brought by LightPath
  • shareholders, and no improper conduct engaged in by its
  • management, in connection with the issuance of the Class E stock
  • The first issue relating to the redemption of the Class
  • E shares is ready for disposition based upon the evidence
  • certificate of incorporation, PX l', it was authorized initially
  • to issue 6.5 million shares of common stock and 1 million shares
  • Ultimately, only one underwriter,
  • D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp.,
  • underwrite an $8 million initial public offering,
  • 1.!5 million Class E-l shares, 1.5 million Class E-2 shares and 1
  • I.!5 shares of Class E-2 and 1 share of Class E-3 being dividended
  • the certificate of designations and were geared to LightPath's
  • conditions to conversion for the Class E-l,
  • LightPath sought the extension as to all Class E shares.
  • LightPath's board then approved and recommended an amendment
  • The proxy statement went into considerable detail to point
  • SECTIONS 3.EAND OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT
  • The evidence establishes - and indeed the defendants concede
  • shares are not entitled to vote at LightPath's annual meeting of
  • In Waqqoner v. Laster, Del.
  • & Re Farm Industries, --nc
  • management a better opportunity to meet the conversion goals.

  • 8 . PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    STOCK
    LIGHTPATH
    COURT
    REPRESENTATIVES
    CERTIFICATION
    RECAPITALIZATION
    PLAINTIFFS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    DECLARATORY
    COMPLAINT
    TEXAS
    VOTE
    COMMON
    FINANCE
    DELAWARE
    PURSUANT
    NUMEROSITY
    MEMBERS
    MOTION
    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
    AMENDED COMPLAINT
    FINANCIAL TARGETS
    LAW
    ANNUAL MEETING
    VALIDITY
    REDEEM
    PREREQUISITES
    SATISFY
    DEL
    
             IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                          .IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                                        ------ X
    
    LIGHTPATH  TECHNOLOGIEZS, INC.,
    
                       Plaintiff,                    C.A. No. 18021 NC
                V .
    
    LOUIS G. LEEBURG, WILLIAM
    LEEBURG and DONALD E..
    LAWSON, as representatives
    of a c:Lass of ALL CLASS E
    STOCKHOLDERS OF LIGHTPATH
    TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
    
                       Defendants,
    
                and
    
    MICHAEL J.  REARDON, ALBERT E.
    RAIZNER, JOHN ABUKHALIL, RICHARD :
    A. GOLD.FARB, MILTON NIRKEN, OSAMA :
    MIKHAIL,  WELDON GUEST, MORDECHAJ :
    BLANKFE:LD, HERMAN  LAI?IN, JAMES T. :
    FOX,  NO:RMAN RAPPAPORT, MARK
    BERGER, CAROL SUE FINKELSTEIN,
    GREGARIO CASAR, RANDOLPH W. EVANS, :
    MARTIN  .BARRASH, RICHARD M. BARRETT,:
    MD., F.A., DANIEL  ESARRETT, CYNTHIA :
    A. BARRETT, ROBERT GORDON, as
    Trustee to the ALAN J. and SHERYL :
    GORDON EISENMAN FAMILY TRUST, and  :
    LARRY LIPSHULTZ,
    
         Additional Defendants.
    __--..----___---.--  _____. -_------------- ;
    
                           PL,AINTIFF'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT
                 OF ITS  MOT'ION FOR CLASS ACTION DETERMINATION
    
                               PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
    
                Plaintiff  LightPath Technologies, Inc. ("LightPath" or
    
    the "Company") submits this brief in support of its motion for an
    
    order pursuant to Chancery Court Rule 23(b)  (l)(A) and  (b)  (2),
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • as representatives of a c:Lass of ALL CLASS E
  • STOCKHOLDERS OF LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
  • Additional Defendants.
  • common:stock in the Fall of 1995 as a result of which the Class E
  • and should be certified pursuant to that Rule.
  • This action for a declaratory judgment was commenced on
  • as the result of LightPath's inability to meet financial targets
  • Class E Stock will not be entitled to vote at LightPath's
  • against the validity of the Recapitalization.
  • consented to the certification of a Defendant class pursuant to
  • Vice President of Finance.
  • in Texas commenced an action in Texas against LightPath and certain
  • On July 11, 2000, LightPath made a motion for leave to
  • "amended complaint"), The amended complaint names as additional
  • defendants the Class E-stockholder plaintiffs in the Texas action
  • that the Recapitalization was valid and lawful under Delaware law.
  • The record date for voting at its annual meeting precedes
  • the four prerequisites for certification set forth in Rule
  • be so numerous that joinder of all members is impractical.
  • it appears beyond dispute that Rule 23's numerosity
  • Whether the Company is legally obligated to redeem
  • To satisfy that prerequisite,
  • S_teiner v. Meverson Del.

  • 9 . AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL CLAS ACTION COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    STOCKHOLDERS
    LIGHTPATH
    COMMON STOCK
    DEFENDANTS
    COURT
    SHARES
    HOLDERS
    TARGETS
    LEEBURG
    DONALD
    LAWSON
    REPRESENTATIVES
    BARRETT
    TEXAS
    DELAWARE
    RIGHTS
    CONVERSION TARGETS
    CHANCERY
    FINANCIAL TARGETS
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES
    ROBERT GORDON
    ACTION COMPLAINT
    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
    CLASS E-L STOCK
    CLASS E-2
    CERTIFICATE
    MINIMUM PRETAX INCOME
    REDEMPTION PRICE
    BUSINESS
    
          IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
    
                        IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
                     ___-___-_------------- X
    
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
    
                       Plaintiff,                C.A. No. 18021 NC
              V .
    
    LOUIS G.  LEEBIJRG, WILLIAM
    LEEBURG and DONALD E.
    LAWSON, as representatives
    of a class of ALL CLASS E
    STOCKHOLDERS OF LIGHTPATH
    TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
    
                      Defendants,
    
              and
    
    MICHAEL J. REARDON, ALBERT E.                                       --!
    RAIZNER, JOHN  ABUKHALIL, RICHARD :                                 -,
    A. GOLDFARB, MI:LTON NIRKEN, OSAMA :                   ;                  .
    MIKHAIL,  WELDON GUEST, MORDECHAJ :                                 :  '
                                                           _.           c_
    BLANKFELD, HERMAN LAPIN, JAMES T. :                          ..,
    FOX, NORMAN  RAPPAPORT,  MARK
    BERGER, CAROL  SlJE FINKELSTEIN,
    GREGARIO CASAR, RANDOLPH W. EVANS, :
    MARTIN  BARMSH, RICHARD M.
    BARRETT, M.D.P.A., DANIEL BARRETT, :
    CYNTHIA A. BARRETT, ROBERT GORDON, :
    as Trustee of A:LAN J. and SHERRI       :
    GORDON EISENMAN FAMILY TRUST, and :
    LARRY I. LIPSHU:LTZ,
    
         Additional Defendants.
    ______----------------------------- ;
    
           AMENDED  AXD SUPPLEMENTAL CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    
               Plaintiff LightPath Technologies, Inc. ("LightPath"
    
    or "the Company") for its complaint herein,  alleges:
    
               1.      'This is an action for a declaratory judgment
    
    determining the rights and obligations of  LightPath and the
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
  • LEEBURG and DONALD E. LAWSON, as representatives of a class of ALL CLASS E
  • STOCKHOLDERS OF LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
  • GREGARIO CASAR, RANDOLPH W. EVANS,: MARTIN BARMSH, RICHARD M. BARRETT, M.D.P.A., DANIEL
  • Additional Defendants.
  • Plaintiff LightPath Technologies, Inc. ("LightPath"
  • determining the rights and obligations of LightPath and the
  • holders of its Class E Common Stock.
  • shares of Class E-l stock, 1.5 million shares of Class E-2
  • appropriate amendment to the certificate of incorporation was
  • targets and their class E stock was converted.
  • following financial targets are met:
  • if the Company's Minimum Pretax Income defined as earnings
  • Class E-l stock are unchanged.
  • less the required 30 consecutive business days prior to August
  • redemption price of $0.0001 per share.
  • to determine whether any of the conversion targets has
  • Texas (the "Texas Class E
  • commenced an action in a state court in Texas
  • E.ntering a declaratory judgment pursuant to 10
  • Action Complaint attached hereto by hand delivery addressed to the

  • 10 . COMPLAINT

    EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
    SHARES
    CONVERSION
    TARGETS
    PRICE
    COMMON STOCK
    STOCKHOLDERS
    CERTIFICATE
    CLASS E-L
    CLASS E-2
    REDEEM
    MINIMUM PRETAX INCOME
    DESIGNATIONS
    CLASS E-3
    MERGER
    DEFENDANTS
    OUTSTANDING
    VOTING
    MEETING
    REDEMPTION PRICE
    OFFERING
    IPO
    LAWSON
    HOLDERS
    MANAGEMENT
    PRIOR
    BID PRICE
    DONALD
    DIRECTORS
    MEMBERS
    
                IN THEaCOURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                                  IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
    ------------------------------ X:
    LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ::
                          Plaintiff,
                                             :
                          -v.-               :      C.A. No.
                                             :
    LOUIS G. LEEBURG, WILLIAM                :
    LEEBURG and DONALD E.                    :
    LAWSON, as representatives :
    of a class of ALL CLASS E                :
    STOCKHOLDERS OF LIGHTPATH                :
    TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,                      ::
                         Defendants.
    _----------------------------- 4
    
                 Plaintiff LightPath Technologies, Inc. ("LightPath")  for
    its complaint herein, alleges:
                 1.      This is an action for a declaratory judgment
    determining the rights and obligations of LightPath and the holders
    of its Class E common Stock. As described below, a genuine dispute
    exists between certain of the Class E stockholders and the Company
    concerning those rights and obligations.
                 2. Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation with headquarters
    in Albuquerque, New Mexico. It has outstanding approximately 15
    million shares of Class A stock, 1.5 million shares of Class E-l
    stock, 1.5 million shares of Class E-2 stock, 1 million shares of
    Class E-3 stock, and various other classes of stock. The Class A
    stock is listed on the NASDAQ small cap market system.
                 3. Plaintiff produces GRADIUM@ glass lenses, collimator
    products      and      other       optical     component    products    for    the
    telecommunications market. GRADIUM glass is an optical quality
    
    
    
    glass material with varying refractive indices, capable of reducing
    optical aberrations inherent in conventional lenses and performing
    with a single lens tasks traditionally performed by multi-element
    conventional lens systems. This is a process newly discovered by
    the Company, that was in the developmental stage until 1997. Until
    its initial public offering (the "IPO") in 1996, the Company had
    financed    its    operations    through    the    private    offerings of
    securities, and through borrowings.
                4. Defendants Louis G.  Leeburg, William  Leeburg and
    Donald E. Lawson are holders of Class E stock. Louis G. Leeburg
    owns 7,272 Class E shares and is the Senior Financial Advisor of
    the John E. Fetzer Institute, Inc., which owns 473,789 Class E
    shares; William Leeburg owns or controls 21,816 Class E shares; and
    
    SNIPPETS:
  • This is an action for a declaratory judgment determining the rights and obligations of
  • a genuine dispute exists between certain of the Class E stockholders and the Company
  • It has outstanding approximately 15 million shares of Class A stock, 1.5 million shares of
  • Until its initial public offering (the "IPO") in 1996, the Company had financed its
  • Defendants Louis G. Leeburg, William Leeburg and Donald E. Lawson are holders of Class E
  • existing holders of the Company's common stock, including several senior members of
  • Those shares were to become convertible into Class A shares only in the event that certain
  • The board of directors approved the recapitalization on September 25, 1995, and the
  • On October 2, 1995, an appropriate amendment to the certificate of incorporation was duly
  • The company sold 1,840,OOO "units", consisting of one share of Class A common stock, one
  • management's share of the outstanding class A stock fell from 21% to 7%; and management
  • Because the Class E stock voted as a single class with the Class A stock on most matters,
  • each share of Class E-l Common Stock will be automatically converted into one share of Class days; or if, at any time from August, 1997 through February, 1999, the Bid Price per share of the
  • Company enters into a Merger and the Class A stockholders receive $12.50 or $16.75 per share.
  • Merger and the Class A stockholders receive $18 per share prior to August, 1997, or $23 per
  • a merger occurs before February 22, 1999 and Class A stockholders receive consideration
  • Because the Company did not satisfy the Minimum Pretax Income or the merger consideration
  • Although the Amended Certificate of Designations provides that the Company has until
  • The defendant class consists of over 250 holders of Class E stock and is so numerous that
  •    |