LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

SUTTLES v HENIFEN et al Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: SU, CourtName: Superior Court, District: Third, JudgeName: Rene J. Gonzalez, Plaintiff: SUTTLES, State: AK Alaska, UniqueCaseRef: AK>SU>62, Taxicab Permit, Hathhorn, Summary Judgment, Suttles, Cab Driver, Permit Owner, Lenora Hathhorn, Non-delegable Duty, Trust, Accident, Negligence, Franchise, Alaska, Anchorage, Liability, Linda Suttles, Taxicab Service, Superior Court, Hathhorn Marital Gst, Operating, Passengers, Permittee, Permit Holders, Restatement, Non-passengers, Harry Hathhorn, Exempt Trust, Cross-motion , ContentID: 120239551

Case Documents
1 1998-12-16 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA Iäÿ½â8ÿ½ò8
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 100054
8 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 8 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA Iäÿ½â8ÿ½ò8ÿÄ$

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
HATHHORN
COURT
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SUTTLES
DEFENDANTS
CAB DRIVER
PERMIT OWNER
LENORA HATHHORN
NON-DELEGABLE DUTY
TRUST
ACCIDENT
NEGLIGENCE
FRANCHISE
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE
LIABILITY
LINDA SUTTLES
TAXICAB SERVICE
SUPERIOR COURT
HATHHORN MARITAL GST
OPERATING
PASSENGERS
PERMITTEE
PERMIT HOLDERS
RESTATEMENT
NON-PASSENGERS
HARRY HATHHORN
EXEMPT TRUST
CROSS-MOTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA

THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

LINDA L. SUTTLES,Plaintiff,

vs.

JAROLD HENIFEN, HARRY HATHHORN

TRUST, LENORA HATHHORN, LENORA

HATHHORN MARITAL GST EXEMPT TRUST,

LENORA HATHHORN as trustee of the

HARRY HATHHORN TRUST, and LENORA

HATHHORN as trustee of the

LENORA HATHHORN MARITAL GST

EXEMPT TRUST, Defendants

Case No. 3AN-S96-7970 CI

ORDER

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and

Defendant Lenora Hathhorn's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
SNIPPETS:
  • IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA
  • JAROLD HENIFEN, HARRY HATHHORN
  • TRUST, LENORA HATHHORN, LENORA
  • HATHHORN MARITAL GST EXEMPT TRUST,
  • HARRY HATHHORN TRUST, and LENORA
  • Defendant Lenora Hathhorn's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
  • Linda Suttles had an accident with a taxicab; she sued the cab driver, and the owner of the
  • On the other hand, the taxicab permit owner is vicariously liable for the driver's
  • Henifen had a Municipality of Anchorage permit to operate a taxicab, but he did not own that
  • Suttles claims that Henifen's purported admission, and the fact that her own car was stopped,
  • While she concedes that Henifen had no direct relationship with Hathhorn or the trust, she
  • She claims that 11.01.015 of the Anchorage Municipal Code of Regulations makes cab drivers
  • Invoking 214 of the Restatement of Agency, and 428 of the Restatement of Torts, she argues
  • She claims that the Anchorage Municipal Code only governs permit holders' responsibility to
  • Finally, she maintains that the cases invoking a non-delegable duty are based solely on a
  • In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the court is required to draw all reasonable
  • Although the defendants have failed to produce any facts contesting Henifen's alleged
  • A permittee may enter into an agreement with another person which allows that other person to
  • In Alaska Airlines v. Sweat, the Alaska Supreme Court rejected the contention that
  • The defendants' argument based on the distinction between passengers and non-passengers is
  •    |